381
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Peer Contexts in Schools: Avenues Toward Behavioral Health in Early Adolescence

&

REFERENCES

  • Crosnoe R. Friendships in childhood and adolescence: the life course and new directions. Soc Psychol Q. 2000;63:377–391.
  • Gifford-Smith ME, Brownell CA. Childhood peer relationships: social acceptance, friendships, and peer networks. J Sch Psychol. 2003;41:235–284.
  • Hawkins JD. Academic performance and school success: sources and consequences. In: Weissberg RP, Gullotta TP, Hampton RL, Ryan MA, Adams GR, eds. Enhancing children's wellness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1997:278–305.
  • Wentzel KR, Caldwell K. Friendships, peer acceptance, and group membership: relations to academic achievement in middle school. Child Dev. 1997;68:1198–1209.
  • Balfanz R, Herzog L, Mac Iver D. Preventing student disengagement and keeping students on the graduation path in the urban middle grade schools: early identification and effective interventions. Educ Psychol. 2007;42:223–235.
  • Barber BK, Olsen JA. Assessing the transitions to middle and high school. J Adolesc Res. 2004;19:3–30.
  • Chung H, Elias M, Schneider K. Patterns of individual adjustment changes during middle school transition. J Sch Psychol. 1997;36:83–101.
  • Huesmann LR, Dubow EF, Boxer P. Continuity of aggression from childhood to early adulthood as a predictor of life outcomes: implications for the adolescent-limited and life-course-persistent models. Aggress Behav. 2009;35:136–149.
  • Slominski L, Sameroff A, Rosenblum K, Kasser T. Longitudinal predictors of adult socioeconomic attainment: the roles of socioeconomic status, academic competence, and mental health. Dev Psychopathol. 2011;23:315–324.
  • Greenberg MT, Weissberg RP, O'Brien MU, et al. Enhancing school-based prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning. Am Psychol. 2003;58:466.
  • Christenson SL, Thurlow ML. School dropouts: prevention considerations, interventions, and challenges. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2004;13:36–39.
  • Durlak J, Weissberg R, Dymnicki A, Taylor R, Schellinger K. The impact of enhancing students' social and emotional learning: a meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Dev. 2011;82:405–432.
  • Prevatt F, Kelly FD. Dropping out of school: a review of intervention programs. J Sch Psychol. 2003;41:377–395.
  • Rubin KH, Bukowski WM, Parker JG. Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In: Eisenberg N, ed. Handbook of child psychology. New York: Wiley; 2007;571–645.
  • Hamm JV, Lambert K, Agger CA, Farmer TW. Promotive peer contexts of academic and social adjustment among rural African American early adolescent boys. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2013;83:278–288.
  • Henry D, Chan WY. Cross-sectional and longitudinal effects of sixth-grade setting-level norms for nonviolent problem solving on aggression and associated attitudes. J Community Psychol. 2010;38:1007–1022.
  • Bronfenbrenner U, Morris PA. The bioecological model of human development. In: Handbook of child psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2006;793–828.
  • Fredricks JA, Blumenfeld PC, Paris AH. School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev Educ Res. 2004;74:59–109.
  • Fredricks J, McColskey W, Meli J, Montrosse B, Mordica J, Mooney K. Institute of Education Science. Measuring student engagement in upper elementary through high school: A description of 21 instruments. January 18, 2011. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=REL2011098.
  • Greenwood CR, Horton BT, Utley CA. Academic engagement: current perspectives in research and practice. School Psych Rev. 2002;31:328–349.
  • Marks HM. Student engagement in instructional activity: patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. Am Educ Res J. 2000;37:153–184.
  • Ponitz CC, McClelland MM, Matthews SJ, Morrison FJ. A structured observation of behavioral self-regulation and its contribution to kindergarten outcomes. Dev Psychol. 2009;45:605–619.
  • Eisenberg N, Fabes RA. Prosocial development. In: Eisenberg N, Damon W, eds. Handbook of child psychology, vol. 3: Social, emotional and personality development. 5th ed. New York: Wiley; 1998;701–778.
  • Farmer TW, Xie H. Aggression and school social dynamics: the good, the bad, and the ordinary. J Sch Psychol. 2007;45:461–478.
  • Hinshaw SP. Externalizing behavior problems and academic underachievement in childhood and adolescence: causal relationships and underlying mechanisms. Psychol Bull. 1992;111:127–155.
  • Wentzel KR, Filisetti L, Looney L. Adolescent prosocial behavior: the role of self-processes and contextual cues. Child Dev. 2007;78:895–910.
  • Card NA, Little TD. Proactive and reactive aggression in childhood and adolescence: a meta-analysis of differential relations with psychosocial adjustment. Int J Behav Dev. 2006;30:466–480.
  • Card NA, Stucky BD, Sawalani GM, Little TD. Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: a meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Dev. 2008;79:1185–1229.
  • Hawley PH, Little TD, Card NA. The myth of the alpha male: a new look at dominance-related beliefs and behaviors among adolescent males and females. Int J Behav Dev. 2008;32:76–88.
  • Corsaro WA, Eder D. Children's peer cultures. Annu Rev Sociol. 1990;16:197–220.
  • Prinstein MJ, Dodge KA. Current issues in peer influence research. In: Prinstein MJ, Dodge KA, eds. Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents. New York: Guilford Press; 2008;3–13.
  • Ryan AM. The peer group as a context for the development of young adolescent motivation and achievement. Child Dev. 2001;72:1135–1150.
  • Hartup WW. Peer experience and its developmental significance. In: Bennett M, ed. Developmental psychology: Achievements and prospects. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press; 1999:106–125.
  • Juvonen J, Nishina A, Graham S. Peer harassment, psychological adjustment, and school functioning in early adolescence. J Educ Psychol. 2000;92:349–359.
  • Nakamoto J, Schwartz D. Is peer victimization associated with academic achievement? A meta-analytic review. Soc Dev. 2010;19:221–242.
  • Hymel S, Rubin KH, Rowden L, LeMare L. Children's peer relationships: longitudinal prediction of internalizing and externalizing problems from middle to late childhood. Child Dev. 1990;61:2004–2021.
  • Rubin KH, Mills RS. The many faces of social isolation in childhood. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988;56:916–924.
  • Hamm JV, Schmid L, Farmer TW, Locke B. Injunctive and descriptive peer group norms and the academic adjustment of rural early adolescents. J Early Adolesc. 2011;31:41–73.
  • Kindermann TA, Skinner EA. How do naturally existing peer groups shape children's academic development during sixth grade? Eur J Dev Sci. 2009;3:31–43.
  • Sherif M. The psychology of social norms. Oxford, UK: Harper; 1936.
  • Wasserman S, Faust K. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
  • Kadushin C. Introduction to social network theory. http://melander335.wdfiles.com/local–files/reading-history/kadushin.pdf.
  • Wellman, B. Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. In: Wellman B, Berkowitz SD, eds. Social structures: A network approach. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1988:19–61.
  • Cairns RB, Leung MC, Buchanan L, Cairns BD. Friendships and social networks in childhood and adolescence: fluidity, reliability, and interrelations. Child Dev. 1995;66:1330–1345.
  • Neal JW. Hanging out: features of urban children's peer social networks. J Soc Pers Relat. 2010;27:982–1000.
  • Neal JW. Why social networks matter: a structural approach to the study of relational aggression in middle childhood and adolescence. Child Youth Care Forum. 2007;36:195–211.
  • Schultz PW, Nolan JM, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V. The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychol Sci. 2007;18:429–434.
  • Brechwald, WA, Prinstein, MJ. Beyond homophily: a decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. J Res on Adolesc. 2011;21:166–179.
  • Stormshak EA, Bierman KL, Bruschi C, Dodge KA, Coie JD. The relation between behavior problems and peer preference in different classroom contexts. Child Dev. 1999;70:169–182.
  • Gest S, Osgood D, Feinberg M, Bierman K, Moody J. Strengthening prevention program theories and evaluations: contributions from social network analysis. Prev Sci. 2011;12:349–360.
  • Valente TW, Gallaher P, Mouttapa M. Using social networks to understand and prevent substance use: a transdisciplinary perspective. Subst Use Misuse. 2004;39:1685–1712.
  • Jackson, D, Cappella, E, Neal, JW. Social dynamics of peer aggression in middle childhood: The role of peer networks in classroom aggression norms. Paper presented at: The Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development; March 2015; Philadelphia, PA.
  • Bandura A. Self efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84:191–215.
  • Wright JC, Giammarino M, Parad HW. Social status in small groups: individual-group similarity and the social “misfit.” J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;50:523–536.
  • Chang L. The role of classroom norms in contextualizing the relations of children's social behaviors to peer acceptance. Dev Psychol. 2004;40:691–702.
  • Coleman JS. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am J Sociol. 1988;94:95–120.
  • Dika S, Singh K. Applications of social capital in educational literature: a critical synthesis. Rev Educ Res. 2002;72:31–60.
  • Berndt TJ. Friendship quality and social development. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2002;11:7–10.
  • Ahn HJ, Garandeau CF, Rodkin PC. Effects of classroom embeddedness and density on the social status of aggressive and victimized children. J Early Adolesc. 2010;30:76–101.
  • Pellegrini AD, Bartini M, Brooks F. School bullies, victims, and aggressive victims: factors relating to group affiliation and victimization in early adolescence. J Educ Psychol. 1999;91:216–224.
  • Hodges EV, Malone MJ, Perry DG. Individual risk and social risk as interacting determinants of victimization in the peer group. Dev Psychol. 1997;33:1032–1039.
  • Nangle DW, Erdley CA, Newman JE, Mason CA, Carpenter EM. Popularity, friendship quantity, and friendship quality: interactive influences on children's loneliness and depression. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2003;32:546–555.
  • Lazarsfeld PF, Merton RK. Friendship as a social process: a substantive and methodological analysis. Freedom Control Modern Soc. 1954;18:18–66.
  • Shrum W, Cheek N, Hunter S. Friendship in school: gender and racial homophily. Sociol Educ. 1988;61:227–239.
  • Dijkstra JK, Cillessen AH, Borch C. Popularity and adolescent friendship networks: selection and influence dynamics. Dev Psychol. 2013;49:1242.
  • Bauman, KE, Ennett, ST. On the importance of peer influence for adolescent drug use: commonly neglected considerations. Addiction. 1996;91:185–198.
  • Henry DB, Kobus K. Early adolescent social networks and substance use. J Early Adolesc. 2007;27:346–362.
  • Kinsman, SB, Romer, D, Furstenberg, FF, Schwarz, DF. Early sexual initiation: the role of peer norms. Pediatrics. 1998;102:185–1192.
  • Osgood, DW, Feinberg, ME, Wallace, LN, Moody, J. Friendship group position and substance use. Addict Behav. 2014;39:923–933.
  • Espelage, DL, Holt, MK, Henkel, RR. Examination of peer-group contextual effects on aggression during early adolescence. Child Dev. 2003;74:205–220.
  • Duffy, AL, Nesdale, D. Peer groups, social identity, and children's bullying behavior. Soc Dev. 2009;18:121–139.
  • Torrente C, Cappella E, Neal JW. Children's positive school behaviors and social preference in urban elementary classrooms. J Community Psychol. 2014;42:143–161.
  • Henry D, Guerra N, Huesmann R, Tolan P, VanAcker R, Eron L. Normative influences on aggression in urban elementary school classrooms. Am J Commun Psychol. 2000;28:59–81.
  • Thomas, DE, Bierman, KL, The Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. The impact of classroom aggression on the development of aggressive behavior problems in children. Dev Psychopathol. 2006;18:471–487.
  • Dymnicki AB, Antônio T, Henry DB. Levels and growth of specific and general norms for nonviolence among middle school students. J Adolesc. 2011;34:965–976.
  • Angrist, JD, Lang, K. How important are classroom peer effects? Evidence from Boston's Metco Program (No. w9263). National Bureau of Economic Research. Published October 2002. http://www.nber.org/papers/w9263.
  • Lavy, V, Silva, O, Weinhardt, F. The good, the bad and the average: evidence on the scale and nature of ability peer effects in schools (No. w15600). National Bureau of Economic Research. Published December 2009. http://www.nber.org/papers/w15600.
  • Burke, MA, Sass, TR. Classroom peer effects and student achievement. J Labor Econ. 2013;31:51–82.
  • Kang, C. Classroom peer effects and academic achievement: quasi-randomization evidence from South Korea. J Urban Econ. 2007;61:458–495.
  • Haynie DL. Delinquent peers revisited: does network structure matter? Am J Sociol. 2001;106:1013–1057.
  • Cappella E, Kim HY, Neal JW, Jackson D. Classroom peer relationships and behavioral engagement in elementary school: the role of social network equity. Am J Community Psychol. 2013;52:367–379.
  • McCormick M, Cappella E. Conceptualizing academic norms in middle school: a social network perspective. J Early Adolesc. 2015;35(4):441–466.
  • Tseng V, Seidman E. A systems framework for understanding social settings. Am J Community Psychol. 2007;39:217–228.
  • Schwartz AE, Stiefel L, Wiswall M. Do small schools improve performance in large, urban districts? Causal evidence from New York City. J Urban Econ. 2013;77:27–40.
  • Bloom H, Thompson SL, Unterman R. MDRC. Transforming the high school experience: How New York City's new small schools are boosting student achievement and graduation rates. http://www.mdrc.org/sites/default/files/full_589.pdf.
  • Lee VE, Smith JB. Effects of school restructuring on the achievement and engagement of middle-grade students. Sociol Educ. 1993:164–187.
  • Levine TH. What research tells us about the impact and challenges of smaller learning communities. Peabody J Educ. 2010;85:276–289.
  • Eccles JS, Roeser RW. Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. J Res Adolesc. 2011;21:225–241.
  • Weinstein RS. High standards in a tracked system of schooling: for which students and with what educational supports? Educ Res. 1996:16–19.
  • Gamoran A. University of Wisconsin–Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research. Tracking and inequality: New directions for research and practice (WCER Working Paper No. 2009-6). http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/publications/workingPapers/papers.php.
  • Oakes J, Wells AS. Detracking for high student achievement. Educ Leadersh. 1998;55:38–41.
  • Slavin RE. Every child, every school: Success for all. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press; 1996.
  • Hallinan MT, Smith SS. The effects of classroom racial composition on students' interracial friendliness. Soc Psychol Q. 1985:3–16.
  • Borsari B, Carey KB. Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: a meta-analytic integration. J Stud Alcohol. 2003;64:331.
  • Perkins H, Craig D, Perkins J. Using social norms to reduce bullying: a research intervention among adolescents in five middle schools. Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2011;14:703–722.
  • Hamm JV, Farmer TW, Dadisman K, Gravelle M, Murray AR. Teachers' attunement to students' peer group affiliations as a source of improved student experiences of the school social–affective context following the middle school transition. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2011;32:267–277.
  • Slavin RE. Classroom reward structure: an analytical and practical review. Rev Educ Res. 1977:633–650.
  • Barrish HH, Saunders M, Wolf MM. Good Behavior Game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. J Appl Behav Anal. 1969;2:119–124.
  • Embry DD. The good behavior game: a best practice candidate as a universal behavioral vaccine. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2002;5:273–297.
  • Bradshaw CP, Zmuda JH, Kellam SG, Ialongo NS. Longitudinal impact of two universal preventive interventions in first grade on educational outcomes in high school. J Educ Psychol. 2009;101:926–937.
  • Nolan JD, Houlihan D, Wanzek M, Jenson WR. The Good Behavior Game: a classroom behavior intervention effective across cultures. Sch Psychol Int. 2013;35:191–205.
  • Valente T. Network interventions. Science. 2012;336:49–53.
  • Valente T, Pumpuang P. Identifying opinion leaders to promote behavior change. Health Educ Behav. 2007;34:881–896.
  • Center for Supportive Schools. Peer Group Connection (PGC). www.supportiveschools.org/solutions/peer-group-connection/.
  • Valente T, Hoffman BR, Ritt-Olson A, Lichtman K, Johnson CA. Effects of a social-network method for group assignment strategies on peer-led tobacco prevention programs in schools. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1837–1843.
  • Aronson E, Patnoe S. Cooperation in the classroom: The jigsaw method. London, UK: Pinter & Martin Limited; 2011.
  • Fuchs D, Fuchs LS, Burish P. Peer-assisted learning strategies: an evidence-based practice to promote reading achievement. Learn Disabil Res Pract. 2000;15:85–91.
  • Ginsburg-Block M, Rohrbeck CA, Fantuzzo JW. A meta-analytic review of social, self-concept, and behavioral outcomes of peer-assisted learning. J Educ Psychol. 2006;98:732–749.
  • Rohrbeck CA, Ginsburg-Block MD, Fantuzzo JW, Miller TR. Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: a meta-analytic review. J Educ Psychol. 2003;95:240–257.
  • Borman GD, Slavin RE, Cheung ACK, Chamberlain AM, Madden NA, Chambers B. Final reading outcomes of the national randomized field trial of Success for All. Am Educ Res J. 2007;44:701–731.
  • Chamberlain A, Daniels C, Madden NA, Slavin RE. A randomized evaluation of the Success for All middle school reading program. Middle Grades Res J. 2007;2:1–21.
  • Bradshaw CP, Koth CW, Bevans KB, Ialongo N, Leaf PJ. The impact of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS) on the organizational health of elementary schools. Sch Psychol Q. 2008;23:462–473.
  • Bradshaw C, Koth C, Thornton L, Leaf P. Altering school climate through school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports: findings from a group-randomized effectiveness trial. Prev Sci. 2009;10:100.
  • Heckman JJ, Kautz T. Hard evidence on soft skills. Labour Econ. 2012;19:451–464.
  • Rivers SE, Brackett MA, Reyes MR, Elbertson NA, Salovey P. Improving the social and emotional climate of classrooms: a clustered randomized controlled trial testing the RULER approach. Prev Sci. 2013;14:77–87.
  • Mikami AY, Lerner MD, Lun J. Social context influences on children's rejection by their peers. Child Dev Perspect. 2010;4:123–130.
  • Cappella E, Neal JW. A classmate at your side: teacher practices, peer victimization, and social network affiliations. School Ment Health. 2012;4:81–94.
  • Gest SD, Rodkin PC. Teaching practices and elementary classroom peer ecologies. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2011;32:288–296.
  • Allen JP, Pianta RC, Gregory A, Mikami AY, Lun J. An interaction-based approach to enhancing secondary school instruction and student achievement. Science. 2011;333:1034–1037.
  • Gregory A, Allen JP, Mikami AY, Hafen CA, Pianta RC. Effects of a professional development program on behavioral engagement of students in middle and high school. Psychol Sch. 2014;51:143–163.
  • Mikami AY, Gregory A, Allen JP, Pianta RC, Lun J. Effects of a teacher professional development intervention on peer relationships in secondary classrooms. School Psych Rev. 2011;40:367–375.
  • Cappella E, Kim H, Hamre B, et al. Teacher consultation and coaching within mental health practice: classroom and child effects in urban elementary schools. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012;80:597–610.
  • Gennetian, LA, Magnuson, K, Morris, PA. From statistical associations to causation: what developmentalists can learn from instrumental variables techniques coupled with experimental data. Dev Psychol. 2007;44:381–394.
  • Bierman, KL, Coie, JD, Dodge, KA, et al. The effects of a multiyear universal social–emotional learning program: the role of student and school characteristics. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010;78:156–168.
  • Brown, BB, Mounts, N, Lamborn, SD, Steinberg, L. Parenting practices and peer group affiliation in adolescence. Child Dev. 1993;64: 467–482.
  • Espelage, DL, Low, SK, Jimerson, SR. Understanding school climate, aggression, peer victimization, and bully perpetration: contemporary science, practice, and policy. Sch Psychol Q. 2014;29:233–237.
  • Rankin, BH, Quane, JM. Social contexts and urban adolescent outcomes: the interrelated effects of neighborhoods, families, and peers on African-American youth. Soc Probl. 2002;49:79–100.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.