How Emotional Intelligence Might Get You the Job: The Relationship Between Trait Emotional Intelligence and Faking on Personality Tests

References

• Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Andrei, F., Siegling, A. B., Aloe, A. M., Baldaro, B., & Petrides, K. V. (2016). The incremental validity of the trait emotional intelligence questionnaire (TEIQue): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98, 261–276. doi:10.1080/00223891.2015.1084630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26. doi:10.1111/peps.1991.44.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1996). Effects of impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 261–272. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.3.261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00160
   Google Scholar
• Bing, M. N., Kluemper, D., Davison, H. K., Taylor, S., & Novicevic, M. (2011). Overclaiming as a measure of faking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 148–162. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bing, M. N., Whanger, J. C., Davison, H. K., & VanHook, J. B. (2004). Incremental validity of the frame-of-reference effect in personality scale scores: A replication and extension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 150–157. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkeland, S. A., Manson, T. M., Kisamore, J. L., Brannick, M. T., & Smith, M. A. (2006). A meta-analytic investigation of job applicant faking on personality measures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 317–335. doi:10.1111/ijsa.2006.14.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blickle, G., Meurs, J. A., Zettler, I., Solga, J., Noethen, D., Kramer, J., & Ferris, G. R. (2008). Personality, political skill, and job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 377–387. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2007.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blickle, G., Momm, T., Schneider, P. B., Gansen, D., & Kramer, J. (2009). Does acquisitive self-presentation in personality self-ratings enhance validity? Evidence from two experimental field studies. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17, 142–153. doi:10.1111/ijsa.2009.17.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, G. N., & Christiansen, N. D. (2011). Methods of measuring faking behavior. Human Performance, 24, 358–372. doi:10.1080/08959285.2011.597473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, S., Kluemper, D. H., & Sauley, K. S. (2011). What if we fake emotional intelligence? A test of criterion validity attenuation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 270–277. doi:10.1080/00223891.2011.558870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, N. D., Burns, G. N., & Montgomery, G. E. (2005). Reconsidering forced-choice item formats for applicant personality assessment. Human Performance, 18, 267–307. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1803_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, B. S., & Chang, L. (2016). A meta-analytic multitrait multirater separation of substance and style in social desirability scales. Journal of Personality, 84, 319–334. doi:10.1111/jopy.2016.84.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, M. (2016). Personnel selection: Adding value through people - A changing picture. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Côté, S., & Miners, C. T. (2006). Emotional intelligence, cognitive intelligence, and job performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.51.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, A. L., & Carroll, S. A. (2008). Faking emotional intelligence (EI): Comparing response distortion on ability and trait-based EI measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 761–784. doi:10.1002/job.v29:6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, R. E., Zettler, I., & Hilbig, B. E. (2014). Rethinking trait conceptions of social desirability scales impression management as an expression of honesty-humility. Assessment, 21, 286–299. doi:10.1177/1073191113504619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilchert, S., Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Deller, J. (2006). Response distortion in personality measurement: Born to deceive, yet capable of providing valid self-assessments? Psychology Science, 48, 209–225.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, J. J., Dwight, S. A., & Schneider, D. (2014). The impact of applicant faking on selection measures, hiring decisions, and employee performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 479–493. doi:10.1007/s10869-013-9318-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, E. F., McDaniel, M. A., & Snell, A. E. (1996, August). The validity of non-cognitive measures decays when applicants fake. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Cincinnati, OH. doi:10.5465/AMBPP.1996.4979062
   Google Scholar
• Drenth, P. J. D., Van Wieringen, P. W. C., & Hoolwerf, G. (2001). Drenth Testserie Hoger Niveau: Handleiding. Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Dunnett, S., Koun, S., & Barber, P. J. (1981). Social desirability in the Eysenck Personality Inventory. British Journal of Psychology, 72, 19–26. doi:10.1111/bjop.1981.72.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R. (1994). The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 51–100. doi:10.1006/obhd.1994.1029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R. (2002). Alternatives to difference scores: Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology. In F. Drasgow & N. W. Schmitt (Eds.), Advances in measurement and data analysis (pp. 350–400). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R., & Parry, M. E. (1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1577–1613. doi:10.2307/256822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellingson, J. E., & McFarland, L. A. (2011). Understanding faking behavior through the lens of motivation: An application of VIE theory. Human Performance, 24, 322–337. doi:10.1080/08959285.2011.597477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellingson, J. E., Sackett, P. R., & Connelly, B. S. (2007). Personality assessment across selection and development contexts: Insights into response distortion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 386–395. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, G. R., Perrewé, P. L., & Douglas, C. (2002). Social effectiveness in organizations: Construct validity and research directions. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9, 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190200900104
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, G. R., Witt, L. A., & Hochwarter, W. A. (2001). Interaction of social skill and general mental ability on job performance and salary. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1075–1082. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A. (1990). Faking personality questionnaires: Fabricating different profiles for different purposes. Current Psychology, 9, 46–55. doi:10.1007/BF02686767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffin, R. D., & Boyd, A. C. (2009). Faking and personality assessment in personnel selection: Advancing models of faking. Canadian Psychology, 50, 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, A. A. J. (1997). The construction of the five-factor personality inventory (FFPI). Groningen, the Netherlands: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, J., Barrett, P., & Hogan, R. (2007). Personality measurement, faking, and employment selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1270–1285. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, R. (1982). A socioanalytic theory of personality. In M. M. Page (E d.), 1982 Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 55–89). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, R. (2005). In defense of personality measurement: New wine for old whiners. Human Performance, 18, 331–341. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1804_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, R., Hogan, J., & Roberts, B. W. (1996). Personality measurement and employment decisions: Questions and answers. American Psychologist, 51, 469–477. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.5.469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, R., & Shelton, D. (1998). A socioanalytic perspective on job performance. Human Performance, 11, 129–144. doi:10.1080/08959285.1998.9668028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, R. R. (2007). Socially desirable responding does moderate personality scale validity both in experimental and in nonexperimental contexts. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 39, 184–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/cjbs2007015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, R. R. (2008). Underestimating the effects of faking on the validity of self-report personality scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 311–321. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, R. R., & Jackson, D. N. (1981). Subtlety, information, and faking effects in personality assessment. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 379–388. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198104)37:2<379::AID-JCLP2270370227>3.0.CO;2-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hough, L. M., Eaton, N. K., Dunnette, M. D., Kamp, J. D., & McCloy, R. A. (1990). Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 581–595. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.5.581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huffcutt, A. I., Roth, P., & McDaniel, M. (1996). A meta-analytic investigation of cognitive ability in employment interview evaluations: Moderating characteristics and implications for incremental validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 459−473. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, P. V., Kleinmann, M., König, C. J., & Melchers, K. G. (2015). Shall we continue or stop disapproving of self-presentation? Evidence on impression management and faking in a selection context and their relation to job performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 420–432. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2014.915215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. A. (2011, June). Development of a short form of the IPIP-NEO Personality Inventory. Poster presented at the 2nd Biennial Meeting of the Association for Research in Personality, Riverside, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. A., & Hogan, R. (2006). A socioanalytic view of faking. In R. L. Griffith & M. H. Peterson (Eds.), A closer examination of applicant faking behavior (pp. 209–231). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, D. L., Jin, J., Newman, D. A., & O’Boyle, E. H. (2015). Why does self-reported emotional intelligence predict job performance? A meta-analytic investigation of mixed EI. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 298–342. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, D. L., & Newman, D. A. (2010). Emotional intelligence: An integrative meta-analysis and cascading model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 54–78. doi:10.1037/a0017286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klehe, U. C., Kleinmann, M., Hartstein, T., Melchers, K. G., König, C. J., Heslin, P. A., & Lievens, F. (2012). Responding to personality tests in a selection context: The role of the ability to identify criteria and the ideal-employee factor. Human Performance, 25, 273–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2012.703733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klehe, U. C., Kleinmann, M., Nieß, C., & Grazi, J. (2014). Impression management behavior in assessment centers: Artificial behavior or much ado about nothing? Human Performance, 27, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2013.854365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinmann, M., Ingold, P. V., Lievens, F., Jansen, A., Melchers, K. G., & König, C. J. (2011). A different look at why selection procedures work: The role of candidates’ ability to identify criteria. Organizational Psychology Review, 1, 128–146. doi:10.1177/2041386610387000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluemper, D. H. (2008). Trait emotional intelligence: The impact of core-self evaluations and social desirability. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1402–1412. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komar, S., Brown, D. J., Komar, J. A., & Robie, C. (2008). Faking and the validity of conscientiousness: A Monte-Carlo investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 140–154. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konstabel, K., Aavik, T., & Allik, J. (2006). Social desirability and consensual validity of personality traits. European Journal of Personality, 20, 549–566. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C., & Neter, J. (2004). Applied linear regression models. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Levashina, J., Hartwell, C. J., Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (2014). The structured employment interview: Narrative and quantitative review of the research literature. Personnel Psychology, 67, 241–293. doi:10.1111/peps.2014.67.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, A., & Bagger, J. (2006). Using the BIDR to distinguish the effects of impression management and self-deception on the criterion validity of personality measures: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 131–141. doi:10.1111/ijsa.2006.14.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCann, C. (2013). Instructed faking of the HEXACO reduces facet reliability and involves more gc than gf. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 828–833. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCann, C., Matthews, G., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. D. (2003). Psychological assessment of emotional intelligence: A review of self-reported and performance-based testing. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 11, 247–274. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb028975
   Google Scholar
• Mahar, D., Cologon, J., & Duck, J. (1995). Response strategies when faking personality questionnaires in a vocational selection setting. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 605–609. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(94)00200-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, B. (2009). ‘Faking’ from the applicant’s perspective: A theory of self-presentation in personnel selection settings. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17, 417–430. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2009.00483.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, B. A., Bowen, C. C., & Hunt, S. T. (2002). How effective are people at faking on personality questionnaires? Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00021-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, A., Ramalho, N., & Morin, E. (2010). A comprehensive meta-analysis of the relationship between emotional intelligence and health. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 554–564. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavroveli, S., Petrides, K. V., Rieffe, C., & Bakker, F. (2007). Trait emotional intelligence, psychological well-being and peer-rated social competence in adolescence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25, 263–275. doi:10.1348/026151006X118577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1983). Social desirability scales: More substance than style. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 882–888. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.51.6.882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarland, L. A., & Ryan, A. M. (2000). Variance in faking across noncognitive measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 812–821. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarland, L. A., & Ryan, A. M. (2006). Toward an integrated model of applicant faking behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 979–1016. doi:10.1111/jasp.2006.36.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17, 437–455. doi:10.1037/a0028085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melchers, K. G., Klehe, U. C., Richter, G. M., Kleinmann, M., König, C. J., & Lievens, F. (2009). “I know what you want to know”: The impact of interviewees’ ability to identify criteria on interview performance and construct-related validity. Human Performance, 22, 355–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959280903120295
   Google Scholar
• Mersman, J. L., & Shultz, K. S. (1998). Individual differences in the ability to fake on personality measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 217–227. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00160-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesmer-Magnus, J., & Viswesvaran, C. (2006). Assessing response distortion in personality tests: A review of research designs and analytic strategies. In R. L. Griffith & M. H. Peterson (Eds.), A closer examination of applicant faking behavior (pp. 85–114). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Morgeson, F. P., Campion, M. A., Dipboye, R. L., Hollenbeck, J. R., Murphy, K., & Schmitt, N. (2007). Reconsidering use of personality tests in personnel selection contexts. Personnel Psychology, 60, 683–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00089.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller-Hanson, R. A., Heggestad, E. D., & Thornton, G. C. (2006). Individual differences in impression management: An exploration of the psychological processes underlying faking. Psychology Science, 48, 288–312.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. R., & Dzieweczynski, J. (2005). Why don’t measures of broad dimensions of personality perform better as predictors of job performance? Human Performance, 18, 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1804_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Boyle, E. H., Humphrey, R. H., Pollack, J. M., Hawver, T. H., & Story, P. A. (2011). The relation between emotional intelligence and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 788–818. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connell, M. S., Kung, M. C., & Tristan, E. (2011). Beyond impression management: Evaluating three measures of response distortion and their relationship to job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19, 340–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2011.00563.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Reiss, A. D. (1996). Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 660–679. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauls, C. A., & Crost, N. W. (2005). Cognitive ability and self-reported efficacy of self-presentation predict faking on personality measures. Journal of Individual Differences, 26(4), 194–206. doi:10.1027/1614-0001.26.4.194
   Google Scholar
• Pedhazur‚, E. J., & Schmelkin‚, L. P. (1991). Measurement‚ design‚ and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale‚ NJ: Erlbaum‚.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. H., Griffith, R. L., Isaacson, J. A., O’Connell, M. S., & Mangos, P. M. (2011). Applicant faking, social desirability, and the prediction of counterproductive work behaviors. Human Performance, 24, 270–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2011.580808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrides, K. V. (2011). Ability and trait emotional intelligence. In T. Chamorro-Premuzic, A. Furnham, & S. Von Stumm (Eds.), The Blackwell-Wiley handbook of individual differences. pp. 656–678. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Petrides, K. V., Frederickson, N., & Furnham, A. (2004). The role of trait emotional intelligence in academic performance and deviant behavior at school. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 277–293. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00084-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrides, K. V., & Furnham, A. (2006). The role of trait emotional intelligence in a gender-specific model of organizational variables. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 552–569. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00019.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrides, K. V., Furnham, A., & Mavroveli, S. (2007). Trait emotional intelligence: Moving forward in the field of EI. In G. Matthews, M. Zeidner, & R. Roberts (Eds.), Emotional intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. pp. 151–166. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petrides, K. V., Pérez-González, J. C., & Furnham, A. (2007). On the criterion and incremental validity of trait emotional intelligence. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 26–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930601038912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrides, K. V., Vernon, P. A., Schermer, J. A., Ligthart, L., Boomsma, D. I., & Veselka, L. (2010). Relationships between trait emotional intelligence and the Big Five in the Netherlands. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 906–910. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymark, P. H., Shilobod, T. L., & Steffensmeier, J. (April, 2004). An examination of job-relevant pattern faking. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Raymark, P. H., & Tafero, T. L. (2009). Individual differences in the ability to fake on personality measures. Human Performance, 22, 86–103. doi:10.1080/08959280802541039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosse, J. G., Stecher, M. D., Miller, J. L., & Levin, R. A. (1998). The impact of response distortion on preemployment personality testing and hiring decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 634–644. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roulin, N., Krings, F., & Binggeli, S. (2016). A dynamic model of applicant faking. Organizational Psychology Review, 6, 145–170. doi:10.1177/2041386615580875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherbaum, C. A., Sabet, J., Kern, M. J., & Agnello, P. (2013). Examining faking on personality inventories using unfolding item response theory models. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 207–216. doi:10.1080/00223891.2012.725439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmit, M. J., & Ryan, A. M. (1993). The big five in personnel selection: Factor structure in applicant and nonapplicant populations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 966–974. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.6.966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmit, M. J., Ryan, A. M., Stierwalt, S. L., & Powell, A. B. (1995). Frame-of-reference effects on personality scale scores and criterion-related validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 607–620. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.80.5.607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N., & Oswald, F. L. (2006). The impact of corrections for faking on the validity of noncognitive measures in selection settings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 613–621. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte, M. J., Ree, M. J., & Carretta, T. R. (2004). Emotional intelligence: Not much more than g and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1059–1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevdalis, N., Petrides, K. V., & Harvey, N. (2007). Trait emotional intelligence and decision-related emotions. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1347–1358. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanock, L. R., Baran, B. E., Gentry, W. A., Pattison, S. C., & Heggestad, E. D. (2010). Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 543–554. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9183-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. B., & Ellingson, J. E. (2002). Substance versus style: A new look at social desirability in motivating contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 211–219. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell, A. F., Sydell, E. J., & Lueke, S. B. (1999). Towards a theory of applicant faking: Integrating studies of deception. Human Resource Management Review, 9, 219–242. doi:10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00019-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tett, R. P., Freund, K. A., Christiansen, N. D., Fox, K. E., & Coaster, J. (2012). Faking on self-report emotional intelligence and personality tests: Effects of faking opportunity, cognitive ability, and job type. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 195–201. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tett, R. P., & Simonet, D. V. (2011). Faking in personality assessment: A “multisaturation” perspective on faking as performance. Human Performance, 24, 302–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2011.597472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tisak, J., & Smith, C. S. (1994). Defending and extending difference score methods. Journal of Management, 20, 675–682. doi:10.1177/014920639402000310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uziel, L. (2010). Rethinking social desirability scales from impression management to interpersonally oriented self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 243–262. doi:10.1177/1745691610369465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Linden, D., Pekaar, K. A., Bakker, A. B., Schermer, J. A., Vernon, P. A., Dunkel, C. S., & Petrides, K. V. (2017). Overlap between the general factor of personality and emotional intelligence: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 36–52. doi:10.1037/bul0000078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Linden, D., Te Nijenhuis, J., Cremers, M., Van De Ven, C., & Van Der Heijden-Lek, K. (2014). The general factor of personality (GFP) relates to other ratings of character and integrity: Two validity studies in personnel selection and training of the Dutch armed forces. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 22, 261–271. doi:10.1111/ijsa.2014.22.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hooft, E. A., & Born, M. P. (2012). Intentional response distortion on personality tests: Using eye-tracking to understand response processes when faking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasilopoulos, N. L., & Cucina, J. M. (2006). Faking on noncognitive measures: The interaction of cognitive ability and test characteristics. In R. L. Griffith & M. H. Peterson (Eds.), A closer examination of applicant faking behavior (pp. 305–331). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Vasilopoulos, N. L., Cucina, J. M., Dyomina, N. V., Morewitz, C. L., & Reilly, R. R. (2006). Forced-choice personality tests: A measure of personality and cognitive ability? . Human Performance19, 175–199. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1903_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1999). Meta-analyses of fakability estimates: Implications for personality measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 197–210. doi:10.1177/00131649921969802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitman, D. S., Van Rooy, D. L., Viswesvaran, C., & Alonso, A. (2008). The susceptibility of a mixed model measure of emotional intelligence to faking: A Solomon four-group design. Psychology Science, 50, 44–63.
   Google Scholar
• Zickar, M. J., & Robie, C. (1999). Modeling faking good on personality items: An item-level analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 551–563. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.4.551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, M., Danay, E., Schölmerich, F., & Bühner, M. (2010). Predicting academic success with the Big 5 rated from different points of view: Self-rated, other rated and faked. European Journal of Personality, 24, 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar