On the Reliable Identification and Effectiveness of Computer-Based, Pop-Up Glossaries in Large-Scale Assessments

References

• Abedi, J. (2009). Computer testing as a form of accommodation for English language learners. Educational Assessment, 14, 195–211. doi:10.1080/10627190903448851
   Google Scholar
• Abedi, J. (2013). Validity issues in designing accommodations for English language learners. In The Routledge handbook of language testing (pp. 62–76). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Abedi, J., Courtney, M., & Leon, S. (2003). Research-supported accommodation for English language learners in NAEP(CSE Technical Report No. 586). Los Angeles, CA: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
   Google Scholar
• Abedi, J., & Ewers, N. (2013). Accommodations for English language learners and students with disabilities: A research based decision algorithm. Retrieved from https://portal.smarterbalanced.org/library/en/accommodations-for-english-language-learners-and-students-with-disabilities-a-research-based-decision-algorithm.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Abedi, J., & Gándara, P. (2006). Performance of English language learners as a subgroup in large-scale assessment: Interaction of research and policy. Educational Measurement: Issues & Practice, 25(4), 36–46. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2006.00077.x
   Google Scholar
• Abedi, J., Hofstetter, C. H., & Lord, C. (2004). Assessment accommodations for English language learners: Implications for policy-based empirical research. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 1–28. doi:10.3102/00346543074001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education, Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (U.S.). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: AERA.
   Google Scholar
• Avenia-Tapper, B., & Llosa, L. (2015). Construct relevant or irrelevant? The role of linguistic complexity in the assessment of English language learners’ science knowledge. Educational Assessment, 20(2), 95–111. doi:10.1080/10627197.2015.1028622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, J. M., Kerlin, J. R., & Pollio, H. R. (1970). Training manualfor identifyingfigurative language (Report No, 1), Knoxville: University of Tennessee Metaphor Research Group.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D., Tracy, R., & Cohen, J. (2017). On the effectiveness of pop-up English language glossary accommodations for EL students in large-scale assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 30(4), 259–272. doi:10.1080/08957347.2017.1353986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. J., Ballman, A., Rijmen, F., & Cohen, J., (2019). Technical report: On the reliable identification and effectiveness of computer-based, pop-up glossaries in large scale assessments. Unpublished Manuscript, American Institutes for Research.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Chief State School Officers. (2016). Major provisions of Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) related to the education of English learners. Retrieved from http://www.ccsso.org/Documents/2016/ESSA/CCSSOResourceonESSAELLs02.23.2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jeon, M., Rijmen, F., & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2014). Flexible item response theory modeling with FLIRT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38(5), 404–405. doi:10.1177/0146621614524982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E., & Monroe, B. (2004). Simplified language as an accommodation on math tests. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 29(3), 35–45. doi:10.1177/073724770402900303
   Google Scholar
• Kieffer, M. J., Lesaux, N. K., Rivera, M., & Francis, D. J. (2009). Accommodations for English language learners taking large-scale assessments: A meta-analysis on effectiveness and validity. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1168–1201. doi:10.3102/0034654309332490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiplinger, V. L., Haug, C. A., & Abedi, J. (2000). Measuring math—not reading—on a math assessment: A language accommodation study of English language learners and other special populations. Marion: Indiana Wesleyan Center for Educational Excellence. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED441813).
   Google Scholar
• Kopriva, R., Emick, J., Hipolito-Delgado, C., & Cameron, C. (2007). Do proper accommodation assignments make a difference? Examining the impact of improved decision making on scores for English language learners. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 26, 11–20. doi:10.111/j.1745-3992.2007.00097.x
   Google Scholar
• Li, H., & Suen, H. K. (2012). The effects of test accommodations for English language learners: A meta-analysis. Applied Measurement in Education, 25, 327–346. doi:10.1080/08957347.2012.714690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loenneker-Rodman, B., & Narayanan, S. (2010). Computational approaches to figurative language. Cambridge Encyclopedia of Psycholinguistics, 157, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Martiniello, M. (2008). Language and the performance of English-language learners in math word problems. Harvard Educational Review, 78(2), 333–368. doi:10.17763/haer.78.2.70783570r1111t32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martiniello, M. (2009). Linguistic complexity, schematic representations, and differential item functioning for English language learners in math tests. Educational Assessment, 14(3–4), 160–179. doi:10.1080/10627190903422906
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, Y., Assaf, D., Cohen, Y., Last, M., Argamon, S., Howard, N., & Frieder, O. (2013). Metaphor identification in large texts corpora. PloS One, 8(4), e62343. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennock-Roman, M., & Rivera, C. (2011). Mean effects of test accommodations for ELLs and non-ELLs: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30, 10–28. doi:10.111/empi.2011.30.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. doi:10.1080/10926480709336752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, R. M., & Kreuz, R. J. (1994). Why do people use figurative language? Psychological Science, 5(3), 159–163. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00653.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, E., Rabinowitz, S., Gallagher, C., & Huang, C. W. (2010). Accommodations for English language learner students: The effect of linguistic modification of math test item sets (NCEE 2009-4079). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Sireci, S. G., & Faulkner-Bond, M. (2015). Promoting validity in the assessment of English learners. Review of Research in Education, 39(1), 215–252. doi:10.3102/0091732X14557003
   Google Scholar
• Sireci, S. G., Scarpati, S. E., & Li, S. (2005). Test accommodations for students with disabilities: An analysis of the interaction hypothesis. Review of Educational Research, 75(4), 457–490. doi:10.3102/00346543075004457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solano-Flores, G. (2012). Translation accommodations framework for testing English language learners in mathematics. Retrieved from https://portal.smarterbalanced.org/library/en/translation-accommodations-framework-for-testingenglish-language-learners-in-mathematics.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Solano-Flores, G., Shade, C., & Chrzanowski, A. (2014). Item accessibility and language variation conceptual framework. Retrieved from https://portal.smarterbalanced.org/library/en/item-accessibility-and-language-variation-conceptual-framework.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2017). Fast facts: English language learners. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=96
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. K., & Leon, S. (2009). An investigation of the language demands in content assessments for English language learners. Educational Assessment, 14(3–4), 139–159. doi:10.1080/10627190903425883
   Google Scholar