The Link Between Social-Ecological Network Fit and Outcomes: A Rare Empirical Assessment of a Prominent Hypothesis

References

• Angst, M., & Seppelt, T. (2020). Motifr: Motif Analysis in Multi-Level Networks. R package.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, M. L., L. Jasny, A. Bauman, J. Ben, R. Berardo, Ö. Bodin, J. Cinner, D. A. Feary, A. M. Guerrero, F. A. Januchowski‐Hartley, et al. 2022. Bunkering down’: How one community is tightening social‐ecological network structures in the face of global change. People and Nature 4 (4):1032–48. doi:10.1002/pan3.10364.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, M. L., Ö. Bodin, T. R. McClanahan, J. N. Kittinger, A. S. Hoey, O. G. Gaoue, and N. A. J. Graham. 2019. Social-ecological alignment and ecological conditions in coral reefs. Nature Communications 10 (1):2039. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09994-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berardo, R. 2014. The evolution of self-organizing communication networks in high-risk social-ecological systems. International Journal of the Commons 8 (1):236–58. doi:10.18352/ijc.463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berardo, R., and J. T. Scholz. 2010. Self-organizing policy networks: risk, partner selection, and cooperation in estuaries. American Journal of Political Science 54 (3):632–49. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00451.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergsten, A., D. Galafassi, and Ö. Bodin. 2014. The problem of spatial fit in social-ecological systems: Detecting mismatches between ecological connectivity and land management in an urban region. Ecology and Society 19 (4):22. doi:10.5751/ES-06931-190406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodin, Ö., A. M. Guerrero, D. Nohrstedt, J. Baird, R. Summers, R. Plummer, and L. Jasny. 2022. Choose your collaborators wisely: Addressing interdependent tasks through collaboration in responding to wildfire disasters. Public Administration Review 82 (6):1154–67. doi:10.1111/puar.13518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodin, Ö., and M. Tengö. 2012. Disentangling intangible social-ecological systems. Global Environmental Change 22 (2):430–9. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodin, Ö., B. Crona, M. Thyresson, A. L. Golz, and M. Tengö. 2014. Conservation success as a function of good alignment of social and ecological structures and processes. Conservation Biology 28 (5):1371–9. doi:10.1111/cobi.12306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodin, Ö., G. Robins, R. R. J. McAllister, A. M. Guerrero, B. Crona, M. Tengö, and M. Lubell. 2016. Theorizing benefits and constraints in collaborative environmental governance: a transdisciplinary social-ecological network approach for empirical investigations. Ecology and Society 21 (1), 14. doi:10.5751/ES-08368-210140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodin, Ö., S. M. Alexander, J. Baggio, M. L. Barnes, R. Berardo, G. S. Cumming, L. E. Dee, A. P. Fischer, M. Fischer, M. Mancilla Garcia, et al. 2019. Improving network approaches to the study of complex social–ecological interdependencies. Nature Sustainability 2 (7):551–9. doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0308-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, S. P., and A. Gelman. 1998. General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 7 (4):434–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burch, S., A. Gupta, C. Y. A. Inoue, A. Kalfagianni, Å. Persson, A. K. Gerlak, A. Ishii, J. Patterson, J. Pickering, M. Scobie, et al. 2019. New directions in earth system governance research. Earth System Governance 1:100006. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2019.100006.
   Google Scholar
• Bürkner, P.-C. 2018. Advanced Bayesian multilevel modeling with the R package brms. The R Journal 10 (1):395–411. doi:10.32614/RJ-2018-017.
   Google Scholar
• Bürkner, P.-C., and M. Vuorre. 2019. Ordinal regression models in psychology: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 2 (1):77–101. doi:10.1177/2515245918823199.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, L. G., and A. C. Sandström. 2007. Network governance of the commons. International Journal of the Commons 2 (1):33–54. doi:10.18352/ijc.20.
   Google Scholar
• Cebrián-Piqueras, M., L. Karrasch, and M. Kleyer. 2017. Coupling stakeholder assessments of ecosystem services with biophysical ecosystem properties reveals importance of social contexts. Ecosystem Services 23:108–15. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, G., J. Pittman, S. M. Alexander, S. Berdej, T. Dyck, U. Kreitmair, K. J. Rathwell, S. Villamayor-Tomas, J. Vogt, and D. Armitage. 2015. Institutional fit and the sustainability of social-ecological systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14:34–40. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felipe-Lucia, M. R., A. M. Guerrero, S. M. Alexander, J. Ashander, J. A. Baggio, M. L. Barnes, Ö. Bodin, A. Bonn, M. J. Fortin, R. S. Friedman, et al. 2022. Conceptualizing ecosystem services using social–ecological networks. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 37 (3):211–22. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2021.11.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke, C., L. Pritchard, F. Berkes, J. Colding, and U. Svedin. 2007. The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions: Ten years later. Ecology and Society 12 (1):30–30. doi:10.5751/ES-02064-120130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., A. Jakulin, M. G. Pittau, and Y.-S. Su. 2008. A weakly informative default prior distribution for logistic and other regression models. The Annals of Applied Statistics 2 (4):1360–83. doi:10.1214/08-AOAS191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero, A. M., Ö. Bodin, R. R. J. McAllister, and K. A. Wilson. 2015. Achieving social-ecological fit through bottom-up collaborative governance: An empirical investigation. Ecology and Society 20 (4), 14. doi:10.5751/ES-08035-200441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haller, T., G. Fokou, G. Mbeyale, and P. Meroka. 2013. How fit turns into misfit and back: Institutional transformations of pastoral commons in African floodplains. Ecology and Society 18 (1):16. doi:10.5751/ES-05510-180134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedlund, J., Ö. Bodin, and D. Nohrstedt. 2021. Assessing Policy Issue Interdependencies in Environmental Governance. International Journal of the Commons 15 (1):82. doi:10.5334/ijc.1060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, K., and K. G. Provan. 2007. Structural embeddedness and organizational social outcomes in a centrally governed mental health services network. Public Management Review 9 (2):169–89. doi:10.1080/14719030701340218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, M. N. 2022. How the qualities of actor-issue interdependencies influence collaboration patterns. Ecology and Society 27 (4):14. doi:10.5751/ES-13536-270406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, M. N., M. Angst, and M. Fischer. 2022. Multi-level network dataset of ten Swiss wetlands governance cases based on qualitative interviews and quantitative surveys. Data in Brief 43:108401. doi:10.1016/j.dib.2022.108401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluger, L. C., P. Gorris, S. Kochalski, M. S. Mueller, and G. Romagnoni. 2020. Studying human–nature relationships through a network lens: A systematic review. People and Nature 2 (4):1100–16. doi:10.1002/pan3.10136.
   Google Scholar
• Kruschke, J. 2014. Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan Burlington: Elsevier Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kruschke, J. K. 2021. Bayesian analysis reporting guidelines. Nature Human Behaviour 5 (10):1282–91. doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01177-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebel, L., E. Nikitina, C. Pahl-Wostl, and C. Knieper. 2013. Institutional fit and river basin governance: A new approach using multiple composite measures. Ecology and Society 18 (1), 1. doi:10.5751/ES-05097-180101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomi, A., G. Robins, and M. Tranmer. 2016. Introduction to multilevel social networks. Social Networks 44 (44):266–8. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2015.10.006.
   Google Scholar
• Lubell, M. 2013. Governing institutional complexity: The ecology of games framework. Policy Studies Journal 41 (3):537–59. doi:10.1111/psj.12028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., and T. H. Morrison. 2021. Institutional navigation for polycentric sustainability governance. Nature Sustainability 4 (8):664–71. doi:10.1038/s41893-021-00707-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., J. Scholz, R. Berardo, and G. Robins. 2012. Testing Policy Theory with Statistical Models of Networks. Policy Studies Journal 40 (3):351–74. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00457.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwell, G., P. E. Oliver, and R. Prahl. 1988. Social networks and collective action: A theory of the critical mass. III. American Journal of Sociology 94 (3):502–34. doi:10.1086/229028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, R. R., B. M. Taylor, and B. P. Harman. 2015. Partnership networks for urban development: how structure is shaped by risk. Policy Studies Journal 43 (3):379–98. doi:10.1111/psj.12103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller-Wenk, R., F. Huber, N. Kuhn, and, and A. Peter. 2003. Landnutzung in potenziellen Fliessgewässer-Auen – Artengefährdung und Ökobilanzen. Bern: Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft (BUWAL).
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons – The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2007. A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (39):15181–7. doi:10.1073/pnas.0702288104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2007. Institutional rational choice: an assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework theories of the policy process. In Theories of the policy process, ed. P. Sabatier. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pitt, S. C., T. A. Schwartz, and D. Chu. 2021. AAPOR reporting guidelines for survey studies. JAMA Surgery 156 (8):785–6. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., and P. Kenis. 2007. Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (2):229–52. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Raab, J., R. S. Mannak, and B. Cambre. 2015. Combining structure, governance, and context: A configurational approach to network effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25 (2):479–511. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, W. V., H. A. Mooney, A. Cropper, D. Capistrano, S. R. Carpenter, K. Chopra, P. Dasgupta, T. Dietz, A. K. Duraiappah, and R. Hassan. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being-synthesis: A report of the millennium ecosystem assessment. Washington: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, J. R., A. M. Guerrero, Ö. Bodin, and I. Chadès. 2020. Fundamental insights on when social network data are most critical for conservation planning. Conservation Biology 34 (6):1463–72. doi:10.1111/cobi.13500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, G., J. M. Lewis, and P. Wang. 2012. Statistical Network analysis for analyzing policy networks. Policy Studies Journal 40 (3):375–401. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00458.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayles, J. S., M. Mancilla Garcia, M. Hamilton, S. M. Alexander, J. A. Baggio, A. P. Fischer, K. Ingold, G. R. Meredith, and J. Pittman. 2019. Social-ecological network analysis for sustainability sciences: a systematic review and innovative research agenda for the future. Environmental Research Letters 14 (9):1–18. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab2619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, T. A., and C. W. Thomas. 2017. Winners and losers in the ecology of games: Network position, connectivity, and the benefits of collaborative governance regimes. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 27 (4):647–60. doi:10.1093/jopart/mux009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, T. A., and N. Ulibarri. 2019. Taking network analysis seriously: Methodological improvements for governance network scholarship. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 2 (2):89–101. doi:10.1093/ppmgov/gvy011.
   Google Scholar
• Van Meerkerk, I., J. Edelenbos, and E.-H. Klijn. 2015. Connective management and governance network performance: the mediating role of throughput legitimacy. Findings from survey research on complex water projects in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning C 33 (4):746–64. doi:10.1068/c1345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, J. T. A. 2014. Wetlands in Europe: Perspectives for restoration of a lost paradise. Ecological Engineering 66:6–9. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltner-Toews, D., J. J. Kay, and N.-M E. Lister. 2008. The ecosystem approach: Complexity, uncertainty, and managing for sustainability. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., and K. Faust. 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. United States of America: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Widmer, A., L. Herzog, A. Moser, and K. Ingold. 2019. Multilevel water quality management in the international rhine catchment area: How to establish social-ecological fit through collaborative governance. Ecology and Society 24 (3):14. doi:10.5751/ES-11087-240327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar