References
- Gokmen Karasu AF, Kıran G, Sanlikan F. Intraoperative complications and convertion to laparotomy in gynecologic robotic surgery. Journal of Investigative Surgery. (In press)
- El-Hamamsy D, Geary RS, Gurol-Urganci I, et al. Uptake and outcomes of robotic gynaecological surgery in England (2006-2018): an account of Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES). J Robot Surg. 2021. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01197-5. (online ahead of print).
- Brunes M, Johannesson U, Häbel H, et al. Effects of obesity on peri- and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing robotic versus conventional hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28(2):228–236. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.04.038.
- Cusimano MC, Simpson AN, Dossa F, et al. Laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer patients with obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of conversions and complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 221(5) :410–428.e19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.05.004.
- Raffone A, Travaglino A, Raimondo D, et al. Laparotomic versus robotic surgery in elderly patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021.doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13766. (online ahead of print).
- Bebia V, Gil-Moreno A, Hernández A, et al. Robot-assisted extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy is associated with fewer surgical complications: a post hoc analysis of the STELLA-2 randomized trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;S1553-4650(21)00231-4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2021.05.009. (online ahead of print).
- Gomes MTV, de Costa Porto BT, Parise Filho JP, et al. Safety model for the introduction of robotic surgery in gynecology. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2018;40(7):397–402. doi:https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1655746.
- Tang FH, Tsai EM. Learning curve analysis of different stages of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:1827913. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1827913.