Comparing Male and Female Prison Releasees across Risk Factors and Postprison Recidivism

REFERENCES

• Agresti, A. (1996). An introduction to categorical data analysis. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Lexis Nexis.
   Google Scholar
• Baskin, D. R., Sommers, I., & Fagan, J. (1993). The political economy of female violent street crime. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 20, 401–417.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A. J. (2000). Prisoners in the United States, 1999. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A. J., & Harrison, P. M. (2001). Prisoners in the United States, 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Belknap, J. (2007). The Invisible Woman: Gender, Crime, and Justice (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Belknap, J., & Holsinger, K. (2006). The Gendered Nature of Risk Factors for Delinquency. Feminist Criminology, 1(1), 48–71.
   Google Scholar
• Benda, B. (2005). Gender differences in life-course theory of recidivism: A survival analysis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49(3), 325–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B., Owen, B., Covington, S., & Raeder, M. (2003). Gender-responsive strategies: Research, practice, and guiding principles for women offenders. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.
   Google Scholar
• Brame, R., Paternoster, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Testing for the equality of maximum-likelihood regression coefficients between two independent equations. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14(3), 245–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, R., Breitenbach, M., Dieterich, W., Salisbury, E. J., & Van Voorhis, P. (2012). Women's pathways to serious and habitual crime: A person-centered analysis incorporating gender responsiveness factors. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 1481–1508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. A., French, S., & Gendreau, P. (2009). The prediction of violence in adult offenders: A meta-analytical comparison of instruments and methods of assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 567–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloyes, K. G., Wong, B., Latimer, S., & Abarca, J. (2010). Women, Serious Mental Illness and Recidivism: A Gender-based Analysis of Recidivism Risk for Women with SMI Released from Prison. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 6(1), 3–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collins, R. E. (2010). The effect of gender on violent and nonviolent recidivism: A meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 675–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deschenes, E. P., Owen, B., & Crow, J. (2007). Recidivism among female prisoners: Secondary analysis of the 1994 BJS recidivism data set. Retrieved from http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/216950.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Durose, M. R., Cooper, A. D., & Snyder, H. N. (2014). Recidivism of prisoners released in 30 states in 2005: Patterns from 2005 to 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Erez, E. (1989). Gender, rehabilitation, and probation decisions. Criminology, 27, 307–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Smith, P. (2002). Is the PCL-R really the “unparalleled” measure of offender risk? A lesson in knowledge cumulation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 397–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works! Criminology, 34, 575–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaze, L. E., & Kaeble, D. (2014). Correctional populations in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat, K. (2004). Losing ground: Gendered knowledges, parole risk, and responsibility. Social Politics, 11(3), 363–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman, J. L., Listwan, S. J., & Shaffer, D. K. (2007). Methamphetamine users in a community-based drug court: Does gender matter? Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 45(3/4), 109–130.
   Google Scholar
• Holsinger, A. M., Lurigio, A. J., & Latessa, E. J. (2001). Practitioners’ guide to understanding the basis of assessing offender risk. Federal Probation, 65, 46–50.
   Google Scholar
• Huebner, B. M., DeJong, C., & Cobbina, J. (2010). Women coming home: Long-term patterns of recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 27(2), 225–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illinois Department of Corrections. (2005). Statistical presentation for 2004. Springfield: State of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Illinois Department of Corrections. (2014). Quarterly report, January 1, 2014. Springfield: State of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. E., Friedmann, P. D., Green, T. C., Harrington, M., & Taxman, F. S. (2011). Gender and treatment response in substance use treatment-mandated parolees. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 40(3), 313–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruttschnitt, C. (2013). Gender and crime. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 291–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruttschnitt, C., & Gartner, R. (2003). Women's imprisonment. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 30, pp. 1–82). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langan, P., & Levin, D. (2002). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Leverentz, A. M. (2006). The love of a good man? Romantic relationships as a source of support or hindrance for female ex-offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43, 459–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., Holsinger, A. M., & Latessa, E. J. (2001). Risk/need assessment, offender classification, and the role of childhood abuse. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 543–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lurigio, A. J., Stalans, L. J., Roque, L., Seng, M., & Ritchie, J. (2007). The effects of specialized supervision on women probationers: An evaluation of the POWER program. In R. Muraskin (Ed.), It's a crime: Women and justice (pp. 127–145). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Makarios, M., Steiner, B., & Travis, L. F. (2010). Examining the predictors of recidivism among men and women released from prison in Ohio. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 1377–1391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manchak, S. M., Skeem, J. L., Douglas, K. S., & Siranosian, M. (2009). Does Gender Moderate the Predictive Utility of the Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R) for Serious Violent Offenders? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(5), 425–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade, B., Steiner, B., Makarios, M., & Travis, L. (2013). Estimating a dose–response relationship between time served in prison and recidivism. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50, 525–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menard, S. (2004). Six approaches to calculating standardized logistic regression coefficients. The American Statistician, 58(3), 218–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morash, M. (2010). Women on probation and parole: A feminist critique of community programs and services. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muraskin, R. (Ed.). (2003). It's a crime: Women and justice (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse. (2010). Behind bars II: Substance abuse and America's prison population. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2014). The growth of incarceration in the United States: Exploring causes and consequences. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, D. E., Alderden, M., & Lurigio, A. J. (2003). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus: But what role does gender play in probationer recidivism? Justice Research and Policy, 5(2), 33–54.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, D., Escobar, G., & Stalans, L. (2011). An examination of admissions, exits and end of the year populations of adult female inmates in the Illinois Department of Corrections. Chicago: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, D., Stemen, D., Saltmarsh, K., Karr, S., & Shipinski, S. (2013). Drivers of the sentenced population: Mandatory supervised release (MSR) violators. Springfield, IL: Illinois Sentencing Policy Advisory Council.
   Google Scholar
• Piquero, A. R., Jennings, W. G., Diamond, B., & Reingle, J. M. (2015). A systematic review of age, sex, ethnicity, and race as predictors of violent recidivism. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59(1), 5–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisig, M. D., Holtfreter, K., & Morash, M. (2006). Assessing recidivism risk across female pathways to crime. Justice Quarterly, 23, 384–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rettinger, L. J., & Andrews, D. A. (2010). General risk and need, gender, specificity, and the recidivism of female offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 29–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salisbury, E. J., Van Voorhis, P., & Spiropoulos, G. V. (2009). The predictive validity of a gender-responsive needs assessment: An exploratory study. Crime & Delinquency, 55, 550–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, R. D., Giordano, P. C., & Cernkovich, S. A. (2007). Drug use and desistance processes. Criminology, 45(1), 191–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siennick, S. E., Mears, D. P., & Bales, W. D. (2012). Here and gone: Anticipation and separation effects of prison visits on inmate infractions. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 50, 417–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J. P., Grann, M., & Fazel, S. (2011). A comparative study of violent risk assessment tools: A systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25,980 participants. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 499–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalans, L. J. (2009). Women's offending behavior: Evidence-based review of gender differences and gender responsive programs. Victims & Offenders, 4, 405–411.
   Google Scholar
• Stalans, L. J., & Lurigio, A. J. (2015). Parenting and intimate relationship effects on women offenders’ recidivism and noncompliance with probation. Women & Criminal Justice, 25(3), 152–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, B., & Wooldredge, J. (2014). Comparing Self-Report to Official Measures of Inmate Misconduct. Justice Quarterly, 31(6), 1074–1101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, K. N., & Blanchette, K. (2009). The women are not wrong: It is the approach that is debatable. Criminology and Public Policy, 8(1), 221–229.
   Google Scholar
• Trulson, C. R., DeLisi, M., & Marquart, J. W. (2011). Institutional misconduct, delinquent background, and rearrest frequency among serious and violent delinquent offenders. Crime & Delinquency, 57, 709–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uggen, C., & Kruttschnitt, C. (1998). Crime in the breaking: Gender differences in desistance. Law & Society Review, 32(2), 339–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Knaap, L. M., Alberda, D. L., Oosterveld, P., & Born, M. P. (2012). The predictive validity of criminogenic needs for male and female offenders: Comparing the relative impact of needs in predicting recidivism. Law and Human Behavior, 36, 413–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Voorhis, P. (2012). On behalf of women offenders: Women's place in the science of evidence-based practice. Criminology & Public Policy, 11(2), 111–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Voorhis, P., Wright, E. M., Salisbury, E., & Bauman, A. (2010). Women's risk factors and their contributions to existing risk/needs assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(3), 261–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldredge, J., & Steiner, B. (2014). Race group differences in prison victimization experiences. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 358–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, E. M., Van Voorhis, P., Salisbury, E. J., & Bauman, A. (2012). Gender-responsive lessons learned and policy implications for women in prison: A review. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 1612–1632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar