Who’s Tapped Out and What’s on Tap? Tapping Into Engagement Within a Place-Based Citizen Science Effort

References

• Bonney, R., C. B. Cooper, J. Dickinson, S. Kelling, T. Phillips, K. V. Rosenberg, and J. Shirk. 2009. Citizen science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience 59 (11):977–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonney, R., T. B. Phillips, H. L. Ballard, and J. W. Enck. 2016. Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England) 25 (1):2–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515607406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucchi, M. 2008. Of deficits, deviations and dialogues: Theories of public communication of science. In Handbook of public communication of science and technology, ed. M. Bucchi and B. Trench, 71–90. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, J. W. 1989. Communication as culture: Essays on media and society. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, M., S. Rullman, J. Cousins, N. Esmail, E. Begin, G. Venicx, C. Eisenberg, and M. Studer. 2017. Contributions to publications and management plans from 7 years of citizen science: Use of a novel evaluation tool on Earthwatch-supported projects. Biological Conservation 208:163–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.09.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2009. Shifting the grounds: Constructivist grounded theory methods. In Developing grounded theory: The second generation, ed. J. M. Morse, P. N. Stern, J. Corbin, B. Bowers, K. Charmaz, and A. E. Clarke, 127–54. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cigliano, J. A., and H. L. Ballard. 2017. Citizen science for coastal and marine conservation. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, C. B., and B. V. Lewenstein. 2016. Two meanings of citizen science. In The rightful place of science: Citizen science, ed. D. Cavalier, 51–62. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, C. B., J. Shirk, and B. Zuckerberg. 2014. The invisible prevalence of citizen science in global research: Migratory birds and climate change. PloS One 9 (9):e106508. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 2008. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Coulson, S., and M. Woods. 2021. Citizen sensing: An action-orientated framework for citizen science. Frontiers in Communication 6:629700. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.629700.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S. R., and M. Horst. 2016. Science communication. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Disney, J. E., E. L. Fox, A. Farrell, C. LeDuc, and D. Bailey. 2017. Engagement in marine conservation through citizen science: A community-based approach to eelgrass restoration in Frenchman Bay, Maine, USA. In Citizen science for coastal and marine conservation, ed. J. A. Cigliano, and H. L. Ballard, 153–77. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dutterer, A. C., C. Wiley, B. Wattendorf, J. R. Dotson, and W. F. Pouder. 2014. TrophyCatch: A conservation program for trophy bass in Florida. Florida Scientist 77 (4):167–83.
   Google Scholar
• Eleta, I., G. G. Clavell, V. Righi, and M. Balestrini. 2019. The promise of participation and decision-making power in citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 4 (1):1–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.171.
   Google Scholar
• Fuccillo, K. K., T. M. Crimmins, C. E. de Rivera, and T. S. Elder. 2015. Assessing accuracy in citizen science-based plant phenology monitoring. International Journal of Biometeorology 59 (7):917–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-014-0892-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., and A. L. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Haywood, B. K. 2014. A “sense of place” in public participation in scientific research. Science Education 98 (1):64–83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haywood, B. K., J. K. Parrish, and J. Dolliver. 2016. Place-based and data-rich citizen science as a precursor for conservation action. Conservation Biology : The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology 30 (3):476–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, B. G., R. Rioja-Nieto, A. MacNeil, J. Lupton, and C. Rahbek. 2013. Comparing diversity data collected using a protocol designed for volunteers with results from a professional alternative. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4 (4):383–92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurlbert, A. H., and Z. Liang. 2012. Spatiotemporal variation in avian migration phenology: Citizen science reveals effects of climate change. PloS One 7 (2):e31662. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2010.A new climate for society.Theory, culture & society 27(2-3): 233–253.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, F. 2021. Getting to the heart of science communication: A guide to effective engagement. Washington, DC; Covelo, CA: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, A. 2006. ‘No personal motive?’ Volunteers, biodiversity, and the false dichotomies of participation. Ethics, Place and Environment 9 (3):279–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13668790600893319.
   Google Scholar
• Loss, S. R., S. S. Loss, T. Will, and P. P. Marra. 2015. Linking place-based citizen science with large-scale conservation research: A case study of bird-building collisions and the role of professional scientists. Biological Conservation 184:439–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.02.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGreavy, B., Calhoun, A. Jansujwicz, J, and Levesque, V. 2016. Citizen science and natural resource governance: program design for vernal pool policy innovation. Ecology and Society 21:2.
   Google Scholar
• McGreavy, B., K. Hutchins, H. Smith, L. Lindenfeld, and L. Silka. 2013. Addressing the complexities of boundary work in sustainability science through communication. Sustainability 5 (10):4195–221. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su5104195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGreavy, B., G. Newman, M. Chandler, M. Clyde, M. Haklay, H. L. Ballard, and J. A. Gallo. 2017. The power of place in citizen science. Maine Policy Review 26 (2):94–5.
   Google Scholar
• McKinley, D. C., A. J. Miller-Rushing, H. L. Ballard, R. Bonney, H. Brown, S. C. Cook-Patton, D. M. Evans, R. A. French, J. K. Parrish, T. B. Phillips, et al. 2017. Citizen science can improve conservation science, natural resource management, and environmental protection. Biological Conservation 208:15–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M, and Huberman, M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, G., M. Chandler, M. Clyde, B. McGreavy, M. Haklay, H. Ballard, S. Gray, R. Scarpino, R. Hauptfeld, D. Mellor, et al. 2017. Leveraging the power of place in citizen science for effective conservation decision making. Biological Conservation 208:55–64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.07.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, T., M. Ferguson, M. Minarchek, N. Porticella, and R. Bonney. 2014. User’s guide for evaluating learning outcomes in citizen science. Ithica, NY: Cornell Lab of Ornithology.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, T., N. Porticella, M. Constas, and R. Bonney. 2018. A framework for articulating and measuring individual learning outcomes from participation in citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 3 (2):3. doi: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.126.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation 141 (10):2417–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riesch, H., and C. Potter. 2014. Citizen science as seen by scientists: Methodological, epistemological and ethical dimensions. Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England) 23 (1):107–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513497324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirk, J. L., H. L. Ballard, C. C. Wilderman, T. Phillips, A. Wiggins, R. Jordan, E. McCallie, M. Minarchek, B. V. Lewenstein, M. E. Krasny, et al. 2012. Public participation in scientific research: A framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society 17 (2):29. doi: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04705-170229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shivlani, M., R. L. Molinari, and N. Moyer. 2014. Development of a Key Biscayne citizen scientist initiative to improve local natural resource conservation. Florida Scientist 77 (4):219–29.
   Google Scholar
• Spicer, P. 2019.Tide and storm surge dynamics in estuaries of variable morphology. MS Thesis, University of Maine, Orono.
   Google Scholar
• Spicer, P., K. Huguenard, L. Ross, and L. N. Rickard. 2019. High‐frequency tide‐surge‐river interaction in estuaries: Causes and implications for coastal flooding. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 124 (12):9517–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spicer, P., P. Matte, K. Huguenard, and L. Rickard. 2021. Coastal windstorms create unsteady, unpredictable storm surges in a fluvial Maine estuary. Shore & Beach 89 (2):3–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.34237/1008921.
   Google Scholar
• Spicer, P., D. Schlichting, K. Huguenard, A. J. Roche, and L. N. Rickard. 2021. Sensing storm surge: A framework for establishing a citizen scientist monitored water level network. Ocean & Coastal Management 211:105802. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stancioff, E., B. Bisson, S. Randall, J. Muhlin, C. McDonough, and S. Gallo. 2017. Signs of the seasons: A New England phenology program. Maine Policy Review 26 (2):19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Tebaldi, C., B. H. Strauss, and C. E. Zervas. 2012. Modelling sea level rise impacts on storm surges along US coasts. Environmental Research Letters 7 (1):014032. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Noordwijk, C. G. E., I. Bishop, S. Staunton-Lamb, A. Oldfield, L. Loiselle, H. Geoghegan, and L. Ceccaroni. 2021. Creating positive environmental impact through citizen science. In The science of citizen science, ed. K. Vohland, A. Land-Zandstra, L. Ceccaroni, R. Lemmens, J. Perello, M. Ponti, R. Samson, and K. Wagenknect, 373–95. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenet, L. P., and M. J. Pfeffer. 2007. Organizing citizen engagement for democratic environmental planning. Society & Natural Resources 20 (9):801–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920701216578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, A., and K. Crowston. 2014. Surveying the citizen science landscape. First Monday 20:1–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v20i1.5520.
   Google Scholar