References
- American National Standards Institute Inc. (ANSI) 2014. American National Standardfor Portable Rechargeable Cells and Batteries - Safety Standard: ANSI C18.2M, Part 2-2014. https://www.nema.org/Standards/ComplimentaryDocuments/Contents%20and%20Scope%20ANSI%20C18.2M,%20Part%202-2014.pdf
- Brown CJ, Cheng JM. 2014. Electronic cigarettes: product characterisation and design considerations. Tob Control. 23 (Suppl 2):ii4–10.
- Buchmann I. 2016. How does internal resistance affect performance? https://batteryuniversity.com/learn/archive/how_does_internal_resistance_affect_performance [accessed 19 Sep 2016].
- Cheng T. 2014. Chemical evaluation of electronic cigarettes. Tob Control. 23 (Suppl 2):ii11–17.
- Dawkins L, Kimber C, Puwanesarasa Y, Soar K. 2015. First- versus second-generation electronic cigarettes: predictors of choice and effects on urge to smoke and withdrawal symptoms. Addiction. 110(4):669–677.
- Food and Drug Administration 2019. Premarket tobacco product applications for electronic nicotine delivery systems: guidance for industry. Rockville, MD: U.S.Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Tobacco Products.
- Fuoco FC, Buonanno G, Stabile L, Vigo P. 2014. Influential parameters on particle concentration and size distribution in the mainstream of e-cigarettes. Environ Pollut. 184:523–529.
- Garner C, Stevens R. 2014. A brief description of history, operation and regulation. Cooperation Centre for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco. https://www.coresta.org/sites/default/files/technical_documents/main/ECIG-RefRep_Ecig-History-Operation-Regulation_Feb2014b.pdf
- Harrell PT, Simmons VN, Correa JB, Padhya TA, Brandon TH. 2014. Electronic nicotine Delivery systems ("e-cigarettes"): review of safety and smoking cessation efficacy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 151(3):381–393.
- International Electrochemical Commission. 2013. International Standard for secondary cells and batteries containing alkaline or other non-acid electrolytes: safety requirements for portable sealed secondary cells, and for batteries made from them, for use in portable applications (62133 2nd Ed., 2012, including Corrigendum 1, 2013).
- Lechner WV, Meier E, Wiener JL, Grant DM, Gilmore J, Judah MR, Mills AC, Wagener TL. 2015. The comparative efficacy of first- versus second generation electronic cigarettes in reducing symptoms of nicotine withdrawal. Addiction. 110(5):862–867.
- Malas M, van der Tempel J, Schwartz R, Minichiello A, Lightfoot C, Noormohamed A, Andrews J, Zawertailo L, Ferrence R. 2016. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: a systematic review. Nicotine Tob Res. 18(10):1926–1936.
- Schripp T, Markewitz D, Uhde E, Salthammer T. 2013. Does E-cigarette consumption cause passive smoking? Indoor Air. 23(1):25–31.
- Taylor J, Wiens T, Peterson J, Saravia S, Lunda M, Hanson K, Wogen M, D’Heilly P, Margetta J, Bye M, et al.; Lung Injury Response Task Force. 2019. Characteristics of E-cigarette, or vaping, products used by patients with associated lung injury and products seized by law enforcement - Minnesota, 2018 and 2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 68(47):1096–1100.
- The Vape Guide 2019. KandyPens special K review. [accessed 20 Dec 2019]. https://thevape.guide/reviews/kandypens-special-k-review/
- Underwriters Laboratories Inc. 2009. Underwriters laboratories standard for safety: household and commercial batteries UL 2054.
- US Fire Administration. 2017. Electronic cigarette fires and explosions in the United States 2009 - 2016. https://www.usfa.fema.gov/downloads/pdf/publications/electronic_cigarettes.pdf
- Wagener TL, Floyd EL, Stepanov I, Driskill LM, Frank SG, Meier E, Leavens EL, Tackett AP, Molina N, Queimado L. 2017. Have combustible cigarettes met their match? The nicotine delivery profiles and harmful constituent exposures of second-generation and third-generation electronic cigarette users. Tob Control. 26(e1):e23–e28.