Building Capacity for Individual and Systems-Level Collaborative Conservation Impacts: Intentional Design for Transformative Practice

References

• Abrams, J., H. Huber-Stearns, H. Gosnell, A. Santo, S. Duffey, and C. Moseley. 2020. Tracking a governance transition: Identifying and measuring indicators of social forestry on the Willamette National Forest. Society & Natural Resources 33 (4):504–23. doi:10.1080/08941920.2019.1605434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2007. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4):543–71. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asase, A., T. I. Mzumara‐Gawa, J. O. Owino, A. T. Peterson, and E. Saupe. 2022. Replacing ‘parachute science’ with ‘global science’. Conservation Science and Practice 4 (5): 1–7. doi:10.1111/csp2.517.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, N. J., R. Roth, S. C. Klain, K. M. A. Chan, D. A. Clark, G. Cullman, G. Epstein, M. P. Nelson, R. Stedman, T. L. Teel, et al. 2017. Mainstreaming the social sciences in conservation. Conservation Biology 31 (1):56–66. doi:10.1111/cobi.12788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes, F. 2010. Devolution of environment and resources governance: Trends and future. Environmental Conservation 37 (4):489–500. doi:10.1017/S037689291000072X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, J. S. 2017. Design features and project age contribute to joint success in social, ecological, and economic outcomes of community-based conservation projects. Conservation Letters 10 (1):23–32. doi:10.1111/conl.12231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruyere, B., J. Copsey, and S. Walker. 2022. Beyond skills and knowledge. The role of self-efficacy and peer networks to build capacity for species conservation planning. Oryx 1–9. doi:10.1017/S0030605322000023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruyere, B., N. Bynum, J. Copsey, A. Porzecanski, and E. Sterling. 2020. Conservation leadership capacity building: A landscape study. Summary of key findings. 
   Google Scholar
• Caffarella, R. S. and S. R. Daffron. 2013. Devising transfer of learning plans. In Planning programs for adult learners, 209–36. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Catalano, A. S., K. Redford, R. Margoluis, and A. T. Knight. 2018. Black swans, cognition, and the power of learning from failure. Conservation Biology 32 (3):584–96. doi:10.1111/cobi.13045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., and V. Braun. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2):77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Clement, S., A. Guerrero Gonzalez, and C. Wyborn. 2020. Understanding effectiveness in its broader context: Assessing case study methodologies for evaluating collaborative conservation governance. Society & Natural Resources 33 (4):462–83. doi:10.1080/08941920.2018.1556761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockburn, J., M. Schoon, G. Cundill, C. Robinson, J. A. Aburto, S. M. Alexander, J. A. Baggio, C. Barnaud, M. Chapman, M. Garcia Llorente, et al. 2020. Understanding the context of multifaceted collaborations for social-ecological sustainability: A methodology for cross-case analysis. Ecology and Society 25 (3):1–15. doi:10.5751/ES-11527-250307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, A., and A. Moote. 2001. Collaborative conservation in theory and practice: A literature review.
   Google Scholar
• Conley, A., and M. A. Moote. 2003. Evaluating collaborative natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources 16 (5):371–86. doi:10.1080/08941920390190032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. M., and V. L. P. Clark. 2018. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, J. M., R. I. N. A. Aviram, S. Bickford, K. Douthwaite, A. M. Y. Goodstine, J.-L. Izursa, S. Kavanaugh, K. MacCarthy, M. O'Herron, and K. E. R. I. Parker. 2004. Defining leadership in conservation: A view from the top. Conservation Biology 18 (1):274–8. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00554.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, L., M. Ryan, and C. Wyborn. 2018. Global patterns in conservation capacity development. Biological Conservation 221:261–9. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., and T. Nabatchi. 2015. Evaluating the productivity of collaborative governance regimes: A performance matrix. Public Performance & Management Review 38 (4):717–47. doi: 10.1080/15309576.2015.1031016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englefield, E., S. A. Black, J. A. Copsey, and A. T. Knight. 2019. Interpersonal competencies define effective conservation leadership. Biological Conservation 235:18–26. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.03.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrada, M., A. Woodcock, P. R. Hernandez, and P. W. Schultz. 2011. Toward a model of social influence that explains minority student integration into the scientific community. Journal of Educational Psychology 103 (1):206–22. doi:10.1037/a0020743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feist, A., R. Plummer, and J. Baird. 2020. The inner-workings of collaboration in environmental management and governance: A systematic mapping review. Environmental Management 66 (5):801–15. doi:10.1007/s00267-020-01337-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Giménez, M. E., D. J. Augustine, L. M. Porensky, H. Wilmer, J. D. Derner, D. D. Briske, and M. O. Stewart. 2019. Complexity fosters learning in collaborative adaptive management. Ecology and Society 24 (2):29–50. doi:10.5751/ES-10963-240229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelle, U. 2006. Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in research practice: Purposes and advantages. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (4):293–311. doi:10.1177/1478088706070839.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. 1984. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development, 20–38. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc. doi:10.1016/B978-0-7506-7223-8.50017-4.
   Google Scholar
• Koontz, T. M., N. W. Jager, and J. Newig. 2020. Assessing collaborative conservation: A case survey of output, outcome, and impact measures used in the empirical literature. Society and Natural Resources 33 (4):1–20. doi:10.1080/08941920.2019.1583397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, A. M., and J. C. Ribot. 2004. Democratic decentralisation through a natural resource lens: An introduction. The European Journal of Development Research 16 (1):1–25. doi:10.1080/09578810410001688707.
   Google Scholar
• Marvier, M., and P. Kareiva. 2014. The evidence and values underlying ‘new conservation’. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 29 (3):131–2. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2014.01.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, T. H. 2020. Experiential learning–A systematic review and revision of Kolb’s model. Interactive Learning Environments 28 (8):1064–77. doi:10.1080/10494820.2019.1570279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mourad, T. M., A. F. McNulty, D. Liwosz, K. Tice, F. Abbott, G. C. Williams, and J. A. Reynolds. 2018. The role of a professional society in broadening participation in science: A national model for increasing persistence. BioScience 68 (9):715–21. doi:10.1093/biosci/biy066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulrennan, M. E., R. Mark, C. H. Scott, M. E. Mulrennan, R. Mark, and C. H. Scott. 2012. Revamping community-based conservation through participatory research. The Canadian Geographer 56 (2):243–59. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0064.2012.00415.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcomer, K. E., H. P. Hatry, and J. S. Wholey. 2015. Handbook of practical program evaluation. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2006. Applying strategic environmental assessment: Good practice guidance for development co-operation. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Onyango, R. O. 2018. Participatory monitoring and evaluation: An overview of guiding pedagogical principles and implications on development. International Journal of Novel Research in Humanity and Social Sciences 5 (4):428–33.
   Google Scholar
• Pyrko, I., V. Dörfler, and C. Eden. 2019. Communities of practice in landscapes of practice. Management Learning 50 (4):482–99. doi:10.1177/1350507619860854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai, N. D., M. S. Devy, T. Ganesh, R. Ganesan, S. R. Setty, A. J. Hiremath, S. Khaling, and P. D. Rajan. 2021. Beyond fortress conservation: The long-term integration of natural and social science research for an inclusive conservation practice in India. Biological Conservation 254:108888. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, S. M. W., J. Montambault, Y. J. Masuda, E. Keenan, W. Butler, J. R. B. Fisher, S. T. Asah, and A. Gneezy. 2017. Advancing conservation by understanding and influencing human behavior. Conservation Letters 10 (2):248–56. doi:10.1111/conl.12252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, M. G., H. Godmaire, P. Abernethy, and M. André Guertin. 2014. Building a community of practice for sustainability: Strengthening learning and collective action of Canadian biosphere reserves through a national partnership. Journal of Environmental Management 145:230–9. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.06.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ries, P. D. 2019. Evaluating impacts of the Municipal Forestry Institute leadership training on participants’ personal and professional lives. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 39:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2019.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, L. 2008. Making capacity building meaningful: A framework for strategic action. Environmental Management 42 (5):833–46. doi:10.1007/s00267-008-9158-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandbrook, C., Howard, P. Nelson, S. Bolderson, and N. Leader-Williams. 2021. Evaluating the impact of the first 10 years of the Cambridge masters in conservation leadership. Oryx 1–10. doi:10.1017/S0030605321000818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawrey, B., J. Copsey, and E. J. Milner-Gulland. 2019. Evaluating impacts of training in conservation: A case study in Mauritius. Oryx 53 (1):117–25. doi:10.1017/S0030605316001691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholte, P. A. U. L., W. T. de Groot, and Z. Mayna. 2005. Protected area managers’ perceptions of community conservation training in West and Central Africa. Environmental Conservation 32 (4):349–55. doi:10.1017/S0376892905002523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skyelander, K., R. Hauptfeld, and M. S. Jones. 2019. 10-Year review of the Center for Collaborative Conservation Fellows Program: An assessment of impacts. Fort Collins, CO, Center for Collaborative Conservation, Colorado State University.
   Google Scholar
• Steger, C., G. Nigussie, M. Alonzo, B. Warkineh, J. Van Den Hoek, M. Fekadu, P. H. Evangelista, and J. A. Klein. 2020. Knowledge coproduction improves understanding of environmental change in the Ethiopian highlands. Ecology and Society 25 (2):1–11. doi:10.5751/ES-11325-250202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterling, E. J., A. Sigouin, E. Betley, J. Zavaleta Cheek, J. N. Solomon, K. Landrigan, A. L. Porzecanski, N. Bynum, B. Cadena, S. H. Cheng, et al. 2021. The state of capacity development evaluation in conservation and natural resource management. Oryx 1–12. doi:10.1017/S0030605321000570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterling, E. J., E. Betley, A. Sigouin, A. Gomez, A. Toomey, G. Cullman, C. Malone, A. Pekor, F. Arengo, M. Blair, et al. 2017. Assessing the evidence for stakeholder engagement in biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation 209:159–71. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stringer, L. C., A. J. Dougill, E. Fraser, K. Hubacek, C. Prell, and M. S. Reed. 2006. Unpacking ‘Participation’ in the adaptive management of social–ecological systems: A critical review. Ecology and Society 11 (2):39. doi:10.5751/ES-01896-110239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, R. E. W., and A. Mendezona Allegretti. 2020. Evaluating the process and outcomes of collaborative conservation: Tools, techniques, and strategies. Society & Natural Resources 33 (4):433–41. doi:10.1080/08941920.2019.1692116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. n.d. Capacity building. https://www.un.org/en/academic-impact/capacity-building (accessed March 3, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, C., J. Zavaleta, S. Wilson, and S. Francisco. 2018. Developing an interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral community of practice in the domain of forests and livelihoods. Conservation Biology 32 (1):60–71. doi:10.1111/cobi.12982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, K., L. Pejchar, S. L. Carroll, M. S. Jones, S. E. Walker, X. A. Shinbrot, C. Huayhuaca, M. E. Fernández-Giménez, and R. S. Reid. 2021. Collaborative conservation in the United States: A review of motivations, goals, and outcomes. Biological Conservation 259:109165. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wlodkowsi, R. J. 2008. Enhancing adult motivation to learn: A comprehensive guide for teaching all adults. 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: A Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series.
   Google Scholar
• Wuelser, G., and C. Pohl. 2016. How researchers frame scientific contributions to sustainable development: A typology based on grounded theory. Sustainability Science 11 (5):789–800. doi: 10.1007/s11625-016-0363-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar