The Use of Computer Technology in Designing Appropriate Test Accommodations for English Language Learners

REFERENCES

• Abedi, J. (2006). Language issues in item-development. In S. M. Downing & T. M. Haladyna ( Eds.), Handbook of test development ( pp. 377–398). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Abedi, J. (2007). Utilizing accommodations in the assessment of English language learners. In N. H. Hornberger ( Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Vol. 7: Language testing and assessment ( pp. 331–348). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Science + Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Abedi, J. (2009). Computer testing as a form of accommodation for English language learners. Educational Assessment, 14, 195–211.
   Google Scholar
• Abedi, J. (2012). Validity issues in designing accommodations. In G. Fulcher & F. Davidson ( Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language testing ( pp. 48–62). Florence, KY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Abedi, J., Bayley, R., Ewers, N., Mundhenk, K., Leon, S., & Kao, J. (2012). Accessible reading assessments for students with disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 59(1), 81–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abedi, J., Courtney, M., Leon, S., Kao, J., and Azzam, T. (2006). English language learners and math achievement: A study of opportunity to learn and language accommodation (CSE Report 702, 2006). Los Angeles: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation/National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
   Google Scholar
• Abedi, J., Courtney, M., Mirocha, J., Leon, S., & Goldberg, J. (2005). Language accommodations for English language learners in large-scale assessments: Bilingual dictionaries and linguistic modification (CSE Report 666). Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
   Google Scholar
• Abedi, J., & Ewers, N. (2013). Accommodations for English language learners and students with disabilities: A research-based decision algorithm. Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium. Retrieved from http://www.smarterbalanced.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Accomodations-for-under-represented-students.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Abedi, J., Hofstetter, C., & Lord, C. (2004) Assessment accommodations for English language learners: Implications for policy based research. Review of Educational Research. 74(1), 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abedi, J., Leon, S., & Mirocha, J. (2003). Impact of students’ language background on content based assessment: Analyses of extant data (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 603). Los Angeles, CA: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
   Google Scholar
• Acosta, B. D., Rivera, C., & Shafer Willner, L. (2008). Best practices in state assessment policies for accommodating English language learners: A delphi study. Arlington, VA: George Washington University Center for Equity and Excellence in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Aguirre-Muñoz, Z. (2000). The impact of language proficiency on complex performance assessments: Examining linguistic accommodation strategies for English language learners (Doctoral dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles). Retrieved from Proquest Dissertations and Theses Full Text (Publication no. AAT 9973171).
   Google Scholar
• Albus, D., Bielinski, J., Thurlow, M., & Liu, K. (2001). The effect of a simplified English language dictionary on a reading test (LEP Projects Report 1). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/LEP1.html
   Google Scholar
• Allen, M., & Yen, W. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, M., Liu, K., Swierzbin, B., Thurlow, M., & Bielinski, J. (2000). Bilingual accommodations for limited English proficient students on statewide reading tests: Phase 2 (Minnesota Report No. 31). Minneapolis, MN: National Center on Educational Outcomes, University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, R. P., Burling, K. S., Harms, M., Beck, R., Hanna, E., Jude, J., … Way, W. (2009). Universal design for computer-based testing guidelines. Iowa City, IA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, T., Parent, L., Chen, W., Ferrara, S., Johnson, E., Oppler, S., & Shieh, Y. (2005). Study of a dual-language test booklet in eighth grade mathematics. Applied Measurement in Education, 18(2), 129–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ercikan, K., Roth, W.-M., Simon, M., Sandilands, D., & Lyons-Thomas, J. (2014). Inconsistencies in DIF Detection for Sub-Groups in Heterogeneous Language Groups. Applied Measurement in Education, 27, 273–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haladyna, T. M., & Downing, S. M. (2004). Construct-irrelevant variance in high-stakes testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 23(1), 17–27.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstetter, C. (2003). Contextual and mathematics accommodation test effects for English-language learners, Applied Measurement in Education, 16(2), 159–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kieffer, M. J., Lesaux, N. K., Rivera, M., & Francis, D. J. (2009). Accommodations for English language learners taking large-scale assessments: A meta-analysis on effectiveness and validity. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1168–1201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopriva, R., Emick, J., Hipolito-Delgado, C., & Cameron, C. (2007). Do proper accommodation assignments make a difference? Examining the impact of improved decision making on scores for English language learners. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 26(3), 11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kopriva, R. J., Gabel, D., & Cameron, C. (2009). Overview of results from the ONPAR elementary and middle school science experimental study with ELs and non-ELs: A promising new approach for measuring complex content knowledge of English learners with lower proficiency levels. Retrieved from http://onpar.us/research/reports.html
   Google Scholar
• Kopriva, R. J., & Winter, P. C. (2013). Assessing the knowledge, skills, and abilities of ELs, selected SwDs and controls on challenging high school science content: Results from randomized trials of ONPAR and technology-enhanced traditional end-of-course biology and chemistry tests. Retrieved from http://onpar.us/research/reports.html
   Google Scholar
• Pennock-Roman, M., & Rivera, C. (2011). Mean effects of test accommodations for ELLs and non-ELLs: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(3), 10–28.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. P. (2010). The effects of test translation on young English learners’ mathematics performance. Educational Researcher, 39, 582–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, M., Hoffmann, T., & Higgins, J. (2009). Meeting the needs of all students: A universal design approach to computer-based testing. Innovate, 5(4).
   Google Scholar
• Russell, M., Johnstone, C., Higgins, J., & Hoffmann, T. (2008). FCAT computer accommodations pilot study final report. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Sato, E., Rabinowitz, S., Gallagher, C., & Huang, C.W. (2010). Accommodations for English language learner students: The effect of linguistic modification of math test item sets. (NCEE 2009-4079). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Sireci, S., Li, S., & Scarpati, S. (2003). The effects of test accommodation on test performance: A review of the literature (Report No. 485). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Amherst, Center for Educational Assessment Research.
   Google Scholar
• Solano-Flores, G. (2008). Who is given tests in what language by whom, when, and where? The need for probabilistic views of language in the testing of English language learners. Educational Researcher, 37(4), 189–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solano-Flores, G. (2014). Probabilistic approaches to examining linguistic features of test items and their effect on the performance of English language learners. Applied Measurement in Education, 27, 236–247.
   Google Scholar
• Thorndike, R. (2005). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Thurlow, M., Lazarus, S. S., Albus, D., & Hodgson, J. (2010). Computer-based testing: Practices and considerations (Synthesis Report 78). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
   Google Scholar
• Young, J. W., Cho, Y., Ling, G., Cline, F., Steinberg, J., & Stone, E. (2008). Validity and fairness of state standards-based assessments for English language learners. Educational Assessment, 13, 170–192.
   Google Scholar