Effectiveness of Transthoracic Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Meta-Analysis

References

• Lagergren J, Smyth E, Cunningham D, et al. Oesophageal cancer. Lancet. 2017;390(10110):2383–2396. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31462-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9829):1887–1892. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60516-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonavina L, Asti E, Sironi A, et al. Hybrid and total minimally invasive esophagectomy: how I do it. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(S8):S761–S772. doi:10.21037/jtd.2017.06.55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna GB, Arya S, Markar SR. Variation in the standard of minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer–systematic review. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;24(3):176–187. doi:10.1053/j.semtcvs.2012.10.004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bjelovic M, Babic T, Spica B, et al. Could hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy improve the treatment results of esophageal cancer? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42(8):1196–1201. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2016.05.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch K, Yoon U, Vogt PM. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and publication bias. J Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surg. 2011;39(2):91–92. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2010.11.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messager M, Pasquer A, Duhamel A, et al. Laparoscopic Gastric Mobilization Reduces Postoperative Mortality After Esophageal Cancer Surgery: A French Nationwide Study. Ann Surg. 2015;262(5):817–822. discussion 822-813 doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000001470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, et al. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73(9):712–716. doi:10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D, et al. Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials. 2007;8(1):16–17555582. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-8-16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmar MK, Torri V, Stewart L. Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Statist Med. 1998;17(24):2815–2834. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981230)17:24<2815::AID-SIM110>3.0.CO;2-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177–188. doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5(1):13–15840177. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-5-13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seagroatt V, Stratton I. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Test had 10% false positive rate. BMJ 1998;316(7129):470. author reply 470-471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I, et al. Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg. 2007;245(2):232–240. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000225093.58071.c6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safranek PM, Cubitt J, Booth MI, et al. Review of open and minimal access approaches to oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97(12):1845–1853. doi:10.1002/bjs.7231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parameswaran R, Titcomb DR, Blencowe NS, et al. Assessment and comparison of recovery after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: an exploratory study in two centers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(6):1970–1977. doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2848-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nozaki I, Mizusawa J, Kato K, et al. Impact of laparoscopy on the prevention of pulmonary complications after thoracoscopic esophagectomy using data from JCOG0502: a prospective multicenter study. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(2):651–659. doi:10.1007/s00464-017-5716-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey L, Khan O, Willows E, et al. Open and laparoscopically assisted oesophagectomy: a prospective comparative study. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery: official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic. Surgery. 2013;43(2):268–273. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezs314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law S, Fok M, Chu KM, et al. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surgery. 1997;122(1):8–14. doi:10.1016/S0039-6060(97)90257-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinieri P, Ouattara M, Brioude G, et al. Long-term outcome of open versus hybrid minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: a propensity score matched studydagger. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg. 2017;51(2):28186271. 223–229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariette C, Markar SR, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS, et al. Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(2):152–162. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1805101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JM, Cheng JW, Lin MT, et al. Is there any benefit to incorporating a laparoscopic procedure into minimally invasive esophagectomy? The impact on perioperative results in patients with esophageal cancer. World J Surg. 2011;35(4):790–797. doi:10.1007/s00268-011-0955-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubo N, Ohira M, Yamashita Y, et al. The impact of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery on pulmonary complications after radical esophagectomy in patients with resectable esophageal cancer. Anticancer Res. 2014;34(5): 2399–2404.
   Google Scholar
• Burdall OC, Boddy AP, Fullick J, et al. A comparative study of survival after minimally invasive and open oesophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(2):431–437. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3694-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mu JW, Gao SG, Xue Q, et al. Updated experiences with minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(45):12873–12881. doi:10.3748/wjg.v21.i45.12873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findlay L, Yao C, Bennett DH, et al. Non-inferiority of minimally invasive oesophagectomy: an 8-year retrospective case series. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(9):3681–3689. doi:10.1007/s00464-016-5406-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glatz T, Marjanovic G, Kulemann B, et al. Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy vs. open esophagectomy: a matched case analysis in 120 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017;402(2):323–331. doi:10.1007/s00423-017-1550-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu PK, Huang CS, Wu YC, et al. Open versus thoracoscopic esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Surg. 2014;38(2):402–409. doi:10.1007/s00268-013-2265-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun JS, Na KJ, Song SY, Kim S, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following hybrid minimally invasive versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2018;9(9):3097–3104 doi:10.21037/jtd.2017.08.49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarpa M, Cavallin F, Saadeh LM, et al. Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: impact on postoperative inflammatory and nutritional status. Dis Esophagus. 2016;29(8):1064–1070. doi:10.1111/dote.12418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiraishi T, Kawahara K, Shirakusa T, et al. Risk analysis in resection of thoracic esophageal cancer in the era of endoscopic surgery. Ann Thoracic Surg. 2006;81(3):1083–1089. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.08.057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitagawa H, Namikawa T, Iwabu J, et al. Efficacy of laparoscopic gastric mobilization for esophagectomy: comparison with open thoraco-abdominal approach. J Laparoendoscopic Adv Surg Tech Part A. 2013;23(5):452–455. doi:10.1089/lap.2012.0377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsujimoto H, Ono S, Sugasawa H, et al. Gastric tube reconstruction by laparoscopy-assisted surgery attenuates postoperative systemic inflammatory response after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. World J Surg. 2010;34(12):2830–2836. doi:10.1007/s00268-010-0757-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeno S, Takahashi Y, Moroga T, et al. Retrospective study using the propensity score to clarify the oncologic feasibility of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer. World J Surg. 2013;37(7):1673–1680.] doi:10.1007/s00268-013-2008-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamasaki M, Miyata H, Fujiwara Y, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: comparative analysis of open and hand-assisted laparoscopic abdominal lymphadenectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction. J Surg Oncol. 2011;104(6):623–628. doi:10.1002/jso.21991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinjo Y, Kurita N, Nakamura F, et al. Effectiveness of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy: comparison of postoperative complications and midterm oncological outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(2):381–390. doi:10.1007/s00464-011-1883-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanasoot A, Yolsuriyanwong K, Ruangsin S, et al. Costs and benefits of different methods of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2017;25(7-8):513–517. doi:10.1177/0218492317731389.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Briez N, Piessen G, Torres F, et al. Effects of hybrid minimally invasive oesophagectomy on major postoperative pulmonary complications. Br J Surg. 2012;99(11):1547–1553. doi:10.1002/bjs.8931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, et al. A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg. 2003;90(1):108–113. doi:10.1002/bjs.4022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taguchi S, Osugi H, Higashino M, et al. Comparison of three-field esophagectomy for esophageal cancer incorporating open or thoracoscopic thoracotomy. Surg Endoscopy. 2003;17(9):1445–1450. doi:10.1007/s00464-002-9232-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitagawa H, Akimori T, Okabayashi T, et al. Total laparoscopic gastric mobilization for esophagectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2009;394(4):617–621. doi:10.1007/s00423-008-0354-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ichikawa H, Miyata G, Miyazaki S, et al. Esophagectomy using a thoracoscopic approach with an open laparotomic or hand-assisted laparoscopic abdominal stage for esophageal cancer: analysis of survival and prognostic factors in 315 patients. Ann Surg. 2013;257(5):873–885. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826c87cd.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimminger PP, Tagkalos E, Hadzijusufovic E, et al. Change from hybrid to fully minimally invasive and robotic esophagectomy is possible without compromises. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;67:30216947. doi:10.1055/s-0038-10664].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bizekis C, Kent MS, Luketich JD, et al. Initial experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Ann Thoracic Surg. 2006;82(2):402–407. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.02.052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsujimoto H, Takahata R, Nomura S, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer attenuates postoperative systemic responses and pulmonary complications. Surgery. 2012;151(5):667–673. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2011.12.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider C, Boddy AP, Fukuta J, et al. Predicting blood transfusion in patients undergoing minimally invasive oesophagectomy. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1342–1347. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.10.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonavina L, Scolari F, Aiolfi A, et al. Early outcome of thoracoscopic and hybrid esophagectomy: Propensity-matched comparative analysis. Surgery. 2016;159(4):1073–1081. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2015.08.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao F, Wang J, Yao J, et al. Is thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy a better alternative to thoracoscopic esophagectomy? Int J Surg. 2017;48:105–109. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.10.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlth F, Plum PS, Chon SH, et al. Total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma reduces postoperative pain and pneumonia compared to hybrid esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(12):29931451. doi:10.1007/s00464-018-6257-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elshaer M, Gravante G, Tang CB, et al. Totally minimally invasive two-stage esophagectomy with intrathoracic hand-sewn anastomosis: short-term clinical and oncological outcomes. Dis Esophagus. 2018;31(3):29293970. doi:10.1093/dote/dox150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li KK, Wang YJ, Liu XH, et al. Propensity-matched analysis comparing survival after hybrid thoracoscopic-laparotomy esophagectomy and complete thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy. World J Surg. 2019;43:30386913. doi:10.1007/s00268-018-48z].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law S, Wong KH, Kwok KF, et al. Predictive factors for postoperative pulmonary complications and mortality after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Surg. 2004;240(5):791–800. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000143123.24556.1c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cense HA, Busch OR, Bemelman WA, et al. Results of the combination of open transthoracic esophagectomy with laparoscopic gastric tube formation for esophageal cancer. Dig Surg. 2006;23(3):164–168. doi:10.1159/000094350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins BZ, Shah AS, Hutcheson KA, et al. Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy. Ann Thoracic Surg. 2004;78(4):1170–1176. discussion 1170-1176 doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.02.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinugasa S, Tachibana M, Yoshimura H, et al. Postoperative pulmonary complications are associated with worse short- and long-term outcomes after extended esophagectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2004;88(2):71–77. doi:10.1002/jso.20137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orringer MB, Marshall B, Stirling MC. Transhiatal esophagectomy for benign and malignant disease. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;105(2):265–276. discussion 276-267 doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(19)33811-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abraham NS, Byrne CJ, Young JM, et al. Meta-analysis of well-designed nonrandomized comparative studies of surgical procedures is as good as randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(3):238–245. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.04.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar