A procedure to detect and identify specific chemicals of potential inhalation toxicity concern in aerosols

References

• Bastos PM, Haglund P. 2012. The use of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography and structure–activity modeling for screening and preliminary risk assessment of organic contaminants in soil, sediment, and surface water. J Soils Sediments. 12(7):1079–1088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker RA, Friedman KP, Simon TW, Marty MS, Patlewicz G, Rowlands JC. 2015. An exposure: activity profiling method for interpreting high-throughput screening data for estrogenic activity—proof of concept. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 71(3):398–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley MC, Almstetter M, Arndt D, Knorr A, Martin E, Pospisil P, Maeder S. 2020. Comprehensive chemical characterization of the aerosol generated by a heated tobacco product by untargeted screening. Anal Bioanal Chem. 412(11):2675–2685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blum KM, Andersson PL, Renman G, Ahrens L, Gros M, Wiberg K, Haglund P. 2017. Non-target screening and prioritization of potentially persistent, bioaccumulating and toxic domestic wastewater contaminants and their removal in on-site and large-scale sewage treatment plants. Sci Total Environ. 575:265–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booyens W, Van Zyl PG, Beukes JP, Ruiz-Jimenez J, Kopperi M, Riekkola ML, Josipovic M, Venter AD, Jaars K, Laakso L, et al. 2015. Size-resolved characterisation of organic compounds in atmospheric aerosols collected at Welgegund, South Africa. J Atmos Chem. 72(1):43–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brokl M, Bishop L, Wright CG, Liu C, McAdam K, Focant JF. 2013. Analysis of mainstream tobacco smoke particulate phase using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J Sep Sci. 36(6):1037–1044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caesar LK, Kvalheim OM, Cech NB. 2018. Hierarchical cluster analysis of technical replicates to identify interferents in untargeted mass spectrometry metabolomics. Anal Chim Acta. 1021:69–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. 1992. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 112(1):155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CORESTA. 2019. Determination of selected carbonyls in mainstream cigarette smoke by HPLC. Paris (France): Cooperation Centre for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco. CORESTA Recommended Method No. 74.
   Google Scholar
• Crosswhite MR, Bailey PC, Jeong LN, Lioubomirov A, Yang C, Ozvald A, Jameson JB, Gillman IG. 2021. Non-targeted chemical characterization of JUUL Virginia Tobacco flavored aerosols using liquid and gas chromatography. Separations. 8(9):130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggers ME, Lee YO, Jackson K, Wiley JL, Porter L, Nonnemaker JM. 2017. Youth use of electronic vapor products and blunts for administering cannabis. Addict Behav. 70:79–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairman BJ. 2015. Cannabis problem experiences among users of the tobacco–cannabis combination known as blunts. Drug Alcohol Depend. 150:77–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gröger T, Welthagen W, Mitschke S, Schäffer M, Zimmermann R. 2008. Application of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography mass spectrometry and different types of data analysis for the investigation of cigarette particulate matter. J Sep Sci. 31(19):3366–3374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht SS. 1998. Biochemistry, biology, and carcinogenicity of tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines. Chem Res Toxicol. 11(6):559–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO. 2000. Cigarettes — Determination of total and nicotine-free dry particulate matter using a routine analytical smoking machine, 3rd ed. Geneva (Switzerland): International Organization for Standardization. International Standard ISO 4387:2000(E).
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2008. Cigarettes — Determination of total and nicotine-free dry particulate matter using a routine analytical smoking machine, 3rd ed.: Amendment 1. Geneva (Switzerland): International Organization for Standardization. International Standard ISO 4387:2000/Amd.1:2008(E).
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2012. Routine analytical cigarette-smoking machine — Definitions and standard conditions. Geneva (Switzerland): International Organization for Standardization. International Standard ISO 3308:2012.
   Google Scholar
• Klupinski TP, Strozier ED, Friedenberg DA, Brinkman MC, Gordon SM, Clark PI. 2016. Identification of new and distinctive exposures from little cigars. Chem Res Toxicol. 29(2):162–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klupinski TP, Strozier ED, Makselan SD, Buehler SS, Peters EN, Lucas EA, Casbohm JS, Friedenberg DA, Landgraf AJ, Frank AJ, et al. 2020. Chemical characterization of marijuana blunt smoke by non-targeted chemical analysis. Inhal Toxicol. 32(4):177–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krewski D, Acosta D, Jr., Andersen M, Anderson H, Bailar JC, III, Boekelheide K, Brent R, Charnley G, Cheung VG, Green S, Jr., et al. 2010. Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy. J Toxicol Environ Health B. 13(2-4):51–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzano C, Hoh E, Massey Simonich SL. 2012. Improved separation of complex polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon mixtures using novel column combinations in GC × GC/ToF-MS. Environ Sci Technol. 46(14):7677–7684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor LA, Gauchotte-Lindsay C, Daéid NN, Thomas R, Daly P, Kalin RM. 2011. Ultra resolution chemical fingerprinting of dense non-aqueous phase liquids from manufactured gas plants by reversed phase comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 1218(29):4755–4763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moir D, Rickert WS, Levasseur G, Larose Y, Maertens R, White P, Desjardins S. 2008. A comparison of mainstream and sidestream marijuana and tobacco cigarette smoke produced under two machine smoking conditions. Chem Res Toxicol. 21(2):494–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muscalu AM, Górecki T. 2018. Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography in environmental analysis. Trends Anal Chem. 106:225–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2001. Standing operating procedures for developing Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for hazardous chemicals. Washington, DC (U.S.): The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17226/10122. [accessed 2021 Sep 14]
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2007. Toxicity testing in the 21st century: A vision and a strategy. Chapter 2. Washington, DC (U.S.): The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17226/11970. [accessed 2022 Feb 09]
   Google Scholar
• NIST. 2017. NIST/EPA/NIH Mass Spectral Library (NIST 17) and NIST Mass Spectral Search Program, version 2.3. Gaithersburg, MD (U.S.): National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce.
   Google Scholar
• OEHHA. 2021. Chemicals: Toxicity criteria on chemicals evaluated by OEHHA. Sacramento, CA (U.S.): Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency. https://oehha.ca.gov/chemicals. [accessed 2021 Jul 15]
   Google Scholar
• Piersanti A, Adani M, Briganti G, Cappelletti A, Ciancarella L, Cremona G, D'Isidoro M, Lombardi C, Pacchierotti F, Russo F, et al. 2018. Air quality modeling and inhalation health risk assessment for a new generation coal-fired power plant in Central Italy. Sci Total Environ. 644:884–898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prebihalo SE, Berrier KL, Freye CE, Bahaghighat HD, Moore NR, Pinkerton DK, Synovec RE. 2018. Multidimensional gas chromatography: advances in instrumentation, chemometrics, and applications. Anal Chem. 90(1):505–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Raies AB, Bajic VB. 2016. In silico toxicology: computational methods for the prediction of chemical toxicity. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci. 6(2):147–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberry ZR, Schauer GL, Kim H, Peters EN. 2017. The use of flavored cigars to smoke marijuana in a sample of US adults co-using cigarettes and marijuana. Tob Regul Sci. 3(2 Suppl 1):S94–S100.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Hernández V, Roca MJ, Egea-Cortines M, Weiss J. 2018. A comparison of semi-quantitative methods suitable for establishing volatile profiles. Plant Methods. 14:67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samokhin A, Sotnezova K, Lashin V, Revelsky I. 2015. Evaluation of mass spectral library search algorithms implemented in commercial software. J Mass Spectrom. 50(6):820–825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schauer GL, Berg CJ, Kegler MC, Donovan DM, Windle M. 2016. Differences in tobacco product use among past month adult marijuana users and nonusers: findings from the 2003–2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Nicotine Tob Res. 18(3):281–288.
   Google Scholar
• Seeley JV, Bates CT, McCurry JD, Seeley SK. 2012. Stationary phase selection and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatographic analysis of trace biodiesel in petroleum-based fuel. J Chromatogr A. 1226:103–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeley JV, Seeley SK. 2013. Multidimensional gas chromatography: fundamental advances and new applications. Anal Chem. 85(2):557–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobus JR, Grossman JN, Chao A, Singh R, Williams AJ, Grulke CM, Richard AM, Newton SR, McEachran AD, Ulrich EM. 2019. Using prepared mixtures of ToxCast chemicals to evaluate non-targeted analysis (NTA) method performance. Anal Bioanal Chem. 411(4):835–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobus JR, Wambaugh JF, Isaacs KK, Williams AJ, McEachran AD, Richard AM, Grulke CM, Ulrich EM, Rager JE, Strynar MJ, et al. 2018. Integrating tools for non-targeted analysis research and chemical safety evaluations at the US EPA. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 28(5):411–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soldz S, Huyser DJ, Dorsey E. 2003. The cigar as a drug delivery device: youth use of blunts. Addiction. 98(10):1379–1386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spicer R, Salek RM, Moreno P, Cañueto D, Steinbeck C. 2017. Navigating freely-available software tools for metabolomics analysis. Metabolomics. 13(9):106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefanuto PH, Smolinska A, Focant JF. 2021. Advanced chemometric and data handling tools for GC × GC-TOF-MS: application of chemometrics and related advanced data handling in chemical separations. Trends Anal Chem. 139:116251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein SE. 1994. Estimating probabilities of correct identification from results of mass spectral library searches. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 5(4):316–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuard SB, Heinonen T. 2018. Relevance and application of read-across – mini review of European Consensus Platform for Alternatives and Scandinavian Society for Cell Toxicology 2017 workshop session. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 123:37–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su M, Sun R, Zhang X, Wang S, Zhang P, Yuan Z, Liu C, Wang Q. 2018. Assessment of the inhalation risks associated with working in printing rooms: a study on the staff of eight printing rooms in Beijing, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 25(17):17137–17143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szöcs E, Stirling T, Scott ER, Scharmüller A, Schäfer RB. 2020. webchem: an R package to retrieve chemical information from the web. J Stat Softw. 93(13):1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA. 1985. Development of statistical distributions or ranges of standard factors used in exposure assessments. Washington, DC (U.S.): Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://hero.epa.gov/hero/index.cfm/reference/details/reference_id/1005783. [accessed 2021 Sep 14]
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA. 1999a. Compendium of methods for the determination of toxic organic compounds in ambient air (Second edition): Compendium Method TO-9A: Determination of polychlorinated, polybrominated and brominated/chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins And dibenzofurans in ambient air. Cincinnati, OH (U.S.): Center for Environmental Research Information, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2019-11/documents/to-9arr.pdf. [accessed 2021 Jul 05]
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA. 1999b. Compendium of methods for the determination of toxic organic compounds in ambient air (Second edition): Compendium Method TO-13A: Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in ambient air using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Cincinnati, OH (U.S.): Center for Environmental Research Information, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2019-11/documents/to-13arr.pdf. [accessed 2021 Jul 05]
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA. 2002. A review of the reference dose and reference concentration processes. Page 4-4. Washington, DC (U.S.): Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2014-12/documents/rfd-final.pdf. [accessed 2021 Jul 30]
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA. 2011a. An overview of methods for EPA’s national-scale air toxics assessment. Section 6: Characterizing risks and hazards in NATA. Research Triangle Park, NC (U.S.): Office of Air Quality, Planning, and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-10/documents/2005-nata-tmd.pdf. [accessed 2021 Jun 17]
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA. 2011b. Exposure Factors Handbook 2011 edition (final report). Chapter 6—Inhalation rates. Washington, DC (U.S.): U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=526167. [accessed 2021 Jun 22]
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA. 2021. CompTox Chemicals Dashboard. Research Triangle Park, NC (U.S.): Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research & Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://comptox.epa.gov/dashboard. [accessed 2021 Sep 13]
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA. 2022. CompTox Chemicals Dashboard. Research Triangle Park, NC (U.S.): Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research & Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://comptox.epa.gov/dashboard/about. [accessed 2022 Feb 13]
   Google Scholar
• U.S. FDA. 2012. Harmful and potentially harmful constituents in tobacco products and tobacco smoke; established list. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0143). U.S. Federal Register. 77:20034–20037. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2012/04/03/2012-7727/harmful-and-potentially-harmful-constituents-in-tobacco-products-and-tobacco-smoke-established-list. [accessed 2021 Sep 09]
   Google Scholar
• Williams AJ, Grulke CM, Edwards J, McEachran AD, Mansouri K, Baker NC, Patlewicz G, Shah I, Wambaugh JF, Judson RS, et al. 2017. The CompTox Chemistry Dashboard: a community data resource for environmental chemistry. J Cheminform. 9(1):61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xie J, Marano KM, Wilson CL, Liu H, Gan H, Xie F, Naufal ZS. 2012. A probabilistic risk assessment approach used to prioritize chemical constituents in mainstream smoke of cigarettes sold in China. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 62(2):355–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar