The Effects of Emotional Expressions in Negotiation: A Meta-Analysis and Future Directions for Research

References

• References marked with asterisks indicate research reviewed in the meta-analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Bax, L. (2011). MIX 2.0: Professional software for meta-analysis in Excel (Version 2.0.1.4) [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.meta-analysis-made-easy.com
   Google Scholar
• Bendersky, C., & McGinn, K. L. (2010). Perspective—Open to Negotiation: Phenomenological Assumptions and Knowledge Dissemination. Organization Science, 21, 781–797. 3 doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergh, D. D., Aguinis, H., Heavey, C., Ketchen, D. J., Boyd, B. K., Su, P., Lau, Cubie L. L.., & Joo, H. (2016). Using meta-analytic structural equation modeling to advance strategic management research: Guidelines and an empirical illustration via the strategic leadership-performance relationship. Strategic Management Journal, 37(3), 477–497. doi:doi.10.1002/smj.2016.37.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L.V., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. R. (2014). Comprehensive meta-analysis version 3. Biostat: Englewood, NJ
   Google Scholar
• Burke, M. J., & Landis, R. S. (2003). Methodological and conceptual challenges in conducting and interpreting meta-analyses. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), Applied psychology series. Validity generalization: A critical review (p. 287–309). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, I. C., & Friedman, B. H. (2004). Autonomic specificity of discrete emotion and dimensions of affective space: a multivariate approach. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 51(2), doi.10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2003.08.002 143-153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1960). A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. doi.10.1177/001316446002000104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (Eds.). (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1993-99100-000
   Google Scholar
• Fleiss, J. L., Cohen, J., & Everitt, B. S. (1969). Large sample standard errors of kappa and weighted kappa. Psychological Bulletin, 72(5), 323–327. doi.10.1037/h0028106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998). Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3(4),486–504. doi.10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. (2018). Inconsistent mediation. Retrieved from http://davidakenny.net/cm/mediate.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Lawler, E. J., & Thye, S. R. (1999). Bringing emotions into social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 217–244 1 doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412984997
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1986). Meta-analytic procedures for combining studies with multiple effect sizes. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 400–406. 3 doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781483398105
   Google Scholar
• Stemmler, G. (1989). The Autonomic Differentiation of Emotions Revisited: Convergent and Discriminant Validation. Psychophysiology, 26(6), 617–632. doi:doi.10.1111/psyp.1989.26.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tofighi, D., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2011). RMediation: An R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 692–700. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0076-x 3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1995). Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modeling. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 865–885. doi:doi.10.1111/peps.1995.48.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Adam, H., & Brett, J. M. (2015). Context matters: The social effects of anger in cooperative, balanced, and competitive negotiation situations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 44–58. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Adam, H., & Brett, J. M. (2018). Everything in moderation: The social effects of anger depend on its perceived intensity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 12–18. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Adam, H., & Shirako, A. (2013). Not all anger is created equal: The impact of the expresser’s culture on the social effects of anger in negotiations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 785–798. doi:10.1037/a0032387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Adam, H., Shirako, A., & Maddux, W. W. (2010). Cultural variance in the interpersonal effects of anger in negotiations. Psychological Science, 21, 882–889. doi:10.1177/0956797610370755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allred, K. G., Mallozzi, J. S., Matsui, F., & Raia, C. P. (1997). The influence of anger and compassion on negotiation performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 175–187. doi:10.1006/obhd.1997.2705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, E. (2017, November 6). Want to win a negotiation? Get mad. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/articles/want-to-win-a-negotiation-get-mad-1509988170
   Google Scholar
• *Bertram, S. (2018). The social effects of anger in international negotiations: The role of self-regulation and bargaining power. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, A. W., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2011). Can nervous nelly negotiate? How anxiety causes negotiators to make low first offers, exit early, and earn less profit. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 43–54. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Campagna, R. T., Mislin, A. A., Kong, D. T., & Bottom, W. P. (2016). Strategic consequences of emotional misrepresentation in negotiation: The blowback effect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 605–624. doi:10.1037/apl0000072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Campagna, R. T., Mislin, A. A., & Bottom, W. P. (2019). Motivated by guilt and low felt trust: The impact of negotiators’ anger expressions on the implementation of negotiated agreements. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 32, 1–21. doi:10.1002/bdm.2119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnevale, P. J., & Isen, A. M. (1986). The influence of positive affect and visual access on the discovery of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 1–13. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(86)90041-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Côté, S., Hideg, I., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2013). The consequences of faking anger in negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 453–463. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curhan, J. R., Elfenbein, H. A., & Kilduff, G. J. (2009). Getting off on the right foot: Subjective value versus economic value in predicting longitudinal job outcomes from job offer negotiations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 524–534. doi:10.1037/a0013746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Dehghani, M., Carnevale, P. J., & Gratch, J. (2014). Interpersonal effects of expressed anger and sorrow in morally charged negotiation. Judgment and Decision Making, 9, 104–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elfenbein, H. A. (2014). The many faces of emotional contagion: An affective process theory for affective linkage. Organizational Psychology Review, 4, 326–362. doi:10.1177/2041386614542889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Filipowicz, A., Barsade, S., & Melwani, S. (2011). Understanding emotional transitions: The interpersonal consequences of changing emotions in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 541–556. doi:10.1037/a0023545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117, 39–66. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgas, J. P. (1998). On feeling good and getting your way: Mood effects on negotiator cognition and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 565–577. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218–226. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, R., Anderson, C., Brett, J., Olekalns, M., Goates, N., & Lisco, C. C. (2004). The positive and negative effects of anger on dispute resolution: Evidence from electronically mediated disputes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 369–376. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hareli, S., David, S., Akron, S., & Hess, U. (2013). The effect of the negotiator’s social power as a function of the counterpart’s emotional reactions in a computer mediated negotiation. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 9(4), 820–831. doi:10.5964/ejop.v9i4.639
   Google Scholar
• *Harinck, F., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2012). Be hard on the interests and soft on the values: Conflict issue moderates the effects of anger in negotiations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(4), 741–752. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02089.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V. (1987). How hard is hard science, how soft is soft science? The empirical cumulativeness of research. American Psychologist, 42(5), 443–455. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.42.5.443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hideg, I., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2017). When expressions of fake emotions elicit negative reactions: The role of observers‘ dialectical thinking. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(8), 1196–1212. doi:10.1002/job.2196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huffcutt, A. I., & Arthur, W. (1995). Development of a new outlier statistic for meta-analytic data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(2), 327–334. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.80.2.327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunsaker, D. A. (2017). Anger in negotiations: A review of causes, effects, and unanswered questions. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 10(3), 220–241. doi:10.1111/ncmr.12096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hutson, M. (2015, September 18). The rationality of rage. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/20/opinion/sunday/the-rationality-of-rage.html
   Google Scholar
• *Jang, D., & Bottom, W. P. (2019). The disutility of expressing anger in negotiations: The importance of strategic risk, personality, and reciprocal interdependence. Unpublished study.
   Google Scholar
• Jang, D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Bottom, W. P. (2018). More than a phase: Form and features of a general theory of negotiation. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 318–356. doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Jay, C. R. (2006). Generalized versus direct affect and the effect of the other’s behavior in negotiation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (1999). Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognition & Emotion, 13(5), 505–521. doi:10.1080/026999399379168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kopelman, S., Rosette, A. S., & Thompson, L. (2006). The three faces of Eve: Strategic displays of positive, negative, and neutral emotions in negotiations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99(1), 81–101. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kopelman, S., & Rosette, A. S. (2008). Cultural variation in response to strategic emotions in negotiations. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17(1), 65–77. doi:10.1007/s10726-007-9087-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawler, E. (2001). An affect theory of social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 107(2), 321–352. doi:10.1086/324071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lelieveld, G.-J., Van Dijk, E., Van Beest, I., Steinel, W., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2011). Disappointed in you, angry about your offer: Distinct negative emotions induce concessions via different mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(3), 635–641. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lelieveld, G.-J., Van Dijk, E., Van Beest, I., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2012). Why anger and disappointment affect other’s bargaining behavior differently. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(9), 1209–1221. doi:10.1177/0146167212446938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lelieveld, G.-J., Van Dijk, E., Van Beest, I., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2013). Does communicating disappointment in negotiations help or hurt? Solving an apparent inconsistency in the social-functional approach to emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(4), 605–620. doi:10.1037/a0033345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Li, S. (2005). Strategic emotion in negotiation: The use and consequences of positive and negative emotions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Lindebaum, D., & Jordan, P. J. (2014). When it can be good to feel bad and bad to feel good: Exploring asymmetries in workplace emotional outcomes. Human Relations, 67(9), 1037–1050. doi:10.1177/0018726714535824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Liu, M., & Wang, C. (2010). Explaining the influence of anger and compassion on negotiators’ interaction goals: An assessment of trust and distrust as two distinct mediators. Communication Research, 37(4), 443–472. doi:10.1177/0093650210362681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 593–614. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mislin, A. A., Campagna, R. L., & Bottom, W. P. (2011). After the deal: Talk, trust building and the implementation of negotiated agreements. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(1), 55–68. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• *Overbeck, J. R., Neale, M. A., & Govan, C. L. (2010). I feel, therefore you act: Intrapersonal and interpersonal effects of emotion on negotiation as a function of social power. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 112(2), 126–139. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phan, K. L., Wager, T., Taylor, S. F., & Liberzon, I. (2002). Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: A meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI. NeuroImage, 16(2), 331–348. doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Pietroni, D., Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Pagliaro, S. (2008). Emotions as strategic information: Effects of other’s emotional expressions on fixed-pie perception, demands, and integrative behavior in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(6), 1444–1454. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillutla, M. M., & Murnighan, J. K. (1996). Unfairness, anger, and spite: Emotional rejections of ultimatum offers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68(3), 208–224. doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.0100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Reid, D. I. (2010). Social motives and interpersonal emotions in dyadic negotiations: A strategic choice perspective. Unpublished masters dissertation, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2001). Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 59–82. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Rothman, N. B. (2008). How to lose friends but make others think: The social consequences of expressing emotional ambivalence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, J. Z., & Brown, B. R. (1975). The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Schei, V., Rognes, J. K., & Myklad, S. (2002). Thinking deep and feeling good: Cognitive motivation and positive affect in negotiation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Association for Conflict Management, Salt Lake City.
   Google Scholar
• *Sinaceur, M., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2006). Get mad and get more than even: When and why anger expression is effective in negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(3), 314–322. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Steinel, W., Van Kleef, G. A., & Harinck, F. (2008). Are you talking to me?! Separating the people from the problem when expressing emotions in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(2), 362–369. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sinaceur, M., Van Kleef, G. A., Neale, M. A., Adam, H., & Haag, C. (2011). Hot or cold: Is communicating anger or threats more effective in negotiation? Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 1018–1032. doi:10.1037/a0023896
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sinaceur, M., Adam, H., Van Kleef, G. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2013). The advantages of being unpredictable: How emotional inconsistency extracts concessions in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 498–508. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sinaceur, M., Kopelman, S., Vasiljevic, D., & Haag, C. (2015). Weep and get more: When and why sadness expression is effective in negotiations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(6), 1847–1871. doi:10.1037/a0038783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• https://www.inc.com/mithu-storoni/it-pays-to-get-angry-in-a-negotiation-if-you-do-it-right.html
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, L. (1990). Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 515–532. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Van Dijk, E., Van Kleef, G. A., Steinel, W., & Van Beest, I. (2008). A social functional approach to emotions in bargaining: When communicating anger pays and when it backfires. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 600–614. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Van Beest, I., Van Kleef, G. A., & Van Dijk, E. (2008). Get angry, get out: The interpersonal effects of anger communication in multiparty negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 993–1002. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Tng, H.-Y., & Au, A. K. (2014). Strategic display of anger and happiness in negotiation: The moderating role of perceived authenticity. Negotiation Journal, 30(3), 301–327. doi:10.1111/nejo.12062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kleef, G. A. (2009). How emotions regulate social life: The emotions as social information (EASI) model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 184–188. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01633.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kleef, G. A. (2014). Understanding the positive and negative effects of emotional expressions in organizations: EASI does it. Human Relations, 67(9), 1145–1164. doi:10.1177/0018726713510329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kleef, G. A. (2016). The interpersonal dynamics of emotion: Toward an integrative theory of emotions as social information. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Van Kleef, G. A., & Côté, S. (2007). Expressing anger in conflict: When it helps and when it hurts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1557–1569. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Van Kleef, G. A., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2010). Longer-term consequences of anger expression in negotiation: Retaliation or spillover? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 753–760. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Van Kleef, G. A., Steinel, W., & Homan, A. C. (2013). On being peripheral and paying attention: Prototypicality and information processing in intergroup conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(1), 63–79. doi:10.1037/a0030988
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Van Kleef, G. A., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2008). What other’s disappointment may do to selfish people: Emotion and social value orientation in a negotiation context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(8), 1084–1095. doi:10.1177/0146167208318402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2004a). The interpersonal effects of anger and happiness in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 57–76. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2004b). The interpersonal effects of emotions in negotiations: A motivated information processing approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(4), 510–528. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., Pietroni, D., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2006). Power and emotion in negotiation: Power moderates the interpersonal effects of anger and happiness on concession making. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(4), 557–581. doi:10.1002/ejsp.320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2006). Supplication and appeasement in conflict and negotiation: The interpersonal effects of disappointment, worry, guilt, and regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(1), 124–142. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wang, L. (2009). To show or not to show: Intrapersonal effects of emotion suppression in dyadic negotiation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana.
   Google Scholar
• *Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2010). An interpersonal approach to emotion in social decision making: The emotions as social information model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 45–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wang, L., Northcraft, G., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2012). Beyond negotiated outcomes: The hidden costs of anger expression in dyadic negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(1), 54–63. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Van Kleef, G. A., & Côté, S. (2018). Emotional dynamics in conflict and negotiation: Individual, dyadic, and group processes. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 437‐464. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104714
   Google Scholar