References
- Anderson, W. F. A., and D. A. MacLean. 2015. Public forest policy development in New Brunswick, Canada: Multiple streams approach, advocacy coalition framework, and the role of science. Ecology and Society 20 (4):20. doi:https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07795-200420.
- Béland, D., M. Howlett, and I. Mukherjee. 2018. Instrument constituencies and public policy-making: An introduction. Policy and Society 37 (1):1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1375249.
- Béland, D., and M. Howlett. 2016. How solutions chase problems: Instrument constituencies in the policy process. Governance 29 (3):393–409. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12179.
- Cairney, P. 2013. Standing on the shoulders of giants: How do we combine the insights of multiple theories in public policy studies? Policy Studies Journal 41 (1):1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12000.
- Elliott, C., and R. Schlaepfer. 2001. Understanding forest certification using the advocacy coalition framework. Forest Policy and Economics 2 (3–4):257–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00043-0.
- Gough, C., and S. Shackley. 2001. The respectable politics of climate change: The epistemic communities and NGOs. International Affairs 77 (2):329–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00195.
- Goyal, N., M. Howlett, and N. Chindarkar. 2020. Who coupled which stream(s)? Policy entrepreneurship and innovation in the energy–water nexus in Gujarat, India. Public Administration and Development 40 (1):49–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1855.
- Haas, P. 1992. Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization 46 (1):1–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001442.
- Haas, P. 2001. Policy knowledge: Epistemic communities. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences 11578–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/04526-5..
- Howlett, M., A. McConnell, and A. Perl. 2015. Weaving the fabric of public policies: Comparing and integrating contemporary frameworks for the study of policy processes. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 18 (3):273–89.
- John, P. 2012. Analyzing public policy. London: Routledge.
- Kingdon, J. 1984. Agendas, alternatives and public policies. New York: Harper Collins.
- Kingdon, J. 1995. Agendas, alternatives and public policies. 2nd ed. New York: Harper Collins.
- Meijerink, S. 2005. Understanding policy stability and change. The interplay of advocacy coalitions and epistemic communities, windows of opportunity, and Dutch coastal flooding policy 1945-2003. Journal of European Public Policy 12 (6):1060–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500270745.
- Mukherjee, I., and M. Howlett. 2015. Who is a stream? Epistemic communities, instrument constituencies and advocacy coalitions in public policy-making. Politics and Governance 3 (2):65–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v3i2.290.
- Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Ostrom, E., M. Cox, and E. Schlager. 2014. An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework and introduction of the social-ecological systems framework. In Theories of the policy process, eds. P. Sabatier and C. M. Weible, 3rd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
- Real-Dato, J. 2009. Mechanisms of policy change: A proposal for a synthetic explanatory framework. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 11 (1):117–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980802648268.
- Sabatier, P. 1986. Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy 6 (1):21–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00003846.
- Sabatier, P. 1998. The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 5 (1):98–130. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501768880000051.
- Sabatier, P., and H. Jenkins-Smith. 1993. Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalitions approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
- Sabatier, P., and C. M. Weible. 2014. Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
- Schlager, E., and C. M. Weible. 2013. New theories of the policy process. Policy Studies Journal 41 (3):389–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12030.
- Scolobig, A., J. Linnerooth-Bayer, and M. Pelling. 2014. Drivers of transformative change in the Italian landslide risk policy. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 9:124–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.05.003.
- Simons, A., and J.-P. Voß. 2018. The concept of instrument constituencies: Accounting for dynamics and practices of knowing governance. Policy and Society 37 (1):14–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1375248.
- Van Eck, N., and L. Waltman. (2009). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84(2):523–538.
- Voß, J.-P., and A. Simons. 2014. Instrument constituencies and the supply side of policy innovation: The social life of emissions trading. Environmental Politics 23 (5):735–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2014.923625.
- Weible, C. M., P. A. Sabatier, and K. McQueen. 2009. Themes and variations: Taking stock of the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Studies Journal 37 (1):121–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00299.x.
- Zahariadis, N. 2003. Ambiguity and choice in public policy: Political decision making in modern democracies. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
- Zito, A. R. 2018. Instrument constituencies and epistemic community theory. Policy and Society 37 (1):36–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1416929.