Publication Cover
Society & Natural Resources
An International Journal
Volume 36, 2023 - Issue 1
206
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Measuring “Iconicism” through the Iconic Species Scale

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 1-19 | Received 27 Aug 2021, Accepted 02 Aug 2022, Published online: 27 Aug 2022

References

  • Ainsworth, G. B., J. A. Fitzsimons, M. A. Weston, and S. T. Garnett. 2018. The culture of bird conservation: Australian stakeholder values regarding iconic, flagship and rare birds. Biodiversity and Conservation 27 (2):345–63. doi: 10.1007/s10531-017-1438-1.
  • Bennett, N. J., R. Roth, S. C. Klain, K. M. Chan, D. A. Clark, G. Cullman, G. Epstein, M. P. Nelson, R. Stedman, T. L. Teel, et al. 2017. Mainstreaming the social sciences in conservation. Conservation Biology 31 (1):56–66. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12788.
  • Bentrupperbäumer, J., T. Day, and J. Reser. 2006. Uses, meanings, and understandings of values in the environmental and protected area arena: A consideration of “World Heritage” values. Society & Natural Resources 19 (8):723–41. doi: 10.1080/08941920600801140.
  • Bernard, H. R. 2018. Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. 6th ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Bishop, B., J. J. Vaske, and A. J. Bath. 2020. Resident cognitions associated with branding Thompson, Manitoba as the wolf capital of the world. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 25 (1):82–91. doi: 10.1080/10871209.2020.1683656.
  • Boley, B. B., and N. G. McGehee. 2014. Measuring empowerment: Developing and validating the Resident Empowerment through Tourism Scale (RETS). Tourism Management 45:85–94. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2014.04.003.
  • Boley, B. B., N. G. McGehee, R. R. Perdue, and P. Long. 2014. Empowerment and resident attitudes toward tourism: Strengthening the theoretical foundation through a Weberian lens. Annals of Tourism Research 49:33–50. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2014.08.005.
  • Brown, T. A. 2006. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Buijs, A., T. Hovardas, H. Figari, P. Castro, P. Devine-Wright, A. Fischer, C. Mouro, and S. Selge. 2012. Understanding people's ideas on natural resource management: Research on social representations of nature. Society & Natural Resources 25 (11):1167–81. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2012.670369.
  • Caro, T., and G. O'Doherty. 1999. On the use of surrogate species in conservation biology. Conservation Biology 13 (4):805–14. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98338.x.
  • Cary, J. 1993. The nature of symbolic beliefs and environmental behavior in a rural setting. Environment and Behavior 25 (4):555–76. doi: 10.1177/0013916593254001.
  • Cerda, C., and T. Losada. 2013. Assessing the value of species: A case study on the willingness to pay for species protection in Chile. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 185 (12):10479–93. doi: 10.1007/s10661-013-3346-5.
  • Charmaz, K. 2014. Constructing grounded theory. SAGE Publications.
  • Churchill, G. A. Jr. 1979. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research 16 (1):64–73. doi: 10.1177/002224377901600110.
  • Connell, D., J. Shapiro, and L. Lavallee. 2015. Old-growth forest values: A case study of the ancient cedars of British Columbia. Society & Natural Resources 28 (12):1323–39. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2015.1041660.
  • Daigle, R. M., P. Archambault, B. S. Halpern, J. S. Stewart Lowndes, and I. M. Côté. 2017. Incorporating public priorities in the Ocean Health Index: Canada as a case study. PLOS One 12 (5):e0178044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178044.
  • Deely, J. N. 1990. Basics of semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  • Dietsch, A. M., T. L. Teel, and M. J. Manfredo. 2016. Social values and biodiversity conservation in a dynamic world. Conservation Biology 30 (6):1212–21. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12742.
  • Douglas, L. R., and D. Veríssimo. 2013. Flagships or battleships: Deconstructing the relationship between social conflict and conservation flagship species. Environment & Society 4 (1):98–116.
  • Ernoul, L., and A. Wardell-Johnson. 2016. Representing the Greater Flamingo in Southern France: A semantic analysis of newspaper articles showing change over time. Ocean & Coastal Management 133:105–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.09.015.
  • Ernoul, L., A. Wardell-Johnson, L. Willm, A. Béchet, O. Boutron, R. Mathevet, S. Arnassant, and A. Sandoz. 2018. Participatory mapping: Exploring landscape values associated with an iconic species. Applied Geography 95:71–8. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.04.013.
  • Fink, C., A. Hausmann, and E. Di Minin. 2020. Online sentiment towards iconic species. Biological Conservation 241:108289. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108289.
  • Frazier, J. G. 2005. Marine turtles: The role of flagship species in interactions between people and the sea. Mast 3 (2):5–38.
  • Ghasemi, B., A. Landon, A. Miller, and B. Williams. 2021. Trust and emotions predict support for large carnivore recovery in the absence of real threats. Society & Natural Resources 34 (10):1318–37. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2021.1953202.
  • Haines-Young, R., and M. Potschin. 2018. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1 and guidance on the application of the revised structure. Nottingham, UK. www.cices.eu.
  • Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson. 2010. Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
  • Hemson, G., S. Maclennan, G. Mills, P. Johnson, and D. Macdonald. 2009. Community, lions, livestock and money: A spatial and social analysis of attitudes to wildlife and the conservation value of tourism in a human-carnivore conflict in Botswana. Biological Conservation 142 (11):2718–25. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.06.024.
  • Hirsch, P., J. P. Brosius, S. O'Conner, A. Zia, M. Welch-Devine, and J. L. Dammert. 2013. Navigating complex trade-offs in conservation and development: An integrative framework. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies 31:99–122.
  • Horsley, S., R. Hohbein, K. Morrow, and G. Green. 2020. What's in a name? A content analysis of environmental NGOs' use of “iconic species” in press releases. Biodiversity and Conservation 29 (8):2711–28. doi: 10.1007/s10531-020-01995-7.
  • Kellert, S. 1984. American attitudes toward and knowledge of animals: An update. In Advances in animal welfare science, eds. M. W. Fox and L. D. Mickley, 177–213. Washington, DC: The Humane Society of the United States.
  • Kellert, S. 1996. The value of life: Biological diversity and human society. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Knackmuhs, E., J. Farmer, and D. Knapp. 2019. The relationship between narratives, wildlidfe value orientations, attitudes, and policy preferences. Society & Natural Resources 32 (3):303–21. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2018.1517916.
  • Kontogianni, A., C. Tourkolias, A. Machleras, and M. Skourtos. 2012. Service providing units, existence values and the valuation of endangered species: A methodological test. Ecological Economics 79:97–104. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.023.
  • Krasny, M., S. Crestol, K. Tidball, and R. Stedman. 2014. New York City's oyster gardeners: Memories and meanings as motivations for volunteer environmental stewardship. Landscape and Urban Planning 132:16–25. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.003.
  • Krasny, M., and K. Tidball. 2015. Civic ecology: Adaptation and transformation from the ground up. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Kreye, M., E. Pienaar, and A. Adams. 2017. The role of community identity in cattleman response to Florida Panther recovery efforts. Society & Natural Resources 30 (1):79–94. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2016.1180730.
  • Krosnick, J., and S. Presser. 2010. Question and questionnaire design. In Handbook of survey research, eds. P. Marsden and J. Wright, 2nd ed. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Kusmanoff, A., F. Fidler, A. Gordon, and S. Bekessy. 2017. Decline of ‘biodiversity’ in conservation policy discourse in Australia. Environmental Science & Policy 77:160–5. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.08.016.
  • Leipold, S., P. Feindt, G. Winkel, and R. Keller. 2019. Discourse analysis of environmental policy revisited: Traditional, trends, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 21 (5):445–63. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2019.1660462.
  • Limburg, K., R. O'Neill, R. Costanza, and S. Farber. 2002. Complex systems and valuation. Ecological Economics 41 (3):409–20. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00090-3.
  • Lõhmus, A., M. Leivits, E. Pēterhofs, R. Zizas, H. Hofmanis, I. Ojaste, and P. Kurlavičius. 2017. The Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus): An iconic focal species for knowledge-based integrative management and conservation of Baltic forests. Biodiversity and Conservation 26 (1):1–21. doi: 10.1007/s10531-016-1223-6.
  • Manfredo, M. J., T. L. Teel, R. E. W. Berl, J. T. Bruskotter, and S. Kitayama. 2021. Social value shift in favour of biodiversity conservation in the United States. Nature Sustainability 4 (4):323–30. doi: 10.1038/s41893-020-00655-6.
  • Manfredo, M., T. Teel, and A. Dietsch. 2016. Implications of human value shift and persistence for biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology 30 (2):287–96. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12619.
  • Manfredo, M. J., T. L. Teel, A. W. Don Carlos, L. Sullivan, A. D. Bright, A. M. Dietsch, J. Bruskotter, and D. Fulton. 2020. The changing sociocultural context of wildlife conservation. Conservation Biology 34 (6):1549–59. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13493.
  • Massey, C., J. Vayro, and C. Mason. 2021. Conservation values and actor networks that shape the Adams River salmon run in Tsutswecw Provencial Park, British Columbia. Society & Natural Resources 24 (9):1–20.
  • Memon, M., H. Ting, T. Ramayah, F. Chuah, and J. Cheah. 2017. A review of the methodological misconceptions and guidelines related to the application of structural equation modeling: A Malaysian scenario. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling 1 (1):i–xiii.
  • Mobius Research and Strategy Ltd. 2014. Identifying public expectations for the management of iconic species, places, and local treasures. https://www.doc.govt.nz/globalassets/documents/about-doc/policies-and-plans/public-expectations-management-iconic-species-places-local-treasures.pdf
  • Moon, K., and D. Blackman. 2014. A guide to understanding social science research for natural scientists. Conservation Biology 28 (5):1167–77. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12326.
