Despite Workforce Diversity Efforts, Career Metrics Differ for Some Demographic Groups in the USDA Forest Service

References

• Batavia, C., B. E. Penaluna, T. R. Lemberger, and M. P. Nelson. 2020. Considering the case for diversity in natural resources. BioScience 70 (8):708–18. doi:10.1093/biosci/biaa068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauregard, N., A. Marchand, J. Bilodeau, P. Durand, A. Demers, and V. E. Haines. 3rd. 2018. Gendered pathways to burnout: Results from the SALVEO study. Annals of Work Exposures and Health 62 (4):426–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, K. R., T. Taylor, J. Church, and A. Buck. 2021. An intersectional approach to the glass ceiling: Gender, Race and share of middle and senior management in U.S. workplaces. Sex Roles 84 (5–6):312–25. doi:10.1007/s11199-020-01168-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., and C. C. Harris. 1993. The implications of work force diversification in the U.S. forest service. Administration & Society 25 (1):85–113. doi:10.1177/009539979302500105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., and C. C. Harris. 2001. A longitudinal study of environmental attitudes of women and gender diversification in the U.S. forest service 1990–1996. Forest Science 47 (2):246–57. doi:10.1093/forestscience/47.2.246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., C. Harris, and T. Squirrell. 2010. Gender diversification in the U.S. forest service: Does it still matter? Review of Public Personnel Administration 30 (3):268–300. doi:10.1177/0734371X10368219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, S. 2009. Diversity in the US federal government: diversity management and employee turnover in federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19 (3):603–30. doi:10.1093/jopart/mun010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, S. 2011. Diversity and representation in the U.S. federal government: Analysis of the trends of federal employment. Public Personnel Management 40 (1):25–46. doi:10.1177/009102601104000103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. W. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989:139–68.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, M. R., S. H. Alonzo, S. K. Adamczak, D. N. Baker, R. S. Beltran, A. L. Borker, A. B. Favilla, R. Gatins, L. C. Goetz, N. Hack, et al. 2021. Anti-racist interventions to transform ecology, evolution and conservation biology departments. Nature Ecology & Evolution 5 (9):1213–23. doi:10.1038/s41559-021-01522-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dockry, M. J., S. S. Sachdeva, C. L. Fisher, L. S. Kenefic, D. H. Locke, and L. M. Westphal. 2022. Student trainee and paid internship programs have positive results but do little to influence long-term employee diversity in the USDA forest service. Plos One 17 (11):e0277423. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0277423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 2003. Management Directive 715, https://www.eeoc.gov/federal-sector/management-directive/section-717-title-vii (last accessed May 28, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Gravier, M. 2008. The 2004 enlargement staff policy of the European Commission: The case for representative bureaucracy. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 46 (5):1025–47. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2008.00828.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry-Brown, R., and N. Campbell-Lewis. 2005. Examining barriers to career advancement among females of color in the federal career service. Race, Gender & Class 12 (3/4):31–46.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, J. S., R. S. Bigler, D. Joel, C. C. Tate, and S. M. van Anders. 2019. The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary. American Psychologist 74 (2):171–93. doi:10.1037/amp0000307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. K. 2019. Leaking talent: How people of color are pushed out of environmental organizations. Report published June, 32 pp. DiverseGreen.org.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, M., Johansson, K., & Andersson, E. (2018). # Metoo in the Swedish forest sector: testimonies from harassed women on sexualised forms of male control. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 33 (5), 419–425.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, J. J. 1991. Integrating gender diverse and interdisciplinary professionals into traditional U.S. Department of Agriculture‐Forest Service Culture. Society & Natural Resources 4 (2):165–76. doi:10.1080/08941929109380751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, C. C. L. Kenefic, S., and S. L. Stout. 2015. Bridging the gender gap: The demographics of scientists in the USDA forest service and academia. BioScience 65 (12):1165–72. doi:10.1093/biosci/biv144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, C. C., L. S. Kenefic, M. J. Dockry, and A. Cobo-Lewis. 2019. Discrimination and career satisfaction: Perceptions from US forest service scientists. Journal of Forestry, 118 (1): 44–58.. doi:10.1093/jofore/fvz057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. G. 2005. The applicant is no gentleman: Women in the forest service. Journal of Forestry 103 (5):259–63. doi:10.1093/jof/103.5.259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, C. 2021. One in four black workers report discrimination at work. Gallup.Com, January 12. https://news.gallup.com/poll/328394/one-four-black-workers-report-discrimination-work.aspx (last accessed June 1, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Mejicano, E. 2020. Workforce diversity in federal natural resource organizations. M.S. thesis, University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Mong, S. N., and V. J. Roscigno. 2010. African American men and the experience of employment discrimination. Qualitative Sociology 33 (1):1–21. doi:10.1007/s11133-009-9142-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, A., and J. Piatak. 2019. Intersectionality, leadership, and inclusion: How do racially underrepresented women fare in the federal government? Review of Public Personnel Administration November:0734371X1988168. doi:10.1177/0734371X19881681.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Personnel Management. n.d. Chapter 31: Separations by other than retirement. https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/data-analysis-documentation/personnel-documentation/processing-personnel-actions/gppa31.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Østergaard, C. R., B. Timmermans, and K. Kristinsson. 2011. Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation. Research Policy 40 (3):500–9. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PBS Newshour. 2018. Congressional hearing on misconduct and retaliation in the U.S. Forest Service. https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=4Rzyrvdq2sA (last accessed June 1, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Riccucci, N. M. 2009. The pursuit of social equity in the federal government: A road less traveled? Public Administration Review 69 (3):373–82. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.01984.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccucci, N. M., and G. G. Van Ryzin. 2017. Representative bureaucracy: A lever to enhance social equity, coproduction, and democracy: Theory to practice. Public Administration Review 77 (1):21–30. doi:10.1111/puar.12649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabharwal, M. 2015. From glass ceiling to glass cliff: Women in senior executive service. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25 (2):399–426. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanz, V. 2017. No way out of the binary: A critical history of the scientific production of sex. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 43 (1):1–27. doi:10.1086/692517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, D. 2015. Caring for the land, serving people: Creating a multicultural forest service in the civil rights era. PhD, Portland State University. doi:10.15760/etd.2461.
   Google Scholar
• Stazyk, E. C., R. S. Davis, and J. Liang. 2021. Probing the links between workforce diversity, goal clarity, and employee job satisfaction in public sector organizations. Administrative Sciences 11 (3):77. doi:10.3390/admsci11030077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D., and S. Demuth. 2000. Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in US federal courts: Who is punished more harshly? American Sociological Review 65 (5):705–29. doi:10.2307/2657543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, R. R. Jr., 1990. From affirmative action to affirming diversity. Harvard Business Review 68 (2):107–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. C., and P. Mohai. 1995. Racial, gender, and professional diversification in the forest service from 1983 to 1992. Policy Studies Journal 23 (2):296–309. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1995.tb01744.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipple, T. J., and J. D. Wellman. 1991. Herbert Kaufman’s forest ranger thirty years later: From simplicity and homogeneity to complexity and diversity. Public Administration Review 51 (5):421. doi:10.2307/976411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USDA Forest Service. 1991. Toward a multicultural organization: Report of the USDA Forest Service Task Force on Work Force Diversity, 37 pp.
   Google Scholar
• van Gool, B., and F. de Zwart. 2013. Politics of representative bureaucracy in India. In Representative bureaucracy in action. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wegmann, K. M., and B. Smith. 2019. Examining racial/ethnic disparities in school discipline in the context of student-reported behavior infractions. Children and Youth Services Review 103:18–27. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.05.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westphal, L. M., M. J. Dockry, L. S. Kenefic, S. S. Sachdeva, A. Rhodeland, D. H. Locke, C. C. Kern, H. R. Huber-Stearns, and M. R. Coughlan. 2022. USDA Forest Service employee diversity during a period of workforce contraction. Journal of Forestry 120 (4):434–52. doi:10.1093/jofore/fvab071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar