153
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Practice Based Knowledge

Using Imperfect Longitudinal Social Science Data for Sound Protected Area Management and Governance

&
Pages 1134-1149 | Received 09 Sep 2021, Accepted 11 Jul 2022, Published online: 29 Jul 2022

References

  • Bare, M., C. Kauffman, and D. C. Miller. 2015. Assessing the impact of international conservation aid on deforestation in sub-Saharan Africa. Environmental Research Letters 10 (12):125010. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125010.
  • Barnes, S. J., J. Mattsson, and S. Flemming. 2016. Remembered experiences and revisit intentions: A longitudinal study of safari park visitors. Tourism Management 57:286–94. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2016.06.014.
  • Basurto, X. 2013. Linking multi-level governance to local common-pool resource theory using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis: Insights from twenty years of biodiversity conservation in Costa Rica. Global Environmental Change 23 (3):573–87. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.011.
  • Bennett, N. J., and T. Satterfield. 2018. Environmental governance: A practical framework to guide design, evaluation, and analysis. Conservation Letters 11 (6):e12600. doi:10.1111/conl.12600.
  • Brown, G., T. Squirrell, and C. Harris. 2010. Growing organizational challenges for the US Forest Service: Results of a longitudinal study in a period of major environmental change. Journal of Forestry 108 (2):77–85. doi:10.1093/jof/108.2.77.
  • Butler, J., J. Shanahan, and D. Decker. 2003. Public attitudes toward wildlife are changing: A trend analysis of New York residents. Wildlife Society Bulletin 31 (4):1027–36. doi:10.2307/3784448.
  • Chan, C. S., L. M. Marafa, and C. C. Konijnendijk Van Den Bosch. 2014. Changing perspectives in urban park management: A longitudinal study of Hong Kong. Managing Leisure 20 (1):1–76. doi:10.1080/13606719.2014.944411.
  • CRD. 2012. Regional parks strategic plan. https://www.crd.bc.ca/docs/default-source/parks-pdf/regional-parks-strategic-plan-2012-21.pdf?sfvrsn¼b19788c9_0 (accessed February 11, 2021).
  • de Silva, S. 2016. Need for longitudinal studies of Asian wildlife in the face of crises. Global Ecology and Conservation 6:276–85. doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2016.03.010.
  • Dearden, P., M. Bennett, and J. Johnston. 2005. Trends in global protected area governance, 1992-2002. Environmental Management 36 (1):89–100. doi:10.1007/s00267-004-0131-9.
  • Dillman, D. A., J. D. Smyth, and L. M. Christian. 2014. Internet, phone, mail, and mixe-mode. 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wikey & Sons.
  • Eklund, J., and M. Cabeza. 2017. Quality of governance and effectiveness of protected areas: crucial concepts for conservation planning. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1399 (1):27–41. doi:10.1111/nyas.13284.
  • Eriksson, M., C. Sandström, and G. Ericsson. 2015. Direct experience and attitude change towards bears and wolves. Wildlife Biology 21 (3):131–7. doi:10.2981/wlb.00062.
  • Fernando, R., and Z. R. Ravanera. 2000. Theoretical and analytical aspects of longitudinal research. PSC Discussion Papers Series 14 (5): 1. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/pscpapers/vol14/iss5/1.
  • Frank, B., M. Walton, and R. Rollins. 2019. Public Support for land acquisition: A key instrument for successful land conservation, governance and management. Society & Natural Resources 32 (6):720–9. doi:10.1080/08941920.2019.1568654.
  • Gezon, L. L. 2014. Who wins and who loses? Unpacking the “local people” concept in ecotourism: a longitudinal study of community equity in Ankarana, Madagascar. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 22 (5):821–38. doi:10.1080/09669582.2013.847942.
  • Giacomelli, S., M. Gibbert, and R. Viganò. 2018. Community empowerment for managing wild boar: a longitudinal case study of northern Italy 2001–2018. Ecology and Society 23 (4):12. doi:10.5751/ES-10353-230412.
  • Gigliotti, L. M., and A. N. DonCarlos. 2017. Wildlife value orientation stability among South Dakota residents: Setting the stage for a longitudinal analysis. Proceedings of the South Dakota Academy of Science 96: 77–93.
  • Golden Kroner, R. E., S. Qin, C. N. Cook, R. Krithivasan, S. M. Pack, O. D. Bonilla, K. A. Cort-Kansinally, B. Coutinho, M. Feng, M. I. Martínez Garcia, et al. 2019. The uncertain future of protected lands and waters. Science (New York, N.Y.) 364 (6443):881–6. doi:10.1126/science.aau5525.
  • Gurney, G. G., J. Cinner, N. C. Ban, R. L. Pressey, R. Pollnac, S. J. Campbell, S. Tasidjawa, and F. Setiawan. 2014. Poverty and protected areas: An evaluation of a marine integrated conservation and development project in Indonesia. Global Environmental Change 26:98–107. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.003.
  • Gurney, G. G., R. Pressey, J. Cinner, R. Pollnac, and S. Campbell. 2015. Integrated conservation and development: Evaluating a community-based marine protected area project for equality of socioeconomic impacts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences 370:1681. doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0277.
  • Harvey, D. 1984. On the history and present condition of geography: An historical materialist manifesto. The Professional Geographer 36 (1):1–11. doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.1984.00001.x.
  • Heagney, E. C., M. Kovac, J. Fountain, and N. Conner. 2015. Socio-economic benefits from protected areas in southeastern Australia. Conservation Biology: The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology 29 (6):1647–57. doi:10.1111/cobi.12554.
  • Heck, N., P. Dearden, A. McDonald, and S. Carver. 2011. Stakeholder opinions on the assessment of mpa effectiveness and their interests to participate at Pacific Rim National Park Reserve, Canada. Environmental Management 47 (4):603–16. doi:10.1007/s00267-010-9609-9.
  • Lindenmayer, D. B., and G. E. Likens. 2018. Effective ecological monitoring. 2nd ed. Clayton South, Australia: CISRO publishing.
  • Liu, W., C. Vogt, J. Luo, G. He, K. Frank, and J. Liu. 2012. Drivers and socioeconomic impacts of tourism participation in protected areas. PLoS ONE 7 (4):e35420. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035420.
  • Lockwood, M. 2010. Good governance for terrestrial protected areas: A framework, principles and performance outcomes. Journal of Environmental Management 91 (3):754–66. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.10.005.
  • Manfredo, M. J., L. Sullivan, A. W. Don Carlos, A. M. Dietsch, T. L. Teel, A. D. Bright, and J. Bruskotter. 2018. America’s wildlife values: The social context of wildlife management in U.S. National report from the research project entitled “America’s Wildlife Values”. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University, Department of Human Dimensions of Natural Resources.
  • Marshall, N. A., E. Bohensky, M. Curnock, J. Goldberg, M. Gooch, B. Nicotra, P. Pert, L. M. Scherl, S. Stone-Jovicich, and R. C. Tobin. 2016. Advances in monitoring the human dimension of natural resource systems: a show-case from the Great Barrier Reef. Environmental Research Letters 11 (11):114020. http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/11/11/114020.
  • Massey, D. S., and R. Tourangeau. 2013. Where do we go from here? Nonresponse and social measurement. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 645 (1):222–36. doi:10.1177/0002716212464191.
  • Melis, G., M. Elliot, and N. Shryane. 2014. Environmental concern over time: Evidence from the longitudinal analysis of a British cohort study from 1991 to 2008. Social Science Quarterly 95 (4):n/a–919. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12107.
  • Menard, S. 2008. Handbook of longitudinal research 1st edition design, measurement, and analysis. Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
  • Miller, D. C., and K. S. Nakamura. 2018. Protected areas and the sustainable governance of forest resources. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 32:96–103. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2018.05.024.
  • Newing, H. 2010. Conducting research in conservation social science methods and practice. London: Routledge.
  • O’Neill, S. 2020. More than meets the eye: A longitudinal analysis of climate change imagery in the print media. Climatic Change 163 (1):9–26. doi:10.1007/s10584-019-02504-8.
  • Ruspini, E. 1999. Longitudinal research and the analysis of social change. Quality and Quantity 33 (3):219–27. doi:10.1023/A:1004692619235.
  • Stidham, M., C. Olsen, E. Toman, S. Frederick, S. McCaffrey, and B. Shindler. 2014. Longitudinal social science research in natural resource communities: Lessons and considerations. Society & Natural Resources 27 (10):1104–8. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.905895.
  • Tourangeau, R., and T. J. Plewes. 2013. Nonresponse in social science surveys: A research agenda. In Panel on a research agenda for the future of social science data collection. Committee on National Statistics Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Treves, A., L. Naughton-Treves, and V. Shelley. 2013. Longitudinal Analysis of attitudes toward wolves. Conservation Biology: The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology 27 (2):315–23. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23525257.
  • Tseng, Y.-P., Y. C. Huang, and R. Ditton. 2012. Developing a longitudinal perspective on the human dimensions of recreational fisheries. Journal of Coastal Research 285 (6):1418–25. doi:10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-12-00059.1.
  • Walton, M. 2016. Regional parks and near wilderness: Connecting local people with nature, serving bigger-picture conservation planning, and addressing changing values of wilderness. The George Wright Forum 33 (3):325–34. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44131483.
  • Ward, C., G. Holmes, and L. Stringer. 2018. Perceived barriers to and drivers of community participation in protected‐area governance. Conservation Biology: The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology 32 (2):437–46. doi:10.1111/cobi.13000.
  • Warren, J., and A. Halpern-Manners. 2012. Panel conditioning in longitudinal social science surveys. Sociological Methods & Research 41 (4):491–534. doi:10.1177/0049124112460374.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.