Sealing of Gastrointestinal Anastomoses with a Fibrin Glue-Coated Collagen Patch: A Safety Study

REFERENCES

• Volpe M, Costi U, Gianferro A, Albano B R, Marcone P, Sbordoni L. [Use of the omental mesh graft in protecting intestinal anastomoses. Experimental research]. Minerva Chir 1991; 46(1–2)41–44
   Google Scholar
• McLachlin A D, Olsson L S, Pitt D F. Anterior anastomosis of the rectosigmoid colon: An experimental study. Surgery 1976; 80(3)306–311
   Google Scholar
• Gulati S M, Thusoo T K, Kakar A, Iyenger B, Pandey K K. Comparative study of free omental, peritoneal, Dacron velour, and Marlex mesh reinforcement of large-bowel anastomosis: An experimental study. Dis Colon Rectum 1982; 25(6)517–521
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pierie J P, de Graaf P W, van Dijk M, Renooij W, van Vroonhoven T J, Obertop H. Improved healing of extraperitoneal intestinal anastomoses in the early phase when surrounded by omentum. Dig Surg 2000; 17(5)487–491
   Google Scholar
• Adams W, Ctercteko G, Bilous M. Effect of an omental wrap on the healing and vascularity of compromised intestinal anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35(8)731–738
   Google Scholar
• Katsikas D, Sechas M, Antypas G, Floudas P, Moshovos K, Gogas J, et al. Beneficial effect of omental wrapping of unsafe intestinal anastomoses. An experimental study in dogs. Int Surg 1977; 62(8)435–437
   Google Scholar
• Smith S R, Swift I, Gompertz H, Baker W N. Abdominoperineal and anterior resection of the rectum with retrocolic omentoplasty and no drainage. Br J Surg 1988; 75(10)1012–1015
   Google Scholar
• Lanter B, Mason R A. Use of omental pedicle graft to protect low anterior colonic anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1979; 22(7)448–451
   Google Scholar
• Agnifili A, Schietroma M, Carloni A, Mattucci S, Caterino G, Lygidakis N J, et al. The value of omentoplasty in protecting colorectal anastomosis from leakage. A prospective randomized study in 126 patients. Hepatogastroenterology 2004; 51(60)1694–1697
   Google Scholar
• Tocchi A, Mazzoni G, Lepre L, Costa G, Liotta G, Agostini N, et al. Prospective evaluation of omentoplasty in preventing leakage of colorectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43(7)951–955
   Google Scholar
• Merad F, Hay J M, Fingerhut A, Flamant Y, Molkhou J M, Laborde Y. Omentoplasty in the prevention of anastomotic leakage after colonic or rectal resection: A prospective randomized study in 712 patients. French Associations for Surgical Research. Ann Surg 1998; 227(2)179–186
   Google Scholar
• Henne-Bruns D, Kreischer H P, Schmiegelow P, Kremer B. Reinforcement of colon anastomoses with polyglycolic acid mesh: An experimental study. Eur Surg Res 1990; 22(4)224–230
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kanellos I, Mantzoros I, Demetriades H, Kalfadis S, Kelpis T, Sakkas L, et al. Healing of colon anastomoses covered with fibrin glue after immediate postoperative intraperitoneal administration of 5-fluorouracil. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47(4)510–515
   Google Scholar
• Moazami N, Oz M C, Bass L S, Treat M R. Reinforcement of colonic anastomoses with a laser and dye-enhanced fibrinogen. Arch Surg. 1990; 125(11)1452–1454
   Google Scholar
• Hjortrup A, Nordkild P, Christensen T, Sjontoft E, Kjaergaard J. Rectal anastomosis with application of luminal fibrin adhesive in the rectum of dogs. An experimental study. Dis Colon Rectum 1989; 32(5)422–425
   Google Scholar
• Byrne D J, Hardy J, Wood R A, McIntosh R, Hopwood D, Cuschieri A. Adverse influence of fibrin sealant on the healing of high-risk sutured colonic anastomoses. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1992; 37(6)394–398
   Google Scholar
• van der Ham A C, Kort W J, Weijma I M, van den Ingh H F, Jeekel H. Healing of ischemic colonic anastomosis: Fibrin sealant does not improve wound healing. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35(9)884–891
   Google Scholar
• Hulkko O A, Haukipuro K A, Laitinen S T. Fibrin glue protection of primary anastomosis in the obstructed left colon. An experimental study on the rat. Acta Chir Scand 1988; 154(1)49–52
   Google Scholar
• Oka H, Harrison R C, Burhenne H J. Effect of a biologic glue on the leakage rate of experimental rectal anastomoses. Am J Surg 1982; 143(5)561–564
   Google Scholar
• Kanellos I, Mantzoros I, Goulimaris I, Zacharakis E, Zavitsanakis A, Betsis D. Effects of the use of fibrin glue around the colonic anastomosis of the rat. Tech Coloproctol 2003; 7(2)82–84
   Google Scholar
• Saclarides T J, Woodard D O, Bapna M, Economou S G. Fibrin glue improves the healing of irradiated bowel anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35(3)249–252
   Google Scholar
• Herget G W, Riede U N, Kassa M, Brethner L, Hasse J. Experimental use of an albumin-glutaraldehyde tissue adhesive for sealing tracheal anastomoses. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2003; 44(1)109–113
   Google Scholar
• Capitan Morales L C, Rodriguez N E, Morales C S, Sanchez G F, Rio Lafuente F D, Cabot O E, et al. Experimental study of sutureless colorectal anastomosis. Hepatogastroenterology 2000; 47(35)1284–1290
   Google Scholar
• Jansson O K, Zilling T L, Walther B S. Healing of colonic anastomoses: comparative experimental study of glued, manually sutured, and stapled anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34(7)557–562
   Google Scholar
• Kjaergaard J, Nordkild P, Sjontoft E, Hjortrup A. Non-sutured fibrin adhesive vs. sutured anastomosis. A comparative intra-individual study in dog colon. Acta Chir Scand 1987; 153(10)599–601
   Google Scholar
• Zilling T L, Jansson O, Walther B S, Ottosson A. Sutureless small bowel anastomoses: Experimental study in pigs. Eur J Surg 1999; 165(1)61–68
   Google Scholar
• Nordkild P, Kjaergaard J, Hjortrup A. Healing of the fibrin adhesive anastomosis in the small intestine of pigs. Dan Med Bull 1989; 36(4)401–403
   Google Scholar
• Galletti G, Giardino R, Ussia G, Brulatti M, Sorrenti G, Galletti M. [Anastomosis of the colon using human fibrin glue (Tissucol). Experimental study in pigs]. Minerva Chir 1986; 41(21)1759–1765
   Google Scholar
• Kram H B, Garces M A, Klein S R, Shoemaker W C. Common bile duct anastomosis using fibrin glue. Arch Surg 1985; 120(11)1250–1256
   Google Scholar
• Haukipuro K A, Hulkko O A, Alavaikko M J, Laitinen S T. Sutureless colon anastomosis with fibrin glue in the rat. Dis Colon Rectum 1988; 31(8)601–604
   Google Scholar
• Jones D B, Brewer J D, Meininger T A, Soper N J. Sutured or fibrin-glued laparoscopic choledochojejunostomy. Surg Endosc 1995; 9(9)1020–1027
   Google Scholar
• van d er, Ham A C, Kort W J, Weijma I M, van den Ingh H F, Jeekel H. Effect of fibrin sealant on the integrity of colonic anastomoses in rats with faecal peritonitis. Eur J Surg. 1993; 159(8)425–432
   Google Scholar
• van der Ham A C, Kort W J, Weijma I M, van den Ingh H F, Jeekel J. Effect of fibrin sealant on the healing colonic anastomosis in the rat. Br J Surg 1991; 78(1)49–53
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez F L, Tejero E, Tieso A. Randomized trial of fibrin glue to seal mechanical oesophagojejunal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1996; 83(1)40–41
   Google Scholar
• Lillemoe K D, Cameron J L, Kim M P, Campbell K A, Sauter P K, Coleman J A, et al. Does fibrin glue sealant decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg 2004; 8(7)766–772
   Google Scholar
• Sapala J A, Wood M H, Schuhknecht M P. Anastomotic leak prophylaxis using a vapor-heated fibrin sealant: Report on 738 gastric bypass patients. Obes Surg 2004; 14(1)35–42
   Google Scholar
• Liu C D, Glantz G J, Livingston E H. Fibrin glue as a sealant for high-risk anastomosis in surgery for morbid obesity. Obes Surg 2003; 13(1)45–48
   Google Scholar
• Fekete F, Gayet B, Panis Y. [Contribution of fibrin glue to the reinforcement of esophageal anastomoses]. Presse Med 1992; 21(4)157–159
   Google Scholar
• Osada H, Tanaka H, Fujii T K, Tsunoda I, Yoshida T, Satoh K. Clinical evaluation of a haemostatic and anti-adhesion preparation used to prevent post-surgical adhesion. J Int Med Res 1999; 27(5)247–252
   Google Scholar
• Schneider A, Bennek J, Olsen K O, Weiss J, Schmidt W, Rolle U. Experimental study evaluating the effect of a barrier method on postoperative intraabdominal adhesions. Dig Dis Sci 2006; 51(3)566–570
   Google Scholar