References
- Anenberg, E., & Kung, E. (2014). Estimates of the size and source of price declines due to nearby foreclosures. American Economic Review, 104(8), 2527–2551. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.8.2527
- Ariely, D., & Wallsten, T. S. (1995). Seeking subjective dominance in multidimensional space: An explanation of the asymmetric dominance effect. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(3), 223–232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1075
- Arrow, K. J. (1951). Social choice and individual values. Yale University Press.
- Bellemare, C., Kröger, S., & Van Soest, A. (2008). Measuring inequity aversion in a heterogeneous population using experimental decisions and subjective probabilities. Econometrica, 76(4), 815–839. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2008.00860.x
- Bhutta, N., Dokko, J., & Shan, H. (2017). Consumer ruthlessness and mortgage default during the 2007-2009 housing bust. The Journal of Finance, 72(6), 2433–2466. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12523
- Borghans, L., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J. J., & Weel, B. T. (2008). The economics and psychology of personality traits. Journal of Human Resources, 43(4), 972–1059. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/jhr.2008.0017
- Brevoort, K. P., & Cooper, C. R. (2013). Foreclosure's wake: The credit experiences of individuals following foreclosure. Real Estate Economics, 41(4), 747–792. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.12021
- Campbell, J. Y., Giglio, S., & Pathak, P. (2011). Forced sales and house prices. American Economic Review, 101(5), 2108–2131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.5.2108
- Clippel, Gd., & Eliaz, K. (2012). Reason‐based choice: A bargaining rationale for the attraction and compromise effects. Theoretical Economics, 7(1), 125–162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3982/TE798
- Collins, A. J., Harrison, D. M., & Seiler, M. J. (2015). Mortgage modification and the decision to strategically default: A game theoretic approach. Journal of Real Estate Research, 37(3), 439–470. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2015.12091425
- Doyle, J. R., O'Connor, D. J., Reynolds, G. M., & Bottomley, P. A. (1999). The robustness of the asymmetrically dominated effect: Buying frames, phantom alternatives, and in‐store purchases. Psychology and Marketing, 16(3), 225–243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199905)16:3<225::AID-MAR3>3.0.CO;2-X
- Fisher, L. M., Lambie-Hanson, L., & Willen, P. S. (2015). The role of proximity in foreclosure externalities: Evidence from condominiums. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7(1), 119–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20130102
- Gerardi, K., Rosenblatt, E., Willen, P. S., & Yao, V. (2015). Foreclosure externalities: New evidence. Journal of Urban Economics, 87(C), 42–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2015.02.004
- Gerasimou, G. (2013). On continuity of incomplete preferences. Social Choice and Welfare, 41(1), 157–167. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-012-0673-3
- Greenberg, A. E., Sussman, A. B., & Hershfield, H. E. (2020). Financial product sensitivity predicts financial health. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 33(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2142
- Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2008). Trusting the stock market. The Journal of Finance, 63(6), 2557–2600. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01408.x
- Harding, J. P., Rosenblatt, E., & Yao, V. W. (2009). The contagion effect of foreclosed properties. Journal of Urban Economics, 66(3), 164–178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2009.07.003
- Harrison, D. M., Luchtenberg, K. F., & Seiler, M. J. (in press). Improving mortgage default collection efforts by employing the decoy effect. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-021-09876-8
- Herne, K. (1997). Decoy alternatives in policy choices: Asymmetric domination and compromise effects. European Journal of Political Economy, 13(3), 575–589. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(97)00020-7
- Herne, K. (1998). Testing the reference‐dependent model: An experiment on asymmetrically dominated reference points. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11(3), 181–192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199809)11:3<181::AID-BDM295>3.0.CO;2-T
- Highhouse, S. (1996). Context-dependent selection: The effects of decoy and phantom job candidates. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(1), 68–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0006
- Huber, J., Payne, J. W., & Puto, C. (1982). Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), 90–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/208899
- Kaplan, S. N., Klebanov, M. M., & Sorensen, M. (2012). Which CEO characteristics and abilities matter? The Journal of Finance, 67(3), 973–1007. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01739.x
- Li, L. (2017). Why are foreclosures contagious? Real Estate Economics, 45(4), 979–997. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.12162
- Lin, C. H., & Wang, J. (2017). Distortion of price discount perceptions through the left-digit effect. Marketing Letters, 28(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-015-9387-5
- Lo, A. W., Repin, D. V., & Steenbarger, B. N. (2005). Fear and greed in financial markets: A clinical study of day-traders. American Economic Review, 95(2), 352–359. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/000282805774670095
- Lombardi, M. (2009). Reason-based choice correspondences. Mathematical Social Sciences, 57(1), 58–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2008.07.001
- Mishra, S., Umesh, U. N., & Stem, D. E. (1993). Antecedents of the attraction effect: An information-processing approach. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(3), 331–349. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3172885
- Ok, E. A., Ortoleva, P., & Riella, G. (2014). Revealed (p) reference theory. The American Economic Review, 105(1), 299–321. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20111046
- Peterson, R. L. (2007). Affect and financial decision-making: How neuroscience can inform market participants. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 8(2), 70–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15427560701377448
- Preqin. (2020). Distressed private capital dry powder reaches a record high. https://www.preqin.com/insights/research/factsheets/distressed-private-capital-dry-powder-reaches-a-record-high.
- Puri, M., & Robinson, D. T. (2007). Optimism and economic choice. Journal of Financial Economics, 86(1), 71–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.09.003
- Ratneshwar, S., Shocker, A. D., & Stewart, D. W. (1987). Toward understanding the attraction effect: The implications of product stimulus meaningfulness and familiarity. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 520–533. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/209085
- Redelmeier, D. A., & Shafir, E. (1995). Medical decision making in situations that offer multiple alternatives. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 273(4), 302–305. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03520280048038
- Schwab.com. (2019). Schwab Modern Wealth Index Survey 2019. Retrieved February 4, 2021, from https://www.aboutschwab.com/modernwealth2019
- Schwartz, J. A., & Chapman, G. B. (1999). Are more options always better? The attraction effect in physicians' decisions about medications. Medical Decision Making: An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 19(3), 315–323. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X9901900310
- Schwarzkopf, D. L. (2003). The effects of attraction on investment decisions. The Journal of Behavioral Finance, 4(2), 96–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15427579JPFM0402_06
- Sedikides, C., Ariely, D., & Olsen, N. (1999). Contextual and procedural determinants of partner selection: Of asymmetric dominance and prominence. Social Cognition, 17(2), 118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1999.17.2.118
- Seiler, M. J. (2014). The Effect of perceived lender characteristics and market conditions on strategic mortgage defaults. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 48(2), 27–256. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-012-9388-6
- Seiler, M. J. (2015a). The role of informational uncertainty in the decision to strategically default. Journal of Housing Economics, 27, 49–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe.2015.02.006
- Seiler, M. J. (2015b). Do as I say, not as I do: The role of advice versus actions in the decision to strategically default. Journal of Real Estate Research, 37(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2015.12091412
- Seiler, M. J. (2016). The perceived moral reprehensibility of strategic mortgage default. Journal of Housing Economics, 32, 18–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe.2016.03.001
- Seiler, M. J. (2018). Asymmetric dominance and its impact on mortgage default deficiency collection efforts. Real Estate Economics, 46(4), 971–990. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.12176
- Simonson, I. (1989). Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(2), 158–174. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/209205
- Slaughter, J. E. (2007). Effects of two selection batteries on decoy effects in job‐finalist choice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(1), 76–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2007.00148.x
- Slaughter, J. E., Sinar, E. F., & Highhouse, S. (1999). Decoy effects and attribute-level inferences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(5), 823–828. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.5.823
- Wedell, D. H. (1991). Distinguishing among models of contextually induced preference reversals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(4), 767–778. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.17.4.767