Understanding the Role of Attitude Components in Co-branding: A Comparison of Spanish and Taiwanese Consumers

References

• Aaker, J. 1997. Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research 34 (3):347–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaker, D. A., and K. Keller. 1990. Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing 54 (1):27–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaker, J. L., and P. Williams. 1998. Empathy versus pride: The influence of emotional appeals across cultures. Journal of Consumer Research 25 (3):241–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiello, G., R. B. Donvito, D. Godey, K.-P. Pederzoli, N. Wiedmann, A. Hennigs, P. Siebels, J. Chan, S. Tsuchiya, S. I. Rabino, et al. 2009. An international perspective on luxury Brand and country-of-origin effect. Journal of Brand Management 16 (5–6):323–37.
   Google Scholar
• Aroian, L. A. 1947. The probability function of the product of two normally distributed variables. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 18 (2):265–71.
   Google Scholar
• Backhaus, K., K. Muhlfeld, and J. Van Doorn. 2001. Consumer perspectives on standardization in international advertising: a student sample. Journal of Advertising Research 41 (5):53–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P., and Y. Yi. 1988. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16 (1):74–94.
   Google Scholar
• Bain & Co. 2012. 2012 Luxury Goods Worldwide Market Study. https://www.vsnews.fr/images/etudes/Bain_Luxury_Goods_2012_Worldwide_Market_Study_11th_edition.pdf (accessed 15 July 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M. J., and G. A. Churchill. 1977. The impact of physically attractive models on advertising evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research 14 (4):538–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, H., and H. Christian. 1996. Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing 13 (2):139–61.
   Google Scholar
• Beezy, M. 2007. Co-branding: A popular form of strategic alliance. In Brand alliances: New models of networking, ed. P. Gopalakrishnan, 80–86. Hyderabad, India: The ICFAI University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, P. D. 1995. Dictionary of marketing terms. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Besharat, A., and R. Langan. 2014. Towards the formation of consensus in the domain of co-branding: Current findings and future priorities. Journal of Brand Management 21 (2):112–32.
   Google Scholar
• Bian, Q., and S. Forsythe. 2012. Purchase intention for luxury brands: A cross cultural comparison. Journal of Business Research 65 (10):1443–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, M., and Y. Chen. 2007. Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. Psychological Review 114 (1):133–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie, R. J., J. Whittome, and G. Brush. 2009. Investigating the service Brand: A customer value perspective. Journal of Business Research 62 (3):345–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calder, B. J., L. Phillips, and A. Tybout. 1981. Designing research for application. Journal of Consumer Research 8 (2):197–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervellon, M. C., and L. Dubé. 2002. Assessing the cross-cultural applicability of affective and cognitive components of attitudes. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 33 (3):346–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, S. I., S. C. Chen, and D. C. Yen. 2015. Continuance intention of e-portfolio system: A confirmatory and multigroup invariance analysis of technology acceptance model. Computer Standards & Interfaces 42:17–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunha, M., M. R. Forehand, and J. W. Angle. 2015. Riding coattails: When co-branding helps versus hurts less-known brands. Journal of Consumer Research 41 (5):1284–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabholkar, P. A., L. M. Bobbitt, and E. J. Lee. 2003. Understanding consumer motivation and behavior related to self-scanning in retailing. Implications for strategy and research on technology-based self. International Journal of Service Industry Management 14 (1):59–95.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13 (3):319–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. 1993. User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man Machine Studies 38 (3):475–87.
   Google Scholar
• Deloitte. 2017. Global Powers of Luxury Goods 2017. The New Luxury Consumer. Available at: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/consumer-industrialproducts/gx-cip-global-powers-luxury-2017.pdf (accessed July 12, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Desai, K. K., and K. Keller. 2002. The effects of ingredient branding strategies on host brand extendibility. Journal of Marketing 66 (1):73–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, S., H. Mesak, and M. Hsu. 2005. An exploratory examination of the influence of national culture on cross-national product diffusion. Journal of International Marketing 13 (2):1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastman, J. K., R. E. Goldsmith, and L. R. Flynn. 1999. Status consumption in consumer behavior: Scale development and validation. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 7 (3):41–51.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, Z. G., and X. B. Wu. 2009. On corporate branding ally strategy. Commercial Research 4:21–4.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, A. M. 2010. Insufficient discriminant validity: A comment on bove, pervan, beatty and shiu (2009). Journal of Business Research 63 (3):324–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., and D. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1):39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geuens, M., and C. Pecheux. 2006. Co-branding in advertising: The issue of product and brand fit, Vlerick Leuven Gent Working Paper Series 2006/17.
   Google Scholar
• Geylani, T., J. Inman, and F. Hofstede. 2008. Image reinforcement or impairment: The effects of co-branding on attribute uncertainty. Marketing Science 27 (4):730–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, L. A. 1960. On the exact variance of products. Journal of the American Statistical Association 55 (292):708–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorsuch, R. L. 1983. Factor analysis. Gillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gurhan-Canli, Z., and D. Maheswaran. 2000. Cultural variations in country of origin effects. Journal of Marketing Research 37 (3):309–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., R. Anderson, R. Tatham, and W. Black. 1998. Multivariate data analysis, 5th ed., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Han, J. K., and B. Schmitt. 1997. Product-category dynamics and corporation identity in brand extensions: A comparison of Hong Kong and US consumers. Journal of International Marketing Research 5(1):77–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, P. A., and G. Serin. 1997. Will low technology products disappear? The hidden innovation processes in low technology industries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 55 (2):179–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., W. Black, B. Balin, and R. Anderson. 2010. Multivariate data analysis. New York: Maxwell Macmillan International Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Hauck, W. E., and N. Stanforth. 2007. Cohort perception of luxury goods and services. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal 11 (2):175–88.
   Google Scholar
• Helmig, B., J. Huber, and P. Leeflang. 2008. Co-branding: The state of the art. Schmalenbach Business Review 60 (4):359–77.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, E. 1980. Attributes of attributes and layers of meaning. Advances in Consumer Research 7:7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, E., and M. Holbrook. 1982. Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods, and propositions. Journal of Marketing 46 (3):92–101. (summer):
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, H.-C., N. Lado, and P. Rivera-Torres. 2017. Detangling consumer attitudes to better explain co-branding success. Journal of Product & Brand Management 26 (7):704–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hult, G. T. M., D. J. Ketchen, D. A. Griffith, C. A. Finnegan, T. Gonzalez-Padron, N. Harmancioglu, Y. Huang, M. B. Talay, and S. T. Cavusgil. 2008. Data equivalence in cross-cultural international business research: Assessment and guidelines. Journal of International Business Studies 39 (6):1027–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IMF 2012. World economic outlook database. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. http://wwwimforg/external/pubs/ft/weo/2012/02/weodata/indexaspx (accessed 10 February 2013).
   Google Scholar
• James, D. 2005. Guilty through association: Brand association transfer to brand alliances. Journal of Consumer Marketing 22 (1):14–24.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, M. 2004. Brand alliances: Building strong brands together. Kluwer: Denventer.
   Google Scholar
• Johar, J. S., and M. Sirgy. 1991. Value-expressive versus utilitarian advertising appeals: When and why to use which appeal. Journal of Advertising 20 (3):23–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. 1974. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 39 (1):31–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalafatis, S., N. Remizova, D. Riley, and J. Singh. 2012. The differential impact of brand equity on B2B co-branding. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 27 (8):623–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapferer, J.-N. 1998. Why are we seduced by luxury brands? Journal of Brand Management 6 (1):44–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kapferer, J.-N. 2012. The new strategic Brand management: Advanced insights and strategic thinking. United Kingdom: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, K. 1998. Brand knowledge structures. In Strategic Brand management: Building, measuring and managing Brand equity, 86–129. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, V., and T. Krishnan. 2002. Multinational diffusion models: An alternative framework. Marketing Science 21 (3):318–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurent, G., and J. Kapferer. 1985. Measuring consumer involvement profiles. Journal of Marketing Research 22 (1):41–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuthesser, L., C. Kohli, and R. Suri. 2003. 2 + 2 = 5? A framework for using co-branding to leverage a brand. Journal of Brand Management 11 (1):35–47.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, G. R. 1996. Consumer marketing in China: Chasing billions, catching million. Hong Kong: Economist Intelligence Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, E., and S. Ang. 2008. Hedonic vs utilitarian consumption: A cross-cultural perspective based on cultural conditioning. Journal of Business Research 61 (3):225–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liñán, F., and Y. Chen. 2009. Development and cross-cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 33 (3):593–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littrell, M., and N. Miller. 2001. Marketing across cultures: Consumers’ perceptions of product complexity, familiarity, and compatibility. Journal of Global Marketing 15 (1):67–86.
   Google Scholar
• Luna, G., and S. Gupta. 2001. An integrative framework for cross-cultural consumer behaviour. International Marketing Review 18 (1):45–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, M. 1991. Scarcity effects on value: A quantitative review of the commodity theory literature. Psychology & Marketing 8 (1):45–57.
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra, N. K., and J. McCort. 2001. A cross-cultural comparison of behavioral intention models: Theoretical consideration and an empirical investigation. International Marketing Review 18 (3):235–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, N. K., S. Kim, and A. Patil. 2006. Common method variance in is research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science 52 (12):1865–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mano, H., and R. Oliver. 1993. Assessing the dimensionality and structure of the consumption experience: Evaluation, feeling and satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research 20 (3):451–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manrai, L. A., D. Lascu, A. Manrai, and H. Babb. 2001. A cross-cultural comparison of style in easter European emerging markets. International Marketing Review 18 (3):270–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateo, J. 2010. The future of the elderly care in Spain and Taiwan: The cultural background. International Journal of Business and Social Sciences 1 (2):28–50.
   Google Scholar
• McCracken, G. 1988. Culture and consumption: New approaches to the symbolic character of consumer goods and activities. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCort, D., and N. Malhotra. 1993. Culture and consumer behavior: towards an understanding of cross-cultural consumer behaviour in international marketing. Journal of International Consumers Marketing 6 (2):91–127.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, J., S. Sengupta, and S. Slater. 2010. Marketing of High-Technology products and innovations. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Monga, A. B., and D. John. 2010. What makes brand elastic? The influence of brand concept and styles of thinking on Brand extension evaluation. Journal of Marketing 74 (3):80–92. (May):
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, S. 2010. Cultural orientation and Brand dilution: Impact of motivation level and extension typicality. Journal of Marketing Research 47 (1):186–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, D. G. 1993. Intel inside: Branding a component in a business market. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 8 (1):14–24.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J., and J. Bernstein. 1994. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Oeppen, J., and A. Jamal. 2014. Collaborating for success: Managerial perspective on co-branding strategies in the fashion industry. Journal of Marketing Management 30 (9–10):925–48.
   Google Scholar
• Okonkwo, U. 2007. Luxury fashion branding: Trends, tactics, techniques. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Panda, T. 2001. Strategic advantage through successful co-branding. Faculty, Marketing Indian Institute Management 1–10. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.558.3147&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed 15 July 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Park, C. W., S. Jun, and A. Shocker. 1996. Composite branding alliances: An investigation of extension and feedback effect. Journal of Marketing Research 33 (4):453–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H. J., N. Rabolt, and K. Jeon. 2008. Purchasing global luxury brands among young Korean consumers. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal 12 (2):244–59.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. A. 2001. On the use of college students in social science research insights from a second-order Meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research 28 (3):450–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phau, I., and G. Prendergast. 2000. Consuming luxury brands: The relevance of the ‘rarity principle. Journal of Brand Management 8 (2):122–38.
   Google Scholar
• Phau, I., and M. Teah. 2009. Devil wears (counterfeit) prada: A study of antecedents and outcomes of attitudes towards counterfeits of luxury brands. Journal of Consumer Marketing 26 (1):15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Phau, I., M. Teah, and A. Lee. 2009. Targeting buyers of counterfeits of luxury brands: A study on attitudes of Singaporean consumers. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing 17 (1):3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., S. B. MacKenzie, J.-Y. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5):879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putrevu, S., and K. Lord. 1994. Comparative and noncomparative advertising: attitudinal effects under cognitive and affective involvement conditions. Journal of Advertising 23 (2):77–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, A. R., and R. W. Ruekert. 1994. Brand alliances as signals of product quality. Sloan Management Review 36 (1):87–97.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, A. R., L. Qu, and R. Ruekert. 1999. Signaling unobservable product quality through a brand ally. Journal of Marketing Research 36 (2):258–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratchford, B. T. 1987. New insights about the FCB grid. Journal of Advertising Research 27:24–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, M. 1973. Marketing communications and the Hierarch-of-effects. In New models for mass communications, ed. by P. Clarke. 147–176. Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Roehm, M. L., and B. Sternthal. 2001. The moderating effect of knowledge and resources on the persuasive impact of analogies. Journal of Consumer Research 28 (2):257–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, F., V. Souza, and J. Leitão. 2011. Strategic coopetition of global brands: A game theory approach to ‘nike + iPod sport kit’ co-branding. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing 3 (4):435–55.
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta, S., and M. Perry. 1997. Some antecedents of global strategic alliance formation. Journal of International Marketing 5 (1):31–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, B., J. Jaehee, P.-S. Chow, and S. Wong. 2014. Co-branding in fast fashion: The impact of consumers’ need for uniqueness on purchase perception. In Fashion branding and consumer behavior: Scientific models, ed. by T.-M. Choi, pp. 101–112. New York, NY: Springer Science Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Sicilia, M., S. Ruiz, and N. Reynolds. 2006. Attitude formation online: How the consumer's need for cognition affects the relationship between attitude towards the website and attitude towards the Brand. International Journal of Market Research 48 (2):139–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonin, B. L., and J. Ruth. 1998. Is a company known by the company it keeps? assessing the spillover effects of Brand alliances on consumer Brand attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research 35 (1):30–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slowikowski, S., and D. Jarratt. 1997. The impact of culture on the adoption of high technology products. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 15 (2):97–105.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., and N. Reynolds. 2009. Affect and cognition as predictors of behavioral intentions towards services. International Marketing Review 26 (6):580–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobel, M. E. 1982. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology 13:290–312.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, M. R. 1996. Consumer behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Srikant, A., and S. Ghosh. 2007. Co-branding in the FMCG sector. In Brand alliances: New models of networking, ed. P. Gopalakrishnan, 116–122. Hyderabad, India: The ICFAI University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steenkamp, J., and H. Van Trijp. 1991. The use of LISREL in validating marketing constructs. International Journal of Research in Marketing 8 (4):283–99.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, C. 2011. Questions to consider when selecting student samples. Journal of Supply Chain Management 47 (3):19–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, T. E. 1998. Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Administrative Science Quarterly 43 (3):668–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, T., M. Horn, and D. Merritt. 2004. Values and lifestyles of individualists and collectivists: A study on Chinese, Japan, British and US consumers. Journal of Consumer Marketing 21 (5):318–31.
   Google Scholar
• Takada, H., and D. Jain. 1991. Cross-national analysis of diffusion of consumer durable goods in pacific rim countries. Journal of Marketing 55 (2):48–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tellis, G. J., S. Stremersch, and E. Yin. 2003. The international takeoff of new products: The role of economics, culture, and country innovativeness. Marketing Science 22 (2):188–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T.,. C. B. Lee, C. S. Chai, and S. L. Wong. 2009. Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: A multigroup invariance analysis of the technology acceptance model (TAM). Computers and Education 53 (3):1000–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, B. 2000. Ten commandments of structural equation modeling. In Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics. ed. by L. G Grimm and P. R. Yarnold, 261–283. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Triandis, H. C., R. Bontempo, M. Villareal, M. Asai, and N. Lucca. 1988. Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 (2):323–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse, D. 1996. Understanding Chinese people as consumers: Past findings and future propositions. In The handbook of Chinese psychology ed. M. H. Bond, 352–363. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uncles, M., G. Dowling, and K. Hammond. 2003. Customer loyalty and customer loyalty programs. Journal of Consumer Marketing 20 (4):294–316.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Heijden, H. 2004. User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly 28 (4):695–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Everdingen, Y., and E. Waarts. 2003. The effect of national culture on the adoption of innovations. Marketing Letters 14 (3):2–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walchli, S. B. 2007. The effects of between partner congruity on consumer evaluation of co-branded products. Psychology and Marketing 24 (11):947–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S.-C., P. Soesilo, and D. Zhang. 2012. Impact of luxury brand retailer co-branding strategy on potential customers: A cross-cultural study. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 27 (3):237–52.
   Google Scholar
• Washburn, J., B. Till, and R. Priluck. 2000. Co-branding: Brand equity and trial effects. Journal of Consumer Marketing 17 (7):591–604.
   Google Scholar
• Wiedmann, K., N. Hennigs, and A. Siebels. 2007. Measuring consumers’ luxury value perception: A cross-cultural framework. Academy of Marketing Science Review 7:1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Wigley, S., and A. Provelengiou. 2011. Market-facing strategic alliances in the fashion sector. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal 15 (2):141–62.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, K., H. Kim, and S. Sen. 2009. Why do consumers buy counterfeit luxury brands? Journal of Marketing Research 46 (2):247–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, A. M. 2001. Understanding organisational culture and the implications for corporate marketing. European Journal of Marketing 35 (3/4):353–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, N., and A. Ahuvia. 1998. Personal taste and family face: Luxury consumption in confucian and Western societies. Psychology and Marketing 15 (5):423–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, N., and S. Lee. 2014. Brand identity fit in co-branding: the moderating role of C-B identification and consumer coping. European Journal of Marketing 48 (7/8):1239–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar