KEYNOTE ADDRESS: HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT: A Historical Overview and Alternative Paths Forward

References

• Albert, R. E. 1994. Carcinogen risk assessment in the U.S. EPA. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 24:70-85. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. 1998a. 1998 Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents (Booklet). Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH.
   Google Scholar
• American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. 1998b. TLVs and other Occupational Exposure Values-1998 (CD-ROM). Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH.
   Google Scholar
• Ames, B. M., Durston, W. E., Yamasaki, E., and Lee, F. D. 1973. Carcinogens are mutagens: A simple test system combining liver homogenates for activation in bacteria for detection. Proc. Natl. Acad. ScL USA 70:2281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterworth, B. E., Conolly, R. B., and Morgan, K. T. 1995. A strategy for establishing mode of action of chemical carcinogens as a guide for approaches to risk assessments. Cancer Lett. 93:129–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantril, S. T., and Parker, H. M. 1945. The Tolerance Dose. Manhattan District Report, NDDC-1100, Oak Ridge, TN.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, R. 1962. Silent Spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970.1970. Public Law no. 91–604; 84 STAT, 1676.
   Google Scholar
• Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990.1990. Public Law no. 101–549,104 STAT, 2399.
   Google Scholar
• Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management. 1997a. Framework for environmental health risk managemer4 vol. 1. Final Report. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management. 1997b. Risk assessment and risk manage-ment in regulatory decision making. vol. 2. Final Report. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Conolly, R. B., Andjelkovich, D. A., Casanova, M., Heck, H. d'A., Janszen, D. B., Kimbell, J. S., Morgan, K. T., and Recio, L. 1995. Multidisciplinary, iterative examination of the mechanism of formaldehyde carcinogenicity: The basis for better risk assessment. CIIT Activities 15(12):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Crump, K. S. 1984. An improved procedure for low-dose carcinogen risk assessment from animal data.]. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol. Oncol. 5:339–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuddihy, R. G., McClellan, R. 0., Hoover, M. D., Dugan, V. L., Chapman, L. D., and Wayland, J. R. 1977. Radiation risks from plutonium recycle. Environ. Sci. TechnoL 11:1160–1165.
   Google Scholar
• Enslein, K., Gombar, V. K., and Blake, B. W. 1994. Use of SAR in computer-assisted prediction of carcinogenicity and mutagenicity of chemicals by the TOPKAT program. Mutat. Res. 305:47–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallo, M. A. 1996. History and scope of toxicology. In Casarett and Doull's toxicology, The basic sci-ence of poisons, ed. C. D. Klaassen, pp. 3-11. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Gehring, P. J., Watanabe, P. G., and Park, C. N. 1978. Resolution of dose-response toxicity data for chemicals requiring metabolic activation: Example vinyl chloride. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 44: 581–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, L. D., and Jordan, B. C. 1988. Basis for Primary Air Quality Criteria and Standards. U.S. Envir-onmental Protection Agency, Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Research Triangle Park, NC. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service, NTIS PB88–180070.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, W. A. 1994. Toward an improved information resource for risk assessment: EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). CIIT Activities 14(10):1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, A. 1943. Exploring the dangerous trades. Boston: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, C. C. 1991. Chemical and physical carcinogenesis: advances and perspectives for the 1990s. Cancer Res. 51 (Suppl.): 5023s–5044s.
   Google Scholar
• Heck, H. d'A., Casanova, M., and Starr, T. B. 1990. Formaldehyde toxicity-A new understanding. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 20: 397–426.
   Google Scholar
• Henshaw, P. S. 1941. Biologic significance of the tolerance dose in x-ray and radium protection.]. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1:789–805.
   Google Scholar
• Higginson, J. 1998. The International Agency for Research on Cancer: A brief review of its history, mis-sion and program. Toxicol. ScL 43:79–85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoel, D. G., and Li, P. 1998. Threshold models in radiation carcinogenesis. Health Phys. 75:241–250.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• International Agency for Research on Cancer. 1997. Polychlorinated dibenzo-para-dioxins and poly-chlorinated dibenzofurans. IARC Monogr. Eval. Carcinogen. Risks Hum. 69. Lyon: IARC.
   Google Scholar
• Jarabek, A. M. 1995. Inhalation RfC methodology: Dosimetric adjustments and dose-response estima-tion of noncancer toxicity in the upper respiratory tract. In Nasal toxicity and dosimetry of inhaled xenobiotics: Implications for human health, ed. F. Miller, pp. 301–325. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, S. H., Murray, T., Boldin, S., and Wingo, P. A. 1998. Cancer statistics, 1998. CA Cancer]. Clin. 48:6–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehman, A. J., and Fitzhugh, 0. G. 1954. 100-Fold margin of safety. Q. Bull. Assoc. Food Drug Offic. XVIII:33–35.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, E. B. 1957. Leukemia and ionizing radiation. Science 125:965–972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltoni, C., and Lefemine, G. 1975. Carcinogenic bioassays of vinyl chloride: current results. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 246:195–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathis, J. F. 1985. CIIT: The jewel of the industry. Part I, II & III. CIIT Activities 5(7):3–6, 5(8):3–6, 5(9):3–6.
   Google Scholar
• McClellan, R. 0. 1994. A commentary on the NRC report "Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment." Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 20:S142–S168.
   Google Scholar
• McClellan, R. 0. 1996. Reducing uncertainty in risk assessment by using specific knowledge to replace default options. Drug Metab. Rev. 28:149–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Bureau of Standards. 1958. Permissible dose from external sources of ionizing radiation. National Bureau of Standards Handbook 59, Sept. 24, 1954; Addendum-Maximum Permissi-ble Radiation Exposures to Man. April 15, 1958. Federal Document Center.
   Google Scholar
• National Committee on Radiation Protection and Measurements. 1960. Report of ad hoc Committee on Somatic Radiation Dose for the General Population. Science 131:482–486.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Research Council. 1956. Report of the Committee on Genetic Effects of Atomic Radiation. In The biological effects of atomic radiation: Summary Reports, pp. 3-31. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academy of Science.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 1983. Risk assessment in the federal government: Managing the process. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 1990. Health effects of exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: HEIR V. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council, 1991. Permissible exposure levels and emergency exposure guidance levels for selected air contaminants. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 1994. Science and judgment in risk assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 1998a. Research priorities for airborne particulate matter. I. Immediate priorities and a long-range research portfolio. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 1998b. Health effects of exposure to radon, HEIR VI. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Toxicology Program, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 1998. Eighth edition of biennial report on carcinogens. Rockville, MD: Technical Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Natural Resources Defense Council v. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1987. 824 F. 2d at 1146 (en banc)(DC Circuit Court).
   Google Scholar
• Neal, R. A. 1991. The Chemical Industry Institute of Toxicology. In Harnessing science for environ-mental regulation, ed. J. D. Graham, pp. 27-37. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 1975. Reactor Safety Study. An Assessment of Accident Risks in U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants WASH-1400. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. National Council on Radiation Protection.
   Google Scholar
• Padgett, J., and Richmond, H. 1983. The process of establishing and revising National Ambient Air Quality Standards.]. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 33:13–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, H. M. 1960. Hearings on Selected Materials on Radiation Protection Criteria and Standards: Their Basis and Use. Washington, DC: Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, Congress of the United States.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, H. M. 1967. Critiques and correspondence related to Dr. Evans' "CORD" Document, Hearing on Radiation Exposure of Uranium Miners. Washington, DC: Subcommittee on Research, De-velopment and Radiation, Joint Committee on Atomic Energy Congress of the United States. Federal Document Center.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, H. M. 1976. Principles of standard setting: The radiation experience. Third Life Sciences Symposium. Los Alamos National Laboratory. CON F Proceedings 751022.
   Google Scholar
• Pitot, H. C., and Dragan, Y. P. 1996. Chemical carcinogenesis. In Casarett and Doull's toxicology, The basic science of poisons, ed. C. D. Klaassen, pp. 201–269. New York: McGraw-Hill. Rodricks, J. V. 1992. Calculated risks. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenkranz, H. S., and Klopman, G. 1994. Structural implications of the ICPEMEC method for quan-tifying genotoxicity data. Mutat. Res. 305:99–116.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stannard, J. N. 1988. Radioactivity and health: A history. Richland, WA: Battelle Memorial Institute, Pacific Northwest Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Stayner, L., Smith, R. J., Gilbert, S., and Bailer, A. J. 1999. Epidemiological approaches to risk assess-ment. Inhal. Toxicol. 11:593–601.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tennant, R. W., Spalding, J., and French, J. E. 1996. Evaluation of transgenic mouse bioassays for identifying carcinogens and noncarcinogens. Mutat. Res. 365:199–127.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1986. Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment. Fed. Reg. 51: 33992–34003.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1989. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pol-lutants; Benzene. Rule and Proposed Rule. Fed. Reg. 54(177):38044–38072.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1996. Proposed guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment; Notice. Fed. Reg. 61(79)1 7960–18011.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1998. Residual Risk Report to Congress—Draft. Research Triangle Park, NC: Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
   Google Scholar
• Vogelstein, B., and Kinzler, K. W. 1993. The multistep nature of cancer. Trends Genet. 9:138–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar