Taking Stock of Land Use Conflict Research: A Systematic Map with Special Focus on Conceptual Approaches

References

• Abegunde, V. Oluwadamilare, Olubunmi O. Alawode, and M. Sibanda. 2020. Socioeconomic impact of land use conflict: A study of agricultural production in Southwest Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies 62 (2):127–46.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. M., K. J. H. Williams, and R. M. Ford. 2013. Community perceptions of plantation forestry: The association between place meanings and social representations of a contentious rural land use. Journal of Environmental Psychology 34:121–36. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aria, M., and C. Cuccurullo. 2017. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics 11 (4):959–75. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arellano, A., and Y. Sierra Praeli. 2022. A look at violence and conflict over Indigenous lands in nine Latin American countries. Mongabay, May 31, 2022. https://news.mongabay.com/2022/05/a-look-at-violence-and-conflict-over-indigenous-lands-in-nine-latin-american-countries/ (accessed November 11, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Asah, S. T., D. N. Bengston, K. Wendt, and K. C. Nelson. 2012. Diagnostic reframing of intractable environmental problems: Case of a contested multiparty public land-use conflict. Journal of Environmental Management 108:108–19. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.04.041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bob, U. 2010. Land-related conflicts in Sub-Saharan Africa. AJCR, 2, October 26. https://www.accord.org.za/ajcr-issues/land-related-conflicts-in-sub-saharan-africa/ (accessed November 11, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Bortz, J., and C. Schuster. 2010. Statistik für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler [Statistics for Humanists and Social Scientists]. 7th ed. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-12770-0.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, W. E., K. den Exter, R. Whitehead, K. Howton, and P. Boyd. 2013. Evaluating progress towards land use conflict program outcome targets. Australian Planner 50 (1):13–34. doi:10.1080/07293682.2012.688840.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., and C. M. Raymond. 2014. Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping. Landscape and Urban Planning 122:196–208. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., K. Kangas, A. Juutinen, and A. Tolvanen. 2017. Identifying environmental and natural resource management conflict potential using participatory mapping. Society & Natural Resources 30 (12):1458–75. doi:10.1080/08941920.2017.1347977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabezas, M. 2022. Patriarchal authoritarianism reloaded: Gender violence, policy conflict, and the resurgence of the far right in Spain. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 45 (1):56–76. doi:10.1111/plar.12484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieslak, I. 2019. Identification of areas exposed to land use conflict with the use of multiple-criteria decision-making methods. Land Use Policy 89:104225. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cilliers, D. P. 2019. Considering flood risk in spatial development planning: A land use conflict analysis approach. Jamba 11 (1):537. doi:10.4102/jamba.v11i1.537.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Côté, I. 2021. Internal migration and resource conflict: Evidence from Riau, Indonesia. Journal of Global Security Studies 7 (1):ogab025. doi:10.1093/jogss/ogab025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dannenberg, P., J. Revilla Diez, and D. Schiller. 2018. Spaces for integration or a divide? New-generation growth corridors and their integration in global value chains in the Global South. Zeitschrift Für Wirtschaftsgeographie 62 (2):135–51. doi:10.1515/zfw-2017-0034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darly, S., and A. Torre. 2013. Conflicts over farmland uses and the dynamics of ‘agri-urban’ localities in the Greater Paris Region: An empirical analysis based on daily regional press and field interviews. Land Use Policy 33:90–9. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, A. L., R. Bryce, and S. M. Redpath. 2013. Use of multicriteria decision analysis to address conservation conflicts. Conservation Biology: The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology 27 (5):936–44. doi:10.1111/cobi.12090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, G., C. Legacy, E. Liu, and M. Darcy. 2016. The factors driving the escalation of community opposition to affordable housing development. Urban Policy and Research 34 (4):386–400. doi:10.1080/08111146.2015.1118377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, L., S. de Bruin, J. Knoop, and J. van Vliet. 2021. Understanding land-use change conflict: A systematic review of case studies. Journal of Land Use Science 16 (3):223–39. doi:10.1080/1747423X.2021.1933226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debolini, M., E. Valette, M. Francois, and J.-P. Chéry. 2015. Mapping land use competition in the rural-urban fringe and future perspectives on land policies: A case study of Meknès (Morocco). Land Use Policy 47:373–81. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastgate, C. J., and D. A. Morrison. 2009. Identifying specific indicators of land use incompatibilities. Military Operations Research 14 (1):1–18. doi:10.5711/morj.14.1.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elix, J., and J. Lambert. 2007. Mapping the values of shorebird habitat in Tasmania: A tool for resolving land use conflict. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 24 (4):469–84. doi:10.1002/crq.185.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, A. C. P., L. F. Sanches Fernandes, D. P. S. Terêncio, R. M. V. Cortes, and F. A. L. Pacheco. 2019. Seasonal and scale effects of anthropogenic pressures on water quality and ecological integritiy: A study in the Sabor River Basin (NE Portugal) using partial least squares-path modeling. Water 11 (9):1941. doi:10.3390/w11091941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrarini, A., P. Serra, M. Almagro, M. Trevisan, and S. Amaducci. 2017. Multiple ecosystem services provision and biomass logistics management in bioenergy buffers: A state-of-the-art review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 73:277–90. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fienitz, M. 2022. Systematic map of literature on land use conflicts: Dataset. Zenodo. doi:10.5281/zenodo.7389768.
   Google Scholar
• Gallant, K., J. Ball, and W. Caldwell. 2006. Once upon a land-use conflict. Huron County uses storytelling to mend fences. Alternatives Journal 32 (4/5):33.
   Google Scholar
• Gottero, E. 2019. Identifying vulnerable farmland: An index to capture high urbanization risk areas. Ecological Indicators 98:61–7. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.10.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidolini, J., J. Ometto, G. Arcoverde, and A. Giarolla. 2020. Environmental land use conflicts in a Macroscale river basin: A preliminary study based on the ruggedness number. Water 12 (5):1222. doi:10.3390/w12051222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddaway, N. R., B. Macura, P. Whaley, and A. S. Pullin. 2017. ROSES for systematic map reports. Version 1.0. Figshare. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.5897299.
   Google Scholar
• Haddaway, N. R., B. Macura, P. Whaley, and A. S. Pullin. 2018. ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps. Environmental Evidence 7 (1):7. doi:10.1186/s13750-018-0121-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddaway, N. R., and A. S. Pullin. 2014. The policy role of systematic reviews: Past, present and future. Springer Science Reviews 2 (1–2):179–83. doi:10.1007/s40362-014-0023-1.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, H. L., and P. A. Loring. 2020. Seeing beneath disputes: A transdisciplinary framework for diagnosing complex conservation conflicts. Biological Conservation 248:108670. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, S. N., Y. M. Sani, A. R. Abdul Aziz, N. M. N. Sulaiman, and W. M. A. W. Daud. 2015. Biogasoline: An out-of-the-box solution to the food-for-fuel and land-use competitions. Energy Conversion and Management 89:349–67. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2014.09.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersperger, A. M., C. Iojă, F. Steiner, and C. A. Tudor. 2015. Comprehensive consideration of conflicts in the land-use planning process: A conceptual contribution. Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences 10 (4):5–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horstkotte, T., T. Lind, and J. Moen. 2016. Quantifying the implications of different land users’ priorities in the management of boreal multiple-use forests. Environmental Management 57 (4):770–83. doi:10.1007/s00267-015-0643-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ianoş, I., F.-C. Merciu, G. Merciu, D. Zamfir, I.-V. Stoica, and G. Vlăsceanu. 2014. Unclear perspectives for a specific intra-urban space: Văcăreşti Lake Area (Bucharest City). Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences 9 (4):215–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2019. Climate change and land: An IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems, ed. P. R. Shukla, J. Skea, E. Calvo Buendia, V. Masson-Delmotte, H.-O. Pörtner, D. C. Roberts, P. Zhai, R. Slade, S. Connors, R. van Diemen, et al.
   Google Scholar
• James, K., N. P. Randall, and N. R. Haddaway. 2016. A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence 5 (1):7. doi:10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, D., T. Baird, and G. Blank. 2019. New landscapes of conflict: Land-use competition at the urban-rural fringe. Landscape Research 44 (4):418–29. doi:10.1080/01426397.2017.1413173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, S., Y. Wang, X. Qian, J. Zhou, Y. Nie, and G. Qian. 2022. A signaling game approach of siting conflict mediation for the construction of waste incineration facilities under information asymmetry. Journal of Cleaner Production 335:130178. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kling, K. G., A. Dahlberg, and S. Wall-Reinius. 2019. Negotiating improved multifunctional landscape use: Trails as facilitators for collaboration among stakeholders. Sustainability 11 (13):3511. doi:10.3390/su11133511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovács, E., E. Kelemen, Á. Kalóczkai, K. Margóczi, G. Pataki, J. Gébert, G. Málovics, B. Balázs, Á. Roboz, E. Krasznai Kovács, et al. 2015. Understanding the links between ecosystem service trade-offs and conflicts in protected areas. Ecosystem Services 12:117–27. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.09.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuckartz, U. 2014. Qualitative Text Analysis. A Guide to Methods, Practice & Using Software. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., W. Tang, J. He, Y. Liu, T. Ai, and D. Liu. 2015. A land-use spatial optimization model based on genetic optimization and game theory. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 49:1–14. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, W., G. Jiang, Y. Chen, Y. Qu, T. Zhou, and W. Li. 2020. How feasible is regional integration for reconciling land use conflicts across the urban-rural interface? Evidence from Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei metropolitan region in China. Land Use Policy 92:104433. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, C., M. Garcia-Martin, C. M. Raymond, B. J. Shaw, and T. Plieninger. 2018. The potential for integrated landscape management to fulfil Europe’s commitments to the sustainable development goals. Landscape and Urban Planning 177:75–82. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.04.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannarini, T., M. Roccato, and S. Russo. 2015. The false consensus effect: A trigger of radicalization in locally unwanted land uses conflicts? Journal of Environmental Psychology 42:76–81. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marr, E. J., P. Howley, and C. Burns. 2016. Sparing or sharing? Differing approaches to managing agricultural and environmental spaces in England and Ontario. Journal of Rural Studies 48:77–91. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, D. G., A. W. Scherr, and C. City. 2010. Making law, making place: Lawyers and the production of space. Progress in Human Geography 34 (2):175–92. doi:10.1177/0309132509337281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyfroidt, P., R. Roy Chowdhury, A. de Bremond, E. C. Ellis, K.-H. Erb, T. Filatova, R. D. Garrett, J. M. Grove, A. Heinimann, T. Kuemmerle, et al. 2018. Middle-range theories of land system change. Global Environmental Change 53:52–67. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montanari, A., A. Londei, and B. Staniscia. 2014. Can we interpret the evolution of coastal land use conflicts? Using artificial neural networks to model the effects of alternative development policies. Ocean & Coastal Management 101:114–22. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.09.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, N., A. Lewis, and C. Griffin. 2010. ‘Not in our front garden’: Land use conflict, spatial meaning and the politics of naming place. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 20 (1):44–56. doi:10.1002/casp.1013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Németh, B., K. Németh, J. Procter, and T. Farrelly. 2021. Geoheritage conservation: Systematic mapping study for conceptual synthesis. Geoheritage 13 (2):45. doi:10.1007/s12371-021-00561-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pape, R., and J. Löffler. 2012. Climate change, land use conflicts, predation and ecological degradation as challenges for reindeer husbandry in Northern Europe: What do we really know after half a century of research? Ambio 41 (5):421–34. doi:10.1007/s13280-012-0257-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peltonen, L., and R. Sairinen. 2010. Integrating impact assessment and conflict management in urban planning: Experiences from Finland. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 30 (5):328–37. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2010.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phromma, I., A. Pagdee, A. Popradit, A. Ishida, and S. Uttaranakorn. 2019. Protected area co-management and land use conflicts adjacent to Phu Kao – Phu Phan Kham National Park, Thailand. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 38 (5):486–507. doi:10.1080/10549811.2019.1573689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, M. 2017. Land use conflict: Rural settlements within industrial colonies. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology 8 (5):1328–32.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez García, V., G. Frédéric, T. Kastner, and P. Meyfroidt. 2020. Agricultural intensification and land use change: Assessing country-level induced intensification, land sparing and rebound effect. Environmental Research Letters 15 (8):085007. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab8b14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saarikoski, H., J. Mustajoki, and M. Marttunen. 2013. Participatory multi-criteria assessment as ‘opening up’ vs. ‘closing down’ of policy discourses: A case of old-growth forest conflict in Finnish Upper Lapland. Land Use Policy 32:329–36. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha, T. K., and S. Pal. 2019. Emerging conflict between agriculture extension and physical existence of wetland in post-dam period in Atreyee River basin of Indo-Bangladesh. Environment, Development and Sustainability 21 (3):1485–505. doi:10.1007/s10668-018-0099-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelly, C., E. Prehoda, J. Price, A. Delach, and R. Thapaliya. 2020. Ratepayer perspectives on mid- to large-scale solar development on Long Island, NY: Lessons for reducing siting conflict through supported development types. Energies 13 (21):5628. doi:10.3390/en13215628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebastien, L. 2017. From NIMBY to enlightened resistance: A framework proposal to decrypt land-use disputes based on a landfill opposition case in France. Local Environment 22 (4):461–77. doi:10.1080/13549839.2016.1223620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebastien, L., J. Pelenc, and J. Milanesi. 2019. Resistance as an enlightening process: a new framework for analysis of the socio-political impacts of place-based environmental struggles. Local Environment 24 (5):487–504. doi:10.1080/13549839.2019.1592133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seppelt, R., S. Lautenbach, and M. Volk. 2013. Identifying trade-offs between ecosystem services, land use, and biodiversity: A plea for combining scenario analysis and optimization on different spatial scales. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 5 (5):458–63. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinthumule, N. I. 2016. Multiple-land use practices in transfrontier conservation areas: The case of Greater Mapungubwe straddling parts of Botswana, South Africa and Zimbabwe. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series 34 (34):103–15. doi:10.1515/bog-2016-0038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinhäußer, R., R. Siebert, A. Steinführer, and M. Hellmich. 2015. National and regional land-use conflicts in Germany from the perspective of stakeholders. Land Use Policy 49:183–94. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, S., Y. Sun, C. Lei, M. Weng, and Z. Cai. 2017. Reorienting paradoxical land use policies towards coherence: A self-adaptive ensemble learning geo-simulation of tea expansion under different scenarios in subtropical China. Land Use Policy 67:415–25. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.06.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talerngsri, K. 2020. Forests, peoples, and governments: Persistent land-use conflict in Northern Thailand. The Economics of Peace and Security Journal 15 (2):19–36. doi:10.15355/epjs15.2.19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tudor, C. A., I. C. Iojă, L. Rozylowicz, I. Pǎtru-Stupariu, and A. M. Hersperger. 2015. Similarities and differences in the assessment of land-use associations by local people and experts. Land Use Policy 49:341–51. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valle Junior, R. F., S. G. P. Varandas, F. A. L. Pacheco, V. R. Pereira, C. F. Santos, R. M. V. Cortes, and L. F. Sanches Fernandes. 2015. Impacts of land use conflicts on riverine ecosystems. Land Use Policy 43:48–62. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.10.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valle Junior, R. F., S. G. P. Varandas, L. F. Sanches Fernandes, and F. A. L. Pacheco. 2014. Environmental land use conflicts: A threat to soil conservation. Land Use Policy 41:172–85. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von der Dunk, A., A. Grêt-Regamey, T. Dalang, and A. M. Hersperger. 2011. Defining a typology of peri-urban land-use conflicts: A case study from Switzerland. Landscape and Urban Planning 101 (2):149–56. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, A. P. P., and M. Arquero de Alarcón. 2018. The competing social and environmental functions of private urban land: The case of an informal land occupation in São Paulo’s South Periphery. Sustainability 10 (11):4160. doi:10.3390/su10114160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walwa, W. J. 2020. Growing farmer-herder conflicts in Tanzania: The licenced exclusions of pastoral communities interests over access to resources. The Journal of Peasant Studies 47 (2):366–82. doi:10.1080/03066150.2019.1602523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widmark, C., and C. Sandstrom. 2012. Transaction costs of institutional change in multiple-use commons: The case of consultations between forestry and reindeer husbandry in northern Sweden. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 14 (4):428–49. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2012.739298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, E. E. A., and W. Van Dooren. 2021. Fatal remedies: How dealing with policy conflict can backfire in a context of trust-erosion. Governance 34 (4):1097–114. doi:10.1111/gove.12630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, K. M., R. A. Baldwin, and S. Barry. 2017. Compatibility of livestock grazing and recreational use on coastal California public lands: Importance, interactions, and management solutions. Rangeland Ecology & Management 70 (2):192–201. doi:10.1016/j.rama.2016.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, S., J. Meijer, C. J. E. Schulp, and P. H. Verburg. 2020. Contextualizing local landscape initiatives in global change: A scenario study for the high forest zone, Ghana. Regional Environmental Change 20 (4):115. doi:10.1007/s10113-020-01701-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasmi, Y., H. Schanz, and A. Salim. 2006. Manifestation of conflict escalation in natural resource management. Environmental Science & Policy 9 (6):538–46. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2006.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You, J., J. Yordy, C. M. Weible, K. Park, T. Heikkila, and D. Gilchrist. 2023. Comparing policy conflict on electricity transmission line sitings. Public Policy and Administration 38 (1):107–29. doi:10.1177/09520767211036800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusran, Y., M. A. K. Sahide, S. Supratman, A. Sabar, M. Krott, and L. Giessen. 2017. The empirical visibility of land use conflicts: From latent to manifest conflict through law enforcement in a national park in Indonesia. Land Use Policy 62:302–15. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.12.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, L., Y. Liu, J. Wang, Y. Yang, and Y. Wang. 2019. Land use conflict identification and sustainable development scenario simulation on China’s southeast coast. Journal of Cleaner Production 238:1–16. doi:10.1007/s10661-019-7809-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar