Ultraportable Devices for Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: First Comparative Analysis

REFERENCES

• Argenta LC, Morykwas MJ. Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: clinical experience. Ann Plast Surg. 1997;38(6):563–576. doi:10.1097/00000637-199706000-00002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Diabetic Foot Study C. Negative pressure wound therapy after partial diabetic foot amputation: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005;366(9498):1704–1710. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67695-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuomo R, Nisi G, Grimaldi L, Brandi C, D'Aniello C. Use of ultraportable vacuum therapy systems in the treatment of venous leg ulcer. Acta Biomed. 2017;88(3):297–301.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hudson DA, Adams KG, Van Huyssteen A, Martin R, Huddleston EM. Simplified negative pressure wound therapy: clinical evaluation of an ultraportable, no-canister system. Int Wound J. 2015;12(2):195–201. doi:10.1111/iwj.12080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston WA, Armstrong DG, Reyzelman AM, Kirsner RS. A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing treatment of venous leg ulcers using mechanically versus electrically powered negative pressure wound therapy. Adv Wound Care. 2015;4(2):75–82. doi:10.1089/wound.2014.0575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan KW, Lo ZJ, Hong Q, Narayanan S, Tan GWL, Chandrasekar S. Use of negative pressure wound therapy for lower limb bypass incisions. Ann Vasc Dis. 2017;10(4):386–390. doi:10.3400/avd.oa.17-00052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerman B, Oldenbrook L, Ryu J, Fong KD, Schubart PJ. The SNaP Wound Care System: a case series using a novel ultraportable negative pressure wound therapy device for the treatment of diabetic lower extremity wounds. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010;4(4):825–830. doi:10.1177/193229681000400409.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galiano RD, Hudson D, Shin J, et al. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy for prevention of wound healing complications following reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018;6(1):e1560. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000001560.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vig S, Dowsett C, Berg L, et al. Evidence-based recommendations for the use of negative pressure wound therapy in chronic wounds: steps towards an international consensus. J Tissue Viability. 2011;20(Suppl 1):S1–S18. doi:10.1016/S0020-1383(11)00041-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumville JC, Hinchliffe RJ, Cullum N, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(10):CD010318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peinemann F, Sauerland S. Negative-pressure wound therapy: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011;108(22):381–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie X, McGregor M, Dendukuri N. The clinical effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy: a systematic review. J Wound Care. 2010;19(11):490–495. doi:10.12968/jowc.2010.19.11.79697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong DG, Marston WA, Reyzelman AM, Kirsner RS. Comparison of negative pressure wound therapy with an ultraportable mechanically powered device vs. traditional electrically powered device for the treatment of chronic lower extremity ulcers: a multicenter randomized-controlled trial. Wound Repair Regen. 2011;19(2):173–180. doi:10.1111/j.1524-475X.2010.00658.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: quick reference guide. 2014. Available from: https://www.npuap.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Updated-10-16-14-Quick-Reference-Guide-DIGITAL-NPUAP-EPUAP-PPPIA-16Oct2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Baharestani M, Baranoski S, et al. Guidelines for managing pressure ulcers with negative pressure wound therapy. Adv. Skin Wound Care. 2004;17 (Suppl. 2):1–16. doi:10.1097/00129334-200411002-00001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wanner MB, Schwarzl F, Strub B, Zaech GA, Pierer G. Vacuum-assisted wound closure for cheaper and more comfortable healing of pressure sores: a prospective study. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2003;37(1):28–33. doi:10.1080/713796078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baharestani MM, Houliston-Otto DB, Barnes S. Early versus late initiation of negative pressure wound therapy: examining the impact on home care length of stay. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2008;54(11):48–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford CN, Reinhard ER, Yeh D, et al. Interim analysis of a prospective, randomized trial of vacuum-assisted closure versus the healthpoint system in the management of pressure ulcers. Ann Plast Surg. 2002;49(1):55–61. discussion
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philbeck TE, Jr., Whittington KT, Millsap MH, Briones RB, Wight DG, Schroeder WJ. The clinical and cost effectiveness of externally applied negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of wounds in home healthcare Medicare patients. Ostomy Wound Manage. 1999;45(11):41–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Joseph AP, Ward MR. A prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of sotalol, amiodarone, and digoxin for the reversion of new-onset atrial fibrillation. Ann Emerg Med. 2000;36(1):1–9. doi:10.1067/mem.2000.107655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavery LA, Boulton AJ, Niezgoda JA, Sheehan P. A comparison of diabetic foot ulcer outcomes using negative pressure wound therapy versus historical standard of care. Int Wound J. 2007;4(2):103–113. doi:10.1111/j.1742-481X.2007.00317.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blume PA, Walters J, Payne W, Ayala J, Lantis J. Comparison of negative pressure wound therapy using vacuum-assisted closure with advanced moist wound therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(4):631–636. doi:10.2337/dc07-2196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lejay A, Creton O, Thaveau F, et al. [Current clinical applications of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) in vascular surgery]. J Mal Vasc. 2008;33(4-5):196–201. doi:10.1016/j.jmv.2008.08.002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Witkowski W, Jawien A, Witkiewicz W, Zon B. Initial multi-centre observations upon the effect of a new Topical Negative Pressure device upon patient and clinician experience and the treatment of wounds. Int Wound J. 2009;6(2):167–174. doi:10.1111/j.1742-481X.2009.00586.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apelqvist J, Willy C, Fagerdahl AM, et al. EWMA document: negative pressure wound therapy. J Wound Care. 2017;26(Suppl. 3):S1–S154. doi:10.12968/jowc.2017.26.Sup3.S1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korber A, Franckson T, Grabbe S, Dissemond J. Vacuum assisted closure device improves the take of mesh grafts in chronic leg ulcer patients. Dermatology (Basel). 2008;216(3):250–256. doi:10.1159/000112937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendonca DA, Drew PJ, Harding KG, Price PE. A pilot study on the effect of topical negative pressure on quality of life. J Wound Care. 2007;16(2):49–53. doi:10.12968/jowc.2007.16.2.27008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arnez ZM, Papa G, Ramella V, Novati FC, Ahcan U, Stocco C. Limb and flap salvage in Gustilo IIIC injuries treated by vascular repair and emergency free flap transfer. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2017;33(S 01):S03–S7. doi:10.1055/s-0037-1603737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicoletti G, Tresoldi MM, Malovini A, Visaggio M, Faga A, Scevola S. Versatile use of dermal substitutes: a retrospective survey of 127 consecutive cases. Indian J Plast Surg. 2018;51(1):46–53. doi:10.4103/ijps.IJPS_217_17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scalise A, Tartaglione C, Bolletta E, et al. The enhanced healing of a high-risk, clean, sutured surgical incision by prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy as delivered by Prevena Customizable: cosmetic and therapeutic results. Int Wound J. 2015;12(2):218–223. doi:10.1111/iwj.12370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stocco C, Berton F, Papa G, Bussani R, Arnez ZM. Vicryl hypersensitivity test with histological response. Dermatitis. 2016;27(3):145–146. doi:10.1097/DER.0000000000000182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyahara HS, Serzedello FR, Ejnisman L, Lima A, Vicente JRN, Helito CP. Incisional negative-pressure wound therapy in revision total hip arthroplasty due to infection. Acta Ortop Bras. 2018;26(5):300–304. doi:10.1590/1413-785220182605196038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming CA, Kuteva M, O'Hanlon K, O'Brien G, McGreal G. Routine use of PICO dressings may reduce overall groin wound complication rates following peripheral vascular surgery. J Hosp Infect. 2018;99(1):75–80. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2017.10.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle RJ, Myers D. A survey of caesarean section surgical site infections with PICO single use negative pressure wound therapy system in high-risk patients in England and Ireland. J Hosp Infect. 2017;97(2):122–124. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2017.02.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papa G, Spazzapan L, Pangos M, Delpin A, Arnez ZM. Compared to coverage by STSG grafts only reconstruction by the dermal substitute Integra(R) plus STSG increases TcPO2 values in diabetic feet at 3 and 6 months after reconstruction*. G Chir. 2014;35(5–6):141–145.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pascone PM, Papa G, Ranieri A. Use of a novel hydrosurgery device in surgical debridement of difficult-to-heal wounds. Wounds. 2008;20(5):139–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar