Advertising Functional Foods: The Effects of Physical Body Size and Appeal Type on Ad Credibility and Purchase Intentions

REFERENCES

• Albers-Miller, N. D., & Stafford, M. R. (1999). International service advertising: An examination of variation in appeal use for experiential and utilitarian services. Journal of Services Marketing, 13(4–5), 390–406.
   Google Scholar
• Bergkvist, L., & Rossiter, J. R. (2007). The predictive validity of multi-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 175–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bower, A. B., & Landreth, S. (2001). Is beauty best? Highly versus normally attractive models in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland, M. T. (1924). Principles of merchandising. New York, NY: Arno Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darby, M. R., & Karni, E. (1973). Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. Journal of Law and Economics, 16(1), 67–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittmar, H., & Howard, S. (2004). Thin-ideal internalization and social comparison tendency as moderators of media models’ impact on women’s body-focused anxiety. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 747–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganesan, S. (1994). Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrits, J., De Ridder, D. T. D., De Wit, J, & Kuijer, R. (2011). Looking fat or being bad? Effects of body size and eating style on peer evaluation in adolescents. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(3) 579–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillen, M. M., & Lefkowitz, E. S. (2011). Body size perceptions in racially/ethnically diverse men and women: Implications for body image and self-esteem. North American Journal of Psychology, 13(3), 447–468.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, H., & Sallis, J. (2011). Extrinsic cues and consumer judgments of food product introductions: The case of Pangasius in Norway. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 17, 536–551.
   Google Scholar
• Kamins, M. A. (1990). An investigation into the “match-up” hypothesis in celebrity advertising: When beauty may only be skin deep. Journal of Advertising, 19(1), 4–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamins, M. A., & Gupta, K. (1994). Congruence between spokesperson and product type: A match-up hypothesis perspective. Psychology and Marketing, 11, 569–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, P., Armstrong, G., Saunders, J., & Wong, V. (2002). Principles of marketing (3rd European ed.). London, UK: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M. C., & Gentry, J. W. (1997). Stuck in the model trap: The effects of beautiful models in ads on female pre-adolescents and adolescents. Journal of Advertising, 26(2), 19–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, B. A. S., Veer, E., & Pervan, S. J. (2007). Self-referencing and consumer evaluations of larger sized female models: A weight locus of control perspective. Marketing Letters, 18, 197–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, B. A. S., & Xavier, R. (2010). How do consumers react to physically larger models? Effects of model body size, weight control beliefs and product type on evaluations and body perceptions. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 18(6), 489–501.
   Google Scholar
• Merriman, J. F. (1958). Evaluating advertising appeals through sales results. Journal of Marketing, 23(2), 164–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra, S., & Beatty, S. (1990). Celebrity spokesperson and brand congruence: An assessment of recall and affect. Journal of Business Research, 21, 159–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., & Wasserman, W. (1996). Applied linear statistical models (4th ed.). Chicago, IL: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Loken, B. (2004). When will larger sized female models in advertisements be viewed positively? The moderating effects of instructional frame, gender and need for cognition. Psychology and Marketing, 21(6), 425–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, J. A., Garbarino, E. C., & Malter, A. J. (2006). Keeping the body in mind: The influence of body esteem and body boundary aberration on consumer beliefs and purchase intentions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(1), 79–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossiter, J. R. (2002). The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19(4), 305–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Selnes, F., & Hansen, H. (2001). The potential hazard of self-service in developing customer loyalty. Journal of Service Research, 4(2), 79–90.
   Google Scholar
• Stafford, M. R., & Day, E. (1995). Retail services advertising: The effects of appeal, medium and service. Journal of Advertising, 24(1), 57–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiggemann, M. (2003). Media exposure, body dissatisfaction and disordered eating: Television and magazines are not the same! European Eating Disorders Review, 11, 418–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Till, B. D., & Busler, M. (2000). The match-up hypothesis: Physical attractiveness, expertise, and the role of fit on brand attitude, purchase intent and brand beliefs. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis for evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar