The Role of Character Strengths for Task Performance, Job Dedication, Interpersonal Facilitation, and Organizational Support

REFERENCES

• Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. Oxford, UK: Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Angleitner, A., Ostendorf, O., & John, O. J. (1990). Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors in German: A psycho-lexical study. European Journal of Personality, 4, 89–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biemann, T., Cole, M. S., & Voelpel, S. (2012). Within-group agreement: On the use (and misuse) of rWG and rWG(J) in leadership research and some best practice guidelines. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 66–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswas-Diener, R. (2006). From the equator to the North Pole: A study of character strengths. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 293–310.
   Google Scholar
• Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman ( Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations ( pp. 71–98). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Borman, W. C., Penner, L. A., Allen, T. D., & Motowidlo, S. J. (2001). Personality predictors of citizenship performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 52–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borman, W. C., White, L. A., & Dorsey, D. W. (1995). Effects of ratee task performance and interpersonal factors on supervisor and peer performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 168–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 11, 710–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buschor, C., Proyer, R. T., & Ruch, W. (2011). On the relations between character strengths and intelligence. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, J. M., & Pancheri, P. (1976). A handbook of cross-national MMPI research. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. D., & Hauenstein, N. M. A. (2005). Interrater agreement reconsidered: An alternative to the rwg indices. Organizational Research Methods, 8, 165–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, R. D. (1987). Person-Environment Fit Theory and organizations: Commensurate dimensions, time perspectives, and mechanisms. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 248–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, V. I., & Borman, W. C. (2000). Investigating the underlying structure of the citizenship performance domain. Human Resource Management Review, 10, 25–44.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Diefendorff, J. M., Brown, D. J., Kamin, A. M., & Lord, R. G. (2002). Examining the roles of job involvement and centrality in predicting organizational citizenship behaviors and job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 93–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1998). Common method bias: Does common methods variance really bias results? Organizational Research Methods, 1, 374–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Harzer, C., & Ruch, W. (2012). When the job is a calling: The role of applying one’s signature strengths at work. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7, 362–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harzer, C., & Ruch, W. (2013). The application of signature character strengths and positive experiences at work. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 965–983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendricks, J. W., & Payne, S. C. (2007). Beyond the Big Five: Leader goal orientation as a predictor of leadership effectiveness. Human Performance, 20, 317–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges, T. D., & Asplund, J. (2010). Strengths development in the workplace. In P. A. Linley, S. Harrington, & N. Garcea ( Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology at work ( pp. 213–220). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, R. L., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasten, R., & Nevo, B. (2008). Exploring the relationship between interrater correlations and validity of peer ratings. Human Performance, 21, 180–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9, 131–146.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W., & Hattrup, K. (1992). A disagreement about within-group agreement: Disentangling issues of consistency versus consensus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 161–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An investigative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implication. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBreton, J. M., Burgess, J. R. D., Kaiser, R. B., Atchley, E. K., & James, L. R. (2003). The restriction of variance hypothesis and interrater reliability and agreement: Are ratings from multiple sources really dissimilar? Organizational Research Methods, 6, 80–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 815–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60, 541–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. A. (2009). A test of the impact of collective efficacy in routine and novel performance environments. Human Performance, 12, 295–309.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, M. D., Eid, J., Kelly, D., Bailey, J. K. S., & Peterson, C. (2006). Character strengths and virtues of developing military leaders: An international comparison. Military Psychology, 18(Suppl.), 57–68.
   Google Scholar
• Motowidlo, S. J. (2000). Some basic issues related to contextual performance and organizational citizenship behavior in human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 10, 115–126.
   Google Scholar
• Motowidlo, S. J. (2003). Job performance. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski ( Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology, Vol. 12: Industrial and organizational psychology ( pp. 39–53). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Motowidlo, S. J., Borman, W. C., & Schmit, M. J. (1997). A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance, 10, 71–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 475–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2007). Methodological issues in positive psychology and the assessment of character strengths. In A. D. Ong & M. H. M. van Dulmen ( Eds.), Handbook of methods in positive psychology ( pp. 292–305). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). Character strengths in fifty-four nations and the fifty US States. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 118–129.
   Google Scholar
• Pervin, L. A., Cervone, D., & John, O. P. (2005). Personality: Theory and research (9th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, C. (2006). The Values in Action (VIA) classification of strengths. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi, A life worth living: Contributions to positive psychology (pp. 29–48). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, C., & Park, N. (2006). Character strengths in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 1149–1154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, C., Park, N., Hall, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2009). Zest and work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 161–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Assessment of character strengths. In G. P. Koocher, J. C. Norcross, & S. S. Hill, III ( Eds.), Psychologists’ desk reference (2nd ed., pp. 93–98). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues. A handbook and classification. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, C., Stephens, J. P., Park, N., Lee, F., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2010). Strengths of character and work. In P. A. Linley, S. Harrington, & N. Garcea ( Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology at work ( pp. 221–231). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruch, W., Proyer, R. T., Harzer, C., Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2010). Values in Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA–IS): Adaptation and validation of the German version and the development of a peer-rating form. Journal of Individual Differences, 31, 138–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology. Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Van Scotter, J. R., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 525–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verquer, M. L., Beehr, T. A., & Wagner, S. H. (2003). A meta-analysis of relations between person–organization fit and work attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 473–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2000). Perspectives on models of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 216–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar