Organ Preservation with EC, HTK, and UW, Solution in Orthotopic Rat Liver Transplantation. Part II. Morphological Study

REFERENCES

• Clavien PA, Harvey PRC, Strasberg SM. Preservation and reperfusion injuries in liver allografts, an overview and synthesis of current studies. Transplantation. 1992;53(5):957–978.
   Google Scholar
• Howard TK, Klintmalm GBG, Cofer JB, Husberg BS, Goldstein RM, Gonwa TA. The influence of preservation injury on rejection in the hepatic transplant recipient. Transplantation. 1990;49(1):103–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins GM. Organ preservation. In: Chatteryee SN, ed. Organtransplantation. Wright-PSG, Boston; 1982:93–149.
   Google Scholar
• Belzer FO, Southard JH. Principles of solid-organ preser-vation by cold storage. Transplantation. 1988;45(4):673–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belzer FO. Clinical organ preservation with UW solution. Transplantation. 1989;47(6):1097–1098.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson NV. A new solution for liver preservation. Br J Surg. 1989;76:107–108.
   Google Scholar
• Bretschneider HJ. Organu¨ bergreifende Prinzipien zur Verla¨ ngerung der Ischa¨ mietoleranz. Leopoldina. 1992; 37(3):161–174.
   Google Scholar
• Ho¨ lscher M, Groenewoud AF. Current status of the HTK solution of Bretschneider in organ preservation. Transpl Proc. 1991;23(5):2334–2337.
   Google Scholar
• Reitun JB, Reith A. Die Bedeutung der Gewebepra¨ para-tion, insbesondere der Fixierung und Fa¨ rbung fu¨ r die Morphometrie und Stereologie. In: Burger G, Oberholzer M, Go¨ ssner W, eds. Morphometrie in der Zyto-und Histopathologie. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1988:83–102.
   Google Scholar
• Rodenacker K. Vom Punkteza¨ hlen zur Bildanalyse-Vorgehensweise und technische Mo¨ glichkeiten. In: Burger G, Oberholzer M, Go¨ ssner W, eds. Morphometrie in der Zyto-und Histopathologie. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1988:25–38.
   Google Scholar
• Kemnitz J, Gubernatis G, Bunzendahl H, Ringe B, Pichlmayr R, Georgii A. Criteria for the histopathological classifcation of liver allograft and their clinical relevance. Transpl Proc. 1989;21(1):2208–2210.
   Google Scholar
• Engemann R. Technique for orthotopic rat liver transplantation. In: Thiede A, Deltz E, Engemann R, Hamelmann H, eds. Microsurgical Models in Rats for Transplantation Research. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1985:69–70.
   Google Scholar
• Schutte B, Reynders MMJ, Bosman FT, Blijham GH. Effect of tissue fxation on anti-bromodeoxyuridine immuno-histochemistry. J Histochem Cytochem. 1987;35:1343–1345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemasters JJ, Thurman RG. Endothelial cell damage and Kupffer cell activation in reperfusion injury to livers stored for transplantation. In: Collins GM, Dubernard JM, Land W, Persijn GG, eds. Procurement, Preservation and Alloca-tion of Vascularized Organs. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht: 1997:137–145.
   Google Scholar
• Thurman RG, Bunzendahl H, Lemasters JJ. Role of sinu-soidal lining cells in hepatic reperfusion injury follow-ing cold storage and transplantation. In: Seminars in Liver Disease, 13th ed. New York: Thieme, 1993:93–100.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway CMB, Harvey PRC, Strasberg SM. Viability of sinusoidal lining cells in cold-preserved rat liver allografts. Transplantation. 1990;49(1):225–229.
   Google Scholar
• Walcher F, Marzi I, Bu¨ hren V. The impact of liver preser-vation in HTK and UW solution on microcirculation af-ter liver transplantation. Transplant Int. 1992;5(1):340–342.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell-Kenkel JC, Thurman RG, Lemasters JJ. Selective loss of nonparenchymal cell viability after cold ischemic storage of rat livers. Transplantation. 1988;45(4):834–837.
   Google Scholar
• Marzi I, Zhong Z, Lemasters JJ, Thurman RG. Evidence that graft survival is not related to parenchymal cell viability in rat liver transplantation. The importance of nonparenchy-mal cells. Transplantation. 1989;48(3):463–468.
   Google Scholar
• McKeown CMB, Edwards V, Phillips MJ, Harvey PRC, Petrunka CN, Strasberg SM. Sinusoidal lining cell damage: The critical injury in cold preservation of liver allografts in the rat. Transplantation. 1988;46(2):178–191.
   Google Scholar
• Takei Y, Marzi I, Kauffman FC, Currin RT, Lemasters JJ, Thurman RG. Increase in survival time of liver transplants by protease inhibitors and a calcium channel blocker, nisoldipine. Transplantation. 1990;50(1):14–20.
   Google Scholar
• Sumimoto R, Kamada N. Lactobionate as the most im-portant component in UW solution for liver preservation. Tranplant Proc. 1990;22(5):2198–2199.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegel HU, Schleimer K, Kranz D, Oldhafer KJ. Organ preservation with EC-, HTK-and UW-solutions in ortho-topic rat liver transplantation in syngeneic rats. Part I: Functional parameters. J Invest Surg. 1998;11:49–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiegel HU, Schleimer K, Kranz D, Diller R. Orthotopic rat liver transplantation and bile duct reconstruction by a splint technique. Eur Surg Res. 1997;29:421–428.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mc Master P, Walton RM, White DGD, Medd RK, Syrakos TP. The influence of ischemia on the biliary tract. Br J Surg. 1980;67:321–324.
   Google Scholar
• Noack K, Bronk SF, Kato A, Gores GJ. The greater vulner-ability of bile duct cells to reoxygenation injury than to anoxia. Transplantation. 1993;56(3):495–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colonna JO, Shaked A, Gomes AS, Colquhoun SD, Jurim O, McDiarmid SV, Millis JM, Goldstein LI, Busuttil RW. Biliary strictures complicating liver transplantation. Ann Surg. 1992;216:344–352.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kadmon M, Bleyl J, Kueppers B, Otto G, Herfarth C. Biliary complications after prolonged University of Wisconsin preservation of liver allografts. Transplant Proc. 1993;25(1):1651–1652.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell-Kenkel JC, Currin RT, Tanaka Y, Thurman RG, Lemasters JJ. Kupffer cell activation and endothelial cell damage after storage of rat livers: Effects of reperfusion. Hepatology. 1991;13(1):83–95.
   Google Scholar