Drilling Setbacks vs Government Takings: The Case of Colorado’s 2018 Colorado Ballot Initiatives

References

• Akerlof, K., R. DeBono, P. Berry, A. Leiserowitz, C. Roser-Renouf, K. L. Clarke, A. Rogaeva, M. C. Nisbet, M. R. Weathers, and E. W. Maibach. 2010. Public perceptions of climate change as a human health risk: Surveys of the United States, Canada and Malta. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 7 (6):2559–606. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7062559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht, D. 2004. Amenities, natural resources, economic restructuring, and socioeconomic outcomes in nonmetropolitan America. Community Development 35 (2):36–52. doi: 10.1080/15575330409490131.
   Google Scholar
• Alcorn, J., J. Rupp, and J. D. Graham. 2017. Attitudes toward “fracking”: Perceived and actual geographic proximity. Review of Policy Research 34 (4):504–36. doi: 10.1111/ropr.12234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson-Hudson, J., W. Knight, M. Humphrey, and S. O’Hara. 2016. Exploring support for shale gas extraction in the United Kingdom. Energy Policy 98:582–9. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere, S., and D. M. Konisky. 2009. Public attitudes toward construction of new power plants. Public Opinion Quarterly 73 (3):566–77. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfp041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballotpedia. 2018a. Colorado Proposition 112, minimum distance requirements for new oil, gas, and fracking projects initiative (2018). https://ballotpedia.org/Colorado_Proposition_112,_Minimum_Distance_Requirements_for_New_Oil,_Gas,_and_Fracking_Projects_Initiative_(2018) (accessed March 21, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Ballotpedia. 2018b. Colorado Amendment 74, compensation to owners for decreased property value due to state regulation initiative (2018). https://ballotpedia.org/Colorado_Amendment_74,_Compensation_to_Owners_for_Decreased_Property_Value_Due_to_State_Regulation_Initiative_(2018) (accessed March 22, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Barth, J. M. 2013. The economic impact of shale gas development on state and local economies: Benefits, costs, and uncertainties. New Solutions 23 (1):85–101. doi: 10.2190/NS.23.1.f.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boudet, H. S., C. M. Zanocco, P. D. Howe, and C. E. Clarke. 2018. The effect of geographic proximity to unconventional oil and gas development on public support for hydraulic fracturing. Risk Analysis 38 (9):1871–90. doi: 10.1111/risa.12989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudet, H., C. Clarke, D. Bugden, E. Maibach, C. Roser-Renouf, and A. Leiserowitz. 2014. Fracking” controversy and communication: Using national survey data to understand public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing. Energy Policy 65:57–67. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudet, H., D. Bugden, C. Zanocco, and E. Maibach. 2016. The effect of industry activities on public support for ‘fracking. Environmental Politics 25 (4):593–612. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2016.1153771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, S. D., S. Zahran, H. Grover, and A. Vedlitz. 2008. A spatial analysis of local climate change policy in the United States: Risk, stress, and opportunity. Landscape and Urban Planning 87 (1):33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). 2018. Personal income and employment. https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?reqid=70&step=1&acrdn=6 (accessed November 12, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Economic Analysis [BEA]. 2018. Personal income and employment. https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?reqid=70&step=1&acrdn=6 (accessed November 12, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, C. E., D. Bugden, P. S. Hart, R. C. Stedman, J. B. Jacquet, D. T. Evensen, and H. S. Boudet. 2016. How geographic distance and political ideology interact to influence public perception of unconventional oil/natural gas development. Energy Policy 97:301–9. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, C. E., P. S. Hart, J. P. Schuldt, D. T. Evensen, H. S. Boudet, J. B. Jacquet, and R. C. Stedman. 2015. Public opinion on energy development: The interplay of issue framing, top-of-mind associations, and political ideology. Energy Policy 81:131–40. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colorado Department of Local Affairs. 2020a. State demographic office data. https://demography.dola.colorado.gov/data/ (accessed November 12, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Colorado Department of Local Affairs. 2020b. Population, population change, 2020. https://demography.dola.colorado.gov/economy-labor-force/data/ (accessed November 12, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Colorado Legislative Bluebook. 2018a. Proposition 112 increased setback requirement for oil and natural gas development. https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/2018_english_final_for_internet_updated_language_73_0.pdf (accessed November 12, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Colorado Legislative Bluebook. 2018b. Amendment 74 compensation for reduction in fair market value by government law or regulation. https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/2018_english_final_for_internet_updated_language_73_0.pdf (accessed November 12, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Colorado Municipal League. 2018. Amendment 74 introductory memo. https://www.cogs.us/DocumentCenter/View/4516/am74-packet (accessed November 12, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC). 2020. How to search the COGCC database for spills/releases & remediations. https://ecmc.state.co.us/documents/about/COGIS_Help/COGCC_Incident_Search_Help_20200910.pdf (accessed November 17, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Colorado Secretary of State. 2016. County level returns for 2016 presidential ballot. https://historicalelectiondata.coloradosos.gov/eng/ (accessed on November 12, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Colorado Secretary of State. 2018. County level returns for Proposition 112 and Amendment 74. https://historicalelectiondata.coloradosos.gov/eng/ (accessed November 12, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, M. A., and D. H. Anderson. 2005. Getting from sense of place to place-based management: An interpretive investigation of place meanings and perceptions of landscape change. Society & Natural Resources 18 (7):625–41. doi: 10.1080/08941920590959613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. 2012. The politics of “fracking”: Regulating natural gas drilling practices in Colorado and Texas. Review of Policy Research 29 (2):177–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2011.00547.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. 2014. Substate federalism and fracking policies: Does state regulatory authority trump local land use autonomy? Environmental Science & Technology 48 (15):8397–403. doi: 10.1021/es405095y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C., and J. M. Fisk. 2014. Energy abundance or environmental worries? Analyzing public support for fracking in the United States. Review of Policy Research 31 (1):1–16. doi: 10.1111/ropr.12048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine‐Wright, P. 2005. Beyond NIMBYism: Towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy 8 (2):125–39. doi: 10.1002/we.124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine‐Wright, P. 2009. Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place‐protective action. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 19 (6):426–41. doi: 10.1002/casp.1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuVivier, K. K., and T. Witt. 2017. NIMBY to NOPE—Or YESS? Cardozo Law Review 38 (4):1453–504.
   Google Scholar
• Energy Information Administration [EIA]. 2023. Where our oil comes from? https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/oil-and-petroleum-products/where-our-oil-comes-from.php (accessed October 20, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Evensen, D. T., C. E. Clarke, and R. C. Stedman. 2014. A New York or Pennsylvania state of mind: social representations in newspaper coverage of gas development in the Marcellus Shale. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 4 (1):65–77. doi: 10.1007/s13412-013-0153-9.
   Google Scholar
• Evensen, D., J. B. Jacquet, C. E. Clarke, and R. C. Stedman. 2014. What’s the ‘fracking’problem? One word can’t say it all. The Extractive Industries and Society 1 (2):130–6. doi: 10.1016/j.exis.2014.06.004.
   Google Scholar
• Evensen, D., R. Stedman, S. O’Hara, M. Humphrey, and J. Andersson-Hudson. 2017. Variation in beliefs about ‘fracking’ between the UK and US. Environmental Research Letters 12 (12):124004. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa8f7e.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firestone, J., and H. Kirk. 2019. A strong relative preference for wind turbines in the United States among those who live near them. Nature Energy 4 (4):311–20. doi: 10.1038/s41560-019-0347-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisk, J. M. 2017. The fracking debate: Intergovernmental politics of the oil and gas renaissance, 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fisk, J. M., A. J. Good, and S. Nelson. 2017. Fueling the boom or smothering it? Examining oil and gas policy differences across the states. The Extractive Industries and Society 4 (4):869–74. doi: 10.1016/j.exis.2017.09.005.
   Google Scholar
• Fisk, J. M., S. Jordan, and A. J. Good. 2022. The shale renaissance: How fracking changed Pennsylvania in the 21st century. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisk, J. M., Y. Park, and Z. Mahafza. 2017. Fractivism” in the city: Assessing defiance at the neighborhood level. State and Local Government Review 49 (2):105–16. doi: 10.1177/0160323X17720712.
   Google Scholar
• Flora, C. B., and J. L. Flora. 2008. Rural communities: Legacy and change. 3rd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fotheringham, A. S., W. Yang, and W. Kang. 2017. Multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR). Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107 (6):1247–65. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2017.1352480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotheringham, A. S., Z. Li, and L. J. Wolf. 2021. Scale, context, and heterogeneity: A spatial analytical perspective on the 2016 US presidential election. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 111 (6):1602–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordono, L. S., H. S. Boudet, A. Karmazina, C. L. Taylor, and B. S. Steel. 2018. Opposition “overblown”? Community response to wind energy siting in the Western United States. Energy Research & Social Science 43:119–31. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravelle, T. B., and E. Lachapelle. 2015. Politics, proximity and the pipeline: Mapping public attitudes toward Keystone XL. Energy Policy 83:99–108. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greider, T., and L. Garkovich. 1994. Landscapes: The social construction of nature and the natural environment. Rural Sociology 59 (1):1–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1994.tb00519.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, C. 2007. Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance. Energy Policy 35 (5):2727–36. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbard, M., and J. Madsen. 2003. Environmental resistance to place-based collaboration in the US West. Society & Natural Resources 16 (8):703–18. doi: 10.1080/08941920309194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, E. L., C. D. Wirz, D. Brossard, D. A. Scheufele, and M. A. Xenos. 2019. Seeing through risk-colored glasses: Risk and benefit perceptions, knowledge, and the politics of fracking in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science 55:168–78. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2019.05.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, S. C., S. L. Lo, and Y. C. Lin. 2013. Application of a fuzzy cognitive map based on a structural equation model for the identification of limitations to the development of wind power. Energy Policy 63:851–61. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurst, Z., and U. Kreuter. 2021. Place-based identities of landowners: Implications for wildlife conservation. Society & Natural Resources 34 (5):659–80. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2020.1871143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquet, J. B. 2012. Landowner attitudes toward natural gas and wind farm development in northern Pennsylvania. Energy Policy 50:677–88. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquet, J. B. 2014. Review of risks to communities from shale energy development. Environmental Science & Technology 48 (15):8321–33. doi: 10.1021/es404647x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, H., C. L. Silva, M. C. Nowlin, and G. deLozier. 2009. Reevaluating NIMBY: Evolving public fear and acceptance in siting a nuclear waste facility. http://www.ipd.gu.se/digitalAssets/1291/1291660_Jenkins-Smith__paper_.pdf. (accessed November 18, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Jerolmack, C., and E. T. Walker. 2018. Please in my backyard: Quiet mobilization in support of fracking in an Appalachian community. American Journal of Sociology 124 (2):479–516. doi: 10.1086/698215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junod, A. N., and J. B. Jacquet. 2019. Shale gas in coal country: Testing the Goldilocks Zone of energy impacts in the western Appalachian range. Energy Research & Social Science 55:155–67. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2019.04.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keske, C. M., R. P. Bixler, C. T. Bastian, and J. E. Cross. 2017. Are population and land use changes perceived as threats to sense of place in the New West? A multilevel modeling approach. Rural Sociology 82 (2):263–90. doi: 10.1111/ruso.12121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G. 1996. Why context should not count. Political Geography 15 (2):159–64. doi: 10.1016/0962-6298(95)00079-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konisky, D. M. 2018. The greening of Christianity? A study of environmental attitudes over time. Environmental Politics 27 (2):267–91. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2017.1416903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konisky, D. M., S. Ansolabehere, and S. Carley. 2020. Proximity, NIMBYism, and public support for energy infrastructure. Public Opinion Quarterly 84 (2):391–418. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfaa025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesky, J., B. D. Goldstein, K. Zell, and S. Beach. 2013. Differing opinions about natural gas drilling in two adjacent counties with different levels of drilling activity. Energy Policy 58:228–36. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kudryavtsev, A., R. C. Stedman, and M. E. Krasny. 2012. Sense of place in environmental education. Environmental Education Research 18 (2):229–50. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2011.609615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, L. R., C. B. Cooper, R. C. Stedman, D. J. Decker, and R. J. Gagnon. 2018. Place-based pathways to proenvironmental behavior: Empirical evidence for a conservation–recreation model. Society & Natural Resources 31 (8):871–91. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2018.1447714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A., and K. Akerlof. 2010. Race, ethnicity and public responses to climate change. https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/2010_04_Race-Ethnicity-and-Public-Responses-to-Climate-Change.pdf (accessed December 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Li, Z., and A. S. Fotheringham. 2022. The spatial and temporal dynamics of voter preference determinants in four US presidential elections (2008–2020). Transactions in GIS 26 (3):1609–28. doi: 10.1111/tgis.12880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., T. Oshan, A. S. Fotheringham, W. Kang, L. Wolf, H. Yu, M. Sachdeva, and S. Bardin. 2020. MGWR version: 2.2.1. Tempe, AZ: Spatial Analysis Research Center (SPARC), Arizona State University. https://sgsup.asu.edu/sparc/multiscale-gwr. (accessed December 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Little, R. L., and S. B. Lovejoy. 1979. Energy development and local employment. Social Science Journal 16 (2):27–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lybecker, D. 2020. The old west, the new west, and the next west? In The environmental politics and policy of western public lands, eds. Erika Allen Wolters and Brent Steel. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahafza, Z., J. M. Fisk, and D. P. Adams. 2021. Crude contempt: Examining local pushback to oil and gas development in California. Politics & Policy 49 (2):479–501. doi: 10.1111/polp.12401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malin, S. A. 2014. There’s no real choice but to sign: Neoliberalization and normalization of hydraulic fracturing on Pennsylvania farmland. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 4 (1):17–27. doi: 10.1007/s13412-013-0115-2.
   Google Scholar
• Malin, S. A., and K. T. DeMaster. 2016. A devil’s bargain: Rural environmental injustices and hydraulic fracturing on Pennsylvania’s farms. Journal of Rural Studies 47:278–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.12.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malin, S. A., and S. S. Ryder. 2023. “A rigged process from the beginning:” Power and procedural injustice within the Colorado Oil and Gas Task Force. Sociological Forum 38 (2):324–51. doi: 10.1111/socf.12883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malin, S. A., S. S. Ryder, and P. M. Hall. 2018. Contested Colorado: Shifting regulations and public responses to unconventional oil production in the Niobrara Shale Region. In Fractured communities: Risk, impacts, and protest against hydraulic fracturing in US Shale regions, ed. A. Ladd, 198–223. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malin, S. A., T. Opsal, T. O’Connor Shelley, and P. M. Hall. 2019. The right to resist or a case of injustice? Meta-power in the oil and gas fields. Social Forces 97 (4):1811–38. doi: 10.1093/sf/soy094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, A. 2018. Community economic identity and colliding treadmills in oil and gas governance. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 8 (1):1–12. doi: 10.1007/s13412-017-0435-8.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, A. 2019. Scalar controversies in oil and gas governance: Perspectives on who should regulate the oil and gas industry from policy actors in Colorado and Utah. The Extractive Industries and Society 6 (1):94–102. doi: 10.1016/j.exis.2018.06.008.
   Google Scholar
• McGranahan, D. 1999. Natural amenities drive rural population change. https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/41047/13201_aer781.pdf?v=0#:∼:text=Population%20change%20in%20rural%20counties,ponds%2C%20lakes%2C%20and%20shoreline (accessed November 18, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• McGranahan, D. A., T. R. Wojan, and D. M. Lambert. 2011. The rural growth trifecta: Outdoor amenities, creative class and entrepreneurial context. Journal of Economic Geography 11 (3):529–57. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbq007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaud, K., J. E. Carlisle, and E. R. Smith. 2008. Nimbyism vs. environmentalism in attitudes toward energy development. Environmental Politics 17 (1):20–39. doi: 10.1080/09644010701811459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, J. C., W. A. Gibson, W. M. Leavitt, and S. C. Jones. 2013. The case for grassroots collaboration: Social capital and ecosystem restoration at the local level. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K., K. Stone, E. S. Cameron, L. Strand, C. Combs, A. Khan, and M. Ungar. 2022. “Steeped in oil”: The socio-psychological factors and processes that influence community members’ attitudes toward economic diversification in an oil and gas-producing community. Society & Natural Resources 35 (9):936–54. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2022.2081999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, T. A., E. W. Maibach, C. Roser-Renouf, K. Akerlof, and A. A. Leiserowitz. 2013. The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming. Nature Climate Change 3 (4):343–7. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson-Crotty, S., and K. J. Meier. 2002. Size doesn’t matter: In defense of single-state studies. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 2 (4):411–22. doi: 10.1177/153244000200200405.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hara, S., M. Humphrey, J. Andersson-Hudson, and W. Knight. 2015. Public perception of shale gas extraction in the UK: Two years on from the Balcombe protests. https://www.bettersociety.net/images/Public%20Perceptions%20of%20shale%20gas%20in%20the%20UK%20sept131015MH.WK.JA-H.pdf (accessed December 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Oshan, T. M., Z. Li, W. Kang, L. J. Wolf, and A. S. Fotheringham. 2019. MGWR: A Python implementation of multiscale geographically weighted regression for investigating process spatial heterogeneity and scale. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 8 (6):269. doi: 10.3390/ijgi8060269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podeschi, C. W., J. C. Brunskill, and G. L. Theodori. 2021. Fracking boomtowns? Proximity, intensity, and perceptions of shale gas extraction in Hughesville and Jersey Shore, Pennsylvania. Energy Research & Social Science 81:102250. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raimi, D., A. Krupnick, and M. Bazilian. 2020. Partisanship and proximity predict opposition to fracking in Colorado. Energy Research & Social Science 64:101441. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly, S., and S. Richey. 2011. Ballot question readability and roll-off: The impact of language complexity. Political Research Quarterly 64 (1):59–67. doi: 10.1177/1065912909349629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renaud, T. 2020. Summary of the law of “takings.” https://www.friscogov.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/DOCS-479543-Frisco-Planning-Commission-re-Summary-of-Law-of-Takings.pdf. (accessed December 3, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Ryder, S. S. 2019. Multiscalar power, conflict and procedural justice in regulating Colorado’s unconventional oil and gas development. PhD Diss., Colorado State University.
   Google Scholar
• Ryder, S. S., and P. Devine-Wright. 2022. Environmental justice implications and conceptual advancements: community experiences of proposed shale gas exploration in the UK. Environmental Politics 31 (7):1161–81. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2021.1996728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryder, S. S., and P. M. Hall. 2017. This land is your land, maybe: A historical institutionalist analysis for contextualizing split estate conflicts in US unconventional oil and gas development. Land Use Policy 63:149–59. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryder, S. S., and S. A. Malin. 2021. Mechanisms of metapower and procedural injustices in the Colorado Oil and Gas Task Force decision-making process. Critical Policy Studies 15 (4):462–85. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2021.1895855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryser, L., and G. Halseth. 2011. Housing costs in an oil and gas boom town: Issues for low-income senior women living alone. Journal of Housing for the Elderly 25 (3):306–25. doi: 10.1080/02763893.2011.595618.
   Google Scholar
• Scannell, L., and R. Gifford. 2013. Personally relevant climate change: The role of place attachment and local versus global message framing in engagement. Environment and Behavior 45 (1):60–85. doi: 10.1177/0013916511421196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafft, K. A., Y. Borlu, and L. Glenna. 2013. The relationship between Marcellus Shale Gas development in Pennsylvania and local perceptions of risk and opportunity. Rural Sociology 78 (2):143–66. doi: 10.1111/ruso.12004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stedman, R. C. 2003. Is it really just a social construction?: The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place. Society & Natural Resources 16 (8):671–85. doi: 10.1080/08941920309189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoutenborough, J. W., S. E. Robinson, and A. Vedlitz. 2016. Is “fracking” a new dirty word? The influence of word choice on public views toward natural gas attitudes. Energy Research & Social Science 17:52–8. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2016.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Horst, D. 2007. NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies. Energy Policy 35 (5):2705–14. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenstra, A. S., B. A. Lyons, and A. Fowler-Dawson. 2016. Conservatism vs. conservationism: Differential influences of social identities on beliefs about fracking. Environmental Communication 10 (3):322–36. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2015.1127851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venables, D., N. F. Pidgeon, K. A. Parkhill, K. L. Henwood, and P. Simmons. 2012. Living with nuclear power: Sense of place, proximity, and risk perceptions in local host communities. Journal of Environmental Psychology 32 (4):371–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, C., S. Ryder, J. P. Roux, Z. Chateau, and P. Devine-Wright. 2023. Contested scales of democratic decision-making and procedural justice in energy transitions. In Energy democracies for sustainable futures, eds. M. Nadesan, M. J. Pasqualetti, and J. Keahey, 317–26. London: Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willits, F. K., G. L. Theodori, and A. E. Luloff. 2016. Self-reported familiarity of hydraulic fracturing and support for natural gas drilling: Substantive and methodological considerations. Journal of Rural Social Sciences 31 (1):83–101.
   Google Scholar
• Zanocco, C., H. Boudet, C. E. Clarke, R. Stedman, and D. Evensen. 2020. NIMBY, YIMBY, or something else? Geographies of public perceptions of shale gas development in the Marcellus Shale. Environmental Research Letters 15 (7):074039. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab7d01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar