A Cross-Level Examination of the Process Linking Transformational Leadership and Creativity: The Role of Psychological Safety Climate

REFERENCES

• Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Culpepper, S. A. (2013). Best-practice recommendations for estimating cross-level interaction effects using multilevel modeling. Journal of Management, 39, 1490–1528. doi:10.1177/0149206313478188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (2008). Studying creativity, its processes, and its antecedents. In J. Zhou & C. E. Shalley (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 33–64). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154–1184. doi:10.2307/256995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aryee, S., Walumbwa, F. O., Zhou, Q., & Hartnell, C. A. (2012). Transformational leadership, innovative behavior, and task performance: Test of mediation and moderation processes. Human Performance, 25, 1–25. doi:10.1080/08959285.2011.631648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 45–68. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basadur, M., Graen, G. B., & Green, S. G. (1982). Training in creative problem solving: Effects on ideation and problem finding and solving in an industrial research organization. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30, 41–70. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(82)90233-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2004). Multifactor leadership questionnaire: Manual leader form, rater, and scoring key for MLQ (Form 5x-Short). Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binnewies, C., Ohly, S., & Sonnentag, S. (2007). Taking personal initiative and communicating about ideas: What is important for the creative process and for idea creativity? European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 16, 432–455. doi:10.1080/13594320701514728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implicationsfor data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2003). Self-concordance at work: Toward understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 554–571. doi:10.2307/30040649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, B. H., Postlethwaite, B. E., Klotz, A. C., Hamdani, M. R., & Brown, K. G. (2012). Reaping the benefits of task conflict in teams: The critical role of team psychological safety climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 151–158. doi:10.1037/a0024200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Methodology (Vol. 2, pp. 349–444). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G., Kirkman, B. L., Kanfer, R., Allen, D., & Rosen, B. (2007). A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 331–346. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, D. R., Aguinis, H., Dalton, C. M., Bosco, F. A., & Pierce, C. A. (2012). Revisiting the file drawer problem in meta-analysis: An assessment of published and nonpublished correlation matriCES. Personnel Psychology, 65, 221–249. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01243.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drazin, R., Glynn, M. A., & Kazanjian, R. K. (1999). Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sensemaking perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24, 286–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drazin, R., Kazanjian, R., & Glynn, M. A. (2008). Creativity and sensemaking among professionals. In J. Zhou & C. E. Shalley (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 263–282). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dulac, T., Coyle-Shapiro, J. A.-M., Henderson, D. J., & Wayne, S. J. (2008). Not all responses to breach are the same: The interconnection of social exchange and psychological contract processes in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 1079–1098. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2008.35732596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 807–834. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 569–591. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383. doi:10.2307/2666999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. C. (2003). Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1419–1452. doi:10.1111/joms.2003.40.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121–138. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frese, M., Teng, E., & Wijnen, C. J. D. (1999). Helping to improve suggestion systems: Predictors of making suggestions in companies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 1139–1155. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513–524. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilson, L. L., & Shalley, C. E. (2004). A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of teams’ engagement in creative processes. Journal of Management, 30, 453–470. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2003.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, Y., Huang, J.-C., & Farh, J.-L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 765–778. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2009.43670890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R. (1992). Group influences on individuals in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 199–267). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159–170. doi:10.1037/h0076546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hirak, R., Peng, A. C., Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. M. (2012). Linking leader inclusiveness to work unit performance: The importance of psychological safety and learning from failures. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 107–117. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., Chin-Hui, C., & Sacramento, C. A. (2011). How does bureaucracy impact individual creativity? A cross-level investigation of team contextual influences on goal orientation-creativity relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 624–641. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2011.61968124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., & Zhou, J. (2009). A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 280–293. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2009.37308035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, B. J., Bynum, B. H., Piccolo, R. F., & Sutton, A. W. (2011). Person-organization value congruence: How transformational leaders influence work group effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 779–796. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2011.64870139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui, C., & Graen, G. (1997). Guanxi and professional leadership in contemporary Sino-American joint ventures in mainland China. The Leadership Quarterly, 8, 451–465. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(97)90024-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85–98. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, D. I., Chow, C., & Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 525–544. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00050-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692–724. doi:10.2307/256287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kark, R., & Carmeli, A. (2009). Alive and creating: The mediating role of vitality and aliveness in the relationship between psychological safety and creative work involvement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 785–804. doi:10.1002/job.v30:6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkman, B. L., Chen, G., Farh, J.-L., Chen, Z. X., & Lowe, K. B. (2009). Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: A cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 744–764. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2009.43669971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovjanic, S., Schuh, S. C., Jonas, K., Quaquebeke, N. V., & Dick, R. (2012). How do transformational leaders foster positive employee outcomes? A self-determination-based analysis of employees’ needs as mediating links. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 1031–1052. doi:10.1002/job.1771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrialand organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 333–375). New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Doherty, M. L. (1989). Integration of climate and leadership: Examination of a neglected issue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 546–553. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, C. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In C. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). San Francisco: CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, X., Li, F., Leung, K., & Monte, A. (2013). Carlo study of the effects of common method variance on significance testing and parameter bias in hierarchical linear modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 16, 243–269. doi:10.1177/1094428112469667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M., & Michels, L. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 202–220. doi:10.1177/1094428105284919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leroy, H., Anseel, F., Halbesleben, J. R. B., Savage, G. T., Dierynck, B., Simons, T., … Sels, L. (2012). Behavioral integrity for safety, priority of safety, psychological safety, and patient safety: A team-level study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 1273–1281. doi:10.1037/a0030076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, H., & Chuang, A. (2007). Transforming service employees and climate: A multilevel, multisource examination of transformational leadership in building long-term service relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1006–1019. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 295–308. doi:10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., Aguinis, H., Culpepper, S. A., & Chen, G. (2012). Understanding and estimating the power to detect cross-level interaction effects in multilevel modeling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 951–966. doi:10.1037/a0028380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., & Taylor, S. R. (2007). A framework for testing meso-mediational relationships in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 141–172. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 77, 11–37. doi:10.1348/096317904322915892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376–390. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 705–750. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00158-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naumann, S. E., & Bennett, N. (2002). The effects of procedural justice climate on work group performance. Small Group Research, 33, 361–377. doi:10.1177/10496402033003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607–634. doi:10.2307/256657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith, J. E. (2006). Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 85–101. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.20785503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccolo, R. F., & Colquitt, J. A. (2006). Transformational leadership and job behaviors: The mediating role of core job characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 327–340. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.20786079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Liu, X. (2000). Statistical power and optimal design for multisite randomized trials. Psychological Methods, 5, 199–213. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.5.2.199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224–253. doi:10.2307/2392563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherbaum, C. A., & Ferreter, J. M. (2009). Estimating statistical power and required sample sizes for organizational research using multilevel modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 347–367. doi:10.1177/1094428107308906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 361–388. doi:10.1080/10400410409534549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 33–53. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 933–958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, S. J., Kim, T.-Y., Lee, J.-Y., & Bian, L. I. N. (2012). Cognitive team diversity and individual team member creativity: A cross-level interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 197–212. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2003). Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: Evidence from Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 703–714. doi:10.2307/30040662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2007). When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1709–1721. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A. B. (2005). Power and sample size in multilevel linear models. In B. S. Everitt & D. C. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science (Vol. 3, pp. 1570–1573). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290–312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Staw, B. M. (1995). Why no one really wants creativity? In C. M. Ford & D. A. Gioia (Eds.), Creative action in organizations (pp. 161–166). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. I. (1974). Stimulating creativity, individual procedures (Vol. 1). Orlando, FL: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, L.-Y., Zhang, Z., Qi, J., & Chen, Z. X. (2012). Empowerment and creativity: A cross-level investigation. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 55–65. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesluk, P. E., Vance, R. J., & Mathieu, J. E. (1999). Examining employee involvement in the context of participative work environments. Group & Organization Management, 24, 271–299. doi:10.1177/1059601199243003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1137–1148. doi:10.2307/3069429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2004). The Pygmalion process and employee creativity. Journal of Management, 30, 413–432. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2002.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tofighi, D., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2011). RMediation: An R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 692–700. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0076-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, J. P. (1995). Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science, 6, 280–321. doi:10.1287/orsc.6.3.280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walumbwa, F. O., Hartnell, C. A., & Oke, A. (2010). Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: A cross-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 517–529. doi:10.1037/a0018867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X.-H., & Howell, J. M. (2012). A multilevel study of transformational leadership, identification, and follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 775–790. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, M. A. (1990). The social psychology of innovation in groups. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work; Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 309–333). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 107–128. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.48037118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar