38
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Videoendoscopic Techniques for Collection of Multiple, Serial Intra-Abdominal Biopsy Specimens in HIV-Negative and HIV-Positive Pigtail Macaques(Macaca nemestrina)

Pages 181-195 | Published online: 09 Jul 2009

REFERENCES

  • CFR (Code of Federal Regulations), Title 9; parts 1, 2, and 3 (docket no. 89-130). Fed Reg. 54:(168).
  • Institute of Laboratory Resources Commission on Life Sci- ences, National Research Council. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996:61–62.
  • Perret-Gentil MI, Sinanan MN, Dennis MB, et al. Videoen- doscopy: An effective and effcient way to perform mul- tiple visceral biopsies in small animals. J Invest Surg. 1999:12(3).
  • Freeman LJ. Introduction. In: Veterinary Endosurger y. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999:xv–xvii.
  • Wilmore DW. Homeostasis: Bodily changes in trauma and surgery. In: Sabiston DC, Jr., ed. Textbook of Surgery: The Biological Basis of Modern Surgical Practice, 15th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1996:55–67.
  • Bolufer JM, Delgado F, Blanes F, et al. Injury in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1995;5(4):318–323.
  • Ronzoni G, Carli F. Hormonal and metabolic response to trauma: Physiopathology and therapeutic management. Minerva Anestesiol. 1992;58(6):323 –346.
  • Kerbl K, Clayman RV, Petros JA, et al. Staging pelvic lymphadenectom y for prostate cancer: A comparison of laparoscopic and open techniques. J Urol. 1993; 150 (2 Pt 1): 396–398; discussion 399.
  • Kerbl K, Clayman RV, McDougall EM, Urban DA, Gill I, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: Evalua- tion of frst clinical series. Eur Urol. 1993;23(4):431 –436.
  • Kavoussi LR, Sosa E, Channdhok e PS, et al. Complica- tions of laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection. J Urol. 1993;149:322 –325.
  • Operative Laparoscopy Study Group. Postoperative ad- hesion development after operative laparoscopy: Eval- uation at early second-look procedures. Fertil Steril. 1991;55(4):700 –704.
  • Schnepper FW. Sterilization by open laparoscopy in a pri- vate offce. J Am Gynecol Laparosc. 1997;4(4):469–472.
  • Mjaland O, Ræder J, Asboe V, et al. Outpatient laparo- scopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1997;84:958 –961.
  • Harkki-Sire´ n P, Kurki T. A nationwide analysis of laparo- scopic complications. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(1):108 – 112.
  • Kehoe S, Mylotte, MJ. 1000 Consecutive laparoscopies in gynaecological practice. Ir J Med Sci. 1993;162(2):33 –36.
  • Marti´ Vicente A, Garci´a V, Toro H, et al. The accidents and complications of laparoscopy. A review of 8,915 cases. Rev Esp Emferm Dig. 1992;82(6):411 –417.
  • Moore RG, Kavoussi LR, Bloom DA, et al. Postoperative adhesion formation after urological laparoscopy in the pe- diatric population. J Urol. 1995;153:792 –795.
  • Tittel A, Schippers E, Treutner KH, et al. Laparoscopy ver- sus laparotomy. An experimental study comparing for- mation of adhesions in dogs. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1994;379:95 –98.
  • Luciano AA, Maier DB, Koch EI, et al. A comparative study of postoperative adhesions following laser surgery by la- paroscopy versus laparotomy in the rabbit model. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;74(2):220 –224.
  • Jorgensen JO, Lalak NJ, Hunt DR. Is laparoscopy associ- ated with a lower rate of postoperative adhesions than laparotomy? A comparative study in the rabbit. Aust N Z J Surg. 1995;65(5):342 –344.
  • Alpers CE, Davis CL, Barr D, et al. Identifcation of platelet- derived growth factor A and B chains in human renal vas- cular rejection. Am J Pathol. 1996;148(2):439–451.
  • Alpers CE, Hudkins KL, Ferguson M, et al. Platelet-derived growth factor A-chain expression in developing and ma- ture human kidneys and in Wilm’s tumor. Kidney Int. 1995;48:146 –154.
  • Mosier DE. Small animal models for acquired immune defciency syndrome (AIDS) research. Lab Anim Sci. 1996;46(3):257 –265.
  • Schmidt A, McClure J, Hu SL, et al. HIV-2 infection in Macaca nemestrina: A pathogeni c model of AIDS in non- human primates. J Med Primatol. 1994;23:247.
  • Frumkin LR, Agy MB, Coombs RW, et al. Acute Infection of Macaca nemestrina by human immunodefciency virus type 1. Virology. 1993;195(2):422 –431.
  • Maruszynski M, Pojda Z. Interleukin 6 (IL-6) levels in the monitoring of surgical trauma. A comparison of serum IL-6 concentrations in patients treated by cholecystectomy via laparotomy or laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 1995;9:882– 885.
  • Glaser F, Sannwal d GA, Buhr HJ, et al. General stress response to conventional and laparoscopic cholecystec- tomy. Ann Surg. 1995;221(4):372 –380.
  • Kehlet H, Nielsen HJ. Impact of laparoscopic surgery on stress responses, immunofunction, and risk of infec- tious complications. New Horiz. 1998;6(2 suppl): S80–S88.
  • Henderson VJ. Techniques of CO2 pneumoperitoneum. In: Tsoi EKM, Organ CH, eds. Abdominal Access in Open and Laparoscopic Surgery. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1996:27–47.
  • Harmon GD, Senagore AJ, Kilbride MJ, et al. Interleukin-6 response to laparoscopic and open colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37:754–759.
  • Allendorf JD, Bessler M, Whelan RL, et al. Postopera- tive immune function varies inversely with the degree of surgical trauma in a murine model. Surg Endosc. 1997;11(5):427 –430.
  • Branger B, Oules R, Balducchi, et al. Ultrasonically con- tinuously guided renal biopsy. Uremia Invest. 1985– 1986;9(2):297–303.
  • Pagliaro L, Rinaldi F, Craxi A, et al. Percutaneous blind biopsy versus laparoscopy with guided biopsy in diagnosis of cirrhosis. A prospective, randomized trial. Dig Dis Sci. 1983;28(1):39–43.
  • Leuschner U, Leuschner M, Strohm WD, et al. Perito- neoscopy and liver biopsy in the diagnosis of liver disease. Leber Magen Darm. 1981;11(6):245 –250.
  • Gossot D, de Kerviler E, Brice P, et al. Surgical endoscopic techniques in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with lymphoma. Br J Surg. 1998;85(8):1107–1110.
  • Fisher AJ, Paulson EK, Sheafor DH, et al. Small lymph nodes of the abdomen, pelvis, and retroperitoneum: Usefulness of sonographically guided biopsy. Radiology. 1997;205(1):185 –190.
  • Quinn SF, Sheley RC, Nelson HA, et al. The role of per- cutaneous needle biopsies in the original diagnosis of lymphoma: A prospective evaluation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1995;6(6):947–952.
  • Gerberding JL, Lewis FR, Schecter WP. Are universal pre- cautions realistic? Surg Clin North Am. 1995;75(6):1091 – 1104.
  • Puro V, Ranchino M, Profli F. Occupational exposures to blood and risk of HIV transmission in a general hospital (1986–1988). Eur J Epidemiol. 1990;6(1):67–70.
  • Diettrich NA, Kaplan G. Laparoscopic surgery for HIV- infected patients: Minimizing danger s for all concerned. J Laparoendos c Surg. 1991;1(5):295–298.
  • Eubanks S, Newman L, Lucas G. Reduction of HIV trans- mission during operative laparoscopy. Surg Laparosc En- dosc. 1993;3(1):2–5.
  • Ho HS, Gunther RA, Wolfe BM. Intraperitoneal carbon dioxide insufflation and cardiopulmonar y functions. Arch Surg. 1992;127:928 –933.
  • Ho HS, Saunders CJ, Gunther RA, et al. Effector of hemo- dynamics during laparoscopy: CO2 absorption or intra- abdominal pressure? J Surg Res. 1995;59:497 –503.
  • Richardson JD, Trinkle JK. Hemodynamic and respira- tory alterations with increased intra-abdominal pressure. J Surg Res. 1976;20:401 –404.
  • Wolf JS, Stoller ML. The physiology of laparoscopy: Basic principles, complications and other considerations. J Urol. 1994;152:294 –302.
  • Wittgen CM, Andrus CH, Fitzgerald SD, et al. Analysis of the hemodynami c and ventilatory effects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg. 1991;126:997–1001.
  • Liu SY, Leighton T, Davis I, et al. Prospective analysis of car- diopulmonary responses to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendos c Surg. 1991;1(5):241–246.
  • Jorgensen JO, Lalak NJ, North L, et al. Venous stasis dur- ing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994;4(2):128–133.
  • Jorgensen JO, Gillies RB, Lalak NJ, et al. Lower limb venous hemodynamics during laparoscopy: An animal study. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994;4(1):32–35.
  • Safran DB, Orlando R. Physiologic effects of pneumoperi- toneum. Am J Surg. 1994;167:281 –286.
  • Freeman LJ. Complications. In: Veterinary Endosurger y. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1999:92–102.
  • Portilla E, Garc´ia D, Rodr´iguez-Reynoso S, et al. Arterial blood gas changes in New Zealand white rabbits during carbon dioxide-induced pneumoperitoneum. Lab Anim Sci. 1998;48(4):398 –400.
  • Conlin MJ, Skoog SJ. Safe laparoscopic access in pediatric patients. Urology. 1994;44(4):579 –581.
  • Capelout o CC, Kavoussi LR. Complications of laparo- scopic surgery. Urology. 1993;42(1):2–12.
  • Senagore AJ, Kilbride MJ, Luchtefeld MA, et al. Superior nitrogen balance after laparoscopic-assisted colectomy. Ann Surg. 1995;221(2):171 –175.
  • Rogers DA, Lobe TE, Schropp KP. Evolving uses of la- paroscopy in children. Surg Clin North Am. 1992;72(6): 1299–1313.
  • Tittel A, Schippers E, Anurov M, et al. Minor abdominal trauma by laparoscopic surgery? Comparison of adhe- sion formation and intestinal motility after laparoscopic and conventional operations in the dog. Zentralbl-Chir. 1996;121(4):329 –334.
  • Bo¨ hm B, Milsom JW, Fazio VW. Postoperative intestinal motility following conventional and laparoscopic intesti- nal surgery. Arch Surg. 1995;130(4):415 –419.
  • Schippers E, Ottinger AP, Anurov M, et al. Laparo- scopic cholecystectomy: A minor trauma? World J Surg. 1993;17(4):539 –542; discussion 543.
  • Hotokezaka M, Combs MJ, Schirmer BD. Recovery of gas- trointestinal motility following open versus laparoscopic colon resection in dogs. Dig Dis Sci. 1996;41(4):705 –710.
  • Davies W, Kollmorgen CF, Tu QM, et al. Laparoscopic colectomy shortens postoperative ileus in a canine model. Surgery. 1997;121(5):550–555.
  • Orlando R, Lirussi F, Okolicsanyi L. Validity of laparoscopy after abdominal surgery. Endoscopy. 1987;19(4):150 – 152.
  • Veazey RS, DeMaria M, Chalifoux LV, et al. Gastrointestinal tract as a major site of CD4+ T cell depletion and viral repli- cation in SIV infection. Science. 1998;280(5362):427 – 431.
  • Shore EM, Kaplan FS. Tutorial. Molecular biology for the clinician. Part II. Tools of molecular biology. Clin Orthop. 1995;320:247 –278.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.