A Modification of Laparoscopic Type C1 Hysterectomy to Reduce Postoperative Bladder Dysfunction: A Retrospective Study

REFERENCES

• Puntambekar SP, Lawande A, Desai R, Kenawadekar R, Joshi S, Joshi GA. Nerve-sparing robotic radical hysterectomy: our technique. J Robot Surg. 2014;8(1):43–47. doi:10.1007/s11701-013-0422-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Centini G, Afors K, Murtada R, Castellano J, Lazzeri L, Fernandes R, et al. Step-by-step Type C laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with nerve-sparing approach. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22(4):545. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2015.02.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zullo MA, Manci N, Angioli R, Muzii L, Panici PB. Vesical dysfunctions after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a critical review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003;48(3):287–293. doi:10.1016/S1040-8428(03)00125-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yabuki Y, Asamoto A, Hoshiba T, Nishimoto H, Kitamura S. Dissection of the cardinal ligament in radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer with emphasis on the lateral ligament. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164(1 Pt 1):7–14. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(91)90614-W.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujii S. Anatomic identification of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a step-by-step procedure. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111(2 Suppl):S33–S41. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.07.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuwabara Y, Suzuki M, Hashimoto M, Furugen Y, Yoshida K, Mitsuhashi N. New method to prevent bladder dysfunction after radical hysterectomy for uterine cervical cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2000;26(1):1–8. doi:10.1111/j.1447-0756.2000.tb01192.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raspagliesi F, Ditto A, Fontanelli R, Solima E, Hanozet F, Zanaboni F, et al. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a surgical technique for preserving the autonomic hypogastric nerve. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;93(2):307–314. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.01.048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yabuki Y, Sasaki H, Hatakeyama N, Murakami G. Discrepancies between classic anatomy and modern gynecologic surgery on pelvic connective tissue structure: harmonization of those concepts by collaborative cadaver dissection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(1):7–15. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu ZM, Wang KJ, Chen M, Lin WW. Applied anatomy of suporting ligaments of cervix uteri in radical vaginal hysterectomy. Sichuan J Anat. 2014;22(1):4–6. Doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-1457.2014.002
   Google Scholar
• Cibula D, Abu-Rustum NR, Benedetti-Panici P, Kohler C, Raspagliesi F, Querleu D, et al. New classification system of radical hysterectomy: emphasis on a three-dimensional anatomic template for parametrial resection. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;122(2):264–268. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.04.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui L, Shi Y, Zhang GN. Perineural invasion as a prognostic factor for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;292(1):13–19. doi:10.1007/s00404-015-3627-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Possover M, Stober S, Plaul K, Schneider A. Identification and preservation of the motoric innervation of the bladder in radical hysterectomy type III. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;79(2):154–157. doi:10.1006/gyno.2000.5919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato K, Suzuka K, Osaki T, Tanaka N. Unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a surgical technique to preserve the pelvic autonomic nerves while increasing radicality. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007;17(5):1172–1178. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.01014.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditto A, Martinelli F, Mattana F, Reato C, Solima E, Carcangiu M, et al. Class III nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy versus standard class III radical hysterectomy: an observational study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(12):3469–3478. doi:10.1245/s10434-011-1767-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Bin ZR, Ling-ying W, Gong-yi Z, Xian L, Gao-zhi Y. A prospective study on nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008;43:606–610.
   Google Scholar
• Wang QM. Anatomical study on the Middle Rectal Artery and its related structures: The Second military medical university. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Liu SK. The Applied anatomic study of the deep uterine vein for radical hysterectomy: Hebei Medical University. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hockel M, Horn LC, Manthey N, Braumann UD, Wolf U, Teichmann G, et al. Resection of the embryologically defined uterovaginal (Mullerian) compartment and pelvic control in patients with cervical cancer: a prospective analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(7):683–692. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70100-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HS, Kim K, Ryoo SB, Seo JH, Kim SY, Park JW, et al. Conventional versus nerve-sparin radical surgery for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. J Gynecol Oncol. 2015;26(2):100–110. doi:10.3802/jgo.2015.26.2.100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang Z, Chen Y, Xu H, Li Y, Wang D. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy with fascia space dissection technique for cervical cancer: description of technique and outcomes. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;119(2):202–207. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.06.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Tillaart SA, Kenter GG, Peters AA, Dekker FW, Gaarenstroom KN, Fleuren GJ, et al. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: local recurrence rate, feasibility, and safety in cervical cancer patients stage IA to IIA. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19(1):39–45. doi:10.1111/IGC.0b013e318197f675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue Z, Zhu X, Teng Y. Comparison of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy and Radical Hysterectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2016;38(5):1841–1850. doi:10.1159/000443122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Qin T, Zhang W, Wu Q, Yang A, Xu F. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for bulky cervical cancer (>/ = 6 cm) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2016;34:35–40. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.08.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar