How diversity gets lost: Age and gender in design practices of information and communication technologies

References

• Aarts, E., Harwig, R., & Schuurmans, M. (2001). Ambient intelligence. In P. Denning (Ed.), The invisible future (pp. 235–250). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Aarts, E., & Marzano, S. (2003). The new everyday: Views on ambient intelligence. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: 010 publishers; Koninklijke Philips Electronics n.v.
   Google Scholar
• Akrich, M. (1992). The description of technical objects. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205–225). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akrich, M. (1995). User representations: Practices, methods and sociology. In A. Rip, T. Misa, & J. Schot (Eds.), Managing technology in society: The approach of constructive technology assessment (pp. 167–184). London, England: Pinter Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. (1994). Business Plan of KidCom. Eindhoven: Philips.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, A., & Lie, M. (1995). Feminism and constructivism: Do artifacts have gender? Science,Technology and Human Values, 20(3), 332–351. doi:10.1177/016224399502000304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassel, J. (2002). Genderizing HCI. In J. Jacko & A. Seras (Eds.), The handbook of human-computer interaction (pp. 402–411). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cassel, J., & Jenkins, H. (Eds.). (1998). From Barbie to Mortal Combat: Gender and computer games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, M., & Anderson, B. (1967). Culture and ageing: An anthropological study of old Americans. San Francisco, CA: Langley Porter Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, R. (1987). The consumption junction: A proposal for research strategies in the sociology of technology. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 261–281). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. doi:10.2307/1229039
   Google Scholar
• Cross, T. (2011, December 10). All the world’s a game: A special report on video games. The Economist. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/node/21541164
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, S. (2006). Technological change and aging. In R. Binstock & L. George (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (6th ed., pp. 257–276). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B9-78-012088-3/88250-0183
   Google Scholar
• Downer, J. (2007). When the chick hits the fan: Representativeness and reproducibility in technological tests. Social Studies of Science, 37(1), 7–26. doi:10.1177/0306312706064235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, W. (2000). The power and the pleasure? A research agenda for making gender stick to engineers. Science, Technology & Human Values, 25(1), 87–119. doi:10.1177/016224390002500104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, C. (2010). Delusions of gender: How our minds, society, and neurosexism create difference. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, C. (1988). Gender and the residential telephone. Sociological Forum, 3(2), 211–233. doi:10.1007/BF01115291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gansmo, H. J. (2003). Inclusion through fun and play. In E. Rommes, I. Van Slooten, E. Van Oost, & N. Oudshoorn (Eds.), Designing inclusion. The development of ICT products to include women in the information society. Publication EU project Strategies of Inclusion. Enschede, The Netherlands: Gender and the Information Society.
   Google Scholar
• Gilleard, C., & Higgs, P. (2010). Aging without agency: Theorizing the fourth age. Aging & Mental Health, 14(2), 121–128. doi:10.1080/13607860903228762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, J. (1992). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (1998). Complete freedom of movement: Video games as gendered play spaces. In J. Cassel & H. Jenkins (Eds.), From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: Gender and computer games (pp. 262–297). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, K., & Loe, M. (Eds.). (2010). Technogenerians: Studying health and illness through an ageing, science, and technology lens (sociology of health and illness monographs). Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, K., & Mamo, L. (2006). Graying the cyborg: New directions in feminist analyses of aging, science, and technology. In T. Calasanti & K. Slevin (Eds.), Age matters: realigning feminist thinking (pp. 99–121). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis; Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y., Heeter, C., & Sun, J. (2008). Beyond Barbie and Mortal Combat: New perspectives on gender and computer games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R., & Pinch, T. (1996). Users as agents of technological change: The social construction of the automobile in the rural United States. Technology and Culture, 37(4), 763–795. doi:10.2307/3107097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lykke, N. (2011). Intersectional analysis in feminism—between conflicts and synergies. In H. Lutz, M. Vivar, & L. Supik (Eds.), Framing intersectionality: Debates on a multi-faceted concept in gender studies (pp. 262–297). Farnham, England: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Maass, S., & Rommes, E. (2007). Uncovering the invisible: Gender-sensitive analysis of call center work and software. In I. Zorn, S. Maass, E. Rommes, C. Schirmer, & H. Schelhowe (Eds.), Gender design IT (pp. 97–108). Berlin, Germany: Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D. (1989). From Kwajalein to Armageddon? Testing and the social construction of missile accuracy. In D. Gooding, T. Pinch, & S. Schaffer (Eds.), The uses of experiment (pp. 409–436). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. SIGNS: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771–1800. doi:10.1086/426800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreadie, C. (2010). Technology and older people. In D. Dannefer & C. Phillipson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social gerontology (pp. 607–617). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Minichiello, V., Browne, J., & Kendig, H. (2000). Perceptions and consequences of ageism: Views of older people. Ageing and Society, 20, 253–278. doi:10.1017/S0144686X99007710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moir, A., & Jessel, D. (1992). Brain sex: The real difference between men & women. New York, NY: Dell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mort, M., & Roberts, C. (2010, September 2–4). At home with machines: Technology in/dependence and ageing. Paper presented at the EASST 2010 conference: Practicing science and technology; performing the social, Trento, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Neven, L. (2010). “But obviously not for me”: Robots, laboratories and the defiant identity of elder test users. Sociology of Health and Illness, 32(2), 335–347. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01218.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neven, L. (2011). Representation of the old and ageing in the design of the new and emerging. Assessing the design of ambient intelligence technologies for older people (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Ney, S. (2009). Resolving messy policy problems: Handling conflict in environmental, transport, health and ageing policy. London, England: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Oldenziel, R. (1999). Making technology masculine: Men, women and modern machines in America 1870–1945. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orenstein, P. (2011). Cinderella ate my daughter. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Oudshoorn, N. (1996). A natural order of things? Reproductive sciences and the politics of othering. In G. Robertson, M. Mash, L. Tickner, J. Bird, B. Curtis, & T. Putnam (Eds.), FutureNatural; nature, science, culture (pp. 122–133). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oudshoorn, N. (2003). The male pill, a biography of a technology in the making. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oudshoorn, N., & Pinch, T. (2003). Introduction: How users and non-users matter. In N. Oudshoorn & T. Pinch (Eds.), How users matter: The co-construction of users and technologies (pp. 1–25). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oudshoorn, N., Rommes, E., & Stienstra, M. (2004). Configuring the user as everybody: Gender and design cultures in information and communication technologies. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 29(1), 30–63. doi:10.1177/0162243903259190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinch, T. (1993). “Testing—one, two, three … testing!”: Toward a sociology of testing. Science, Technology & Human Values, 18(1), 25–41. doi:10.1177/016224399301800103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pool, R. (1994). Eve’s rib: The biological roots of sex differences. New York, NY: Crown Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rommes, E. (2002). Gender scripts and the Internet: The design and use of Amsterdam’s digital city. Enschede, The Netherlands: Twente University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rommes, E. (2011). Inclusion by design? Practices in private companies. In K. Sørensen, E. Rommes, & W. Faulkner (Eds.), Technologies of inclusion: Gender in the information society (pp. 109–127). Trondheim, Norway: Tapir Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rommes, E., Oudshoorn, N., & Stienstra, M. (2003). KidCom designer case. In C. MacKeogh & P. Preston (Eds.), Strategies of inclusion: Gender and the information society. Vol. II: Experiences from private and voluntary sector initiatives (pp. 189–217). Trondheim, Norway: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Salari, S. (2006). Infantilization as elder mistreatment: Evidence from five adult day centers. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 17(4), 53–91. doi:10.1300/J084v17n04_04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salari, S., & Rich, M. (2001). Social and environmental infantilization of aged persons: Observations in two adult day care centers. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 52(2), 115–134. doi:10.2190/1219-B2GW-Y5G1-JFEG
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. (2003). Boys and girls stay in to play: Creating inclusive and exclusive computer entertainment for children. In C. MacKeogh & P. Preston (Eds.), Strategies of inclusion: Gender and the information society. Vol. II: Experiences from private and voluntary sector initiatives (pp. 259–281). Trondheim, Norway: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J., & Williams, R. (2005). The wrong trousers? Beyond the design fallacy: Social learning and the user. In H. Rohracher (Ed.), User involvement in innovation processes strategies and limitations from a socio-technical perspective (pp. 39–72). Munich, Germany: Profil Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Stienstra, M. (2003). Is every kid having fun? A gender approach to interactive toy design. Enschede, The Netherlands: Twente University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Styhre, A., Backman, M., & Börjesson, S. (2005). The gendered machine: Concept car development at Volvo Car Corporation. Gender, Work, and Organization, 12(6), 551–571. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2004.00288.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. (1992). “I don’t feel old”: Subjective ageing and the search for meaning in later life. Ageing and Society, 12, 23–47. doi:10.1017/S0144686X00004657
   Google Scholar
• Tinker, A. (2011). Technology and ageing. In I. Stuart-Hamilton (Ed.), An introduction to gerontology (pp. 363–388). Cambridge, England: Cambrige University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Oost, E. (2003). Materialized gender: How shavers configure the users’ femininity and masculinity. In N. Oudshoorn & T. Pinch (Eds.), How users matter: The co-construction of users and technologies (pp. 193–209). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wajcman, J. (1991). Feminism confronts technology. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wajcman, J. (2010). Feminist theories of technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34, 143–152. doi:10.1093/cje/ben057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, R. (1997). Manufacturing gender in commercial and military cockpit design. Science, Technology & Human Values, 22(2), 235–253. doi:10.1177/016224399702200204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, J., & Ferraro, K. (2002). Thirty year of ageism research. In T. Nelson (Ed.), Ageism: Stereotyping and prejudice against older persons (pp. 339–358). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woolgar, S. (1991). Configuring the user: The case of usability trials. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters (pp. 58–99). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar