Tackling (Not Only) Air Pollution: Cross-sectional Tensions behind State-led Energy Retrofit Program in Poland

References

• Amundsen, H., and E. A. Hermansen. 2021. Green transformation is a boundary object: An analysis of conceptualisation of transformation in Norwegian primary industries. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 4 (3):864–85. doi:10.1177/2514848620934337.
   Google Scholar
• Antweiler, W., and S. Gulati. 2015. Scrapping for clean air: Emissions savings from the BC SCRAP-IT program. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 71:198–214. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2015.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts, B., and H. Goverde. 2006. The governance capacity of (new) policy arrangements: A reflexive approach. In Institutional dynamics in environmental governance, ed. B. Arts and P. Leroy, 69–92. Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/1-4020-5079-8_4.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, J., E. Gerasopoulos, D. Rojas-Rueda, and T. Benmarhnia. 2019. Potential health and equity co-benefits related to the mitigation policies reducing air pollution from residential wood burning in Athens, Greece. Journal of Environmental Science and Health. Part A, Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering 54 (11):1144–51. doi:10.1080/10934529.2019.1629211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, J. H., E. T. Hayes, T. J. Chatterton, and J. W. S. Longhurst. 2018. Policy disconnect: A critical review of UK air quality policy in relation to EU and LAQM responsibilities over the last 20 years. Environmental Science & Policy 85:28–39. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.03.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrington-Leigh, C., J. Baumgartner, E. Carter, B. E. Robinson, S. Tao, and Y. Zhang. 2019. An evaluation of air quality, home heating and well-being under Beijing’s programme to eliminate household coal use. Nature Energy 4 (5):416–23. doi:10.1038/s41560-019-0386-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boso, À., B. Álvarez, C. Oltra, Á. Hofflinger, A. Vallejos-Romero, and J. Garrido. 2019. Examining patterns of air quality perception: A cluster analysis for Southern Chilean cities. SAGE Open 9 (3):215824401986356. doi:10.1177/2158244019863563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunt, H., J. Barnes, S. J. Jones, J. W. S. Longhurst, G. Scally, and E. Hayes. 2017. Air pollution, deprivation and health: Understanding relationships to add value to local air quality management policy and practice in Wales, UK. Journal of Public Health 39 (3):485–97. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdw084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchard-Dziubińska, M. 2019. Air pollution and health in Poland: Anti-smog movement in the most polluted Polish cities. Ekonomia i Środowisko - Economics and Environment 69 (2):76–90.
   Google Scholar
• Chae, Y. 2010. Co-benefit analysis of an air quality management plan and greenhouse gas reduction strategies in the Seoul metropolitan area. Environmental Science & Policy 13 (3):205–16. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2010.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford, K. R. 2021. Problematic exclusions: Analysis of the Clean Air Act’s exceptional event rule revisions. Society & Natural Resources 34 (2):135–48. doi:10.1080/08941920.2020.1780358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch, C., and H. Farrell. 2004. Breaking the path of institutional development? Alternatives to the new determinism. Rationality and Society 16 (1):5–43. doi:10.1177/1043463104039874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushing, L., D. Blaustein-Rejto, M. Wander, M. Pastor, J. Sadd, A. Zhu, and R. Morello-Frosch. 2018. Carbon trading, co-pollutants, and environmental equity: Evidence from California’s cap-and-trade program (2011–2015). PLoS Medicine 15 (7):e1002604. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Schio, N., and B. van Heur. 2022. Resistance is in the air: From post-politics to the politics of expertise. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 40 (3):592–610. doi:10.1177/23996544211034182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EEA (European Environment Agency). 2014. Air quality in Europe - 2020 report. EEA Report No 05/2014. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/air-quality-in-europe-2014 (accessed 13 May 2023).
   Google Scholar
• EEA (European Environment Agency). 2020. Air quality in Europe - 2020 report. EEA Report No 09/2020. https://www.eea.europa.eu//publications/air-quality-in-europe-2020-report (accessed 13 May 2023).
   Google Scholar
• EEA (European Environment Agency). 2021. Poland - Air pollution country fact sheet. https://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/air/country-fact-sheets/2021-country-fact-sheets/poland (accessed 13 May 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Frankowski, J. 2020. Attention: Smog alert! Citizen engagement for clean air and its consequences for fuel poverty in Poland. Energy and Buildings 207:109525. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganguly, T., K. L. Selvaraj, and S. K. Guttikunda. 2020. National Clean Air Programme (NCAP) for Indian cities: Review and outlook of clean air action plans. Atmospheric Environment: X 8:100096. doi:10.1016/j.aeaoa.2020.100096.
   Google Scholar
• Giorgi, L., and M. Redclift. 2000. European environmental research in the social sciences: Research into ecological modernization as a ‘boundary object’. European Environment 10 (1):12–23. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0976(200001/02)10:1%3C12::AID-EET213%3E3.0.CO;2-%23.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. 2015. Life support: The political ecology of urban air. City 19 (2-3):192–215. doi:10.1080/13604813.2015.1014710.
   Google Scholar
• Gulia, S., S. M. Shiva Nagendra, M. Khare, and I. Khanna. 2015. Urban air quality management-A review. Atmospheric Pollution Research 6 (2):286–304. doi:10.5094/APR.2015.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardenbrook, R., A. DeMarco, and J. Rose. 2022. A narrative political ecology approach to unsheltered homelessness and episodic poor air quality along an urban riparian corridor. Society & Natural Resources 35 (11):1152–69. doi:10.1080/08941920.2022.2098437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holifield, R., J. Chakraborty, and G. Walker. 2017. The worlds of environmental justice. In The Routledge handbook of environmental justice, ed. R. Holifield, J. Chakraborty, and G. Walker, 1st ed., 1–11. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315678986.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, H. C., and P. A. Sabatier. 1994. Evaluating the advocacy coalition framework. Journal of Public Policy 14 (2):175–203. doi:10.1017/S0143814X00007431.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, N., and M. Winskel. 2021. A review of heat decarbonisation policies in Europe. Edinburgh, Scotland: University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. 2010. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies, Updated 2nd ed. Harlow, England: Longman. ISBN 10: 1-292-03920-5
   Google Scholar
• Kooiman, J. 2003. Governing as governance. London: SAGE Publications. ISBN 10: 0761940367, doi:10.4135/9781446215012.
   Google Scholar
• Księżopolski, K.,. M. Drygas, K. Pronińska, and I. Nurzyńska. 2020. The economic effects of new patterns of energy efficiency and heat sources in rural single-family houses in Poland. Energies 13 (23):6358. doi:10.3390/en13236358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kudełko, M. 2012. Koszty zewnętrzne produkcji energii elektrycznej z projektowanych elektrowni dla kompleksów złożowych węgla brunatnego Legnica i Gubin oraz sektora energetycznego w Polsce [External costs of electricity production from planned power plants for the Legnica and Gubin lignite deposit complexes and the energy sector in Poland]. Warsaw, Poland: Greenpeace.
   Google Scholar
• Kundzewicz, Z. W., and P. Matczak. 2012. Climate change regional review: Poland: Climate change regional review: Poland. Wires Climate Change 3 (4):297–311. doi:10.1002/wcc.175.
   Google Scholar
• Li, V. O., Y. Han, J. C. Lam, Y. Zhu, and J. Bacon-Shone. 2018. Air pollution and environmental injustice: Are the socially deprived exposed to more PM2.5 pollution in Hong Kong? Environmental Science & Policy 80:53–61. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liefferink, D. 2006. The dynamics of policy arrangements: Turning round the tetrahedron. In Institutional dynamics in environmental governance, ed. B. Arts and P. Leroy, 45–68. vol 47. Springer Netherlands. ISBN: 978-1-4020-5079-4, doi:10.1007/1-4020-5079-8_3.
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., and M. Roberts. 2013. Why institutions matter: The new institutionalism in political science. Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN: 100333929543.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, J. G. 2020. Air pollution: A systematic review of its psychological, economic, and social effects. Current Opinion in Psychology 32:52–65. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M., and S. Vergari. 1996. Advocacy coalitions, policy entrepreneurs, and policy change. Policy Studies Journal 24 (3):420–34. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1996.tb01638.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myllyvirta, L., J. Jerabek, I. Łoś, and L. Pazderski. 2013. Węgiel zabija. Analiza kosztów zdrowotnych emisji zanieczyszczeń z polskiego sektora energetycznego [Coal kills. Analysis of the health costs of pollutant emissions from the Polish energy sector]. Warsaw, Poland: Greenpeace.
   Google Scholar
• Nazar, W., and M. Niedoszytko. 2022. Air pollution in Poland: A 2022 narrative review with focus on respiratory diseases. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19 (2):895. doi:10.3390/ijerph19020895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niedziałkowski, K., A. Pietrzyk-Kaszyńska, M. Pietruczuk, and M. Grodzińska-Jurczak. 2016. Assessing participatory and multi-level characteristics of biodiversity and landscape protection legislation: The case of Poland. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 59 (10):1891–911. doi:10.1080/09640568.2015.1100982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, K., V. Rodrigues, S. Slingerland, K. Vanherle, J. Soares, S. Rafael, C. Trozzi, E. A. Bouman, J. Ferreira, A. Kewo, et al. 2022. Assessing the impacts of citizen-led policies on emissions, air quality and health. Journal of Environmental Management 302 (Pt A):114047. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114047.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oskarsson, P., and H. P. Bedi. 2018. Extracting environmental justice: Countering technical renditions of pollution in India’s coal industry. The Extractive Industries and Society 5 (3):340–7. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2018.05.003.
   Google Scholar
• Pellow, D. N. 2011. Politics by other greens. In Environmental inequalities beyond borders, ed. J. Carmin and J. Agyeman, 247–66. The MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262515870
   Google Scholar
• PSGAZ. 2018. Do 2022 roku 90 proc. Polaków uzyska dostęp do gazu ziemnego [by 2022, 90 percent. Poles will gain access to natural gas]. https://www.psgaz.pl/aktualnosci/do-2022-roku-90-proc-polakow-uzyska-dostep-do-gazu-ziemnego (accessed 13 May 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Physicians of London, ed. 2016. Every breath we take The lifelong impact of air pollution: Report of a working party. Royal College of Physicians of London. London: RCP, eISBN 978-1-86016-568-9
   Google Scholar
• Sakson-Boulet, A. 2020. The Clean Air Priority Programme–Evaluation and perspectives. Środkowoeuropejskie Studia Polityczne 1(1):171–92. doi:10.14746/ssp.2020.1.9.
   Google Scholar
• Sanduijav, C., S. Ferreira, M. Filipski, and Y. Hashida. Y. 2021. Air pollution and happiness: Evidence from the coldest capital in the world. Ecological Economics 187:107085. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheidel, A., D. Del Bene, J. Liu, G. Navas, S. Mingorría, F. Demaria, S. Avila, B. Roy, I. Ertör, L. Temper, et al. 2020. Environmental conflicts and defenders: A global overview. Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions 63:102104. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraufnagel, D. E., J. R. Balmes, C. T. Cowl, S. De Matteis, S.-H. Jung, K. Mortimer, R. Perez-Padilla, M. B. Rice, H. Riojas-Rodriguez, A. Sood, et al. 2019. Air pollution and noncommunicable diseases. Chest 155 (2):417–26. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2018.10.041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schueftan, A., and A. D. González. 2015. Proposals to enhance thermal efficiency programs and air pollution control in south-central Chile. Energy Policy 79:48–57. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sendek-Matysiak, E., and Z. Łosiewicz. 2021. Analysis of the development of the electromobility market in Poland in the context of the implemented subsidies. Energies 14 (1):222. doi:10.3390/en14010222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokołowski, J., D. Zelewski, J. Stępień, and P. Lewandowski. 2020. Energy poverty between energy paradigms in Poland. In Perspectives on energy poverty in post-communist Europe, ed. G. Jiglau, A. Sinea, U. Dubois, and P. Biermann, 139–152. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B. K., J. Axsen, and S. Sorrell. S. 2018. Promoting novelty, rigor, and style in energy social science: Towards codes of practice for appropriate methods and research design. Energy Research & Social Science 45:12–42. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., and J. R. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science 19 (3):387–420. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, W., and K. A. Thelen, eds. 2005. Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-928045-2
   Google Scholar
• Supreme Audit Office. 2022. Implementation of the Clean Air Priority Program (CAPP). https://www.nik.gov.pl/plik/id,26690,vp,29488.pdf (accessed 13 May 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Szulecka, J., and K. Szulecki. 2017. Polish environmental movement 1980-2017: (De)legitimization, politics & ecological crises. ESPRi Working Paper No. 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3075126
   Google Scholar
• Szulecka, J., and K. Szulecki. K 2022. Between domestic politics and ecological crises: (De)legitimization of Polish environmentalism. Environmental Politics 31 (7):1214–43. doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1674541.
   Google Scholar
• Thörn, H. 2021. New forms of environmental movement institutionalization. In The Routledge handbook of environmental movements, ed. M. Grasso and M. Giugni, 1st ed., 325–37. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780367855680-25.
   Google Scholar
• Tognetti, F. 2021. Analysis of existing incentives in Europe for heating powered by fossil fuels and renewable sources. https://www.coolproducts.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Analysis-of-Fossil-Fuel-Incentives-in-Europe_FINAL_.pdf (accessed 13 May 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Tonn, B., B. Hawkins, E. Rose, and M. Marincic. 2021. Income, housing and health: Poverty in the United States through the prism of residential energy efficiency programs. Energy Research & Social Science 73:101945. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.101945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, C., and J. Baxter. 2017. Procedural justice in Canadian wind energy development: A comparison of community-based and technocratic siting processes. Energy Research & Social Science 29:160–9. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2018. Fighting smog: Energy efficiency and anti-smog in single-family buildings in Poland. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2020. Towards robust, scalable and inclusive Clean Air programme for all. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Wróblewski, M., J. Suchomska, and I. Tamborska. 2021. Citizens or consumers? Air quality sensor users and their involvement in sensor. Community. Results from qualitative case study. Urban Transformations 13 (20):11406. doi:10.3390/su132011406.
   Google Scholar
• Zajchowski, C., N. Q. Lackey, and G. D. McNay. 2019. “Now is not the time to take a breather”: United States federal land management agency professionals’ perceptions at the 40th anniversary of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977. Society & Natural Resources 32 (9):1003–20. doi:10.1080/08941920.2019.1605436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar