Recreation Area Characteristics and Their Impact on Property Values within Florida’s Wekiva River System

References

• Anderson, S. T., and S. E. West. 2006. Open space, residential property values, and spatial context. Regional Science and Urban Economics 36 (6):773–89. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2006.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariza, E., R. Ballester, R. Rigall-I-Torrent, A. Saló, E. Roca, M. Villares, J. A. Jiménez, and R. Sardá. 2012. On the relationship between quality, users’ perception and economic valuation in NW Mediterranean beaches. Ocean & Coastal Management 63:55–66. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekiroglu, S., S. Destan, M. Can, T. Turkoglu, and A. Tolunay. 2015. Econometric analysis of a forest recreation area: An example from Istanbul, Turkey. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 24 (9a):2937–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, K. P., K. J. Boyle, and B. C. Neumann. 2009. Property price effects of a national wildlife refuge: Great Meadows National Wildlife Refuge in Massachusetts. Land Use Policy 26 (4):1011–9. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bin, O., J. Czajkowski, J. Li, and G. Villarini. 2017. Housing market fluctuations and the implicit price of water quality: Empirical evidence from a South Florida housing market. Environmental and Resource Economics 68 (2):319–41.   doi:10.1007/s10640-016-0020-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borisova, T., K. Oehlbeck, X. Bi, T. Wade, A. Hodges, K. Grogan, and F. Hei. 2020. Economic value of Florida water resources: Contributions of tourism and recreation to the economy, UF IFAS EDIS, Publication #FE1065.
   Google Scholar
• Bottero, M., C. Caprioli, M. Foth, P. Mitchell, M. Rittenbruch, and M. Santangelo. 2022. Urban parks, value uplift and green gentrification: An application of the spatial hedonic model in the city of Brisbane. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 74:127618 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brander, L. M., and M. J. Koetse. 2011. The value of urban open space: Meta-analyses of contingent valuation and hedonic pricing results. Journal of Environmental Management 92 (10):2763–73. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, S. D., A. Sebastian, R. Blessing, and P. B. Bedient. 2018. Case study results from southeast Houston, Texas: Identifying the impacts of residential location on flood risk and loss. Journal of Flood Risk Management 11:S110–S120. doi:10.1111/jfr3.12184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buta, N., S. M. Holland, and K. Kaplanidou. 2014. Local communities and protected areas: The mediating role of place attachment for pro-environmental civic engagement. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 5-6:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.jort.2014.01.001.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W. Y., X. Li, and J. Hua. 2019. Environmental amenities of urban rivers and residential property values: A global meta-analysis. The Science of the Total Environment 693:133628. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, X., S. V. Damme, L. Li, and P. Uyttenhove. 2019. Evaluation of ecosystem services: A review of methods. Ecosystem Services 37:100925. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, L. T., A. Y. Lo, and L. Fok. 2017. Recreational specialization and ecologically responsible behavior of Chinese birdwatchers in Hong Kong. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 25 (6):817–31. doi:10.1080/09669582.2016.1251445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, S., H. Seung, G. Kim, R. K. Roberts, and J. Suhyun. 2009. Amenity values of spatial configurations of forest landscapes over space and time in the southern Appalachian highlands. Ecological Economics 68 (10):2646–57. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.04.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chwiałkowski, C., and A. Zydroń. 2021. Socio-economic and spatial characteristics of Wielkopolski National Park: Application of the hedonic pricing method. Sustainability 13 (9):5001. doi:10.3390/su13095001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crompton, J. L. 2005. The impact of parks on property values: Empirical evidence from the past two decades in the United States. Managing Leisure 10 (4):203–18. doi:10.1080/13606710500348060.
