References
- AARP. (n.d.). AARP Network of Age-Friendly States and Communities. Retrieved from https://www.aarp.org/livable-communities/network-age-friendly-communities/info-2014/member-list.html
- Aboderin, I., Kano, M., & Owii, H. (2017). Toward “age-friendly slums”? Health challenges of older slum dwellers in Nairobi and the applicability of the age-friendly city approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14, 1259. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14101259
- Alley, D., Liebig, P., Pynoos, J., Banerjee, T., & Choi, I. H. (2007). Creating elder-friendly communities: Preparing for an aging society. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 49(1–2), 1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1300/J083v49n04_01
- Atkins, C., & Sampson, J. (2002). Critical appraisal guidelines for single case study research. ECIS 2002 Proceedings. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2002/15
- Brasher, K., & Winterton, R. (2016). Whose responsibility? Challenges to creating an age-friendly Victoria in the wider Australian policy context. In T. Moulaert & S. Garon (Eds.), Age-friendly cities and communities in international comparison (pp. 229–245). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
- Broome, K., Worrall, L., Fleming, J., & Boldy, D. (2013). Evaluation of age-friendly guidelines for public buses. Transportation Research Part A, 53, 68–80.
- Buffel, T., McGarry, P., Phillipson, C., De Donder, L., Dury, S., De Witte, N., … Verté, D. (2014). Developing age-friendly cities: Case studies from Brussels and Manchester and implications for policy and practice. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26(1–2), 52–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2014.855043
- Buffel, T., & Phillipson, C. (2016). Can global cities be ‘age-friendly cities’? Urban development and ageing populations. Cities, 55, 94–100. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.03.016
- Butterfoss, F. D. (2007). Coalitions and partnerships in community health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Chan, A. C., & Cao, T. (2015). Age-friendly neighbourhoods as civic participation: Implementation of an active ageing policy in Hong Kong. Journal of Social Work Practice, 29(1), 53–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2014.993947
- Cramm, J., Van Dijk, H., & Nieboer, A. (2018). The creation of age-friendly environments is especially important to frail older people. Ageing & Society, 38(4), 700–720. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X16001240
- Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. (2014). CASP checklists (Qualitative) Oxford. Retrieved February 2, 2018, from http://www.casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists
- de Leeuw, E. (2012). Evaluating WHO Healthy Cities in Europe: Issues and perspectives. Journal of Urban Health, 90(Supplement 1), 14–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-012-9767-6
- Dehar, M., Casswell, S., & Duignan, P. (1993). Formative and process evaluation of health promotion and disease prevention programs. Evaluation Review, 17(2), 204–220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X9301700205
- DelaTorre, A., & Neal, M. (2017). Ecological approaches to an age-friendly Portland and Multnomah County. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 31(2), 130–145. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2017.1309931
- Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., & Sutton, A. (2005). Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10(1), 45–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/135581960501000110
- Dixon-Woods, M., Cavers, D., Agarwal, S., Annandale, E., Arthur, A., Harvey, J., … Sutton, A. J. (2006). Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6, 35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-35
- Dupuis-Blanchard, S., Gould, O. N., & French, I. (2016). L’importance de planifier en vue du vieillissement de la population: Notre ville est-elle amie des aînés? Journal of New Brunswick Studies, 7(1), 87–104.
- Evans, R. G., & Stoddart, G. L. (1990). Producing health, consuming health care. Social Science & Medicine, 31(2), 1347–1363. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(90)90074-3
- Feldman, P. H., & Oberlink, M. R. (2003). The AdvantAge Initiative: Developing community indicators to promote the health and well-being of older people. Family and Community Health, 26(4), 268–274.
- Fields, B., & Tudor, J. (2015). Age-friendly community policy innovation: Complete streets implementation in Louisiana, United States. In K. G. Fitzgerald & F. G. Caro (Eds.), International perspectives on age-friendly cities (pp. 241–255). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Gallagher, E., & Mallhi, A. (2010). Age-friendly British Columbia: Lessons learned from October 1, 2007-September 30, 2010. (n.p.). British Columbia, Canada.
- Garon, S., Paris, M., Beaulieu, M., Veil, A., & Laliberté, A. (2014). Collaborative partnership in age-friendly cities: Two case studies from Quebec, Canada. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26(1–2), 73–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2014.854583
- Garon, S., Paris, M., Veil, A., Beaulieu, M., & Laliberté, A. (2015). Villes-amies des aînés au Québec: Mise en oeuvre et conditions d’implantation de trois projects pilotes. In J.-P. Viriot Durandal, E. Raymond, T. Moulaert, & M. Charpentier (Eds.), Droits de vieillir et citoyenneté des aînés: Pour une perspective international, (pp. 183-204). Quebec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.
- Glicksman, A., Clark, K., Kleban, M. H., Ring, L., & Hoffman, C. (2014). Building an integrated research/policy planning age-friendly agenda. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26(1–2), 131–146. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2014.854142
- Glicksman, A., & Ring, L. (2017). Defining the goals of age-friendly interventions. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 31(2), 93–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2017.1309925
- Kano, M., Rosenberg, P. E., & Dalton, S. D. (2017). A global pilot study of age-friendly city indicators. Social Indicators Research, 1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1680-7
- Kawachi, I., & Berkman, L. F. (2003). Neighborhoods and health. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
- Kendig, H., Elias, A. M., Matwijiw, P., & Anstey, K. (2014). Developing age-friendly cities and communities in Australia. Journal of Aging and Health, 26(8), 1390–1414. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264314532687
- Keyes, L., & Benavides, A. (2017). Local government adoption of age friendly policies: An integrated model of responsiveness, multi-level governance and public entrepreneurship theories. Public Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 149–185.
- Lai, -M.-M., Lein, S.-Y., Lau, S.-H., & Lai, M.-L. (2016). Modeling age-friendly environment, active aging, and social connectedness in an emerging Asian economy. Journal of Aging Research, 2016, 1–14. Article ID 2052380. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2052380
- Lehning, A., & Greenfield, E. (2017). Research on age-friendly community initiatives: Taking stock and moving forward. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 31(2), 178–192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2017.1309937
- Lehning, A. J., Smith, R. J., & Dunkle, R. E. (2014). Age-friendly environments and self-rated health: An exploration of Detroit elders. Research on Aging, 36(1), 72–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027513500054
- Liddle, J., Scharf, T., Bartlam, B., Bernard, M., & Sim, J. (2014). Exploring the age-friendliness of purpose-built retirement communities: Evidence from England. Ageing & Society, 34(9), 1601–1629. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X13000366
- Lui, C., Everingham, J., Warburton, J., Cuthill, M., & Bartlett, H. (2009). What makes a community age‐friendly: A review of international literature. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 28(3), 116–121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6612.2009.00355.x
- Menec, V. (2017). Conceptualizing social connectivity in the context of age-friendly communities. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 31(2), 99–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2017.1309926
- Menec, V., & Nowicki, S. (2014). Examining the relationship between communities’ ‘age-friendliness’ and life satisfaction and self-perceived health in rural Manitoba, Canada. Rural and Remote Health, 14(1), 2594.
- Menec, V. H., Means, R., Keating, N., Parkhurst, G., & Eales, J. (2011). Conceptualizing age-friendly communities. Canadian Journal on Aging, 30(3), 479–493. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980811000237
- Menec, V. H., Novek, S., Veselyuk, D., & McArthur, J. (2014). Lessons learned from a Canadian, province-wide age-friendly initiative: The age-friendly Manitoba initiative. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 26(1–2), 33–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2014.854606
- Moulaert, T., & Houioux, G. (2016). A Belgian case study: Lack of age-friendly cities and communities knowledge and social participation practices in Wallonia. In T. Moulaert & S. Garon (Eds.), Age-friendly cities and communities in international comparison (pp. 213–228). Cham: Springer.
- Neal, M. B., DeLaTorre, A. K., & Carder, P. C. (2014). Age-friendly Portland: A university-city-community partnership. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26(1–2), 88–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2014.854651
- Neal, M. B., & Wernher, I. (2014). Evaluating your age-friendly community program: A step-by-step guide. Portland, US: Institute on Aging. Portland State University.
- Neville, S., Napier, S., Adams, J., Wham, C., & Jackson, D. (2016). An integrative review of the factors related to building age‐friendly rural communities. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 25(17–18), 2402–2412. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13299
- Nieboer, A., & Cramm, J. (2017). Age-friendly communities matter for older people’s well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9923-5
- Nykiforuk, C. J., Rawson, D., McGetrick, J. A., & Belon, A. P. (2017). Canadian policy perspectives on promoting physical activity across age-friendly communities: Lessons for advocacy and action. Ageing and Society, 1–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X17000939
- O’Brien, E. (2014). Planning for population ageing: Ensuring enabling and supportive physical-social environments – Local infrastructure challenges. Planning Theory & Practice, 15(2), 220–234. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2014.902986
- Orpana, H., Chawla, M., Gallagher, E., & Escaravage, E. (2016). Developing indicators for evaluation of age-friendly communities in Canada: Process and results. Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada, 36(10), 214–223.
- Ozanne, E., Biggs, S., & Kurowski, W. (2014). Competing frameworks in planning for the aged in the growth corridors of Melbourne. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26(1–2), 147–165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2014.860311
- Plouffe, L., & Kalache, A. (2010). Towards global age-friendly cities: Determining urban features that promote active aging. Journal of Urban Health, 85(5), 733–739. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-010-9466-0
- Plouffe, L. A., Garon, S., Brownoff, J., Foucault, M.-L., Lawrence, R., Beaupré, J.-P., & Toews, V. (2013). Advancing age-friendly communities in Canada. Canadian Review of Social Policy, 68/69, 24–38.
- Plouffe, L. A., & Kalache, A. (2011). Making communities age friendly: State and municipal initiatives in Canada and other countries. Gaceta Sanitaria, 25(Suppl. 2), 131–137. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.11.001
- Public Health Agency of Canada. (2012). Age-Friendly Communities in Canada: Community Implementation Guide. Ottawa: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada.
- Public Health Agency of Canada. (2015). Age-friendly communities evaluation guide - using indicators to measure progress. Ottawa: Minister of Health.
- Public Health Agency of Canada. (n.d.). How can Canadian communities become more age-friendly? Retrieved March 20, 2018, from http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/seniors-aines/afc-caa-eng.php
- Rémillard-Boilard, S., Buffel, T., & Phillipson, C. (2017). Involving older residents in age-friendly developments: From information to coproduction mechanisms. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 31(2), 146–159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2017.1309932
- Ring, L., Glicksman, A., Kleban, M., & Norstrand, J. (2017). The future of age-friendly: Building a more inclusive model using principles of ecology and social capital. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 31(2), 117–129. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2017.1309930
- Roever, L., & Reis, O. (2015). Critical appraisal of a case report. Evidence Based Medicine and Practice, 1, 1. doi:https://doi.org/10.4172/EBMP.1000e103
- Russell, E. A. (2015). Age-friendly community capacity building in Newfoundland and Labrador ( PhD dissertation). St. John’s: Memorial University of Newfoundland.
- Ruza, K., Kim, J. I., Leung, I., Kam, C., & Ng, S. Y. M. (2014). Sustainable, age-friendly cities: An evaluation framework and case study application on Palo Alto, California. Sustainable Cities and Society, 14, 390–396. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2014.05.013
- Sallis, J. E., Cervero, R. B., Ascher, W., Henderson, K. A., Kraft, M. K., & Kerr, J. (2006). An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annual Review of Public Health, 27, 297–322. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102100
- Scharlach, A., Davitt, J., Lehning, A., Greenfield, E., & Graham, C. (2014). Does the village model help to foster age-friendly communities? Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26(1–2), 181–196. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2014.854664
- Shannon, S., & O’Connor, H. (2015). Ireland’s age-friendly cities and counties: The development of a national program. In K. G. Fitzgerald & F. G. Caro (Eds.), International perspectives on age-friendly cities (pp. 46–61). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Spina, J., & Menec, V. (2015). What community characteristics help or hinder rural communities in becoming age-friendly? Perspectives from a Canadian prairie province. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 34(4), 444–464. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464813496164
- Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Steels, S. (2015). Key characteristics of age-friendly cities and communities: A review. Cities, 47, 45–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.02.004
- Sun, Y., Chao, T.-Y., Woo, J., & Au, D. W. H. (2017). An institutional perspective of “glocalization” in two Asian tigers: The “structure−agent−strategy” of building an age-friendly city. Habitat International, 59, 101–109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.11.013
- Wang, Y., Gonzales, E., & Morrow-Howell, N. (2017). Applying WHO’s age-friendly communities framework to a national survey in China. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 60(3), 215–231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2017.1292980
- Weed, M. (2005). “Meta interpretation”: A method for the interpretive synthesis of qualitative research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(1), Art. 37. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0501375
- Williams-Roberts, H., Jeffery, B., Johnson, S., & Muhajarine, N. (2016). The effectiveness of healthy community approaches on positive health outcomes in Canada and the United States. Social Sciences, 5(3). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci5010003
- Winterton, R. (2016). Organizational responsibility for age-friendly social participation: Views of Australian rural community stakeholders. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 28(4), 261–276. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2016.1145504
- World Health Organization. (2007). Global Age-Friendly Cities: A Guide. Geneva: Author.
- World Health Organization. (2009). WHO global network of age-friendly cities. Geneva: Author. Retrieved March 20, from http://www.who.int/ageing/Brochure-EnglishAFC9.pdf
- World Health Organization. (2015). Measuring the age-friendliness of cities: A guide to using core indicators. Kobe: WHO Centre for Health Development.
- World Health Organization. (n.d.). WHO global network for age-friendly cities and communities. Retrieved June 13, 2018, from http://www.who.int/ageing/projects/age_friendly_cities_network/en/
- Yin, R. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). London: Sage.