Can concern for the long-term care of older parents explain son preference at birth in India?

References

• Agarwal, B. (1994). A field of one’s own: Gender and land rights in South Asia. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agewell Foundation. (2013, December). Health: Long-term care services for old people in India. Paper presented at the Regional Expert Meeting at UN-ESCAP, Shanghai, China.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, F., Choe, M. K., & Roy, T. K. (1996). Son preference: The family-building process and child mortality in India. East-West Center Working Paper, Population Series, 85.
   Google Scholar
• Babu, K. V., Rani, D. U., & Reddy, M. V. S. (2003). Economic value of children and fertility. New Delhi, India: Discovery Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Chamarbagwala, R. (2011). Sibling composition and selective gender-based survival bias. Journal of Population Economics, 24(3), 935–955. doi:10.1007/s00148-010-0314-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, C. L. W., Yip, P. S. F., Ng, E. H. Y., Ho, P. C., Chan, C. H. Y., & Au, J. S. K. (2002). Gender selection in China: Its meanings and implications. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 19(9), 426–430. doi:10.1023/A:1016815807703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Li, H., & Meng, L. (2012). Parental sex selection and missing girls in China. Osaka, Japan: Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
   Google Scholar
• Cigno, A. (1992). Children and pensions. Journal of Population Economics, 5, 175–183. doi:10.1007/BF00172091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cigno, A., & Werding, M. (2007). Children and pensions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colombo, F., Llena-Nazal, A., Mercier, J., & Tjadens, F. (2011). Help wanted? Providing and paying for long-term care. Paris, France: Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cooney, S., & Di, J. (1999). Primary family caregivers of impaired elderly in Shanghai, China: Kin relationship and caregiver burden. Research on Aging, 21(6), 739–761. doi:10.1177/0164027599216002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das Gupta, M., Zhenghua, J., Bohua, L., Zhenming, X., Chung, W., & Hwa-Ok, B. (2003). Why is son preference so persistent in east and south Asia? A cross-country study of China, India and the Republic of Korea. Journal of Development Studies, 40(2), 153–187. doi:10.1080/00220380412331293807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai, S., Dubey, A., Joshi, B. L., Sen, M., Shariff, A., & Vanneman, R. (2010). Human development in India: Challenges for a society in transition. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dharmalingam, G. (1996). The social context of family size preference and fertility behavior in South Indian villages. Genus, 52(1–2), 83–103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ganatra, B. R., Hirve, S. S., Walawalker, S., Garda, L., & Rao, V. N. (2000, February). Induced abortion in a rural community in western Maharashtra: Prevalence and patterns. Paper presented at the Workshop on Reproductive Health in India: New Evidence and Issues, Pune, India.
   Google Scholar
• Government of India. Ministry of Law and Justice. (2007). Constitution of India. Article 41. Retrieved from http://www.lawmin.nic.in/coi/coiason29july08.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hammad, B., & Rajoria, S. (2013). Economics and sociology of son preference in India. European Academic Research, 1(7), 1595–1605.
   Google Scholar
• Horioka, C. Y. (2014). Are Americans and Indians more altruistic than the Japanese and Chinese? Evidence from a new international survey of bequest plans. Review of Economics of the Household, 12(3), 411–437. doi:10.1007/s11150-014-9252-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha, P., Kesler, M., Kumar, R., Ram, F., Ram, U., Aleksandrowicz, L. … Banthia, J. K. (2011). Trends in selective abortions of girls in India: Analysis of nationally representative birth histories from 1990 to 2005 and census data from 1991 to 2011. The Lancet, 377, 1921–1928. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60649-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadoya, Y., & Khan, M. S. R. (2015). The role of gender in long-term care for older parents: Evidence from India. Discussion Paper, E14-15. Nagoya, Japan: Economic Research Center, Nagoya University.
   Google Scholar
• Kadoya, Y., & Yin, T. (2014). Who will care for older people in China? Exploring the implications of gender imbalance at birth. Working with Older People, 18(2), 97–105. doi:10.1108/WWOP-01-2014-0002
   Google Scholar
• Kadoya, Y., & Yin, T. (2015). Widow discrimination and family caregiving in India: Evidence from microdata collected from six major cities. Journal of Women & Aging, 27(1), 59–67. doi:10.1080/08952841.2014.928486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, U., Chung, W., & Das Gupta, M. (1998). Fertility and son preference in Korea. Population Studies, 52(3), 317–325. doi:10.1080/0032472031000150496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandelbaum, D. G. (1948). The family in India. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 4(2), 123–139.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, B., & Cafasso, L. (1992). Gender differences in caregiving: Fact or artifact? The Gerontologist, 32(4), 498–507. doi:10.1093/geront/32.4.498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oomman, N., & Ganatra, B. R. (2002). Sex selection: The systematic elimination of girls. Reproductive Health Matters, 10(19), 184–188. doi:10.1016/S0968-8080(02)00029-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2005). Long-term care for older people. Paris, France: Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2013). Pensions at a glance: Asia/Pacific 2013. Paris, France: Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Oster, E. (2008). Proximate sources of population sex imbalance in India. Demography, 46(2), 325–339. doi:10.1353/dem.0.0055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pande, R. P., & Astone, N. M. (2007). Explaining son preference in rural India: The independent role of structural versus individual factors. Population Research Policy Review, 26, 1–29. doi:10.1007/s11113-006-9017-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinquart, M., & Sörensen, S. (2006). Gender differences in caregiver stressors, social resources, and health: An updated meta-analysis. Journal of Gerontology: Psychology Science, 61B(1), 33–45. doi:10.1093/geronb/61.1.P33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, L., & Rao, V. (2004). The determinants of gender equity in India: Examining Dyson and Moore’s thesis with new data. Population and Development Review, 30(2), 239–268. doi:10.1111/padr.2004.30.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittirong, J., Prasartkul, P., & Rindfuss, R. R. (2014). From whom do older persons prefer support? The case of rural Thailand. Journal of Aging Studies, 31, 171–181. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2014.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stöhr, T. (2015). Siblings’ interaction in migration decisions: Who provides for the elderly left behind? Journal of Population Economics, 28(3), 593–629. doi:10.1007/s00148-015-0546-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, K. T. (1998). An exploration of actions of filial piety. Journal of Aging Studies, 12(4), 369–386. doi:10.1016/S0890-4065(98)90025-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlassoff, C. (1990). The value of sons in an Indian village: How widows see it. Population Studies, 44(1), 5–20. doi:10.1080/0032472031000144356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, G., Su, X., & Hatton-Yeo, A. (2012). The security for Chinese older people in urban–rural one child families. Working with Older People, 16(2), 88–96. doi:10.1108/13663661211231846
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2014). Gender statistics. World DataBank. Retrieved from http://databank.worldbank.org/Data/Views/VariableSelection/SelectVariables.aspx?source=283#c_c
   Google Scholar
• Zhan, H. J., & Montgomery, R. J. V. (2003). Gender and elder care in China: The influence of filial piety and structural constraints. Gender & Society, 17(2), 209–229. doi:10.1177/0891243202250734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar