The Third-Person Perception of Sex Appeals in Hedonic and Utilitarian Product Ads

References

• Ajzen, I. 1991. Theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (2):179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C.-T., and C.-H. Tseng. 2013. Can sex sell bread? the impacts of sexual appeal type, product type and sensation seeking. International Journal of Advertising 32 (4):559–85. doi: 10.2501/IJA-32-4-559-585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapin, J. R. 2000. Third person perception and optimistic bias among urban minority at risk youth. Communication Research 27 (1):51–81. doi: 10.1177/009365000027001003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chia, S. C., K.-H. Lu, and D. M. McLeod. 2004. Sex, lies, and video compact disc: A case study on third-person perception and motivations for media censorship. Communication Research 31 (1):109–30. doi: 10.1177/0093650203260204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho doVale, R., and J. Duarte. 2013. Classification of FMCG product macro-categories on the utilitarian vs. hedonic dimension. Laboratório de 11 (1):29–36.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. E., and T.J. Crawford. 1978. Development and construct validation of a measure of attitudes toward public exposure to sexual stimuli. Journal of Personality Assessment 42 (4):392–400. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4204_10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, W. P. 1983. The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly 47 (1):1–15. doi: 10.1086/268763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duck, J. M., D.J. Terry, and M.H. Hogg. 1995. The perceived influence of aids advertising: Third-person effects in the context of positive media content. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 17 (3):305–25. doi: 10.1207/s15324834basp1703_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisend, M. 2008. Explaining the impact of scarcity claims in advertising: The mediating role of perceptions of susceptibility. Journal of Advertising 37 (3):33–40. doi: 10.2753/JOA0091-3367370303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisend, M. 2015. Persuasion knowledge and third-person perceptions in advertising: The moderating effect of regulatory competence. International Journal of Advertising 34 (1):54–69. doi: 10.1080/02650487.2014.993792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisend, M. 2017. The third-person effect in advertising: A meta-analysis. Journal of Advertising 46 (3):377–94. doi: 10.1080/00913367.2017.1292481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., A.I. Nathanson, B.H. Detenber, and D.M. McLeod. 1999. Rethinking the social distance corollary: Perceived likelihood of exposure and the third-person perception. Communication Research 25:275–302. doi: 10.1177/009365099026003001.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. A., L.A. White, D. Byrne, and K. Kelley. 1988. Erotophobia- erotophilia as a dimension of personality. Journal of Sex Research 25 (1):123–51. doi: 10.1080/00224498809551448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., and S.A. Taylor. 2013. Social cognition from brains to culture. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, E., and K.C.C. Yang. 2006. Consumer responses to sexual appeals in cross- cultural advertisements. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 19 (2):29–52. doi: 10.1300/J046v19n02_03.
   Google Scholar
• Golan, G. J., and S.A. Banning. 2008. Exploring a link between the third-person effect and the theory of reasoned action: Beneficial ads and social comparison. American Behavioral Scientist 52 (2):208–24. doi: 10.1177/0002764208321352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., and E. Thorson. 1992. Perceived persuasive effects of product commercials and public service announcements. Communication Research 19 (5):574–96. doi: 10.1177/009365092019005002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., and J.D. Storey. 2003. The influence of presumed influence. Journal of Communication 53 (2):199–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02586.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksen, L., and J.A. Flora. 1999. Third-person perception and children: Perceived impact of pro and anti-smoking ads. Communication Research 26 (6):643–65. doi: 10.1177/009365099026006001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, A., and M. Heitmann. 2006. Providing more or providing less? Accounting for cultural differences in consumers’ preference for variety. International Marketing Review 23 (1):7–24. doi: 10.1108/02651330610646278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffner, C., R.S. Plotkin, M. Buchanan, J.D. Anderson, S.K. Kamigaki, L.A. Hubbs, L. Kowalczyk, K. Silberg, and A. Pastorek. 2001. The third-person effect in perceptions of the influence of television violence. Journal of Communication 51 (2):283–316. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02881.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. 1984. Cultural dimensions in management and planning. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 1 (2):81–99. doi: 10.1007/BF01733682.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Huh, J., D.E. Delorme, and L.N. Reid. 2004. The third-person effect and its influence on behavioral outcomes in a product advertising context: The case of direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising. Communication Research 31 (5):568–90. doi: 10.1177/0093650204267934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail, A.R., and T.C. Melewar. 2014. Attitude of Muslim consumers toward sex appeal in advertising: A comparative study between subcultures in Malaysia. Journal of Promotion Management 20 (5):553–70. doi: 10.1080/10496491.2014.946204.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. 2013. ‘They will help, so I don’t need to?’ behavioural hypothesis of the third-person effect in donation aid advertising. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 30 (1):93–106. doi: 10.1080/10641734.2013.754715.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, B., and R. Tamborini. 2005. Third-person effect and internet pornography: The influence of collectivism and internet self-efficacy. Journal of Communication 55 (2):292–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02673.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, J.S., T. M. Chock, and G. J. Golan. 2018. Consumer perceptions of online advertising of weight loss products: The role of social norms and perceived deception. Journal of Marketing Communications 26 (2):1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, F., H. Cheng, and J. Li. 2009. Consumer responses to sex appeal advertising: A cross-cultural study. International Marketing Review 26 (4/5):501–20. doi: 10.1108/02651330910972002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, V.-H., and R. Wei. 2002. Third-person effect, gender, pornography on the internet. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 46 (1):13–33. doi: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4601_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, H.R., and S. Kitayama. 1991. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review 98 (2):224–53. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, D. M., W.P. Eveland, and A.I. Nathanson. 1997. Support for censorship of violent and misogynic rap lyrics: An analysis of the third-person effect. Communication Research 24 (2):153–74. doi: 10.1177/009365097024002003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meirick, P. C. 2005. Self-enhancement motivation as a third-variable in the relationship between first- and third-person effects. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17 (4):473–83. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edh077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers-Levy, J., and A.M. Tybout. 1989. Schema incongruity as a basis for product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research 16 (1):39–54. doi: 10.1086/209192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittal, B., and W.M. Lassar. 2000. Sexual liberalism as a determinant of consumer response to sex in advertising. Journal of Business and Psychology 15 (1):111–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paek, H.-J., P. Zhongdang, Y. Sun, J. Abisaid, and D. Houden. 2005. The third- person perception as social judgment: An exploration of social distance and uncertainty in perceived effects of political attack ads. Communication Research 32 (2):143–70. doi: 10.1177/0093650204273760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, P.-L., J. Meng, and S. Zhou. 2012. Examining third-person perceptions in the context of sexually oriented advertising. Journal of Promotion Management 18 (2):189–208. doi: 10.1080/10496491.2012.668431.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, B., M.B. Salwen, and M. Dupagne. 2000. The third-person effect: A meta- analysis of the perceptual hypothesis. Mass Communication and Society 3 (1):57–85. doi: 10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_04.
   Google Scholar
• Peiser, W., and J. Peter. 2001. Explaining individual differences in third-person perception: A limits/possibilities perspective. Communication Research 28 (2):156–80. doi: 10.1177/009365001028002002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perloff, R. M. 1999. The third-person effect: A critical review and synthesis. Media Psychology 1 (4):353–78. doi: 10.1207/s1532785xmep0104_4.
   Google Scholar
• Perloff, R. M. 2002. The third person effect. In Media effects: Advances in theory and research, ed. J. Bryant, and D. Zillman, 489–506. NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Peter, J. P., and J.J. Olson. 2005. Consumer behavior and marketing strategy. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Putrevu, S. 2008. Consumer responses toward sexual and nonsexual appeals the influence of involvement, need for cognition (NFC), and gender. Journal of Advertising 37 (2):57–69. doi: 10.2753/JOA0091-3367370205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichert, T. 1997. Taking sexually oriented appeals seriously: Can they really be persuasive in social marketing situations? Doctoral dissertation, The University of Arizona.
   Google Scholar
• Reichert, T. 2003. What is sex about advertising? Perspectives from consumer behavior and social science research. In Sex in advertising: Perspectives on the erotic appeal, ed. T. Reichert, and J. Lambiase, 11–38. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Reichert, T., M. La Tour, and J. Kim. 2007. Assessing the influence of gender and sexual self-schema on affective responses to sexual content in advertising. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 29 (2):63–77. doi: 10.1080/10641734.2007.10505217.
   Google Scholar
• Reichert, T., C.C. Childers, and L.L. Reid. 2012. How sex in advertising varies by product category: An analysis of three decades of visual sexual imagery in magazine advertising. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 33 (1):1–19. doi: 10.1080/10641734.2012.675566.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, S. A., and M.A. Hogg. 2005. A self-categorization explanation for the third-person effect. Human Communication Research 31 (1):129–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2005.tb00867.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas, H., D.V. Shah, and R.J. Faber. 1996. For the good of others: Censorship and the third-person effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 8 (2):163–86. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/8.2.163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salwen, M. B., and M. Dupagne. 1999. The third-person effect: Perceptions of the media's influence and immoral consequences. Communication Research 26 (5):523–49. doi: 10.1177/009365099026005001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salwen, M. B., and M. Dupagne. 2003. News of y2k and experiencing y2k: Exploring the relationship between the third-person effect and optimistic bias. Media Psychology 5 (1):57–82. doi: 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0501_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. R. 1997. The role of culture in emotion-antecedent appraisal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73 (5):902–22. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.73.5.902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta, J., and D.W. Dahl. 2008. Gender-related reactions to gratuitous sex appeals in advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology 18 (1):62–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2007.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, P., and R. Roy. 2016. Looking beyond first-person effects (FPES) in the influence of scarcity appeals in advertising: A replication and extension of Eisend (2008). Journal of Advertising 45 (1):78–84. doi: 10.1080/00913367.2015.1093438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiv, B., J. Edell, and J.W. Payne. 1997. Factors affecting the impact of negatively and positively framed ad messages. Journal of Consumer Research 24 (3):285–94. doi: 10.1086/209510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soley, L., and G. Kurzbard. 1986. Sex in advertising: A comparison of 1964 and 1984 magazine advertisement. Journal of Advertising 15 (3):46–54. doi: 10.1080/00913367.1986.10673018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spangenberg, E. R., K.E. Voss, and A.E. Crowley. 1997. Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of attitude: A generally applicable scale. Advances in Consumer Research 24:235–41.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., Z. Pan, and L. Shen. 2008. Understanding the third-person perception: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Journal of Communication 58 (2):280–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00385.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, D., P. Moy, and D.S. Weis. 2004. Preparations for y2k: Revisiting the behavioral component of the third-person effect. Journal of Communication 54 (1):138–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02618.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waller, D. S., S. Deshpande, and B.Z. Erdogan. 2013. Offensiveness of advertising with violent image appeal: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Promotion Management 19 (4):400–17. doi: 10.1080/10496491.2013.817220.
   Google Scholar
• Wan, F., R.J. Faber, and A. Fung. 2003. Perceived impact of thin female models in advertising: A cross-cultural examination of third person perception and its impact on behaviors. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics 15 (1/2):51–73. doi: 10.1108/13555850310765079.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, G. X. 2016. Deceptive advertising and third-person perception: The interplay of generalized and specific suspicion. Journal of Marketing Communications 22 (5):494–512. doi: 10.1080/13527266.2014.918051.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, J., and W.J. Gonzenbach. 2008. Does a perceptual discrepancy lead to action? A meta-analysis of the behavioral component of the third-person effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 20 (3):375–85. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edn031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youn, S., R.J. Faber, and D.V. Shah. 2000. Restricting gambling advertising and the third-person effect. Psychology and Marketing 17:633–49. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200007)17:7<633::AID-MAR4>3.0.CO;2-B.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., and T. Daugherty. 2009. Third-person effect and social networking: Implications for online marketing and word-of mouth communication. American Journal of Business 24 (2):53–64. doi: 10.1108/19355181200900011.
   Google Scholar