Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of Investigative Surgery Volume 32, 2019 - Issue 6
Submit an article Journal homepage
235
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Evaluating Auditory Pathway by Electrical Auditory Middle Latency Response and Postoperative Hearing Rehabilitation

Bin WangDepartment of Otolaryngology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, ChinaView further author information
,
Keli CaoDepartment of Otolaryngology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, ChinaCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
,
Chaogang WeiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, ChinaView further author information
,
Zhiqiang GaoDepartment of Otolaryngology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, ChinaView further author information
&
Huan LiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaView further author information
Pages 542-551 | Received 22 Nov 2017, Accepted 15 Feb 2018, Published online: 14 Mar 2018

REFERENCES

  • Chi F. China's current situation of future tasks in hearing implant. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2010;45(10):796–797. PMID:21176565.
  • Geisler CD, Frishkopf LS, Brown RM. The “early” response to clicks in awake subjects. Q Prog Rep Res Lab Elect, MIT. 1957;15:144–148.
  • Kraus N, McGee T. The middle latency response generating system. Electroence -Phalog. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1995;44:93–101.
  • Karen A, Harrison RV. Effects of cochlear implant use on the electrically evoked middle latency response in children. Hear Res. 2005;204:78–89. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2005.01.003. PMID:15925193.
  • Firszt JB, Chambers RD, Kraus N, et al. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR. MLR, and N1sess Auditory Pathway. 2002;23(6):502–515.
  • Ponton CW, Eggermont J. Of kittens and kids: altered cortical maturation following profound deafness and cochlear implant use. Audiol Neurootol. 2001;6:363–380. doi:10.1159/000046846. PMID:11847464.
  • Kileny PR. Evoked potentials in the management of patients with cochlear implants: Research and clinical applications. Ear Hear. 2007;28:124S–127S. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e318031549d. PMID:17496663.
  • Wang B, Cao K. Measurement of electrical evoked middle latency response in cochlear implantation operation. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012;47(3):196–201. PMID:22805019.
  • Chen J, Cao K, Wei C, et al. The application of EABR measurement during artificial cochlear transplantation. Zhongguo Ting Li Yu Yan Kang Fu Ke Xue Za Zhi. 2008;4(1):18–21.
  • Francisco Sales de Almeida1 PR. Luiz eduardo ferreira paiva jent during artificial ceration and clinical applvoked responses: a standardizing study. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol. 2006;72(2):227–34.
  • Amy L, Miller JGA, John C, et al. Cochlear implant thresholds: comparison of middle latency responses with psychophysical and cortical-spike-activity thresholds. Hear Res. 2001;152:566.
  • Zhou N, Wu Z, Han D, et al. Characteristics of the response of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials to different stimulus modes. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 2004;39(8):483–485. PMID:15563084.
  • Abbas PJ, Brown CJ, Shallop JK, et al. Summary of results using the nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential[J]. Ear Hear. 1999;20(1):45. doi:10.1097/00003446-199902000-00005. PMID:10037065.
  • Guedes MC, Weber R, Neto RVDB, et al. Influence of evoked compound action potential on speech perception in cochlear implant users[J]. Brazilian J Otorhinolaryngology. 2007;73(4):439–445. doi:10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30095-1.
  • Smoorenburg GF, Willeboer C, Dijk JEV. Speech Perception in Nucleus CI24M Cochlear Implant Users with Processor Settings Based on Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Thresholds[J]. Audiol Neurootol. 2002;7(6):335–347. doi:10.1159/000066154. PMID:12401965.
  • Ji F, Yang S. Progress in the application of electrically evoked compound action potential test in cochlear implant[J]. Chin J Otol. 2011;9(2):226–229.
  • Li X, Wen L, Gao L. Changes of Electrode Impedance and T/C levels in Nucleus 24CA Cochlear Implant after Implantation[J]. Chin J Otol. 2012;10(1):19–22.
  • O'Driscoll M, El-Deredy W, Ramsden RT. Brain stem responses evoked by stimulation of the mature cochlear nucleus with an auditory brain stem implant［J］. Ear Hear. 2011;32(3):286–299. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181fc9d72. PMID:21157353.
  • Karen A, Gordon C, Harrison RV. Effects of cochlear implant use on the electrically evoked middle latency response in children. Hear Res. 2005;204:78–89. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2005.01.003. PMID:15925193.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.