   Google Scholar
• Crompton, J. L., and S. Nicholls. 2020. Impact on property values of distance to parks and open spaces: An update of US studies in the new millennium. Journal of Leisure Research 51 (2):127–46. doi:10.1080/00222216.2019.1637704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czembrowski, P., and J. Kronenberg. 2016. Hedonic pricing and different urban green space types and sizes: Insights into the discussion on valuing ecosystem services. Landscape and Urban Planning 146:11–9. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahal, R. P., R. K. Grala, J. S. Gordon, I. A. Munn, D. R. Petrolia, and J. R. Cummings. 2019. A hedonic pricing method to estimate the value of waterfronts in the Gulf of Mexico. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 41:185–94. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2019.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duker, P., and S. Klanarongchao. 2022. Community-based conservation of the Ngao River in Thailand: A networked story of success. Society & Natural Resources 35 (12):1315–32. doi:10.1080/08941920.2022.2109087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobedo, F. J., D. C. Adams, and N. Timilsina. 2015. Urban forest structure effects on property value. Ecosystem Services 12:209–17. 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, K. S., X. Chen, and C. A. Robichaud. 2017. A hedonic analysis of the impact of marine aquaculture on coastal housing prices in Maine. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 46 (2):242–67. doi:10.1017/age.2017.19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, J. R., J. C. Brenner, M. Drescher, S. L. Dickinson, and E. G. Knackmuhs. 2016. Perpetual private land conservation: The case for outdoor recreation and functional leisure. Ecology and Society 21 (2):45–66. doi:10.5751/ES-08515-210246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida Realtors. 2022. Florida Housing Market Data Reports. Accessed October 20, 2022. https://www.floridarealtors.org/newsroom/market-data.
   Google Scholar
• Florida State Parks. 2021. Wekiva River Area. Accessed October 21, 2022. http://floridastateparks.com/WekivaRiver.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, G., and R. J. Johnston. 2020. What does it cost to ensure salt marsh migration? Using hedonic modeling to inform cost-effective conservation. Journal of Environmental Management 262:110262. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, R. K., J. W. Morse, and A. B. Adams. 2019. Cultural ecosystem services and decision‐making: How researchers describe the applications of their work. People and Nature 1 (4):457–75. doi:10.1002/pan3.10044.
   Google Scholar
• Grizzetti, B., D. Lanzanova, C. Liquete, A. Reynaud, and A. C. Cardoso. 2016. Assessing water ecosystem services for water resource management. Environmental Science & Policy 61:194–203. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halvorsen, R., and R. Palmquist. 1980. The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. American Economic Review 70 (3):474–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ham, C., P. A. Champ, J. B. Loomis, and R. M. Reich. 2012. Accounting for heterogeneity of public lands in hedonic property models. Land Economics 88 (3):444–56. doi:10.3368/le.88.3.444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, M., S. Jennifer, A. Thacher, W. Daniel, W. McCollum, and P. Berren. 2008. Intra-regional amenities, wages, and home prices: The role of forests in the southwest. Land Economics 84 (4):635–51. doi:10.3368/le.84.4.635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayakawa, K., and M. H. Pesaran. 2015. Robust standard errors in transformed likelihood estimation of dynamic panel data models with cross-sectional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics 188 (1):111–34. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.03.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Z., B. Swallow, and F. Qiu. 2021. Measuring the amenity value of urban open space using a spatial hedonic approach: The case of Edmonton, Canada. Paper presented at International Association of Agricultural Economists, Virtual, 17–31 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, C. U., T. E. Panduro, T. H. Lundhede, K. von Graevenitz, and B. J. Thorsen. 2021. Who demands peri-urban nature? A second stage hedonic house price estimation of household’s preference for peri-urban nature. Landscape and Urban Planning 207:104016. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.104016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. S. 2002. Water versus development in Florida. International Journal of Economic Development 4:3–4.  
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L., M. Vieno, A. Fitch, E. Carnell, C. Steadman, P. Cryle, M. Holland, E. Nemitz, D. Morton, J. Hall, et al. 2019. Urban natural capital accounts: Developing a novel approach to quantify air pollution removal by vegetation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 8 (4):413–28. doi:10.1080/21606544.2019.1597772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaval, P. 2020. The impact of landscape amenities on property values: Evidence from a hedonic pricing analysis of the Slovenian housing market. Land Use Policy 97:104758.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. G., K. C. Hung, and S. Y. Park. 2015. Determinants of housing prices in Hong Kong: A Box-Cox quantile regression approach. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 50 (2):270–87. doi:10.1007/s11146-014-9456-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., S. Yoon, E. Yang, and B. Thapa. 2020. Valuing recreational beaches: A spatial hedonic pricing approach. Coastal Management 48 (2):118–41. doi:10.1080/08920753.2020.1732799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacs, K. F. 2012. Integrating property value and local recreation models to value ecosystem services from regional parks. Landscape and Urban Planning 108 (2-4):79–90. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreye, M. M., D. C. Adams, R. Ghimire, W. Morse, T. Stein, and J. M. Bowker. 2017. Forest ecosystem services: Cultural values. General Technical Report SRS-226. Vol. 226, 11–30. Asheville, NC: US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Kuminoff, N. V., C. F. Parmeter, and J. C. Pope. 2008. Hedonic price functions: Guidance on empirical specification No. 382-2016-22504.
   Google Scholar
• Kummu, M., H. De Moel, P. J. Ward, and O. Varis. 2011. How close do we live to water? A global analysis of population distance to freshwater bodies. PloS One 6 (6):e20578. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lærdal, S., and J. Vorkinn. 2017. The impact of external, environmental, and neighborhood factors on housing prices in Stavanger: A hedonic price model study. Master’s thesis, University of Stavanger, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, C., J. J. Opaluch, and G. Sfinarolakis. 2014. The windy city: Property value impacts of wind turbines in an urban setting. Energy Economics 44:413–21. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2014.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin, S. L., J. R. Alavalapati, and R. K. Shrestha. 2005. Estimating the cost of preserving private lands in Florida: A hedonic analysis. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 37 (1):115–30. doi:10.1017/S1074070800007148.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, E. K., and C. Perrings. 2013. The value of water-related amenities in an arid city: The case of the Pheonix Metropolitan Area. Landscape and Urban Planning 109 (1):45–55. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Łaszkiewicz, E., P. Czembrowski, and J. Kronenberg. 2019. Can proximity to urban green spaces be considered a luxury? Classifying a non-tradeable good with the use of hedonic pricing method. Ecological Economics 161:237–47. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.03.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M., J. Huang, and Y. Lu. 2018. Valuing urban green space and its impact on house prices: Evidence from Beijing. Habitat International 76:74–81.
   Google Scholar
• Liebelt, V., S. Bartke, and N. Schwarz. 2018. Hedonic pricing analysis of the influence of urban green spaces onto residential prices: The case of Leipzig, Germany. European Planning Studies 26 (1):133–57. doi:10.1080/09654313.2017.1376314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ligus, M., and P. Peternek. 2016. Measuring structural, location and environmental effects: A hedonic analysis of housing market in Wroclaw, Poland. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 220:251–60. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.497.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsey, G., and D. B. L. Nguyen. 2004. Use of greenway trails in Indiana. Journal of Urban Planning and Development 130 (4):213–7. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2004)130:4(213).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, T., W. Hu, Y. Song, and A. Zhang. 2020. Exploring spillover effects of ecological lands: A spatial multilevel hedonic price model of the housing market in Wuhan, China. Ecological Economics 170:106568 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liyanage, C. P., and K. Yamada. 2017. Impact of population growth on the water quality of natural water bodies. Sustainability 9 (8):1405. doi:10.3390/su9081405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashour, T., J. Alavalapati, R. Matta, S. Larkin, and D. Carter. 2005. A hedonic analysis of the effect of natural attributes and deed restrictions on the value of conservation easements. Forest Policy and Economics 7 (5):771–81. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2005.03.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer, R., M. Pitzer, and S. Sebastian*. 2004. Hedonic price indices for the Paris housing market. Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv 88 (3):303–26. doi:10.1007/s101820400173.
   Google Scholar
• Meng, S., Q. Huang, L. Zhang, C. He, L. Inostroza, Y. Bai, and D. Yin. 2020. Matches and mismatches between the supply of and demand for cultural ecosystem services in rapidly urbanizing watersheds: A case study in the Guanting Reservoir basin, China. Ecosystem Services 45:101156. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. R., J. P. Doubek, H. Xu, and B. J. Cardinale. 2020. Hedonic price estimates of lake water quality: Valued attribute, instrumental variables, and ecological-economic benefits. Ecological Economics 176:106692.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, E. R. 1981. The demand for site-specific recreational activities: A characteristics approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 8 (4):345–71. doi:10.1016/0095-0696(81)90046-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutanga, C. N., S. Vengesayi, N. Muboko, and E. Gandiwa. 2015. Towards harmonious conservation relationships: A framework for understanding protected area staff-local community relationships in developing countries. Journal for Nature Conservation 25:8–16. doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2015.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natcher, D. C., and C. G. Hickey. 2002. Putting the community back into community-based resource management: A criteria and indicators approach to sustainability. Human Organization 61 (4):350–63. doi:10.17730/humo.61.4.dem6fx3npep78xaq.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, S, and J. L. Crompton. 2017. The effect of rivers, streams, and canals on property values. River Research and Applications 33 (9):1377–86. 10.1002/rra.3197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, S. 2019. Impacts of environmental disturbances on housing prices: A review of the hedonic pricing literature. Journal of Environmental Management 246 (15):1–10. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.144.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicholls, S., and J. L. Crompton. 2018. The contribution of scenic views of, and proximity to, lakes and reservoirs to property values. Lakes & Reservoirs: Science, Policy and Management for Sustainable Use 23 (1):63–78. doi:10.1111/lre.12207.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Economic and Demographic Research. 2022. Orange County Economic Profile. accessed October 18, 2022. http://edr.state.fl.us/content/area-profiles/county/orange.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ostergren, D., F. I. Solop, and K. K. Hagen. 2005. National Park Service fees: Value for the money or a barrier to visitation? Journal of Park & Recreation Administration 23 (1):18–36.
   Google Scholar
• Othman, J., and Y. Jafari. 2019. Economic valuation of an urban lake recreational park: Case of Taman Tasik Cempaka in Bandar Baru Bangi, Malaysia. Sustainability 11 (11):3023. doi:10.3390/su11113023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, L. J., C. Tisdell, and A. T. Lisle. 2002. The impact of Noosa National Park on surrounding property values: An application of the hedonic price method. Economic Analysis and Policy 32 (2):155–71. doi:10.1016/S0313-5926(02)50023-0.
   Google Scholar
• Perez-Verdin, G., M. E. Lee, and D. J. Chavez. 2004. Outdoor recreation in a protected area in southern Durango, Mexico: Analysis of local residents’ perceptions. Society & Natural Resources 17 (10):897–910. doi:10.1080/08941920490505310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poudyal, N. C., D. G. Hodges, and C. D. Merrett. 2009. A hedonic analysis of the demand for and benefits of urban recreation parks. Land Use Policy 26 (4):975–83. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redfin. 2022. Florida housing market. Accessed July 21, 2022. https://www.redfin.com/state/Florida/housing-market#overview.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, S. 1974. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy 82 (1):34–55. doi:10.1086/260169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, D. H., J. B. Loomis, and G. L. Peterson. 1984. Pricing for efficiency and revenue in public recreation areas. Journal of Leisure Research 16 (3):195–208. doi:10.1080/00222216.1984.11969585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander, H. A., and R. G. Haight. 2012. Estimating the economic value of cultural ecosystem services in an urbanizing area using hedonic pricing. Journal of Environmental Management 113:194–205.   doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander, H. A., and S. S. Polasky. 2009. The value of views and open space: Estimates from a hedonic pricing model for Ramsey County, Minnesota, USA. Land Use Policy 26 (3):837–45. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander, H. A., S. Polasky, and R. G. Haight. 2010. The value of urban tree cover: A hedonic property price model in Ramsey and Dakota Counties, Minnesota, USA. Ecological Economics 69 (8):1646–56. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao, J., Y. Zhou, H. Luo, J. Wang, and Q. Zhang. 2023. Comparative analysis of visual amenity services valuation: A nationwide assessment through propensity scoring matching and hedonic regression. Journal of Environmental Management 325 (Pt B):116564. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116564.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sheppard, S. 1999. Hedonic analysis of housing markets. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics 3:1595–635. doi:10.1016/S1574-0080(99)80010-8.
   Google Scholar
• Shultz, S. D., and D. A. King. 2001. The use of census data for hedonic price estimates of open-space amenities and land use. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 22 (2/3):239–52. doi:10.1023/A:1007895631071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikorska, D., P. Sikorski, and R. J. Hopkins. 2017. High biodiversity of green infrastructure does not contribute to recreational ecosystem services. Sustainability 9 (3):334. doi:10.3390/su9030334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skrydstrup, J., R. Löwe, I. B. Gregersen, M. Koetse, J. C. Aerts, M. De Ruiter, and K. Arnbjerg-Nielsen. 2022. Assessing the recreational value of small-scale nature-based solutions when planning urban flood adaptation. Journal of Environmental Management 320:115724. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, V. K., and Y. Kaoru. 1986. Modeling recreation demand within a random utility framework. Economics Letters 22 (4):395–9. doi:10.1016/0165-1765(86)90105-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn, W., H. W. Kim, J. H. Kim, and M. H. Li. 2020. The capitalized amenity of green infrastructure in single-family housing values: An application of the spatial hedonic pricing method. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 49:126643. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soler, I. P., and G. Gemar. 2018. Hedonic price models with geographically weighted regression: An application to hospitality. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 9:126–37. doi:10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stedman, R., B. L. Amsden, and L. Kruger. 2006. Sense of place and community: Points of intersection with implications for leisure research. Leisure/Loisir 30 (2):393–404. doi:10.1080/14927713.2006.9651360.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, T. V., C. B. Denny, and L. A. Pennisi. 2003. Using visitors’ motivations to provide learning opportunities at water-based recreation areas. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 11 (5):404–25. doi:10.1080/09669580308667213.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, H. M. 2021. (eds.). A case for amenity-driven growth? The value of lake amenities and industrial disamenities in the great lakes region. In Measuring Amenities and Disamenities in the Housing Market: Applications of the Hedonic Method, ed. Randall Jackson, WVU Research Repository, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Stock, J. H., and M. W. Watson. 2008. Heteroskedasticity‐robust standard errors for fixed effects panel data regression. Econometrica 76 (1):155–74. doi:10.1111/j.0012-9682.2008.00821.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, L. O. 2017. Hedonics. In A primer on nonmarket valuation: The economics of non-market goods and resources, eds., Champ, P., Boyle, K., Brown, T., Volume 13. Dordrecht: Springe. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7104-8_7
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, L. O. 2008. Theoretical foundations and empirical developments in hedonic modeling. In Hedonic methods in housing markets, ed. Baranzini, A., Ramirez, J., Schaerer, C., Thalmann, P. New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-76815-1_2.
   Google Scholar
• Thur, S. M. 2010. User fees as sustainable financing mechanisms for marine protected areas: An application to the Bonaire National Marine Park. Marine Policy 34 (1):63–9. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2009.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torabi, S. A., and A. Koocheki. 2019. Modeling spatial and temporal distribution of recreational ecosystem services of forests using GIS and hedonic pricing method: A case study in Kelardasht forests, Iran. Forest Policy and Economics 109:101989.
   Google Scholar
• Troy, A., and J. M. Grove. 2008. Property values, parks, and crime: A hedonic analysis in Baltimore, MD. Landscape and Urban Planning 87 (3):233–45. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuttle, C. M., and M. D. Heintzelman. 2015. A loon on every lake: A hedonic analysis of lake water quality in the Adirondacks. Resource and Energy Economics 39:1–15. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2014.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Bureau of Economic Analysis. 2020. Accessed July 19, 2022. https://data.census.gov/cedsci/.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, D.,. R. Siber, R. Brouwer, I. Logar, and D. Sanadgol. 2016. Valuing water resources in Switzerland using a hedonic price model. Water Resources Research 52 (5):3510–26. doi:10.1002/2015WR017534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, S., B. B. Boley, N. Palardy, and C. J. Gaither. 2017. The impact of urban greenways on residential concerns: Findings from the Atlanta BeltLine Trail. Landscape and Urban Planning 167:147–56. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.06.009.
   Google Scholar
• Willi, K., and J. Back. 2018. Evaluation of state water quality assessments and the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, 112. Washington, DC: Interagency Wild and Scenic Rivers Coordinating Council.
   Google Scholar
• Woolridge, J. M. 1992. Some alternatives to the box-cox regression model. International Economic Review 33 (4):935–55. doi:10.2307/2527151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C., Y. Du, S. Li, P. Liu, and X. Ye. 2022. Does visual contact with green space impact housing prices? An integrated approach of machine learning and hedonic modeling based on the perception of green space. Land Use Policy 115:106048. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlami, V.,. J. Danek, S. Zogaris, E. Gallou, I. P. Kokkoris, G. Kehayias, and P. Dimopoulos. 2020. Residents’ views on landscape and ecosystem services during a wind farm proposal in an island protected area. Sustainability 12 (6):2442. doi:10.3390/su12062442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xian, G., M. Crane, and J. Su. 2007. An analysis of urban development and its environmental impact on the Tampa Bay watershed. Journal of Environmental Management 85 (4):965–76.   doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaradic, P. A., O. R. Pergams, and P. Kareiva. 2009. The impact of nature experience on willingness to support conservation. PLoS One 4 (10):e7367. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., X. Xiao, R. Cao, C. Zheng, Y. Guo, W. Gong, and Z. Wei. 2020. How important is community participation to eco-environmental conservation in protected areas? From the perspective of predicting locals’ pro-environmental behaviours. The Science of the Total Environment 739:139889. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, D., Y. Tian, and G. Jiang. 2018. Spatio-temporal investigation of the interactive relationship between urbanization and ecosystem services: Case study of the Jingjinji urban agglomeration, China. Ecological Indicators 95:152–64. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zygmunt, R., and M. Gluszak. 2015. Forest proximity impact on underdeveloped land values: A spatial hedonic study. Forest Policy and Economics 50:82–9. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2014.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar