How the Supplier Relationship, Market Position, and Proximity Impact Supplier Involvement and New Product Performance

References

• Aitken, B. J., and Harrison, A. E. 1994. Do domestic firms benefit from foreign direct investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review 89(3): 605–618. doi:10.1257/aer.89.3.605
   Google Scholar
• Benton, W., and Maloni, M. 2005. The influence of power driven buyer/seller relationships on supply chain satisfaction. Journal of Operations Management 23(1): 1–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2004.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidault, F., Despres, C., and Butler, C. 1998. The drivers of cooperation between buyers and suppliers for product innovation. Research Policy 26(7–8): 719–732. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00034-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birou, L. M., and Fawcett, S. E. 1994. Supplier involvement in integrated product development. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 24(5): 4–14. doi: 10.1108/09600039410063982
   Google Scholar
• Blenkhorn, D. L., and Noori, A. H. 1990. What it takes to supply Japanese OEMs. Industrial Marketing Management 19(1): 21–30. doi: 10.1016/0019-8501(90)90024-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonaccorsi, A., and Lipparini, A. 1994. Strategic partnerships in new product development: An Italian case study. Journal of Product Innovation Management 11(2): 134–145. doi: 10.1111/1540-5885.1120134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brettel, M., and Cleven, N. J. 2011. Innovation culture, collaboration with external partners and NPD performance. Creativity and Innovation Management 20(4): 253–272. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2011.00617.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broekel, T., and Boschma, R. 2012. Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: the proximity paradox. Journal of Economic Geography 12(2): 409–433. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbr010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, A. S., and Pearson, J. N. 2002. The impact of purchasing and supplier involvement on strategic purchasing and its impact on firm’s performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 22(9): 1032–1053. doi: 10.1108/01443570210440528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, S.-C., Chen, R.-H., Lin, R.-J., Tien, S.-W., and Sheu, C. 2006. Supplier involvement and manufacturing flexibility. Technovation 26(10): 1136–1146. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2005.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, K. B. 1989. Project scope and project performance: The effect of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development. Management Science 35(10): 1247–1263. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.35.10.1247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., and Aiken, L. S. 2013. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davila, T. 2000. An empirical study on the drivers of management control systems’ design in new product development. Accounting, Organizations and Society 25(4–5): 383–409. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00034-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devaraj, S., Hollingworth, D. G., and Schroeder, R. G. 2004. Generic manufacturing strategies and plant performance. Journal of Operations Management 22(3): 313–333. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2004.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowlatshahi, S. 2000. Designer–buyer–supplier interface: Theory versus practice. International Journal of Production Economics 63(2): 111–130. doi: 10.1016/S0925-5273(99)00009-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., and Oh, S. 1987. Developing buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing 51(2): 11–27. doi: 10.2307/1251126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, J. H. 1997. Effective interfirm collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value. Strategic Management Journal 18(7): 535–556. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7 < 535::AID-SMJ885 > 3.0.CO;2-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, J. H., and Singh, H. 1998. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review 23(4): 660–679. doi: 10.2307/259056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, T., and Wang, D. 2013. Supply chain involvement for better product development performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems 113(2): 190–206. doi: 10.1108/02635571311303532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitjar, R. D., and Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2013. Firm collaboration and modes of innovation in Norway. Research Policy 42(1): 128–138. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fliess, S., and Becker, U. 2006. Supplier integration—Controlling of co-development processes. Industrial Marketing Management 35(1): 28–44. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrigós, J. A., and Molina, M. M. 2020. Integrating customers and suppliers in retail co-innovation. Research Technology Management 63(3): 33–41. doi: 10.1080/08956308.2020.1733887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. 1983. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory 1:201–233. doi: 10.2307/202051
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, A., and Page, A. L. 1996. PDMA success measurement project: Recommended measures for product development success and failure. Journal of Product Innovation Management 13(6): 478–496. doi: 10.1111/1540-5885.1360478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, J. L., Meredith, J. R., McCutcheon, D., and Kamath, E. R. 1997. Suppliers’ contributions to product development: An exploratory study. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 44(3): 258–267. doi: 10.1109/17.618077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauptman, O. 1990. The different roles of communication in software development and hardware R&D: Phenomenologic paradox or atheoretical empiricism? Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 7(1): 49–71. doi: 10.1016/0923-4748(90)90025-3
   Google Scholar
• He, Y., Keung Lai, K., Sun, H., and Chen, Y. 2014. The impact of supplier integration on customer integration and new product performance: The mediating role of manufacturing flexibility under trust theory. International Journal of Production Economics 147:260–270. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.04.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ireland, R. D., and Webb, J. W. 2007. A multi-theoretic perspective on trust and power in strategic supply chains. Journal of Operations Management 25(2): 482–497. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2006.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jap, S. D., and Ganesan, S. 2000. Control mechanisms and the relationship life cycle: Implications for safeguarding specific investments and developing commitment. Journal of Marketing Research 37(2): 227–245. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.37.2.227.18735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jean, R. B., Kim, D., Shin, G. C., and Hult, T. 2021. Enhancing performance in emerging-market-supplier/MNE-buyer relationships: An examination of the interplay between virtual and relational governance. Industrial Marketing Management 93:101–114. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., and Onwuegbuzie, A. J. 2004. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher 33(7): 14–26. doi: 10.3102/0013189X033007014
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, W. H. A., and Filippini, R. 2013. Integration capabilities as mediator of product development practices–performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 30(1): 95–111. doi: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2012.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyanaram, G., Robinson, W. T., and Urban, G. L. 1995. Order of market entry: established empirical generalizations, emerging empirical generalizations, and future research. Marketing Science 14(3): 212–221. doi: 10.1287/mksc.14.3.G212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenis, P., and Knoke, D. 2002. How organizational field networks shape interorganizational tie-formation rates. Academy of Management Review 27(2): 275–293. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2002.6588029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler, E. H., and Chakrabarti, A. K. 1996. Innovation speed: A conceptual model of context, antecedents, and outcomes. Academy of Management Review 21(4): 1143–1191. doi: 10.2307/259167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiessling, T., Harvey, M., and Garrison, G. 2004. The importance of boundary-spanners in global supply chains and logistics management in the 21st century. Journal of Global Marketing 17(4): 93–115. doi: 10.1300/J042v17n04_06
   Google Scholar
• Knoben, J., and Oerlemans, L. A. G. 2006. Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration: A literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews 8(2): 71–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamming, R. 1993. Beyond Partnership: Strategies for Innovation and Lean Supply. London: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, G. S., Abel, K. D., Valentine, W. S., and Wright, R. C. 1999. Key factors in increasing speed to market and improving new product success rates. Industrial Marketing Management 28(4): 319–326. doi: 10.1016/S0019-8501(98)00008-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makino, S., and Beamish, P. W. 1998. Performance and survival of joint ventures with non-conventional ownership structures. Journal of International Business Studies 29(4): 797–818. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCutcheon, D. M., Grant, R. A., and Hartley, J. 1997. Determinants of new product designers’ satisfaction with suppliers’ contributions. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 14(3–4): 273–290. doi: 10.1016/S0923-4748(97)00012-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao, F., Wang, G., and Jiraporn, P. 2018. Key supplier involvement in IT-enabled operations: When does it lead to improved performance? Industrial Marketing Management 75:134–145. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millson, M. R., and Wilemon, D. 2002. The impact of organizational integration and product development proficiency on market success. Industrial Marketing Management 31(1): 1–23. doi: 10.1016/S0019-8501(99)00126-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorman, C., and Slotegraaf, R. J. 1999. The contingency value of complementary capabilities in product development. Journal of Marketing Research 36(2): 239–257. doi: 10.2307/3152096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerkar, A., and Miceli, K. A. 2018. Boundary spanning. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management, edited by Mie Augier and David J. Teece. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-00772-8_333
   Google Scholar
• Olson, E. M., Walker, O. C., and Ruekert, R. W. 1995. Organizing for effective new product development: The moderating role of product innovativeness. Journal of Marketing 59(1): 48–62. doi: 10.2307/1252014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulraj, A., Lado, A. A., and Chen, I. J. 2008. Inter-organizational communication as a relational competency: Antecedents and performance outcomes in collaborative buyer–SIs. Journal of Operations Management 26(1): 45–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2007.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, K. J., Handfield, R. B., and Ragatz, G. L. 2003. A model of supplier integration into new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 20(4): 284–299. doi: 10.1111/1540-5885.00028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, K. J., Handfield, R. B., and Ragatz, G. L. 2005. Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design. Journal of Operations Management 23(3–4): 371–388. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2004.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. 1983. The technological dimension of competitive strategy. In Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy. vol. 1, edited by Peters TJ and Waterman RH (1982), In Search of Excellence-Lessons from America’s Best-run Companies, New York: Harper and Row, 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Ragatz, G. L., Handfield, R. B., and Petersen, K. J. 2002. Benefits associated with supplier integration into new product development under conditions of technology uncertainty. Journal of Business Research 55(5): 389–400. doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00158-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rampersad, G., Quester, P., and Troshani, I. 2010. Managing innovation networks: Exploratory evidence from ICT, biotechnology and nanotechnology networks. Industrial Marketing Management 39(5): 793–805. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2009.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard, P. J., Devinney, T. M., Yip, G. S., and Johnson, G. 2009. Measuring organizational performance: Towards methodological best practice. Journal of Management 35(3): 718–804. doi: 10.1177/0149206308330560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, W. T., and Chiang, J. 2002. Product development strategies for established market pioneers, early followers, and late entrants. Strategic Management Journal 23(9): 855–866. doi: 10.1002/smj.257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, M. J., Katsikeas, C. S., and Bello, D. C. 2008. Drivers and performance outcomes of trust in international strategic alliances: The role of organizational complexity. Organization Science 19(4): 647–665. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvador, F., and Villena, V. H. 2013. Supplier integration and NPD outcomes: conditional moderation effects of modular design competence. Journal of Supply Chain Management 49(1): 87–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-493x.2012.03275.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, M., and Di Benedetto, C. A. 2008. Supplier’s involvement and success of radical new product development in new ventures. Journal of Operations Management 26(1): 1–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2007.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, M., and Parry, M. E. 1999. Challenges of managing the development of breakthrough products in Japan. Journal of Operations Management 17(6): 665–688. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00019-4
   Google Scholar
• Stojčić, N. 2021. Collaborative innovation in emerging innovation systems: Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe. The Journal of Technology Transfer 46(5–6): 531–562. doi: 10.1007/s10961-020-09792-8
   Google Scholar
• Swink, M., Narasimhan, R., and Wang, C. 2007. Managing beyond the factory walls: Effects of four types of strategic integration on manufacturing plant performance. Journal of Operations Management 25(1): 148–164. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2006.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, C. L., and Tracey, M. 2007. Collaborative new product development environments: Implications for supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management 43(3): 2–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2007.00031.x
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, E. 2013. Supplier integration in new product development: Computer mediated communication, knowledge exchange and buyer performance. Industrial Marketing Management 42(6): 890–899. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.05.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tichy, N. M., Tushman, M. L., and Fombrun, C. 1979. Social network analysis for organizations. Academy of Management Review 4(4): 507–519. doi: 10.2307/257851
   Google Scholar
• Torre, A., and Rallet, A. 2005. Proximity and localization. Regional Studies 39(1): 47–59. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracey, M., and Leng Tan, C. 2001. Empirical analysis of supplier selection and involvement, customer satisfaction, and firm performance. Supply Chain Management 6(4): 174–188. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000005709
   Google Scholar
• Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(1): 35–67. doi: 10.2307/2393808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos, F. C., and Ramirez, R. 2011. Complexity in business environments. Journal of Business Research 64(3): 236–241. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Corswant, F., and Tunälv, C. 2002. Coordinating customers and proactive suppliers. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 19(3–4): 249–261. doi: 10.1016/S0923-4748(02)00020-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. 1988. The Sources of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, A. 1999. Relationship promoters. Industrial Marketing Management 28(5): 537–551. doi: 10.1016/S0019-8501(99)00081-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Modi, S. B., and Schoenherr, T. 2021. Leveraging sustainable design practices through supplier involvement in new product development: The role of the suppliers’ environmental management capability. International Journal of Production Economics 232. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107919
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weterings, A., and Boschma, R. 2009. Does spatial proximity to customers matter for innovative performance?: Evidence from the Dutch software sector. Research Policy 38(5): 746–755. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuyts, S., Dutta, S., and Stremersch, S. 2004. Portfolios of interfirm agreements in technology-intensive markets: Consequences for innovation and profitability. Journal of Marketing 68(2): 88–100. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.68.2.88.27787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynstra, F., and Pierick, E. T. 2000. Managing supplier involvement in new product development: a portfolio approach. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 6(1): 49–57. doi: 10.1016/S0969-7012(99)00035-0
   Google Scholar
• Yin, S., Li, B., Zhang, X., and Zhang M. 2019. How to improve the quality and speed of green new product development. Processes 7(7): 443. doi: 10.3390/pr7070443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., Cavusgil, E., and Cavusgil, S. T. 2014. An investigation of the black-box supplier integration in new product development. Journal of Business Research 67(6): 1058–1064. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar