Team Development: Definition, Measurement and Relationships with Team Effectiveness

References

• Agazarian, Y. (1999). Phases of development in the systems-centered psychotherapy group. Small Group Research, 30, 82–107. doi:10.1177/104649649903000105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agazarian, Y., & Gantt, S. (2003). Phases of group development: Systems-centered hypotheses and their implications for research and practice. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7, 238–252. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.7.3.238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 634–665. doi:10.2307/2393475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40, 1297–1333. doi:10.1177/0149206314527128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, H., Poole, M. S., Henry, K. B., Wheelan, S. A., & Moreland, R. (2004). Time, change, and development: The temporal perspective on groups. Small Group Research, 35, 73–105. doi:10.1177/1046496403259757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atwater, L., & Carmeli, A. (2009). Leader–Member exchange, feelings of energy, and involvement in creative work. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 264–275. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubé, C., & Rousseau, V. (2005). Team goal commitment and team effectiveness: The role of task interdependence and supportive behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 9, 189–204. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.9.3.189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Verbeke, W. (2004). Using the job demands-resources model to predict burnout and performance. Human Resource Management, 43, 83–104. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-050X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
   Google Scholar
• Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J., & McLendon, C. L. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 989–1004. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behfar, K. J., Peterson, R. S., Mannix, E. A., & Trochim, W. M. K. (2008). The critical role of conflict resolution in teams: A close look at the links between conflict type, conflict management strategies, and team outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 170–188. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennis, W., & Shepard, H. (1956). A theory of group development. Human Relations, 9, 415–437. doi:10.1177/001872675600900403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bion, W. (1961). Experiences in groups and other papers. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analyses. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349–381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y., & Lee, J. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29, 87–111. doi:10.2307/25148669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonebright, D. A. (2010). 40 years of storming: A historical review of Tuckman’s model of small group development. Human Resource Development International, 13, 111–120. doi:10.1080/13678861003589099
   Google Scholar
• Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In H. C. Triandis & W. W. Lambert (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 349–444). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Brower, A. (1996). Group development as constructed social reality revisited: The constructivism of small groups. Families in Society, 77, 336–344. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, M. J., & Dunlap, W. P. (2002). Estimating interrater agreement with the average deviation index: A user’s guide. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 159–172. doi:10.1177/1094428102005002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzaglo, G., & Wheelan, S. A. (1999). Facilitating work team effectiveness: Case studies from central America. Small Group Research, 30, 108–129. doi:10.1177/104649649903000106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D., & Fiske, D. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait–multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105. doi:10.1037/h0046016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823–847. doi:10.1111/peps.1993.46.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, S. A., & De Paola, C. (2000). The measurement of cohesion in work teams. Small Group Research, 31, 71–88. doi:10.1177/104649640003100104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234–246. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, A., Bordia, P., & Duck, J. (2003). Punctuated equilibrium and linear progression: Toward a new understanding of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 106–117. doi:10.2307/30040680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, A., Duck, J., & Bordia, P. (2006). Understanding the multidimensionality of group development. Small Group Research, 37, 327–350. doi:10.1177/1046496406290564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239–290. doi:10.1177/014920639702300303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A. C., & Anderson, N. (2011). Measuring trust in teams: Development and validation of a multifaceted measure of formative and reflective indicators of team trust. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20, 119–154. doi:10.1080/13594320903272083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302. doi:10.1037/h0040957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropanzano, R., Li, A., & Benson, L. (2011). Peer justice and teamwork process. Group & Organization Management, 36, 567–596. doi:10.1177/1059601111414561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Wit, F. R. C., Greer, L. L., & Jehn, K. A. (2012). The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 360–390. doi:10.1037/a0024844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed). London, UK: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Dobrow, S. R., & Tosti-Kharas, J. (2011). Calling: The development of a scale measure. Personnel Psychology, 64, 1001–1049. doi:10.1111/peps.2011.64.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drach-Zahavy, A., & Somech, A. (2001). Understanding team innovation: The role of team processes and structures. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 5, 111–123. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.5.2.111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrhart, M. G., Bliese, P. D., & Thomas, J. L. (2006). Unit-level OCB and unit effectiveness: Examining the incremental effect of helping behavior. Human Performance, 19, 159–173. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1902_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger, R., Karagonlar, G., Stinglhamber, F., Neves, P., Becker, T. E., Gonzalez-Morales, M. G., & Steiger-Mueller, M. (2010). Leader–Member exchange and affective organizational commitment: The contribution of supervisor’s organizational embodiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1085–1103. doi:10.1037/a0020858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericksen, J., & Dyer, L. (2004). Right from the start: Exploring the effects of early team events on subsequent project team development and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 438–471. doi:10.2307/4131442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faraj, S., & Sproull, L. (2000). Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Science, 46, 1554–1568. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.12.1554.12072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, D. L., Brown, D. J., Berry, J. W., & Lian, H. (2008). The development and validation of the workplace ostracism scale. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1348–1366. doi:10.1037/a0012743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, S. G., Hunter, T. A., & Macrosson, W. D. K. (1997). Team or group? Managers’ perceptions of the differences. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 12, 232–242. doi:10.1108/02683949710174838
   Google Scholar
• Furr, R. M. (2011). Scale construction and psychometrics for social and personality psychology. London, UK: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Furst, S. A., Reeves, M., Rosen, B., & Blackburn, R. S. (2004). Managing the life cycle of virtual teams. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 6–20. doi:10.5465/AME.2004.13837468
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, R., & Kandemir, D. (2006). An illustration of modeling moderating variables in cross-national studies. International Marketing Review, 23, 371–389. doi:10.1108/02651330610678967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, M. J., & Dennis, A. R. (2013). Toward an integrated model of group development: Disruption of routines by technology-induced change. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29, 43–86. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222290302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9–41. doi:10.2307/256496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B., & Vermeulen, F. (2003). A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 202–239. doi:10.2307/3556657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilson, L. L., Mathieu, J. E., Shalley, C. E., & Ruddy, T. M. (2005). Creativity and standardization: Complementary or conflicting drivers of team effectiveness? Academy of Management Journal, 48, 521–531. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2005.17407916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilson, L. L., & Shalley, C. E. (2004). A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of teams’ engagement in creative processes. Journal of Management, 30, 453–470. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2003.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goncalo, J. A., Polman, E., & Maslach, C. (2010). Can confidence come too soon? Collective efficacy, conflict and group performance over time. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113, 13–24. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315–342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hare, A. P. (1973). Theories of group development and categories for interaction analysis. Small Group Research, 4, 259–304. doi:10.1177/104649647300400301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinen, J. S., & Jacobson, E. (1976). A model of task group development in complex organizations and a strategy of implementation. Academy of Management Review, 1, 98–111. doi:10.5465/AMR.1976.4396620
   Google Scholar
• Hinkin, T. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21, 967–988. doi:10.1177/014920639502100509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 104–121. doi:10.1177/109442819800100106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochwarter, W. A., Ferris, G. R., Zinko, R., Arnell, B., & James, M. (2007). Reputation as a moderator of political behavior-work outcomes relationships: A two-study investigation with convergent results. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 567–576. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, J. K., & Brotheridge, C. M. (2008). Do teams grow up one stage at a time? Exploring the complexity of group development models. Team Performance Management, 14, 214–232. doi:10.1108/13527590810898491
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, C., Rydbo, N., & Börresen, J. E. (2014). The links between group development and health in manufacturing industry. Small Group Research, 45, 400–415. doi:10.1177/1046496414534473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janz, B. D., Colquitt, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (1997). Knowledge worker team effectiveness: The role of autonomy, interdependence, team development, and contextual support variables. Personnel Psychology, 50, 877–904. doi:10.1111/peps.1997.50.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. A., Greer, L., Levine, S., & Szulanski, G. (2008). The effects of conflict types, dimensions, and emergent states on group outcomes. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17, 465–495. doi:10.1007/s10726-008-9107-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 238–251. doi:10.2307/3069453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, J. E., & Bearley, W. L. (2001). Facilitating team development: A view from the field. Group Facilitation, 3, 56–65.
   Google Scholar
• Kark, R., & Carmeli, A. (2009). Alive and creating: The mediating role of vitality and aliveness in the relationship between psychological safety and creative work involvement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 785–804. doi:10.1002/job.v30:6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karriker, J. H. (2005). Cyclical group development and interaction-based leadership emergence in autonomous teams: An integrated model. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 11, 54–64. doi:10.1177/107179190501100405
   Google Scholar
• Kivimaki, M., & Elovainio, M. (1999). A short version of the Team Climate Inventory: Development and psychometric properties. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 241–246. doi:10.1348/096317999166644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 211–236. doi:10.1177/109442810033001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2015). Advancing research on team process dynamics: Theoretical, methodological, and measurement considerations. Organizational Psychology Review, 5, 270–299. doi:10.1177/2041386614533586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 12. Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 333–376). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7, 77–124. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuipers, B. S., & Stoker, J. I. (2009). Development and performance of self-managing work teams: A theoretical and empirical examination. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20, 399–419. doi:10.1080/09585190802670797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, N., Stern, L. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1993). Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 133–1651. doi:10.2307/256824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacoursiere, R. (1974). A group method facilitate learning during the stages of a psychiatric affiliation. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 24, 342–351. doi:10.1080/00207284.1974.11491836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laird, M. D., Zboja, J. J., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). Partial mediation of the political skill-reputation relationship. Career Development International, 17, 557–582. doi:10.1108/13620431211280132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M., & Michels, L. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 202–220. doi:10.1177/1094428105284919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 815–852. doi:10.1177/1094428106296642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LePine, J. A., Piccolo, R. F., Jackson, C. L., Mathieu, J. E., & Saul, J. R. (2008). A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61, 273–307. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00114.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., & Roe, R. A. (2012). Introducing an intrateam longitudinal approach to the study of team process dynamics. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21, 718–748. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2012.660749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannix, E., & Jehn, K. A. (2004). Let’s norm and storm, but not right now: Integrating models of group development and performance. In E. Mannix, M. Neale, & S. Blount (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams: Temporal issues (Vol. 6, pp. 11–37). New York, NY: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Maples, M. F. (1988). Group development: Extending Tuckman’s theory. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 13, 17–23. doi:10.1080/01933928808411771
   Google Scholar
• Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356–376. doi:10.5465/amr.2001.4845785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., & Gilson, L. (2012). Criteria issues and team effectiveness. In S. W. J. Kozlowski (Ed.), Oxford handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 910–930). London, UK: Oxford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., & Rapp, T. L. (2009). Laying the foundation for successful team performance trajectories: The roles of team charters and performance strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 90–103. doi:10.1037/a0013257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. L. (2003). The stages of group development: A retrospective study of dynamic team processes. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 20, 121–134. doi:10.1111/j.1936-4490.2003.tb00698.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, T. (1964). Group transformations: An analysis of a learning group. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, B. B., Salas, E., & Glickman, A. S. (1993). An analysis of team evolution and maturation. The Journal of General Psychology, 120, 277–291. doi:10.1080/00221309.1993.9711148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgeson, F. P., DeRue, D. S., & Karam, E. P. (2010). Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. Journal of Management, 36, 5–39. doi:10.1177/0149206309347376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muchielli, R. (1984). Le travail en equipe. Thiron, France: Editions ESF, Librairies Techniques.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, J. C., Miguez, J., & Lourenço, P. R. (2005). Group development: The issue of sequentiality. Boletim SPEF, 30/31, 121–131.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., Ahearne, M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 262–270. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porath, C., Spreitzer, G., Gibson, C., & Garnett, F. G. (2012). Thriving at work: Toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 250–275. doi:10.1002/job.756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, T. W., & Lilly, B. S. (1996). The effects of conflict, trust, and task commitment on project team performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 7, 361–376. doi:10.1108/eb022787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riordan, C. M., & Vandenberg, R. J. (1994). A central question in cross-cultural research: Do employees of different cultures interpret work-related measures in an equivalent manner? Journal of Management, 20, 643–671. doi:10.1177/014920639402000307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, G., & Morley, C. (2007). Running the electronic sweatshop: Call centre managers’ views on call centres. Journal of Management & Organization, 13, 249–263. doi:10.1017/S1833367200003722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe, R. A., Gockel, C., & Meyer, B. (2012). Time and change in teams: Where we are and where we are moving. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21, 629–656. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2012.729821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seers, A., & Woodruff, S. (1997). Temporal pacing in task forces: Group development or deadline pressure? Journal of Management, 23, 169–187. doi:10.1177/014920639702300204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheard, A. G., & Kakabadse, A. P. (2002). From loose groups to effective teams: The nine key factors of the team landscape. Journal of Management Development, 21, 133–151. doi:10.1108/02621710210417439
   Google Scholar
• Siemsen, E., Roth, A., & Oliveira, P. (2010). Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 456–476. doi:10.1177/1094428109351241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. (2001). Group development: A review of the literature and a commentary on future research directions. Group Facilitation, 3, 14–45.
   Google Scholar
• Srivastva, S., Obert, S. L., & Neilsen, E. H. (1977). Organizational analysis through group processes: A theoretical perspective for organizational development. In C. Cooper (Ed.), Organizational development in the UK and the USA: A joint evaluation. London, UK: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sundstrom, E., McIntyre, M., Halfhill, T., & Richards, H. (2000). Work groups: From the Hawthorne studies to work teams of the 1990s and beyond. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 44–67. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.4.1.44
   Google Scholar
• Sung, S. Y., & Choi, J. N. (2012). Effects of team knowledge management on the creativity and financial performance of organizational teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118, 4–13. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjosvold, D., Hui, C., & Yu, Z. (2003). Conflict management and task reflexivity for team in-role and extra-role performance in China. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 14, 141–163. doi:10.1108/eb022895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjosvold, D., & Yu, Z. (2004). Goal interdependence and applying abilities for team in-role and extra-role performance in China. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 8, 98–111. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.8.2.98
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384–399. doi:10.1037/h0022100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. C. (1977). Stages of small-group development revisited. Group & Organization Management, 2, 419–427. doi:10.1177/105960117700200404
   Google Scholar
• Tyran, K. L., & Gibson, C. B. (2008). Is what you see, what you get?: The relationship among surface- and deep-level heterogeneity characteristics, group efficacy, and team reputation. Group & Organization Management, 33, 46–76. doi:10.1177/1059601106287111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Ven, A., & Ferry, D. (1980). Measuring and assessing organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• van der Haar, S., Li, J., Segers, M., Jehn, K. A., & van den Bossche, P. (2015). Evolving team cognition: The impact of team situation models on team effectiveness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 596–610. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2014.942731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70. doi:10.1177/109442810031002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wageman, R. (1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 145–180. doi:10.2307/2393703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheelan, S. A. (2005). Group processes: A developmental perspective (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Wheelan, S. A., Davidson, B., & Tilin, F. (2003). Group development across time: Reality or illusion? Small Group Research, 34, 223–245. doi:10.1177/1046496403251608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheelan, S. A., & Hochberger, J. M. (1996). Validation studies of the group development questionnaire. Small Group Research, 27, 143–170. doi:10.1177/1046496496271007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheelan, S. A., & Williams, T. (2003). Mapping dynamic interaction patterns in work groups. Small Group Research, 34, 443–467. doi:10.1177/1046496403254043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., Waldman, D. A., & Wang, Z. (2012). A multilevel investigation of leader–Member exchange, informal leader emergence, and individual and team performance. Personnel Psychology, 65, 49–78. doi:10.1111/peps.2012.65.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinko, R., Ferris, G. R., Humphrey, S. E., Meyer, C. J., & Aime, F. (2012). Personal reputation in organizations: Two-study constructive replication and extension of antecedents and consequences. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85, 156–180. doi:10.1111/joop.2012.85.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar