Assessing team performance: Moderating roles of transactive memory, hypercompetition, and emotional regulation

References

• Akgun, A. E., Byrne, J. C., Keskin, H., & Lynn, G. S. (2006). Transactive memory system in new product development teams. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53, 95–111. doi:10.1109/TEM.2005.857570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alavi, M., & Tiwana, A. (2002). Knowledge integration in virtual teams: The potential role of KMS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 1029–1037. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1532-2890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anand, V., Manz, C. C., & Glick, W. H. (1998). An organizational memory approach to information management. Academy of Management Review, 23, 796–809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assanova, M., & McGuire, M. (2009). Applicability analysis of the emotional intelligence theory. Indiana University, Bloomington. Retrieved July 21, 2010, from http://www.indiana.edu/~spea/pubs/undergrad-honors/honors_vol.3_no.1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bain, P. G., Mann, L., Atkins, L., & Dunning, J. (2005). R&D project leaders: Roles and responsibilities. In L. Mann (Ed.), Leadership, management, and innovation in R&D project teams (pp. 49–70). Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Baruch, Y., & Lin, C.-P. (2012). All for one, one for all: Competition and virtual team performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79, 1155–1168. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandon, D., & Hollingshead, A. B. (2004). Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organization Science, 15, 633–644. doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breu, K., Hemingway, C. J., Strathern, M., & Bridger, D. (2002). Workforce agility: The new employee strategy for the knowledge economy. Journal of Information Technology, 17, 21–31. doi:10.1080/02683960110132070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S., & Eisenhardt, K. (1998). Competing on the edge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cardy, R. L., & Miller, J. S. (2003). Technology: Implications for HRM. In D. Stone (Ed.), Advances in human performance and cognitive engineering research (pp. 99−118). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, S., van Witteloostuijn, A., & Eden, L. (2010). From the editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 178–184. doi:10.1057/jibs.2009.88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M. L., & Lin, C. P. (2014). Modelling perceived corporate citizenship and psychological contracts: A mediating mechanism of perceived job efficacy. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23(2), 231–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, S. Y., Lee, H., & Yoo, Y. (2010). The impact of information technology and transactive memory systems on knowledge sharing, application, and team performance: A field study. MIS Quarterly, 34, 855–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conklin, J. (2001). Designing organizational memory: Preserving intellectual assets in a knowledge economy (Gognexus Institute White Paper). Retrieved from http://cognexus.org/dom.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, C., & Kelloway, K. (2000). Predictors of knowledge sharing in organisations ( Unpublished MSc thesis). Queen’s School of Business, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Côté, S., & Miners, C. T. H. (2006). Emotional intelligence, cognitive intelligence, and job performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crombie, D., Lombard, C., & Noakes, T. (2009). Emotional intelligence scores predict team sports performance in a National cricket competition. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 4, 209–224. doi:10.1260/174795409788549544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, A. P., Hu, M. Y., & Griffith, D. A. (2014). What makes a brand manager effective? Journal of Business Research, 67(2), 144–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• D’Aveni, R. A. (1999). Strategic supremacy through disruption and dominance. MIT Sloan Management Review, 40, 127–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Os, W. P. (2013). Share, be creative, and perform: How team creativity mediates the relationship between transactive memory systems and team decision performance. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Erasmus Universiteit.
   Google Scholar
• Decker, B., Landaeta, R. E., & Kotnour, T. G. (2009). Exploring the relationships between emotional intelligence and the use of knowledge transfer methods in the project environment. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 7, 15–36. doi:10.1057/kmrp.2008.29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirks, K. T. (2000). Trust in leadership and team performance: Evidence from NCAA basketball. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 1004–1012. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.1004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elfenbein, H. A., Polzer, J. T., & Ambady, N. (2007). Team emotion recognition accuracy and team performance. In N. M. Ashkanasy, W. J. Zerbe, & C. E. J. Ha¨rtel (Eds.), Research on emotions in organizations (Vol. 3, pp. 87–119). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, L. R., Dalrymple, M. A., & Neville, K. (1997). Assessing performance of AWACS command and control teams. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 172–176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Emotional labor: Helping workers present a positive face. (n.d.). Mind Tools. Retrieved from http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTMM_44.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Faraj, S., & Sproull, L. (2000). Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Science, 46, 1554–1568. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.12.1554.12072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatas, E., Neugebauer, T., & Perote, J. (2006). Within team competition in the minimum game. Pacific Economic Review, 11, 247–266. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0106.2006.00312.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellner, A. N. (2008). The effects of emotional intelligence on performance of a cognitive task in the context of collaboration vs. competition ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrier, W. J., Smith, K. G., & Grimm, C. M. (1999). The role of competitive action in market share erosion and industry dethronement: A study of industry leaders and challengers. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 372–388. doi:10.2307/257009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feyerherm, A. E., & Rice, C. L. (2002). Emotional intelligence and team performance: The good, the bad and the ugly. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 10, 343–362. doi:10.1108/eb028957
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth, D. R. (2000). Group dynamics (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, P., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 115–134. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goleman, D. (1997). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.
   Google Scholar
• Grandey, A. A. (2000). Emotional regulation in the workplace: A new way to conceptualize emotional labor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 95–110. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.5.1.95
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Green, R. (2011, September). Emotional intelligence: The new rules of engagement for managers of student residences. Student Residences Management Journal. Retrieved from http://ei.treble7.com/storage/rachel/Student%206_2_pg20-24.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gross, J. J. (2007). The handbook of emotion regulation. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollingshead, A. B. (1998). Communication, learning, and retrieval in transactive memory systems. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 423–442. doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingshead, A. B. (2001). Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1080–1089. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingshead, A. B., & Brandon, D. P. (2003). Potential benefits of communication in transactive memory systems. Human Communication Research, 29, 607–615. doi:10.1111/hcre.2003.29.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, P., Doll, W. J., Nahm, A. Y., & Li, X. (2004). Knowledge sharing in integrated product development. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7, 102–112. doi:10.1108/14601060410534393
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, J. S. C., Lin, T. C., & Wang, S. Y. (2012, December). Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities of information system development project teams. In The 7th pre-ICIS international research workshop on information technology project management, Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, M.-L. M., Horng, J.-S., & Sun, Y.-H. C. (2009). Hospitality teams: Knowledge sharing and service innovation performance. Tourism Management, 30, 41–50. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2008.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, M. (2009). A conceptual framework of the effects of positive affect and affective relationships on group knowledge networks. Small Group Research, 40, 323–346. doi:10.1177/1046496409332441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. E., Brett, J. F., Sessa, V. I., Cooper, D. M., Julin, J. A., & Peyronnin, K. (1991). Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 675–689. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.5.675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 219–229. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.67.2.219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85–98. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, B. H., Huang, C. J., Wu, C. Y., & Tsai, C. T. (2012). Inter-organizational cooperation in regional innovation systems: A catalyst of transactive memory systems. In 2012 Proceedings of Technology Management for Emerging Technologies (Vol. 12, pp. 1700–1704). Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Joe, S.-W., Tsai, Y.-H., Lin, C.-P., & Liu, W.-T. (2014). Modeling team performance and its determinants in high-tech industries: Future trends of virtual teaming. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 88, 16–25. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. D., Hollenbeck, J. R., Humphrey, S. E., Ilgen, D. R., Jundt, D., & Meyer, C. J. (2006). Cutthroat cooperation: Asymmetrical adaptation to changes in team reward structures. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 103–119. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.20785533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, P. J., & Troth, A. C. (2004). Managing emotions during team problem solving: Emotional intelligence and conflict resolution. Human Performance, 17, 195–218. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1702_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, K. D., Sarker, S., & Sarker, S. (2007). Knowledge transfer within information systems development teams: Examining the role of knowledge source attributes. Decision Support Systems, 43, 322–335. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2006.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y. (2007). The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time. MIS Quarterly, 31, 783–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. R., & Barsade, S. G. (2001). Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 99–130. doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 233–265). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, K. J., Tosi, H., & Cannella Jr, A. A. (1999). Multilevel theory building: Benefits, barriers, and new developments. Academy of Management Review, 24, 248–253. doi:10.5465/AMR.1999.1893934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, M. H., & Shaw, B. (2002). Transactive memory and exception handling in high-performance project teams. In Engineering Management Conference, 2002. IEMC’02. 2002 IEEE International (Vol. 1, pp. 148–153). Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, A. M., Thelwell, R. C., Lowther, J., & Devonport, T. J. (2009). Emotional intelligence and psychological skills use among athletes. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal, 37, 195–201. doi:10.2224/sbp.2009.37.2.195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, K. S., Wong, C.-S., & Song, L. J. (2004). The construct and criterion validity of emotional intelligence and its potential utility for management studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 483–496. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, P., Gillespie, N., Mann, L., & Wearing, A. (2010). Leadership and trust: Their effect on knowledge sharing and team performance. Management Learning, 41, 473–491. doi:10.1177/1350507610362036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, A. S. (2008). Matching ethical work climate to in-role and extra-role behaviors in a collectivist work setting. Journal of Business Ethics, 79, 43–55. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9392-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, K. (2003). Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 587–604. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y.-D., Ma, W.-J., Luo, J.-L., & Zhang, Q.-L. (2013). Competition and emotion impact on effect of prototype elicitation during insight problem solving. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44, 1–13. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2012.00001
   Google Scholar
• Liang, D. W., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. (1995). Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 384–393. doi:10.1177/0146167295214009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C.-P. (2007). To share or not to share: Modeling knowledge sharing using exchange ideology as a moderator. Personnel Review, 36, 457–475. doi:10.1108/00483480710731374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C.-P., Wang, Y.-J., Tsai, Y.-H., & Hsu, Y.-F. (2010). Perceived job effectiveness in coopetition: A survey of virtual teams within business organizations. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1598–1606. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, X. J. (2010). Developmental stage of learning culture and its impact on individual and organizational outcomes. In The proceedings of 2010 international conference on management science and engineering (ICMSE). Melbourne, Australia: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Magnini, V. P. (2008). Practicing effective knowledge sharing in international hotel joint ventures. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27, 249–258. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2007.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Man, D. C., & Lam, S. S. K. (2003). The effects of job complexity and autonomy on cohesiveness in collectivistic and individualistic work groups: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 979–1001. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millward, L. J., Haslam, S. A., & Postmes, T. (2007). Putting employees in their place: The impact of hot desking on organizational and team identification. Organization Science, 18, 547–559. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreland, R. L. (1999). Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. In L. L. Thompson, J. M. Levine, & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 3–31). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Moreland, R. L., & Argote, L. (2004). Transactive Memory in Dynamic Organizations. In R. Peterson & E. Mannix (Eds.), Understanding the dynamic organization (pp. 135–162). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Moreland, R. L., Argote, L., & Krishnan, R. (1998). Training people to work in groups. In R. S. Tindale, L. Heath, J. Edwards, E. J. Posvac, F. B. Bryant, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, … J. Mayers (Eds.), Applications of theory and research on groups to social issues (pp. 37–60). New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Moreland, R. L., & Myaskovsky, L. (2000). Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 117–133. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlini, A. H., & Halverson, T. R. (2006). Emotional intelligence in the national hockey league. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 38, 109–119. doi:10.1037/cjbs2006001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2000). The knowing-ding gap: How smart companies turn knowledge into action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poon, J. M. L. (2003). Situational antecedents and outcomes of organizational politics perceptions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18, 138–155. doi:10.1108/02683940310465036
   Google Scholar
• Prince-Embury, S., & Courville, T. (2008). Comparison of one-, two-, and three-factor models of personal resiliency using the resiliency scales for children and adolescents. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 23, 11–25. doi:10.1177/0829573508316589
   Google Scholar
• Ren, Y., Carley, K. M., & Argote, L. (2001). Simulating the role of transactive memory in group training and performance. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
   Google Scholar
• Reus, T. H., & Liu, Y. (2004). Rhyme and reason: Emotional capability and the performance of knowledge-intensive work groups. Human Performance, 17, 245–266. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1702_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhee, S. Y. (2005). How shared emotions among group members influence group effectiveness? The role of broadening-and-building interactions ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, A. W., Scully, J., & West, M. A. (2005). Intergroup conflict and intergroup effectiveness in organizations: Theory and scale development. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14, 177–203. doi:10.1080/13594320444000263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rico, R., Sanchez-Manzanares, M., Gil, F., & Gibson, C. (2008). Team implicit coordination processes: A team knowledge-based approach. The Academy of Management Review, 33, 163–184. doi:10.5465/AMR.2008.27751276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. (1985). Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. In L. L. Cummings & B. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 1–37). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rupert, J. (2010). Diversity faultlines and team learning ( Working Paper). Department of Social and Organisational Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Ruscher, J. B., & Fiske, S. T. (1990). Interpersonal competition can cause individuating processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 832–843. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruscher, J. B., Fiske, S. T., Mikl, H., & Van Manen, S. (1991). Individuating processes in competition: Interpersonal versus intergroup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 595–605. doi:10.1177/0146167291176001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryckman, R. M., Hammer, M., Kaczor, L. M., & Gold, J. A. (1996). Construction of a personal development competitive attitude scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 374–385. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6602_15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryckman, R. M., Libby, C. R., Borne, B. V. D., Gold, J. A., & Lindner, M. A. (1997). Values of hypercompetitive and personal development competitive individuals. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 271–283. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6902_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandhu, R. (2014). Father attachment predicts adolescent girls’ social and emotional development. (Doctoral dissertation). Antioch University Seattle, Seattle, WA, USA. Retrieved from http://aura.antioch.edu/etds/93
   Google Scholar
• Stough, C., Saklofske, P. H., & Parker, J. (2008). A brief analysis of 20 years emotional intelligence. An introduction to assessing emotional intelligence: Theory research and applications. In J. C. Cassady & M. A. Eissa (Eds.), Emotional intelligence: Perspectives from educational and positive psychology (pp. 3–8). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Su, C., Huang, M., & Contractor, N. (2010). Understanding the structures, antecedents and outcomes of organisational learning and knowledge transfer: A multi-theoretical and multilevel network analysis. European Journal of International Management, 4, 576–601. doi:10.1504/EJIM.2010.035590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumukadas, N., & Sawhney, R. (2004). Workforce agility through employee involvement. IIE Transactions, 36, 1011–1021. doi:10.1080/07408170490500997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sy, T., Tram, S., & O’Hara, L. A. (2006). Relation of employee and manager emotional intelligence to job satisfaction and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 461–473. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2005.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, C. (2010). An empirical study on firm R&D team’s creativity: Implications from China’s hi-tech industries. Journal of Science and Technology Policy in China, 1, 275–284. doi:10.1108/17585521011083148
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, L. L., & Cohen, T. R. (2012). Metacognition in teams and organizations. In P. Briñol & K. G. DeMarree (Eds.), Social metacognition (pp. 283–302). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tjosvold, D. W., & Tjosvold, M. M. (1991). Leading the team organization. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• van der Kleij, R., & Hoeppermans, M. (2011). How performance feedback and reflection affect transactive memory. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 55, 311–315. doi:10.1177/1071181311551065
   Google Scholar
• Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185–208). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wegner, D. M., Erber, R., & Raymond, P. (1991). Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 923–929. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.6.923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, S. B., Pescosolido, A. T., & Druskat, V. U. (2002). Emotional intelligence as the basis of leadership emergence in self-managing teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 505–522. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00141-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, Y., & Kanawattanachai, P. (2001). Developments of transactive memory systems and collective mind in virtual teams. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9, 187–208. doi:10.1108/eb028933
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, Y. C., Fulk, J., Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. (2009). Expertise directory development, shared task interdependence, and strength of communication network ties as multilevel predictors of expertise exchange in transactive memory work groups. Communication Research. doi:10.1177/0093650209351469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar