Using Bayesian Networks to Characterize Student Performance across Multiple Assessments of Individual Standards

References

• Almond, R. G., DiBello, L. V., Moulder, B., & Zapata-Rivera, J.-D. (2007). Modeling diagnostic assessments with Bayesian Networks. Journal of Educational Measurement, 44(4), 341–359. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2007.00043.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almond, R. G., Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., Yan, D., & Williamson, D. M. (Eds.). (2015). Bayesian networks in educational assessment. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Almond, R. G., Mulder, J., Hemat, L. A., & Yan, D. (2009). Bayesian network models for local dependence among observable outcome variables. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34(4), 491–521. doi:10.3102/1076998609332751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almond, R. G., Shute, V. J., Underwood, J. S., & Zapata-Rivera, J.-D. (2009). Bayesian networks: A teacher’s view. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 50(3), 450–460. doi:10.1016/j.ijar.2008.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. J., & Yu, H.-T. (2007). Log-multiplicative association models as item response models. Psychometrika, 72(1), 5–23. doi:10.1007/s11336-005-1419-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balov, N. (2013). Consistent model selection of discrete Bayesian networks from incomplete data. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 7, 1047–1077. doi:10.1214/13-EJS802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balov, N., & Salzman, P. (2017). catnet: Categorical Bayesian Network Inference. Accessed 12 August 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=catnet
   Google Scholar
• Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & Van Heerden, J. (2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review, 110(2), 203. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelo, R., & Roverato, A. (2006). A robust procedure for gaussian graphical model search from microarray data with p larger than n. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7(94), 2621–2650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CCSSO/NGA. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Council of Chief State School Officers and the National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. Accessed 6 July 2020. http://corestandards.org/
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, R. P. (2012). mirt: A multidimensional item response theory package for the R environment. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(6), 1–29. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Culpepper, S. A., Wang, S., & Douglas, J. (2018). A hidden Markov model for learning trajectories in cognitive diagnosis with application to spatial rotation skills. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42(1), 5–23. doi:10.1177/0146621617721250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., & de la Torre, J. (2013). A general cognitive diagnosis model for expert-defined polytomous attributes. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 0146621613479818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2004). Learning trajectories in mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 81–89. doi:10.1207/s15327833mtl0602_1
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D., & Sarama, J. (2007). Building blocks—SRA real math, grade PreK. Columbus, OH: SRA-McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• CONATI, C., GERTNER, A., & VANLEHN, K. (2002). Using Bayesian networks to manage uncertainty in student modeling. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 12, 47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conati, C., Gertner, A. S., VanLehn, K., & Druzdzel, M. J. (1997). On-line student modeling for coached problem solving using Bayesian networks, User Modeling, 1997, Vienna. Springer. 231–242.
   Google Scholar
• Conati, C., & Maclaren, H. (2009). Empirically building and evaluating a probabilistic model of user affect. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 19(3), 267–303. doi:10.1007/s11257-009-9062-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Confrey, J., Gianopulos, G., McGowan, W., Shah, M., & Belcher, M. (2017). Scaffolding learner-centered curricular coherence using learning maps and diagnostic assessments designed around mathematics learning trajectories. ZDM, 49(5), 717–734. doi:10.1007/s11858-017-0869-1
   Google Scholar
• Confrey, J., & Maloney, A. (2010). The construction, refinement, and early validation of the equipartitioning learning trajectory, Jun-2010, Chicago IL. Vol.1. pp. 968-975. International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS) .
   Google Scholar
• Confrey, J., Maloney, A. P., & Corley, A. K. (2014). Learning trajectories: A framework for connecting standards with curriculum. ZDM, 46(5), 719–733. doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0598-7
   Google Scholar
• Confrey, J., Maloney, A., Nguyen, K., Mojica, G., & Myers, M. (2009). Equipartitioning/splitting as a foundation of rational number reasoning using learning trajectories. 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Thessaloniki, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Culbertson, M. J. (2016). Bayesian networks in educational assessment: The state of the field. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40(1), 3–21. doi:10.1177/0146621615590401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dadey, N., Tao, S., & Keng, L. (2018, April). Developing scale scores and cut scores for on-demand assessments of individual standards. Annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Daro, P., Mosher, F. A., & Corcoran, T. B. (2011). Learning trajectories in mathematics: A foundation for standards, curriculum, assessment, and instruction. Philadelphia, PA:Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Desmarais, M. C., Meshkinfam, P., & Gagnon, M. (2006). Learned student models with item to item knowledge structures. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 16(5), 403–434. doi:10.1007/s11257-006-9016-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertner, A. S., Conati, C., & VanLehn, K. (1998). Procedural help in Andes: Generating hints using a Bayesian network student model. AAAI/IAAI, 1998, 106–111.
   Google Scholar
• Gierl, M. J., & Cui, Y. (2008). Defining characteristics of diagnostic classification models and the problem of retrofitting in cognitive diagnostic assessment. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective, 6(4), 263–268.
   Google Scholar
• Gobert, J. D., Kim, Y. J., Sao Pedro, M. A., Kennedy, M., & Betts, C. G. (2015). Using educational data mining to assess students’ skills at designing and conducting experiments within a complex systems microworld. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 18, 81–90. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2015.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf, E. A., & Arieli-Attali, M. (2015). Designing and developing assessments of complex thinking in mathematics for the middle grades. Theory Into Practice, 54(3), 195–202. doi:10.1080/00405841.2015.1044365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., & Vecchi, M. P. (1983). Optimization by simulated annealing. Science, 220(4598), 671–680. doi:10.1126/science.220.4598.671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korb, K. B., & Nicholson, A. E. (2010). Bayesian artificial intelligence. United States: CRC press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, W.-C. (2010). Classification Consistency and Accuracy for Complex Assessments Using Item Response Theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, Vol. 47(1), pp. 1–17. JSTOR.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Corter, J. E. (2011). Diagnosis of subtraction bugs using bayesian networks. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35(1), 27–47. doi:10.1177/0146621610377079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, R., & Mislevy, R. (2004). Specifying and refining a measurement model for a computer-based interactive assessment. International Journal of Testing, 4(4), 333–369. doi:10.1207/s15327574ijt0404_3
   Google Scholar
• Mislevy, R. J. (1994). Probability‐based inference in cognitive diagnosis. ETS Research Report Series, 1994(1), i–31.
   Google Scholar
• Mislevy, R. J., & Gitomer, D. H. (1995). The role of probability‐based inference in an intelligent tutoring system. ETS Research Report Series, 1995(2), i–27.
   Google Scholar
• Nagarajan, R., Scutari, M., & Lèbre, S. (2013). Bayesian networks in R. New York, NY: Springer New York. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6446-4
   Google Scholar
• Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: Networks of plausible reasoning. United Kingdom:Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Perie, M., Marion, S., & Gong, B. (2009). Moving toward a comprehensive assessment system: A framework for considering interim assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 5–13. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00149.x
   Google Scholar
• Reye, J. (2004). Student modelling based on belief networks. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14(1), 63–96.
   Google Scholar
• Scutari, M. (2010). Learning Bayesian Networks with the bnlearn R Package. Journal of Statistical Software, 35(3). doi:10.18637/jss.v035.i03
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scutari, M., & Denis, J.-B. (2014). Bayesian networks: With examples in R. United Kingdom:Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114–145. doi:10.2307/749205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sniedovich, M. (2010). Dynamic programming: Foundations and principles. United States: CRC press.
   Google Scholar
• Templin, J., & Bradshaw, L. (2014). Hierarchical diagnostic classification models: A family of models for estimating and testing attribute hierarchies. Psychometrika, 79(2), 317–339. doi:10.1007/s11336-013-9362-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, P., Rutstein, D. W., Mislevy, R. J., Liu, J., Levy, R., Dicerbo, K. E., andBehrens, J. T. (2012). A bayesian network approach to modeling learning progressions. In A. C. Alonzo & A. W. Gotwals (Eds.), Learning progressions in science (pp. 257–292). Rotterdam: SensePublishers. doi:10.1007/978-94-6091-824-7_12
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, J. L. M., & Norton, A. (2018). Learning progression toward a measurement concept of fractions. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1). doi:10.1186/s40594-018-0119-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2009). Measuring progressions: Assessment structures underlying a learning progression. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 716–730. doi:10.1002/tea.20318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J. (2021). An investigation of longitudinal diagnostic classifications using a hidden Markov model (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Georgia.
   Google Scholar