202
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Older Adults, Tablets, and Ambivalence: A Grounded Theory Study of a One-Tablet-Per Older Person, Public Program in Uruguay

ORCID Icon
Pages 325-346 | Received 23 Mar 2021, Accepted 14 Jul 2021, Published online: 15 Mar 2022

References

  • Bala, H., Labonté-lemoyne, E., & Léger, P. M. (2017). Neural correlates of technological ambivalence: A research proposal. In F. D. Davis, R. Riedl, J. Vom Brocke, P. M. Léger, & A. B. Randolph (Eds.), Information systems and neuroscience (pp. 83–89). Springer International Publishing, AG.
  • Ball, C., Francis, J., Huang, K. T., Kadylak, T., Cotten, S. R., & Rikard, R. V. (2019). The physical–digital divide: Exploring the social gap between digital natives and physical natives. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 38(8), 1167–1184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464817732518
  • Baumer, E., Morgan, G., Burrell, M., Brubaker, J., & Dourish, P. (2015). Why study technology non-use? First Monday, 20(11). http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v20i11.6310
  • Borgmann, A. (2016, January 8). How much higher can ICT rise? On the final limits of ICT. Ubiquity. ACM Publications. https://blog.ubiquity.acm.org/how-much-higher-can-ict-rise-on-the-final-limits-of-ict/
  • Brunet, N., & Márquez, C. (2016). Envejecimiento y personas mayores en Uruguay. In J. J. Calvo (Ed.), Atlas Sociodemográfico y de la Desigualdad den Uruguay, Fascículo 7 (pp. 1–79). INE.
  • Charmaz, K. (2011). Qualitative interviewing and grouned theory analysis. In J. F. Gubrium & J. H. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research (pp. 675–694). Sage.
  • Chu, T. H., & Yeo, T. E. D. (2020). Rethinking mediated political engagement: Social media ambivalence and disconnective practices of politically active youths in Hong Kong. Chinese Journal of Communication, 13(2), 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2019.1634606
  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (3rd ed.). Sage.
  • Cotelo, E. (2015, June 22). Sobre el Plan Ibirapitá: tablets y, ojalá, algo más. Radiomundo 1170 AM En Perspectiva. EnPerspectiva. https://www.enperspectiva.net/en-perspectiva-programa/editorial/sobre-el-plan-ibirapita-tablets-y-ojala-algo-mas/
  • Cozza, M., Östlund, B., & Peine, A. (2021). When theory meets practice in entanglements of ageing and technology. TECNOSCIENZA: Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 11(2), 5–12. http://www.tecnoscienza.net/index.php/tsj/article/view/443/265
  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2016). 30 essential skills for the qualitative researcher. Sage.
  • Czaja, S. J. (2017). The role of technology in supporting social engagement among older adults. Public Policy & Aging Report, 27(4), 145–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppar/prx034
  • Davis, J. L. (2012). Social media and experiential ambivalence. Future Internet, 4(4), 955–970. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi4040955
  • Douglas, J. (1977). Existential sociology. In D. Jack, Douglas, M. John, & Johnson (Eds.), Existential sociology (pp. 3–73). Cambridge University Press.
  • Etzioni, A. (2020). The sociology of surviving the coronavirus. Center for The National Interest. https://nationalinterest.org/feature/sociology-surviving-coronavirus-133512
  • Fernández-Ardèvol, M., & Ivan, L. (2013). Older people and mobile communication in two European contexts. Romanian Journal of Communication & Public Relations, 15(3), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.21018/rjcpr.2013.3.196
  • Fernández-Ardèvol, M., Sawchuk, K., & Grenier, L. (2017). Maintaining connections: Octo-and nonagenarians on digital ‘use and non-use.’ Nordicom Review, 38(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0396
  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2005). Social science that matters. Foresight Europe, 2, 38–42. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.734.4015&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  • Freeman, S., Marston, H. R., Olynick, J., Musselwhite, C., Kulczycki, C., Genoe, R., & Xiong, B. (2020). Intergenerational effects on the impacts of technology use in later life: Insights from an international, multi-site study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16), 5711. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165711
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.
  • Hänninen, R., Taipale, S., & Luostari, R. (2021). Exploring heterogeneous ICT use among older adults: The warm experts’ perspective. New Media & Society. 23(6), 1584–1601. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820917353
  • Hunsaker, A., & Hargittai, E. (2018). A review of internet use among older adults. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3937–3954. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818787348
  • Ivan, L., & Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (2017). Older people and the use of ICTs to communicate with children and grandchildren. Transnational Social Review, 7(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/21931674.2016.1277861
  • Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S. H. (2009). Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva, 47(2), 119–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4
  • Kania-Lundholm, M. (2019). Slow side of the divide?: Older ICT non-and seldom-users discussing social acceleration and social change. Digital Culture & Society, 5(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2019-0106
  • Knallerfrauen, (2013, December 24). IPad as a chopping board [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPGY2T9r1Ok
  • Knowles, B. H., & Hanson, V. L. (2018). The Wisdom of older technology (non-) users. Communications of the ACM, 61(3), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1145/3179995
  • König, R., & Seifert, A. (2020). From online to offline and vice versa: Change in internet use in later life across Europe. Frontiers in Sociology, 5(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2020.00004
  • Loe, M. (2015). Comfort and medical ambivalence in old age. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 93, 141–146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.04.013
  • Marston, H. R., Genoe, R., Freeman, S., Kulczycki, C., & Musselwhite, C. (2019). Older adults’ perceptions of ICT: Main findings from the technology in later life (TILL) study. Healthcare, 7(3), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare7030086
  • Marston, H. R., Shore, L., & White, P. J. (2020). How does a (smart) age-friendly ecosystem look in a post-pandemic society? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 8276. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218276
  • Marston, H. R., & van Hoof, J. (2019). “Who doesn’t think about technology when designing urban environments for older people?” A case study approach to a proposed extension of the WHO’s age-friendly cities model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(19), 3525. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193525
  • May, K. A. (1986). Writing and evaluating the grounded theory research report. In W. C. Chenitz & J. M. Swanson (Eds.), From practice to grounded theory (pp. 146–154). Addison-Wesley.
  • Mead, G., & Neves, B. B. (2018). Recursive approaches to technology adoption, families, and the life course: Actor-network theory and strong-structuration theory. In B. B. Neves & C. Casimiro (Eds.), Connecting families? Information & communication technologies, generations, and the life course (pp. 41–57). Policy Press.
  • Memoria Annual (2017). Plan Ibirapitá. https://ibirapita.org.uy/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/plan_ibirapita_MEMORIA-2017.pd
  • Moore, R. C., & Hancock, J. T. (2020). Older adults, Social technologies, and the coronavirus pandemic: Challenges, strengths, and strategies for support. Social Media+ Society, 6(3), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120948162
  • Olsson, T., & Viscovi, D. (2018). Warm experts for elderly users: Who are they and what do they do? Human Technology, 14(3), 324–342. https://doi.org/10.17011/ht/urn.201811224836
  • Olsson, T., & Viscovi, D. (2020). Who actually becomes a silver surfer? Prerequisites for digital inclusion. Javnost-The Public, 27(3), 230–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2020.1794403
  • Peine, A. (2019). Technology and ageing—theoretical propositions from science and technology studies (STS). In B. B. Neves & F. Vetere (Eds.), Ageing and digital technology (pp. 51–64). Springer.
  • Peine, A., Marshall, B., Martin, W., & Neven, L. (2021). Socio-Gerontechnology: key themes, future agendas. In A. Peine, B. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology –Interdisciplinary critical studies of age-ing and technology (pp. 1–23). Routledge.
  • Peine, A., & Neven, L. (2020). The co-constitution of ageing and technology–a model and agenda. Ageing and Society. 41(2), 2845–2866. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X20000641
  • Plan Ibirapitá (2019). Quinta Encuesta de Uso. Departamento de Evaluación y Monitoreo. https://ibirapita.org.uy/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Ibirapit%C3%A1-encuesta-de-uso-2019.pdf
  • Quan-Haase, A., Martin, K., & Schreurs, K. (2016). Interviews with digital seniors: ICT use in the context of everyday life. Information, Communication & Society, 19(5), 691–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1140217
  • Rambe, P., & Nel, L. (2015). Technological utopia, dystopia and ambivalence: Teaching with social media at a South African university. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 629–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12159
  • Rasi, P., Vuojärvi, H., & Rivinen, S. (2021). Promoting media literacy among older people: A systematic review. Adult Education Quarterly, 71(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713620923755
  • Ribak, R., & Rosenthal, M. (2015). Smartphone resistance as media ambivalence. First Monday, 20(11). http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v20i11.6307
  • Richardson, M., Zorn, T. E., & Weaver, K. (2011). Older people and new communication technologies narratives from the literature. Annals of the International Communication Association, 35(1), 121–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2011.11679114
  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed ed.). Free Press.
  • Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., and Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
  • Schlomann, A., Seifert, A., Zank, S., Woopen, C., & Rietz, C. (2020). Use of information and communication technology (ICT) devices among the oldest-old: Loneliness, anomie, and Autonomy. Innovation in Aging, 4(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz050
  • Schreurs, K., Quan-Haase, A., & Martin, K. (2017). Problematizing the digital literacy paradox in the context of older adults’ ICT use: Aging, media discourse, and self-determination. Canadian Journal of Communication, 42(2), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2017v42n2a3130
  • Seifert, A., Kamin, S. T., & Lang, F. R. (2020). technology adaptivity mediates the effect of technology biography on internet use variability. Innovation in Aging, 4(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz054
  • Suopajarvi, T. (2015). Past experiences, current practices and
  • Suopajärvi, T. (2015). Past experiences, current practices and future design: Ethnographic study of aging adults’ everyday ICT practices—And how it could benefit public ubiquitous computing design. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 93, 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.04.006
  • Wajcman, J. (2015). Pressed for Time. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
  • Wenger, C. G. (2011). Interviewing older people. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research (pp. 259–278). Sage.
  • White, P. J., Marston, H. R., Shore, L., & Turner, R. (2020). Learning from COVID-19: Design, age-friendly technology, hacking and mental models. Emerald Open Research, 2(21), 21. https://doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.13599.1
  • Yilmaz, K. (2013). Comparison of quantitative and qualitative research traditions: Epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. European Journal of Education, 48(2), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12014

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.