  • Moore, M. P. 1993. Constructing irreconcilable conflict: The function of synecdoche in the Spotted Owl controversy. Communication Monographs 60 (3):258–74. doi: 10.1080/03637759309376312.
  • Ocean Health Index. 2015. Iconic species. http://www.oceanhealthindex.org/methodology/components/iconic-species-distribution
  • Padgett, D. 1998. Qualitative methods in social work research: Challenges and rewards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Remis, M., and R. Hardin. 2009. Transvalued species in an African forest. Conservation Biology 23 (6):1588–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01290.x.
  • Reser, J., and J. Bentrupperbäumer. 2005. What and where are environmental values? Assessing the impacts of current diversity of use of ‘environmental’ and ‘World Heritage’ values. Journal of Environmental Psychology 25 (2):125–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.03.002.
  • Rokeach, M. 1973. The nature of human values. New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Rossiter, J. 2011. Marketing measurement revolution The C-OAR-SE method and why it must replace psychometrics. European Journal of Marketing 45 (11/12):1561–88. doi: 10.1108/03090561111167298.
  • Rowntree, L., and M. Conkey. 1980. Symbolism and the cultural landscape. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 70 (4):459–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01327.x.
  • Saldaña, J. 2016. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: SAGE.
  • Sandler, R. L. 2012. The ethics of species: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Saunders, B., J. Sim, T. Kingstone, S. Baker, J. Waterfield, B. Bartlam, H. Burroughs, and C. Jinks. 2018. Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity 52 (4):1893–907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8.
  • Selig Center for Economic Growth. 2017. An economic impact study of Georgia's Jekyll Island. https://www.terry.uga.edu/about/selig/Jekyll%20Island%20Economic%20Impact.pdf
  • Slagle, K., R. Wilson, J. Bruskotter, and E. Toman. 2019. The symbolic wolf: A construal level theory analysis of the perceptions of wolves in the United States. Society & Natural Resources 32 (3):322–37. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2018.1501525.
  • State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage. 2017. Saving our species: Iconic species strategy. https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/-/media/OEH/Corporate-Site/Documents/Animals-and-plants/Threatened-species/iconic-species-strategy-170447.pdf (accessed November 15, 2018).
  • Sutrop, U. 2001. List task and a cognitive salience index. Field Methods 13 (3):263–76. doi: 10.1177/1525822X0101300303.
  • Teel, T., and M. Manfredo. 2010. Understanding the diversity of public interests in wildlife conservation. Conservation Biology 24 (1):128–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01374.x.
  • Tremblay, P. 2008. Wildlife in the landscape: A top end perspective on destination-level wildlife and tourism management. Journal of Ecotourism 7 (2–3):179–96. doi: 10.1080/14724040802140535.
  • Trentelman, C. K., J. Irwin, K. A. Petersen, N. Ruiz, and C. Szalay. 2016. The case for personal interaction: Drop-off/pick-up methodology for survey research. Journal of Rural Social Sciences 31 (3):68–104.
  • U.S. Census Bureau. 2018. 2013–2017 American community survey 5-year estimates. American Factfinder. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/technical-documentation/table-and-geography-changes/2017/5-year.html
  • Vieira da Silva, C., L. Madureira, J. L. Costa, and J. L. Santos. 2016. Using public preferences to weight species prioritization criteria in conservation decision making: A case study to explore potential strengths and weaknesses. Society & Natural Resources 29 (12):1517–32. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2016.1171937.
  • Whitley, C., L. Kalof, and T. Flach. 2021. Using animal portraiture to activate emotional affect. Environment and Behavior 53 (8):837–63. doi: 10.1177/0013916520928429.
  • Wilson, M. 1997. The wolf in Yellowstone: Science, symbol, or politics? Deconstructing the conflict between environmentalism and wise use. Society & Natural Resources 10 (5):453–68. doi: 10.1080/08941929709381044.
  • Xu, X., L. Xia, Q. Zhang, S. Wu, M. Wu, and H. Liu. 2020. The ability of different imputation methods for missing values in mental measurement questionnaires. BMC Medical Research Methodology 20 (1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00932-0.
  • Zia, A., P. Hirsch, A. Songorwa, D. R. Mutekanga, S. O'Connor, T. McShane, P. Brosius, and B. Norton. 2011. Cross-scale value trade-offs in managing social-ecological systems: The politics of scale in Ruaha National Park. Ecology and Society 16 (4):1–7. doi: 10.5751/ES-04375-160407.
  • Zinn, H., M. Manfredo, J. Vaske, and K. Wittmann. 1998. Using normative beliefs to determine the acceptability of wildlife management actions. Society & Natural Resources 11 (7):649–62. doi: 10.1080/08941929809381109.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.