Faking Good and Faking Bad Among Military Conscripts

REFERENCES

• Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology,44, 1–26. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkeland, S. A., Manson, T. M., Kisamore, J. L., Brannick, M. T., & Smith, M. A. (2006). A meta-analytic investigation of job applicant faking on personality measures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment,14, 317–335. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2006.00354.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boss, P., & Brenner, C. (2006). Persönlichkeitsfragebogen Rekrutierung: Subskalen B5 (Big Five) [Personality test recruitment: Subscale B5 (Big Five)]. Zürich, Switzerland: Psychologisches Institut der Universität Zürich, Sozial- und Wirtschaftspsychologie.
   Google Scholar
• Cellar, D. F., Miller, M. L., Doverspike, D. D., & Klawsky, J. D. (1996). Comparison of factor structures and criterion-related validity coefficients for two measures of personality based on the five factor model. Journal of Applied Psychology,81, 694–704. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, N. D., Rozek, R. F., & Burns, G. (2010). Effects of social desirability scores on hiring judgments. Journal of Personnel Psychology,9, 27–39. doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin,112, 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekmann, J., & König, C. J. (in press). Personality testing in personnel selection: Love it? Leave it? Understand it! In I. Nikolaou & J. Oostrom (Eds.), Employee recruitment, selection, and assessment: Contemporary issues for theory and practice. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Di Milia, L. (2004). Australian management selection practices: Closing the gap between research findings and practice. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources,42, 214–228. doi:10.1177/1038411104045364
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, J. J., Dwight, S. A., & Hurtz, G. M. (2003). An assessment of the prevalence, severity, and verifiability of entry-level applicant faking using the randomized response technique. Human Performance,16, 81–106. doi:10.1207/S15327043HUP1601_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan, J. J., Dwight, S. A., & Schneider, D. (2014). The impact of applicant faking on selection measures, hiring decisions, and employee performance. Journal of Business and Psychology,29, 479–493. doi:10.1007/s10869-013-9318-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellingson, J. E., & McFarland, L. (2011). Understanding faking behavior through the lens of motivation: An application of VIE theory. Human Performance,24, 322–337. doi:10.1080/08959285.2011.597477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, J., Gao, D., Carroll, S. A., Lopez, F. J., Tian, T. S., & Meng, H. (2012). Testing the efficacy of a new procedure for reducing faking on personality tests within selection contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology,97, 866–880. doi:10.1037/a0026655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galić, Z., & Jerneić, Ž. (2013). Measuring faking on Five-Factor personality questionnaires: The usefulness of Communal and Agentic Management Scales. Journal of Personnel Psychology,12, 115–123. doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffin, R. D., & Boyd, A. C. (2009). Faking and personality assessment in personnel selection: Advancing models of faking. Canadian Psychology,50, 151–160. doi:10.1037/a0015946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, B., & Wilson, I. G. (2012). Faking good: Self-enhancement in medical school applicants. Medical Education,46, 485–490. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04208.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, R. L., Chmielowski, T., & Yoshita, Y. (2007). Do applicants fake? An examination of the frequency of applicant faking behavior. Personnel Review,36, 341–355. doi:10.1108/00483480710731310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gürber, C., & Skupnjak, A. (2006). Persönlichkeitsfragebogen Rekrutierung: Subskala LM (Leistungsmotivation) [Personality test recruitment: Subscale LM (achievement striving)]. Zürich, Switzerland: Psychologisches Institut der Universität Zürich, Sozial- und Wirtschaftspsychologie.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R. C. W., & Hall, R. C. W. (2011). Plaintiffs who malinger: Impact on litigation on fake testimony. In M. Ziegler, C. MacCann, & R. Roberts (Eds.), New perspectives on faking in personality assessment (pp. 255–281). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, J., Barrett, P., & Hogan, R. (2007). Personality measurement, faking, and employment selection. Journal of Applied Psychology,92, 1270–1285. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper, A. C., & Sackett, P. R. (2008, April). Self-presentation on personality measures in lab and field settings: A meta-analysis. Paper presented at the 23rd annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, R., Wüthrich, A., Stoll, F., & Boss, P. (2006). Intelligenztest 95 (Test 95) [Intelligence test 95 (Test 95)]. Zürich, Switzerland: Psychologisches Institut der Universität Zürich, Sozial- und Wirtschaftspsychologie.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, A., König, C. J., Kleinmann, M., & Melchers, K. G. (2012). The interactive effect of impression motivation and cognitive schema on self-presentation in a personality inventory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,42, 1932–1957. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00925.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klehe, U.-C., Kleinmann, M., Hartstein, T., Melchers, K. G., König, C. J., Heslin, P. A., & Lievens, F. (2012). Responding to personality tests in a selection context: The role of the ability to identify criteria and the ideal-employee factor. Human Performance,25, 273–302. doi:10.1080/08959285.2012.703733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komar, S., Komar, J. A., Robie, C., & Taggar, S. (2010). Speeding personality measures to reduce faking: A self-regulatory model. Journal of Personnel Psychology,9, 126–137. doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König, C. J., Hafsteinsson, L. G., Jansen, A., & Stadelmann, E. (2011). Applicants’ self-presentational behavior across cultures: Less self-presentation in Switzerland and Iceland than in the US. International Journal of Selection and Assessment,19, 331–339. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2011.00562.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König, C. J., Klehe, U.-C., Berchtold, M., & Kleinmann, M. (2010). Reasons for being selective when choosing personnel selection procedures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment,18, 17–27. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00485.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König, C. J., Merz, A.-S., & Trauffer, N. (2012). What is in applicants’ minds when they fill out a personality test? Insights from a qualitative study. International Journal of Selection and Assessment,20, 442–452. doi:10.1111/ijsa.12007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, B. (2009). “Faking” from the applicant’s perspective: A theory of self-presentation in personnel selection settings. International Journal of Selection and Assessment,17, 417–430. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2009.00483.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarland, L. A., & Ryan, A. M. (2000). Variance in faking across noncognitive measures. Journal of Applied Psychology,85, 812–821. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarland, L. A., & Ryan, A. M. (2006). Toward an integrated model of applicant faking behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,36, 979–1016. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00052.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melchers, K. G., & Annen, H. (2010). Officer selection for the Swiss Armed Forces: An evaluation of validity and fairness issues. Swiss Journal of Psychology,69, 105–115. doi:10.1024/1421-0185/a000012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller-Hanson, R., Heggestad, E. D., & Thornton, G. C., III. (2006). Individual differences in impression management: An exploration if the psychological process underlying faking. Psychology Science,48, 288–312.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, T. A., Goffin, R. D., & Gellatly, I. R. (2010). Test-taking motivation and personality test validity. Journal of Personnel Psychology,9, 117–125. doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ones, D. S., Dilchert, S., Viswesvaran, C., & Judge, T. A. (2007). In support of personality assessment in organizational settings. Personnel Psychology,60, 995–1027. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00099.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmit, M. J., & Ryan, A.-M. (1993). The Big Five in personnel selection: Factor structure in applicant and nonapplicant populations. Journal of Applied Psychology,78, 966–974. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.78.6.966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, J. A., & Postlethwaite, B. E. (2012). A matter of context: A meta-analytic investigation of the relative validity of contextualized and noncontextualized personality measures. Personnel Psychology,65, 445–494. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01250.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sliter, K. A., & Christiansen, N. D. (2012). Effects of targeted self-coaching on applicant distortion of personality measures. Journal of Personnel Psychology,11, 169–175. doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell, A. F., Sydell, E. J., & Lueke, S. B. (1999). Towards a theory of applicant faking: Integrating studies of deception. Human Resource Management Review,9, 219–242. doi:10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00019-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel, P. D., & König, C. J. (2006). Integrating theories of motivation. Academy of Management Review,31, 889–913. doi:10.5465/AMR.2006.22527462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoll, M. (2006). Persönlichkeitsfragebogen Rekrutierung: Subskala B (Belastbarkeit) [Personality test recruitment: Subscale B (stress tolerance)]. Zürich, Switzerland: Psychologisches Institut der Universität Zürich, Sozial- und Wirtschaftspsychologie.
   Google Scholar
• Tett, R. P., Anderson, M. G., Ho, C.-L., Yang, T. S., Huang, L., & Hanvongse, A. (2006). Seven nested questions about faking on personality tests: An overview and interactionist model of item-level response distortion. In R. L. Griffith, & M. H. Peterson (Eds.), A closer examination of applicant faking behavior (pp. 43–83). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,5, 297–323. doi:10.1007/BF00122574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hooft, E. A. J., & Born, M. P. (2012). Intentional response distortion on personality tests: Using eye-tracking to understand response processes when faking. Journal of Applied Psychology,97, 301–316. doi:10.1037/a0025711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1999). Meta-analyses of fakability estimates: Implications for personality measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement,59, 197–210. doi:10.1177/00131649921969802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walmsley, P. T., & Sackett, P. R. (2013). Factors affecting potential personality retest improvement after initial failure. Human Performance,26, 390–408. doi:10.1080/08959285.2013.836196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zibarras, L. D., & Woods, S. A. (2010). A survey of UK selection practices across different organization sizes and industry sectors. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,83, 499–511. doi:10.1348/096317909X425203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar