On the Cross-Country Comparability of Indicators of Socioeconomic Resources in PISA

References

• Bartholomew, D. J. (1980). Factor analysis for categorical data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 42, 293–321.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K., Glanville, J. A., & Stecklov, G. (2001). Socioeconomic status and class in studies of fertility and health in developing countries. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 153–185. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 371–399. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchmann, C. (2002). Measuring family background in international studies of education: Conceptual issues and methodological challenges. In A. C. Porter & A. Gamoran (Eds.), Methodological advances in cross-national surveys of educational achievement (pp. 150–197). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieciuch, J., Davidov, E., Oberski, D. L., & Algesheimer, R. (2015). Testing for measurement invariance by detecting local misspecification and an illustration across online and paper-and-pencil samples. European Political Science, 14, 521–538. doi:10.1057/eps.2015.64
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1968). The concept of equality of educational opportunity. Harvard Educational Review, 38, 7–22. doi:10.17763/haer.38.1.m3770776577415m2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane, P. K., Gibbons, L. E., Ocepek-Welikson, K., Cook, K., Cella, D., Narasimhalu, K., … Teresi, J. A. (2007). A comparison of three sets of criteria for determining the presence of differential item functioning using ordinal logistic regression. Quality of Life Research, 16, 69–84. doi:10.1007/s11136-007-9185-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran, P. J., Hussong, A. M., Cai, L., Huang, W., Chassin, L., Sher, K. J., & Zucker, R. A. (2008). Pooling data from multiple longitudinal studies: The role of item response theory in integrative data analysis. Developmental Psychology, 44, 365–380. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Divgi, D. R. (1986). Does the Rasch model really work for multiple choice items? Not if you look closely. Journal of Educational Measurement, 23, 283–298. doi:10.1111/jedm.1986.23.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ercikan, K., & Koh, K. (2005). Examining the construct comparability of the English and French versions of TIMSS. International Journal of Testing, 5, 23–35. doi:10.1207/s15327574ijt0501_3
   Google Scholar
• Ganzeboom, H. B. G., DeGraaf, P. M., & Treiman, D. J. (1992). A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status. Social Science Research, 21, 1–56. doi:10.1016/0049-089X(92)90017-B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganzeboom, H. B. G., & Treiman, D. J. (1996). Internationally comparable measures of occupational status for the 1988 International Standard Classification of Occupations. Social Science Research, 25, 201–239. doi:10.1006/ssre.1996.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, A. C., Robitzsch, A., Kiefer, T., Gross, J., & Uenlue, A. (2016). The R package CDM for cognitive diagnosis models. Journal of Statistical Software, 74(2), 1–24. doi:10.18637/jss.v074.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, E. (2012). Rescaling sampling weights and selecting mini-samples from large-scale assessment databases. In D. Hastedt & M. Von Davier (Eds.), IERI monograph series: Issues and methodologies in large-scale assessments (Vol. 5, pp. 117–134). Hamburg, Germany and Princeton, NJ: IEA-ETS Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, R. M., & Huang, M. H. (1997). Verbal ability and socioeconomic success: A trend analysis. Social Science Research, 26, 331–376. doi:10.1006/ssre.1997.0604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, S. M., & Piccinin, A. M. (2009). Integrative data analysis through coordination of measurement and analysis protocol across independent longitudinal studies. Psychological Methods, 14, 150–164. doi:10.1037/a0015566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36, 409–426. doi:10.1007/BF02291366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. (1989). Model modification in covariance structure analysis: Application of the expected parameter change statistic. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 285–305. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2403_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khorramdel, L., & Von Davier, M. (2016). Item response theory as a framework for test construction. In K. Schweizer & C. Distefano (Eds.), Principles and methods of test construction: Standards and recent advancements (pp. 52–80). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiner, S., & Christensen, K. B. (2014). Analyses of model fit and robustness. A new look at the PISA scaling model underlying ranking of countries according to reading literacy. Psychometrika, 79, 210–231. doi:10.1007/s11336-013-9347-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunina-Habenicht, O., Rupp, A. A., & Wilhelm, O. (2009). A practical illustration of multidimensional diagnostic skills profiling: Comparing results from confirmatory factor analysis and diagnostic classification models. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 35, 64–70. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2009.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. (1983). Latent variable structural equation modeling with categorical data. Journal of Econometrics, 22, 43–65. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(83)90093-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2011). Mplus user’s guide. Sixth edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (1999). Classifying educational programmes: Manual for ISCED-97 implementation in OECD countries. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2002). PISA 2000 technical report. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2009). PISA 2009 assessment framework—Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2010a). PISA 2009 results: Overcoming social background—Equity in learning opportunities and outcomes (volume II). Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2010b). PISA 2009 results: Learning trends: Changes in student performance since 2000 (volume V). Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011). Against the odds: Disadvantaged students who succeed in school. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2012). PISA 2009 technical report. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264190511-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 technical report. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveri, M. E., & Ercikan, K. (2011). Do different approaches to examining construct comparability in multilanguage assessments lead to similar conclusions? Applied Measurement in Education, 24, 349–366. doi:10.1080/08957347.2011.607063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveri, M. E., & Von Davier, M. (2011). Investigation of model fit and score scale comparability in international assessments. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 53, 315–333.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveri, M. E., & Von Davier, M. (2014). Toward increasing fairness in score scale calibrations employed in international large-scale assessments. International Journal of Testing, 14, 1–21. doi:10.1080/15305058.2013.825265
   Google Scholar
• Rensvold, R. B., & Cheung, G. W. (1998). Testing measurement models for factorial invariance: A systematic approach. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 1017–1034. doi:10.1177/0013164498058006010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutkowski, D., & Rutkowski, L. (2013). Measuring socioeconomic background in PISA: One size might not fit all. Research in Comparative and International Education, 8(3), 259–278. doi:10.2304/rcie.2013.8.3.259
   Google Scholar
• Rutkowski, L., & Svetina, D. (2014). Assessing the hypothesis of measurement invariance in the context of large-scale international surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 31–57. doi:10.1177/0013164413498257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research 1990–2000. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417–453. doi:10.3102/00346543075003417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skrondal, A., & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2004). Generalized latent variable modeling: Multilevel, longitudinal, and structural equation models. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• White, K. R. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 461–481. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.91.3.461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker, T. A. (2012). Using the modification index and standardized expected parameter change for model modification. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80, 26–44. doi:10.1080/00220973.2010.531299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widaman, K. F., & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In K. J. Bryant, M. Windle, & S. G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281–324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design. Chicago, IL: MESA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, K., Khorramdel, L., & Von Davier, M. (2013). ETS scaling PIAAC cognitive data (OECD Technical Report of the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC)). Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/skills/piaac/_Technical%20Report_17OCT13.pdf
   Google Scholar