The Effect of Different Degrees of Regional Accentedness in Radio Commercials: An Experiment with German Consumers

References

• Barry, T. E., and D. J. Howard. 1990. A review and critique of the hierarchy of effects in advertising. International Journal of Advertising 9 (2):121–35. doi:10.1080/02650487.1990.11107138.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, D., and J. McPhail. 2010. The impact of accented speech in international television advertisements. Global Business Languages 2 (1):91–105. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/gbl/vol2/iss1/9
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, E. M., and J. S. Brennan. 1981. Accent scaling and language attitudes: Reactions to Mexican American English speech. Language and Speech 24 (3):207–21. doi:10.1177/002383098102400301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. P., and D. M. Stayman. 1992. Antecedents and consequences of attitude towards the ad: a Meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research 19 (1):34–51. doi:10.1086/209284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cargile, A. C., and H. Giles. 1997. Understanding language attitudes: Exploring listener affect and identity. Language & Communication 17 (3):195–217. doi:10.1016/S0271-5309(97)00016-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cargile, A. C., and H. Giles. 1998. Language attitudes toward varieties of English: an American‐Japanese context. Journal of Applied Communication Research 26 (3):338–56. doi:10.1080/00909889809365511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, H. K., and M. A. McHenry. 2006. Effect of accent and dialect on employability. Journal of Employment Counseling 43 (2):70–83. doi:10.1002/j.2161-1920.2006.tb00008.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham-Andersson, U., and O. Engstrand. 1989. Perceived strength and identity of foreign accent in Swedish. Phonetica 46 (4):138–54. doi:10.1159/000261839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragojevic, M., H. Giles, A.-C. Beck, and N. T. Tatum. 2017. The fluency principle: Why foreign accent strength negatively biases language attitudes. Communication Monographs 84 (3):385–405. doi:10.1080/03637751.2017.1322213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragojevic, M., H. Giles, and B. Watson. 2013. Language ideologies and language attitudes: A foundational framework. In The social meanings of language, dialect and accent: International perspectives on speech styles, ed. by H. Giles and B. Watson, 1–25. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J., and M. Jacobsen. 1987. Standard and regional standard speech: Distinctions and similarities. Language in Society 16 (03):369–79. doi:10.1017/S0047404500012458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., A. J. C. Cuddy, P. Glick, and J. Xu. 2002. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82 (6):878–902. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuertes, J. N., W. H. Gottdiener, H. Martin, T. C. Gilbert, and H. Giles. 2012. A meta-analysis of the effects of speakers' accents on interpersonal evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology 42 (1):120–33. doi:10.1002/ejsp.862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gärtig, A.-K., A. Plewnia, and A. Rothe. 2010. Wie Menschen in Deutschland über Sprache denken: Ergebnisse einer bundesweiten Repräsentativerhebung zu aktuellen Spracheinstellungen [How people in Germany think about language: Findings of a country-wide representative survey about current language attitudes] Mannheim: Institut für Deutsche Sprache.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, H. 1970. Evaluative reactions to accents. Educational Review 22 (3):211–27. doi:10.1080/0013191700220301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles, H. 1972. The effect of stimulus mildness-broadness in the evaluation of accents. Language and Speech 15 (3):262–9. doi:10.1177/002383097201500304.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grondelaers, S., R. van Hout, and M. Steegs. 2010. Evaluating regional accent variation in standard Dutch. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 29 (1):101–16. doi:10.1177/0261927x09351681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijmer, T., and R. Vonk. 2002. Effecten van een regionaal accent op de beoordeling van de spreker [Effects of a regional accent on speaker evaluation.]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie 57 (4):108–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, B., F. van Meurs, and E. de Groot. 2017. The effects of degrees of Dutch accentedness in ELF and in French, German and Spanish. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 27 (1):44–66. doi:10.1111/ijal.12101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, B., F. van Meurs, and N. Hogervorst. 2016. Effects of degree of accentedness in lecturers’ Dutch-English pronunciation on Dutch students’ attitudes and perceptions of comprehensibility. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 5 (1):1–17. doi:10.1075/dujal.5.1.01hen.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, B., F. van Meurs, and A.-K. Reimer. 2018. The evaluation of lecturers' nonnative-accented English: Dutch and German students' evaluations of different degrees of Dutch-accented and German-accented English of lecturers in higher education. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 34:28–45. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2018.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, B., F. van Meurs, and E. van der Meij. 2015. Does a foreign accent sell? The effect of foreign accents in radio commercials for congruent and non-congruent products. Multilingua - Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication 34 (1):119–30. doi:10.1515/multi-2013-0048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornikx, J., F. van Meurs, and R.-J. Hof. 2013. The effectiveness of foreign-language display in advertising for congruent versus incongruent products. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 25 (3):152–65. doi:10.1080/08961530.2013.780451.
   Google Scholar
• Institut-für-Demoskopie-Allensbach. 2008. Auch ausserhalb von Bayern wird Bayerish gern gehört. Die beliebtesten und unbeliebtesten Dialekte [outside Bavaria, Bavarian is also well received. The best and least-loved dialects.]. Allensbacher Berichte 4:1–6. http://www.ifd-allensbach.de/uploads/tx_reportsndocs/prd_0804.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ivanič, A. S., K. Bates, and T. Somasundaram. 2014. The role of the accent in radio advertisements to ethnic audiences. Journal of Advertising Research 54 (4):407–19. doi:10.2501/jar-54-4-407-419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, H., B. Furbeth, V. Hausner, and S. Berke. 2009. Generationenstudie 2009, Heimatgefuhl und Leben in Bayern [Generation study 2009, sense of home and life in Bavaria]. München: Hanns-Seidel-Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly-Holmes, H. 2005. Advertising as multilingual communication. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, E. S., and J. A. Linn. 2013. Resistance and persuasion. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lalwani, A. K., M. Lwin, and K. L. Li. 2005. Consumer responses to English accent variations in advertising. Journal of Global Marketing 18 (3–4):143–65. doi:10.1300/J042v18n03_07.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, W. E., R. C. Hodgson, R. C. Gardner, and S. Fillenbaum. 1960. Evaluative reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60 (1):44–51. doi:10.1037/h0044430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavidge, R. J., and G. A. Steiner. 1961. A model of predictive measurements of advertising effectiveness. Journal of Marketing 25 (6):55–62. doi:10.1353/asr.2000.0008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., X. Wen, L. Wei, and W. Zhao. 2013. Advertising persuasion in China: Using Mandarin or Cantonese? Journal of Business Research 66 (12):2383–9. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.05.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lwin, M., and C.-H. Wee. 1999. The effect of an audio stimulus: Accents in English language on cross-cultural consumer response to advertising. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 11 (2):5–37. doi:10.1300/J046v11n02_02.
   Google Scholar
• Lwin, M., and C.-H. Wee. 2000. The influence of spokesperson's race in relation to accents used in television commercials. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 22 (1):67–83. doi:10.1080/10641734.2000.10505102.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, J., and D. Schuler. 1994. The matchup effect of spokesperson and product congruency: A schema theory interpretation. Psychology and Marketing 11 (5):417–45. doi:10.1002/mar.4220110502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mai, R., and S. Hoffmann. 2010. Die Wirkung von Akzent und Dialekt in der internen und externen Kommunikation: Stand der betriebswirtschaftlich orientierten Forschung und Forschungsdirektiven [the effect of accent and dialect in internal and external communications: state of the art of business-oriented research and research directives]. Journal für Betriebswirtschaft 60 (4):241–68. doi:10.1007/s11301-010-0065-7.
   Google Scholar
• Mai, R., and S. Hoffmann. 2011. Four positive effects of a salesperson’s regional dialect in services selling. Journal of Service Research 14 (4):460–74. doi:10.1177/1094670511414551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mai, R., S. Hoffmann, and S. Müller. 2009. Die asymmetrische Wirkung eines Akzents in der Werbung [the asymmetrical effect of an accent in advertising]. [Die asymmetrische Wirkung eines Akzents in der Werbung]. Marketing ZfP 31 (4):255–65. doi:10.15358/0344-1369-2009-4-255.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, V. H. 1991. What is a Chinese "dialect/topolect"?: Reflections on some key Sino-English linguistic terms. Philadelphia: Department of Oriental Studies, University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Marlow, M. L., and H. Giles. 2008. Who you tink you, talkin propah? Hawaiian Pidgin demarginalised. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 3 (1):53–68. doi:10.1080/17447140802153535.
   Google Scholar
• Martín-Santana, J. D., C. Muela-Molina, E. Reinares-Lara, and M. Rodríguez-Guerra. 2015. Effectiveness of radio spokesperson's gender, vocal pitch and accent and the use of music in radio advertising. BRQ Business Research Quarterly 18 (3):143–60. doi:10.1016/j.brq.2014.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales, A. C., M. L. Scott, and E. A. Yorkston. 2012. The role of accent standardness in message preference and recall. Journal of Advertising 41 (1):33–45. doi:10.2753/JOA0091-3367410103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, M. J., and T. M. Derwing. 1995a. Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning 45 (1):73–97. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00963.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, M. J., and T. M. Derwing. 1995b. Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech. Language and Speech 38 (3):289–306. doi:10.1177/002383099503800305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nejjari, W., M. Gerritsen, M. Van der Haagen, and H. Korzilius. 2012. Responses to Dutch-accented English. World Englishes 31 (2):248–67. doi:10.1111/j.1467-971X.2012.01754.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesdale, D., and R. Rooney. 1996. Evaluations and stereotyping of accented speakers by pre-adolescent children. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 15 (2):133–54. doi:10.1177/0261927X960152002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piller, I. 2001. Identity constructions in multilingual advertising. Language in Society 30 (2):153–86. doi:10.1017/s0047404501002019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plewnia, A., and A. Rothe. 2012. Sprache–Einstellungen–Regionalität [Language - Attitudes - Regionality]. In Sprache und Einstellungen, ed. by L. M. Eichinger, A. Plewnia, C. h. Schoel, and D. Stahlberg, 9–69. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.
   Google Scholar
• Puzakova, M., H. Kwak, and M. Bell. 2015. Beyond seeing McDonald's fiesta menu: the role of accent in brand sincerity of ethnic products and brands. Journal of Advertising 44 (3):219–31. doi:10.1080/00913367.2014.957367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakic, T., M. C. Steffens, and A. Mummendey. 2011. When it matters how you pronounce it: the influence of regional accents on job interview outcome. British Journal of Psychology 102 (4):868–83. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02051.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinares-Lara, E., J. D. Martín-Santana, and C. Muela-Molina. 2016. The effects of accent, differentiation, and stigmatization on spokesperson credibility in radio advertising. Journal of Global Marketing 29 (1):15–28. doi:10.1080/08911762.2015.1119919.
   Google Scholar
• Roessel, J., C. Schoel, R. Zimmermann, and D. Stahlberg. 2017. Shedding new light on the evaluation of accented speakers: Basic mechanisms behind nonnative listeners’ evaluations of nonnative accented job candidates. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. doi:10.1177/0261927x17747904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, E. B. 1979. Why do low-prestige language varieties persist? In Language and social psychology, ed. by H. Giles, R. St. Clair, P. Trudgill, W. Labov, and R. Fasold, 145–157. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Schoel, C., and D. Stahlberg. 2012. Spracheinstellungen aus sozialpsychologischer Perspektive II: Dialekte [Language attitudes from a sociolinguistic perspective II: Dialects]. In Sprache und Einstellungen, ed. by L. M. Eichinger, A. Plewnia, C. h. Schoel, and D. Stahlberg, vol.61, 205–226. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.
   Google Scholar
• Statistisches-Bundesamt-Dustatis 2017. Europe in figures. Retrieved from https://www.destatis.de/Europa/EN/Country/Comparison/GER_EU_Compared.html (accessed October 4, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Stibbard, R. M., and J.-I. Lee. 2006. Evidence against the mismatched interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit hypothesis. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120 (1):433–42. doi:10.1121/1.2203595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trudgill, P. 1974. Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Typisch-Bayerisch, 2017. Typisch Bayerisch. Retrieved from www.typisch-bayerisch.de (accessed October 4, 2017)
   Google Scholar
• Van Ittersum, K., M. J. Candel, and M. T. Meulenberg. 2003. The influence of the image of a product's region of origin on product evaluation. Journal of Business Research 56 (3):215–26. doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(01)00223-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar