Should I Really Pay a Premium for This? Consumer Perspectives on Cultured Muscle, Plant-Based and Fungal-Based Protein as Meat Alternatives

References

• Ahmad, M. I., Farooq, S., Alhamoud, Y., Li, C., & Zhang, H. (2022). A review on mycoprotein: History, nutritional composition, production methods, and health benefits. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 121, 14–29. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2022.01.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoniak, M. A., Szymkowiak, A., & Pepliński, B. (2022). The source of protein or its value? Consumer perception regarding the importance of meat (-like) product attributes. Applied Sciences, 12(9), 1–13. doi:10.3390/app12094128
   Google Scholar
• Anusha Siddiqui, S., Bahmid, N. A., Mahmud, C. M., Boukid, F., Lamri, M., & Gagaoua, M. (2022). Consumer acceptability of plant-, seaweed-, and insect-based foods as alternatives to meat: A critical compilation of a decade of research. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 1–22. doi:10.1080/10408398.2022.2036096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora, R. S., Brent, D. A., & Jaenicke, E. C. (2020). Is India ready for alt-meat? Preferences and willingness to pay for meat alternatives. Sustainability, 12(11), 1–20. doi:10.3390/su12114377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asioli, D., Bazzani, C., & Nayga, R. M. Jr. (2022). Are consumers willing to pay for in‐vitro meat? An investi-gation of naming effects. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73(2), 356–375. doi:10.1111/1477-9552.12467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäckström, A., Pirttilä-Backman, A., & Tuorila, H. (2004). Willingness to try new foods as predicted by so-cial representations and attitude and trait scales. Appetite, 43(1), 75–83. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2004.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, C.M., Bröring, S., Lagerkvist, C.J., (2021). Information, attitudes, and consumer evaluations of cultivated meat. Food Quality and Preference, 92, 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104226
   Google Scholar
• Bazzani, C., Gustavsen, G. W., Nayga, R. M., Jr,., & Rickertsen, K. (2018). A comparative study of food values between the United States and Norway. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 45(2), 239–272. doi:10.1093/erae/jbx033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekker, G. A., Fischer, A. R., Tobi, H., & Van Trijp, H. C. (2017). Explicit and implicit attitude toward an emerging food technology: The case of cultured meat. Appetite, 108, 245–254. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2016.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BlueNalu (2022). How it is made. Retrieved from https://www.bluenalu.com/how-its-made
   Google Scholar
• Boereboom, A., Mongondry, P., de Aguiar, L. K., Urbano, B., Jiang, Z. V., de Koning, W., & Vriesekoop, F. (2022). Identifying consumer groups and their characteristics based on their willingness to engage with cultured meat: A comparison of four European countries. Foods, 11(2), 197. doi:10.3390/foods11020197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boukid, F. (2021). Plant-based meat analogues: From niche to mainstream. European Food Research and Technology, 247(2), 297–308. doi:10.1007/s00217-020-03630-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, C., & Sanctorum, H. (2021). Alternative proteins, evolving attitudes: Comparing consumer attitudes to plant-based and cultured meat in Belgium in two consecutive years. Appetite, 161, 105111–105161. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caputo, V., Sogari, G., & Van Loo, E. J. (2022). Do plant‐based and blend meat alternatives taste like meat? A combined sensory and choice experiment study. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy. doi:10.1002/aepp.13247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chezan, D., Flannery, O., & Patel, A. (2022). Factors affecting consumer attitudes to fungi-based protein: A pilot study. Appetite, 175, 106012–106043. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2022.106043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W., Peterson, R. A., & Brown, S. P. (2008). Structural equation modelling in marketing: Some practical reminders. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 16(4), 287–298. doi:10.2753/MTP1069-6679160402
   Google Scholar
• Chriki, S., & Hocquette, J. F. (2020). The myth of cultured meat: A review. Frontiers in Nutrition, 7, 7–9. doi:10.3389/fnut.2020.00007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, E. S., Oberrauter, L. M., Normann, A., Norman, C., Svensson, M., Niimi, J., & Bergman, P. (2021). Identifying barriers to decreasing meat consumption and increasing acceptance of meat substitutes among Swedish consumers. Appetite, 167, 105612–105643. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, D. N., & Evans, G. (2008). Construction and validation of a psychometric scale to measure consumers’ fears of novel food technologies: The food technology neophobia scale. Food Quality and Preference, 19(8), 704–710. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtain, F., & Grafenauer, S. (2019). Plant-based meat substitutes in the flexitarian age: An audit of products on supermarket shelves. Nutrients, 11(11), 1–14. doi:10.3390/nu11112603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Boer, J., & Aiking, H. (2011). On the merits of plant-based proteins for global food security: Marrying macro and micro perspectives. Ecological Economics, 70(7), 1259–1265. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Koning, W., Dean, D., Vriesekoop, F., Aguiar, L. K., Anderson, M., Mongondry, P., … Boereboom, A. (2020). Drivers and Inhibitors in the Acceptance of Meat Alternatives: The Case of Plant and Insect-Based Proteins. Foods, 9(9), 1–18. doi:10.3390/foods9091292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekkers, B. L., Boom, R. M., & van der Goot, A. J. (2018). Structuring processes for meat analogues. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 81, 25–36. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2018.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derbyshire, E., & Ayoob, K. T. (2019). Mycoprotein: Nutritional and health properties. Nutrition Today, 54(1), 7–15. doi:10.1097/NT.0000000000000316
   Google Scholar
• Elzerman, J. E., Keulemans, L., Sap, R., & Luning, P. A. (2021). Situational appropriateness of meat products, meat substitutes and meat alternatives as perceived by Dutch consumers. Food Quality and Preference, 88, 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eternal (2022). Mycofood. Retrieved from https://www.eternal.bio/mycofood
   Google Scholar
• Finnigan, T., Needham, L., & Abbott, C. (2017). Mycoprotein: A healthy new protein with a low environmental impact. In Sustainable protein sources (pp. 305–325). Cambridge, UK: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-802778-3.00019-6
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Luciano, C., De Aguiar, L., Vriesekoop, F., & Urbano, B. (2019). Consumers’ willingness to purchase three alternatives to meat proteins in the United Kingdom, Spain, Brazil and the Dominican Republic. Food Quality and Preferences, 78, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Luciano, C. A., Rondón Domínguez, F. R., Vriesekoop, F., & Urbano, B. (2021). Consumer acceptance of insects as food: Revision of food neophobia scales. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 305–319. doi:10.1080/08974438.2021.1889733
   Google Scholar
• Hadi, J., & Brightwell, G. (2021). Safety of Alternative Proteins: Technological, environmental and regulatory aspects of cultured meat, plant-based meat, insect protein and single-cell protein. Foods, 10(6), 1–29. doi:10.3390/foods10061226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. E., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. A. (2017). Primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hampton, J. O., Hyndman, T. H., Allen, B. L., & Fischer, B. (2021). Animal harms and food production: Informing ethical choices. Animals, 11(5), 1–39. doi:10.3390/ani11051225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashempour-Baltork, F., Khosravi-Darani, K., Hosseini, H., Farshi, P., & Reihani, S. F. S. (2020). Mycoproteins as safe meat substitutes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.119958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellwig, C., Gmoser, R., Lundin, M., Taherzadeh, M. J., & Rousta, K. (2020). Fungi burger from stale bread? A case study on perceptions of a novel protein-rich food product made from an edible fungus. Foods, 9(8), 1–18. doi:10.3390/foods9081112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, J., You, J., Moon, J., & Jeong, J. (2020). Factors affecting consumers’ alternative meats buying intentions: Plant-based meat alternative and cultured meat. Sustainability, 12(14), 1–16. doi:10.3390/su12145662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imm, B. Y., Heo, Y. W., & Imm, J.-Y. (2021). Effects of plant-based content, flavor and texture information on consumer satisfaction with non-fried ramen. Food Quality and Preference, 92, 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerslake, E., Kemper, J. A., & Conroy, D. (2022). What’s your beef with meat substitutes? Exploring barriers and facilitators for meat substitutes in omnivores, vegetarians, and vegans. Appetite, 170, 105864–105812. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krings, V. C., Dhont, K., & Hodson, G. (2022). Food technology neophobia as a psychological barrier to clean meat acceptance. Food Quality and Preference, 96, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, P., Mehta, N., Ahmed, A. A., Akhilesh, K. V., Ubedullah, K., Neelesh, S., … Lorenzo, J. M. (2022). Potential alternatives of animal proteins for sustainability in the food sector. Food Reviews International, 1–26. doi:10.1080/87559129.2022.2094403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langen, N. (2011). Are ethical consumption and charitable giving substitutes or not? Insights into consumers’ coffee choice. Food Quality and Preference, 22(5), 412–421. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, T. B., Denver, S., Nordström, J., Christensen, T., & Sandøe, P. (2021). Moral convictions and meat consumption—a comparative study of the animal ethics orientations of consumers of pork in Denmark, Germany, and Sweden. Animals, 11(2), 1–19. doi:10.3390/ani11020329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusk, J. L., & Briggeman, B. C. (2009). Food values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(1), 184–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C., Lange, C., & Marette, S. (2021). Importance of additional information, as a complement to information coming from packaging, to promote meat substitutes: A case study on a sausage based on vegetable proteins. Food Quality and Preference, 87, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathijs, E. (2015). Exploring future patterns of meat consumption. Meat science, 109, 112–116. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattick, C. S., Landis, A. E., Allenby, B. R., & Genovese, N. J. (2015). Anticipatory life cycle analysis of in vitro biomass cultivation for cultured meat production in the United States. Environmental science & Technology, 49(19), 11941–11949. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b01614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauricio, R. A., Campos, J. A. D. B., & Nassu, R. T. (2022). Meat with edible coating: Acceptance, purchase intention and neophobia. Food Research International, 154, 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, F., Hartmann, C., & Siegrist, M. (2021). Consumers’ associations, perceptions and acceptance of meat and plant-based meat alternatives. Food Quality and Preference, 87, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishyna, M., Chen, J., & Benjamin, O. (2020). Sensory attributes of edible insects and insect-based foods—Future outlooks for enhancing consumer appeal. Trends in Food Science Technology, 95, 141–148. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2019.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, C. J., Croney, C. C., & Widmar, N. J. (2016). Exploring relationships between ethical consumption, lifestyle choices, and social responsibility. Advances in Applied Sociology, 6, 199–216. doi:10.4236/aasoci.2016.65017
   Google Scholar
• Motoki, K., Park, J., Spence, C., & Velasco, C. (2022). Contextual acceptance of novel and unfamiliar foods: Insects, cultured meat, plant-based meat alternatives, and 3D printed foods. Food Quality and Preference, 96, 1–19. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mycorena (2022a). Promyc. Retrieved from https://mycorena.com/promyc
   Google Scholar
• Mycorena (2022b). The fear of new food. Retrieved from https://mycorena.com/mycotalks/the-fear-of-new-food-
   Google Scholar
• MyForestFood (2022). MyBacon. Retrieved from https://myforestfoods.com/mybacon
   Google Scholar
• Onwezen, M. C., Bouwman, E. P., Reinders, M. J., & Dagevos, H. A. (2021). A systematic review on consumer acceptance of alternative proteins: Pulses, algae, insects, plant-based meat alternatives, and cultured meat. Appetite, 159, 105057–105058. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2020.105058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onwezen, M. C., Verain, M. C., & Dagevos, H. (2022). Positive emotions explain increased intention to consume five types of alternative proteins. Food Quality and Preference, 96, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakseresht, A., Kaliji, S. A., & Canavari, M. (2022). Review of factors affecting consumer acceptance of cultured meat. Appetite, 170, 105824–105829. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmieri, N., & Forleo, M. B. (2021). An explorative study of key factors driving Italian consumers’ willingness to eat edible seaweed. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 433–455. doi:10.1080/08974438.2021.1904082
   Google Scholar
• Phonthanukitithaworn, C., Saeeaw, A., Tang, H., Chatsakulpanya, P., Wang, W., & Ketkaew, C. (2021). Marketing strategies and acceptance of edible insects among Thai and Chinese young adult consumers. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing. doi:10.1080/08974438.2021.1979160
   Google Scholar
• Pliner, P., & Hobden, K. (1992). Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans. Appetite, 19(2), 105–120. doi:10.1016/0195-6663(92)90014-W
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post, M. J., Levenberg, S., Kaplan, D. L., Genovese, N., Fu, J., Bryant, C., & Moutsatsou, P. (2020). Scientific, sustainability and regulatory challenges of cultured meat. Nature Food, 1, 403–415. doi:10.1038/s43016-020-0112-z
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. A. (1996). Green consumers in the 1990s: Profile and implications for advertising. Journal of Business Research, 36(3), 217–231. doi:10.1016/0148-2963(95)00150-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roininen, K., Lähteenmäki, L., & Tuorila, H. (1999). Quantification of consumer attitudes to health and hedonic characteristics of foods. Appetite, 33(1), 71–88. doi:10.1006/appe.1999.0232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rondoni, A., Millan, E., & Asioli, D. (2021). Plant-based eggs: Views of industry practitioners and experts. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing. doi:10.1080/08974438.2021.1915222
   Google Scholar
• Röös, E., de Groote, A., & Stephan, A. (2022). Meat tastes good, legumes are healthy and meat substitutes are still strange-the practice of protein consumption among Swedish consumers. Appetite, 174, 106002–106008. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2022.106002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Smith, D., Reams, R., & Hair Jr, J. F. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 105–115. doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, L., Rueda, O., & Smetana, S. (2023). Environmental impacts of meat and meat replacements. In Meat and meat replacements (pp. 365–397). Woodhead Publishing. doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-85838-0.00012-2
   Google Scholar
• Schouteten, J. J., De Steur, H., De Pelsmaeker, S., Lagast, S., Juvinal, J. G., de Bourdeaudhuij, I., … Gellynck, X. (2016). Emotional and sensory profiling of insect-, plant- and meat-based burgers under blind, expected and informed conditions. Food Quality and Preferences, 52, 27–31. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweiggert-Weisz, U., Eisner, P., Bader-Mittermaier, S., & Osen, R. (2020). Food proteins from plants and fungi. Current Opinion in Food Science, 32, 156–162. doi:10.1016/j.cofs.2020.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., & Hartmann, C. (2020a). Consumer acceptance of novel food technologies. Nature Food, 1(6), 343–350.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siegrist, M., & Hartmann, C. (2020b). Perceived naturalness, disgust, trust and food neophobia as predictors of cultured meat acceptance in ten countries. Appetite, 155, 104814. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2020.104814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., Hartmann, C., & Keller, C. (2013). Antecedents of food neophobia and its association with eating behavior and food choices. Food Quality and Preference, 30(2), 293–298. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slade, P. (2018). If you build it, will they eat it? Consumer preferences for plant-based and cultured meat burgers. Appetite, 125, 428–437. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2018.02.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sogari, G., Li, J., Wang, Q., Lefebvre, M., Huang, S., Mora, C., & Gómez, M. I. (2022). Toward a reduced meat diet: University North American students’ acceptance of a blended meat-mushroom burger. Meat science, 187, 108745–108749. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.108745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statista (2021). Market revenue of plant-based meat worldwide from 2016 to 2026. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/forecasts/877369/global-meat-substitutes-market-value
   Google Scholar
• Suman, G., Nupur, M., Anuradha, S., & Pradeep, B. (2015). Single cell protein production: A review. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 4(9), 251–262.
   Google Scholar
• Tosun, P., Yanar, M., Sezgin, S., & Uray, N. (2021). Meat substitutes in sustainability context: A content analysis of consumer attitudes. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 33(5), 541–563. doi:10.1080/08974438.2020.1840475
   Google Scholar
• UpsideFoods (2022). The upside of chicken. Retrieved from https://upsidefoods.com/our-foods/
   Google Scholar
• Van der Weele, C., Feindt, P., van der Goot, A. J., van Mierlo, B., & Van Boekel, M. (2019). Meat alternatives: An integrative comparison. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 88, 505–512. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2019.04.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeke, W. (2015). Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society. Food Quality and Preference, 39, 147–155. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeke, W., Hung, Y., Baum, C. M., & De Steur, H. (2021). The power of initial perceived barriers versus motives shaping consumers’ willingness to eat cultured meat as a substitute for conventional meat. Livestock Science, 253, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeke, W., Marcu, A., Rutsaert, P., Gaspar, R., Seibt, B., Fletcher, D., & Barnett, J. (2015). Would you eat cultured meat? Consumers’ reactions and attitude formation in Belgium, Portugal and the United Kingdom. Meat science, 102, 49–58. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.11.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeke, W., Sans, P., & Van Loo, E. J. (2015). Challenges and prospects for consumer acceptance of cultured meat. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(2), 285–294. doi:10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60884-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wansink, B., Sonka, S., Goldsmith, P., Chiriboga, J., & Eren, N. (2005). Increasing the acceptance of soy-based foods. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 17(1), 35–55. doi:10.1300/J047v17n01_03
   Google Scholar
• Weinrich, R., Strack, M., & Neugebauer, F. (2020). Consumer acceptance of cultured meat in Germany. Meat science, 162, 107924–107926. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.107924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker, J. A., Johnson, R. I., Finnigan, T. J. A., Avery, S. V., & Dyer, P. S. (2020). The biotechnology of quorn mycoprotein: Past, present and future challenges. In H. Nevalainen (Eds.), Grand challenges in fungal biotechnology. Grand challenges in biology and biotechnology. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-29541-7_3
   Google Scholar
• Wilks, M., Hornsey, M., & Bloom, P. (2021). What does it mean to say that cultured meat is unnatural? Appetite, 156, 104960–104966. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2020.104960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilks, M., & Phillips, C. J. (2017). Attitudes to in vitro meat: A survey of potential consumers in the United States. PLoS One, 12(2), 1–14. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., Li, L., & Bai, J. (2020). Consumer acceptance of cultured meat in urban areas of three cities in China. Food Control, 118, 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar