http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0355-2022
References
- Belknap, J., & Holsinger, K. (2006). The gendered nature of risk factors for delinquency. Feminist Criminology, 1(1), 48–71.
- Ferber, M. A., & Hutton Raabe, P. (2003). Women in the Czech Republic: Feminism, Czech style. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 16(3), 407–430.
- Hardyman, P. L., & Van Voorhis, P. (2004). Developing gender-specific classification systems for women offenders. Washington, DC: USDOJ, National Institute of Corrections.
- Holtfreter, K., & Wattanaporn, K. (2014). An examination of gender responsiveness for female offender reentry. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(1), 41–57.
- Mancini, C., Baker, T., Dhungana Sainju, K., Golden, K., Bedard, L. E., & Gertz, M. (2016). Examining external support received in prison and concerns about reentry among incarcerated women. Feminist Criminology, 11(2), 163–190.
- Turner, N., Preston, D. L., McAvoy, S., & Gillam, L. (2013). Problem gambling inside and out: The assessment of community and institutional problem gambling in the Canadian correctional system. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29(3), 435–451.
- Van Voorhis, P., Salisbury, E. J., Wright, E. M., & Bauman, A. (2008). Achieving accurate pictures of risk and identifying gender responsive needs: Two new assessments for women offenders. Washington, DC: USDOJ, National Institute of Corrections.
- Van Voorhis, P., Wright, E., Salisbury, E. J., & Bauman, A. (2010). Women’s risk factors and their contributions to existing risk/needs assessment: The current status of gender responsive assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(3), 261–288.
- Wright, E. M., V., Voorhis, P., Salisbury, E. J., & Bauman, A. (2012). Gender-responsive lessons learned and policy implications for women in prison: A review. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(12), 1612–1632.
Bibliografie
- Belknap, J., & Holsinger, K. (2006). The gendered nature of risk factors for delinquency. Feminist Criminology, 1, 48–71. doi:10.1177/1557085105282897
- Ferber, M. A., & Hutton Raabe, P. (2003). Women in the Czech Republic: Feminism, Czech style. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 16, 407- 430. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20020174.
- Hardyman, P. L., & Van Voorhis, P. (2004). Developing Gender-specific Classification Systems for Women Offenders. Washington, DC: USDOJ, National Institute of Corrections.
- Holtfreter, K., & Wattanaporn, K. (2014). An examination of gender responsiveness for female offender reentry. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41, 41–57. doi:10.1177/0093854813504406
- Mancini, C., Baker, T., Dhungana Sainju, K., Golden, K., Bedard, L. E., & Gertz, M. (2016). Examining external support received in prison and concerns about reentry among incarcerated women. Feminist Criminology, 11(2), 163–190. doi:10.1177/1557085115579483
- Turner, N., Preston, D. L., McAvoy, S., & Gillam, L. (2013). Problem gambling inside and out: The assessment of community and institutional problem gambling in the Canadian correctional system. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29, 435–451. doi:10.1007/s10899-012-9321-1
- Van Voorhis, P., Salisbury, E. J., Wright, E. M., & Bauman, A. (2008). Achieving Accurate Pictures of Risk and Identifying Gender Responsive Needs: Two New Assessments for Women Offenders. Washington, DC: USDOJ, National Institute of Corrections.
- Van Voorhis, P., Wright, E., Salisbury, E. J., & Bauman, A. (2010). Women’s risk factors and their contributions to existing risk/needs assessment: The current status of gender responsive assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 261–288. doi:10.1177/0093854809357442
- Wright, E. M., Van Voorhis, P., Salisbury, E. J., & Bauman, A. (2012). Gender-responsive lessons learned and policy implications for women in prison: A review. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 1612–1632. doi:10.1177/0093854812451088