529
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Girls in Traditional and Gender-Responsive Juvenile Justice Placements

ORCID Icon

REFERENCES

  • Abram, K. M., Teplin, L. A., Charles, D. R., Longworth, S. L., McClelland, G. M., & Dulcan, M. K. (2004). Posttraumatic stress disorder and trauma in youth in juvenile detention. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61, 403–410.
  • Acoca, L., & Dedel, K. (1998). No place to hide: Understanding and meeting the needs of girls in the California juvenile justice system. San Francisco, CA: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
  • Amaro, H., Blake, S. M., Schwartz, P. M., & Flinchbaugh, L. J. (2001). Developing theory-based substance abuse prevention programs for young adolescent girls. Journal of Early Adolescence, 21, 256–293.
  • Belknap, J. (2001). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and justice (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • Belknap, J., & Holsinger, K. (2006). The gendered nature of risk factors for delinquency. Feminist Criminology, 1(1), 48–71.
  • Belknap, J., Holsinger, K., & Dunn, M. (1997). Understanding incarcerated girls: The results of a focus group study. The Prison Journal, 77(4), 381–404.
  • Bloom, B. E., Owen, B., & Covington, S. (2002). Gender-responsive strategies: Research, practice and guiding principles for women offenders. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.
  • Chesney-Lind, M., & Okamoto, S. K. (2001). Gender matters: Patterns in girls’ delinquency and gender responsive programming. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 1(3), 1–28.
  • Chesney-Lind, M., & Pasko, L. (2004). The female offender: Girls, women and crime (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Chesney-Lind, M., & Shelden, R. G. (2014). Girls, delinquency, and juvenile justice (4th ed.). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Covington, S. S., & Bloom, B. E. (2003). Gendered justice: Women in the criminal justice system. In B. E. Bloom (Ed.), Gendered justice: Addressing female offenders. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
  • Eggers, T. Z. (1998). The “Becca Bill” would not have saved Becca: Washington state’s treatment of young female offenders. Law and Inequality, 16, 219–258.
  • Feld, B. C. (2009). Violent girls or relabeled status offenders? An alternative interpretation of the data. Crime & Delinquency, 55, 241–265.
  • Garcia, C. A., & Lane, J. (2013). What a girl wants, what a girl needs: Findings from a gender-specific focus group study. Crime & Delinquency, 59(4), 536–561.
  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Girls Incorporated. (1996). Prevention and parity: Girls in juvenile justice. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
  • Green, Peters, & Associates. (1998). Guiding principles for promising female programming: An inventory of best practices. Nashville, TN: The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
  • Hannah-Moffat, K., & Shaw, M. (2003). The meaning of “risk” in women’s prisons: A critique. In B. E. Bloom (Ed.), Gendered justice: Addressing female offenders. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
  • Jones, N. J., Brown, S. L., Wanamaker, K. A., & Greiner, L. (2014). A quantitative exploration of gendered pathways to crime in a sample of male and female juvenile offenders. Feminist Criminology, 9, 113–136. doi:10.1177/1557085113501850
  • Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1992. Sec. 223 (8) ((B)).
  • Kempf-Leonard, K., & Sample, L. L. (2000). Disparity based on sex: Is gender-specific treatment warranted. Justice Quarterly, 17(1), 89–128.
  • Leonard, E. D. (2003). Stages of gendered disadvantage in the lives of convicted battered women. In B. E. Bloom (Ed.), Gendered justice: Addressing female offenders. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
  • McDaniels-Wilson, C., & Belknap, J. (2008). The extensive sexual violation and sexual abuse histories of incarcerated women. Violence Against Women, 14, 1090–1126.
  • Owen, B. (2003). Differences with a distinction: Women offenders and criminal justice practice. In B. E. Bloom (Ed.), Gendered justice: Addressing female offenders. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
  • Raeder, M. S. (2003). Gendered implications of sentencing and correctional practices: A legal perspective. In B. E. Bloom (Ed.), Gendered justice: Addressing female offenders. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
  • Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Smith, P., & Smith, W. A. (2005). Experiencing community through the eyes of young female offenders. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(4), 364–385.
  • Solis, J. M., Shadur, J. M., Burns, A. R., & Hussong, A. M. (2012). Understanding the diverse needs of children whose parents abuse substances. Current Drug Abuse Reviews, 5(2), 135–147.
  • Surrey, J. L. (1991). The “self-in-relation”: A theory of women’s development. In J. V. Jordan A. G. Kaplan J. B. Miller I. P. Stiver & J. L. Surrey (Eds.), Women’s growth in connection: Writings from the Stone Center. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Teplin, L. A., Abram, K. M., McClelland, G. M., Dulcan, M. K., & Mericle, A. A. (2002). Psychiatric disorders in youth in juvenile detention. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 1133–1143.
  • Utah Administrative Code. (n.d.). Rule R277–474, School Instruction and Human Sexuality. Retrieved from http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/code/r277/r277-474.htm
  • Valentine Foundation, & Women’s Way. (1990). A conversation about girls. Bryn Mawr, PA: Valentine Foundation.
  • Veysey, B. M. (2003). Adolescent girls with mental health disorders involved with the juvenile justice system (Research and Program Brief). New York, NY: National Center for Mental Health and Juvenile Justice.
  • Walker, S. C., Muno, A., & Sullivan-Colglazier, C. (2015). Principles in practice: A multistate study of gender-responsive reforms in the juvenile justice system. Crime & Delinquency, 61(5), 742–766.
  • Watson, L., & Edelman, P. (2012, October). Improving the juvenile justice system for girls: Lessons from the states. Washington, DC: Georgetown Center for on Poverty, Inequality, and Public Policy.
  • Zahn, M. A., Day, J. C., Mihalic, S. F., & Tichavsky, L. (2009). Determining what works for girls in the juvenile justice system: A summary of evaluation evidence. Crime & Delinquency, 55(2), 266–293.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.