Urban Communities for Transition toward Sustainable Behavior in the Context of Authoritarianism: Analysis of Non-Profit Community-Based Organizations in Budapest, Hungary

References

• Austin, J. E., and M. M. Seitanidi. 2012. Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses. Part 2: Partnership processes and outcomes. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 41 (6):929–68. doi:10.1177/0899764012454685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozóky, A. 2018. The shadows of ‘illiberal democracy. In Proceedings of 5th ACADEMOS Conference 2018, ed. A. Taranu, 63–72. Bologna: Filodiritto.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2):77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Buzogány, Á. 2015. Representation and participation in movements. Strategies of environmental civil society organizations in Hungary. Comparative Southeast European Studies 63 (3):491–514. doi:10.1515/soeu-2015-630308.
   Google Scholar
• Buzogány, A., S. Kerényi, and G. Olt. 2022. Back to the grassroots? The shrinking space of environmental activism in illiberal Hungary. Environmental Politics 31 (7):1267–88. doi:10.1080/09644016.2022.2113607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, D. S., and K. Halvorsen. 2001. An evaluation of three democratic, community-based approaches to citizen participation: Surveys, conversations with community groups, and community dinners. Society & Natural Resources 14 (2):107–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowther, D., and S. Cooper. 2002. Rekindling community spirit and identity: The role of ecoprotestors. Management Decision 40 (4):343–53. doi:10.1108/00251740210426330.
   Google Scholar
• Farnhill, T. 2016. The characteristics of UK unions’ environmental activism and the agenda’s utility as a vehicle for union renewal. Global Labour Journal 7 (3):3. doi:10.15173/glj.v7i3.2536.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, G. A. 2012. Group culture and the interaction order: Local sociology on the meso-level. Annual Review of Sociology 38 (1):159–79. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145518.
   Google Scholar
• Fridays For Future. 2019. ’Klímatüntetés – 2. hét’. [Climate Protest – 2. week] (accessed August 23, 2022). https://www.facebook.com/events/1219390811564326/?acontext=%7B%22event_action_hist ory%22%3A[%7B%22surface%22%3A%22page%22%7D]%7D
   Google Scholar
• Gusfield, J. R. 1978. Community: A critical response. Oxford: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Haanpaa, L. 2007. Structures and mechanisms in sustainable consumption research. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development 6 (1):53–66. doi:10.1504/IJESD.2007.012736.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, K. 1989. The return to community. American journal of Community Psychology 17 (1):1–15. doi:10.1007/BF00931199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hisschemöller, M., and I. Sioziou. 2013. Boundary organisations for resource mobilisation: Enhancing citizens’ involvement in the Dutch energy transition. Environmental Politics 22 (5):792–810. doi:10.1080/09644016.2013.775724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeister-Tóth, Á., K. Kelemen, and M. Piskóti. 2012. Life paths in Hungary in the light of commitment to sustainability. Interdisciplinary Environmental Review 13 (4):323–39. doi:10.1504/IER.2012.051449.
   Google Scholar
• Jamšek, S., and B. Culiberg. 2020. Introducing a three-tier sustainability framework to examine bike-sharing system use: An extension of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Consumer Studies 44 (2):140–50. doi:10.1111/ijcs.12553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, E. H. 2011. Rethinking ecological citizenship: The role of neighbourhood networks in cultural change. Environmental Politics 20 (6):843–60. doi:10.1080/09644016.2011.617169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Király, G., G. Kiss, A. Köves, and G. Pataki. 2013. Nem növekedés-központú gazdaságpolitikai alternatívák: a fenntartható életmód felé való átmenet szakpolitikai lehetőségei [Degrowth economic policy alternatives: Policy options for the transition to a sustainable lifestyle]. Budapest: Nemzeti Fenntartható Fejlődési Tanács Titkársága.
   Google Scholar
• Kiss, G., G. Pataki, A. Köves, and G. Király. 2018. Framing sustainable consumption in different ways: Policy lessons from two participatory systems mapping exercises in Hungary. Journal of Consumer Policy 41 (1):1–19. doi:10.1007/s10603-017-9363-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasznai Kovács, E. K., and G. Pataki. 2021. The dismantling of environmentalism in Hungary. In Politics and the environment in Eastern Europe, ed. E. Krasznai Kovács, 25–52. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Krasznai Kovács, E. 2021. Introduction: Political ecology in Eastern Europe. In Politics and the environment in Eastern Europe, ed. E. Krasznai Kovács, 1–24. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lusch, R. F., S. L. Vargo, and A. Gustafsson. 2016. Fostering a trans-disciplinary perspectives of service ecosystems. Journal of Business Research 69 (8):2957–63. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middlemiss, L. 2010. Community action for individual sustainability: Linking sustainable consumption, citizenship and justice. Managing Environmental Justice 62:71–91.
   Google Scholar
• Middlemiss, L. 2011. The power of community: How community-based organizations stimulate sustainable lifestyles among participants. Society & Natural Resources 24 (11):1157–73. doi:10.1080/08941920.2010.518582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikecz, D., B. Böcskei, and Z. Vasali. 2022. A Magyar jobboldal (ellen)keretei a klímaválságra és-mozgalomra [Hungarian right-wing (counter)frames for the climate crisis and the climate movement]. In Éghajlatváltozás és klímapolitika ed. D. Mikecz and D. Oross, 158–82. Budapest, HU: Napvilag Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, R. H. 2018. The best cases of “actually existing socialism”. The Independent Review 23 (2):283–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naz, F., J. Oláh, D. Vasile, and R. Magda. 2020. Green purchase behavior of university students in Hungary: An empirical study. Sustainability 12 (23):10077. doi:10.3390/su122310077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, L., P. Sutton, and C. Hunter. 2010. Theorizing the meso level: The household as a crucible of pro-environmental behaviour. Progress in Human Geography 34 (3):309–27. doi:10.1177/0309132509346994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spash, C. L., and K. Dobernig. 2017. Theories of (un)sustainable consumption. SRE – Discussion Papers 04. Vienna: WU Vienna University of Economics and Business. (accessed September 20, 2021). http://www-sre.wu.ac.at/sre-disc/sre-disc-2017_04.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Suri, H. 2011. Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal 11 (2):63–75. doi:10.3316/QRJ1102063.
   Google Scholar
• Svendsen, E. S., L. K. Campbell, D. R. Fisher, J. J. Connolly, M. L. Johnson, N. F. Sonti, D. H. Locke, L. M. Westphal, C. L. Fisher, J. M. Grove, et al. 2016. Stewardship mapping and assessment project: A framework for understanding community-based environmental stewardship. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. (accessed August 23, 2022). https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cures_pub/7/.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, L., and J. Y. Zhang. 2021. Just sustainability’ or just sustainability? Shanghai’s failed drive for global excellence. Society & Natural Resources 34 (4):449–66. doi:10.1080/08941920.2020.1843745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar