Cross-Linked Versus Conventional Polyethylene for Long-Term Clinical Outcomes After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

References

• Issa K, Johnson AJ, Naziri Q, Khanuja HS, Delanois RE, Mont MA. Hip osteonecrosis: does prior hip surgery alter outcomes compared to an initial primary total hip arthroplasty?. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(1):162–166. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedard NA, Callaghan JJ, Liu SS, Greiner JJ, Klaassen AL, Johnston RC. Cementless THA for the treatment of osteonecrosis at 10-year follow-up: have we improved compared to cemented THA?. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(7):1192–1199. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.09.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mall NA, Nunley RM, Zhu JJ, Maloney WJ, Barrack RL, Clohisy JC. The incidence of acetabular osteolysis in young patients with conventional versus highly crosslinked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(2):372. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1518-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz SM, Gawel HA, Patel JD. History and systematic review of wear and osteolysis outcomes for first-generation highly crosslinked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(8):2262–2277. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1872-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seppo S, Harris WH, Konttinen YT, et al. Alternative materials to improve total hip replacement tribology. Acta Orthopaed Scand 2003;74(4):380–388.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacobs CA, Christensen CP, A, Seth G, Harry MK. Clinical performance of highly cross-linked polyethylenes in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(12):2779–2786. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker DA, Bellare A, Pruitt L. The effects of degree of crosslinking on the fatigue crack initiation and propagation resistance of orthopedic-grade polyethylene. J Biomed Mater Res. 2003;66A(1):146–154. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.10606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram JH, Stone M, Fisher J, Ingham E. The influence of molecular weight, crosslinking and counterface roughness on TNF-alpha production by macrophages in response to ultra high molecular weight polyethylene particles. Biomaterials 2004;25(17):3511–3522. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen C, Tang ZH, Hu JZ, Zou GY, Xiao RC, Yan DX. Does cross-linked polyethylene decrease the revision rate of total hip arthroplasty compared with conventional polyethylene? A meta-analysis. Orthopaed Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100(7):745–750. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.07.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzyk PR, Saccone M, Sprague S, Simunovic N, Bhandari M, Schemitsch EH. Cross-linked versus conventional polyethylene for total hip replacement. A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(5):593–600. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B5.25908.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mu Z, Tian J, Wu T, Yang J, Pei F. A systematic review of radiological outcomes of highly cross-linked polyethylene versus conventional polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthopaed (Sicot). 2009;33(3):599–604. doi: 10.1007/s00264-008-0716-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atrey A, Ward SE, Khoshbin A, et al. Ten-year follow-up study of three alternative bearing surfaces used in total hip arthroplasty in young patients: a prospective randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(12):1590–1595. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B12.BJJ-2017-0353.R1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Rey E, García-Cimbrelo E, Cruz-Pardos A. New polyethylenes in total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Series B. 2013;95-B(3):326–332. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B3.29456.
   Google Scholar
• Tsukamoto M, Ohnishi H, Mori T, Kawasaki M, Uchida S, Sakai A. Fifteen-year comparison of wear and osteolysis analysis for cross-linked or conventional polyethylene in cementless total hip arthroplasty for hip dysplasia – a retrospective cohort study. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(1):161–165.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devane PA, Horne JG, Ashmore A, Mutimer J, Kim W, Stanley J. Highly cross-linked polyethylene reduces wear and revision rates in total hip arthroplasty: a 10-year double-blinded randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(20):1703–1714. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broomfield JA, Malak TT, Thomas GE, Palmer AJ, Taylor A, Glyn-Jones S. The relationship between polyethylene wear and periprosthetic osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty at 12 years in a randomized controlled trial cohort. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(4):1186–1191. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.10.037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alessandro L, Altman DG, Jennifer T, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Epidemiol Biostat Public Health 2009;139:b2700. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handoll HH, Gillespie WJ, Gillespie LD, Madhok R. The Cochrane collaboration: a leading role in producing reliable evidence to inform healthcare decisions in musculoskeletal trauma and disorders. Indian J Orthop. 2008;42(3):247–251. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.41849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreas S. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle–Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 2010;25(9):603–605. doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canfield SE, Dahm P. Rating the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations using GRADE. World J Urol. 2011;29(3):311–317. doi: 10.1007/s00345-011-0667-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21:123–129. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557.doi: 10.1136/bmj7414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics. 2000;56(2):455–463. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Schwarzkopf R, Glyn JS, et al. The John Charnley award: highly crosslinked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty decreases long-term wear: a double-blind randomized trial. Case Rep Orthoped. 2015;473(2):432–438. [Mismatch] doi: 10.1155/2014/792781.
   Google Scholar
• Engh CA, Jr, Hopper RH, Jr, Huynh C, Ho H, Sritulanondha S, Engh CAA. Prospective, randomized study of cross-linked and non-cross-linked polyethylene for total hip arthroplasty at 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(8):2–7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.03.048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johanson PE, Digas G, Herberts P, Thanner J, Karrholm J. Highly crosslinked polyethylene does not reduce aseptic loosening in cemented THA 10-year findings of a randomized study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(11):3083–3093. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2400-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm B, Tonino A, Heyligers IC. Long-term reduction of wear and osteolysis with cross-linked PE? 13-year follow-up of a prospectively randomized comparison with conventional PE. Total Hip Arthroplasty. 2012;59–70. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-27361-2_6.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper RH, Jr., Ho H, Sritulanondha S, Williams AC, Engh CA. Jr. Otto aufranc award: crosslinking reduces THA wear, osteolysis and revision rates at 15-year followup compared with noncrosslinked polyethylene. Clin Orthopaed Relat Res. 2018;476(2):279–290. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachiewicz PF, Soileau ES. Highly cross-linked polyethylene provides decreased osteolysis and reoperation at minimum 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(9):1959–1962. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna SA, Somerville L, McCalden RW, Naudie DD, Macdonald SJ. Highly cross-linked polyethylene decreases the rate of revision of total hip arthroplasty compared with conventional polyethylene at 13 years' follow-up. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(1):28–32. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B1.36527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teeter MG, Yuan X, Somerville LE, MacDonald SJ, McCalden RW, Naudie DD. Thirteen-year wear rate comparison of highly crosslinked and conventional polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized controlled trial. CJS. 2017;60(3):212–216. doi: 10.1503/cjs.005216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsukamoto M, Mori T, Ohnishi H, Uchida S, Sakai A. Highly cross-linked polyethylene reduces osteolysis incidence and wear-related reoperation rate in cementless total hip arthroplasty compared with conventional polyethylene at a mean 12-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(12):3771–3776. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.06.047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakashima Y, Sato T, Yamamoto T, et al. Results at a minimum of 10 years of follow-up for AMS and PerFix HA-coated cementless total hip arthroplasty: impact of cross-linked polyethylene on implant longevity. J Orthopaed Sci. 2013;18(6):962–968. doi: 10.1007/s00776-013-0456-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukui K, Kaneuji A, Sugimori T, Ichiseki T, Matsumoto T. Wear comparison between conventional and highly cross-linked polyethylene against a zirconia head: a concise follow-up, at an average 10 years, of a previous report. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(9):1654–1658. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.12.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minoda Y, Kobayashi A, Sakawa A, et al. Wear particle analysis of highly crosslinked polyethylene isolated from a failed total hip arthroplasty. J Biomed Mater Res. 2008;86(2):501–505. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manley MT, Edidin AA, Dumbleton JH. A literature review of the association between wear rate and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17(5):649–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jepsen P, Johnsen SP, Gillman MW, Sørensen HT. Interpretation of observational studies. Heart. 2004;90(8):956–960. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.017269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar